VTRS vs AMPH vs GRML Stock Comparison

Viatris, Amphastar Pharmaceuticals and Greenland Mines Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (AMRX) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
VTRS Viatris Inc
$18.72 +5.0% 1M +79.7% 1Y
Market cap
$21.95B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$14.74B
Div. yield
–
Generic Drugs Healthcare
4 wins
GRML Greenland Mines Ltd
$5.70 -61.1% 1M +946.3% 1Y
Market cap
$13.77M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Generic Drugs Healthcare
1 win

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Amphastar Pharmaceuticals leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Amphastar Pharmaceuticals 5, Viatris 4, Greenland Mines 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionVTRSAMPHGRMLLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $21.95B $1.14B $13.77M VTRS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -53.4x 14.6x -0.6x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 7.1x 8.3x — VTRS
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +4.4% +1.0% — VTRS
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -2.8% 10.8% — AMPH
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -0.2% 6.4% — AMPH
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 4.6x 1.8x — AMPH
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +79.7% +6.4% +946.3% GRML
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +7.0%/yr +7.1%/yr — AMPH
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 32.4% 54.2% 444.8% VTRS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 66/100 73/100 34/100 AMPH

Percentile Scorecard

VTRSAMPHGRML

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisVTRSAMPHGRML
Valuation 93 #44 of 625 99 #8 of 625 13 #543 of 625
Growth 48 #314 of 602 43 #342 of 602 2 #588 of 602
Profitability 81 #104 of 551 88 #69 of 551 68 #177 of 551
Financial Health 23 #508 of 656 38 #409 of 656 78 #146 of 656
Shareholder Returns 85 #54 of 365 99 #5 of 365 6 #342 of 365
Overall 66 73 34
  • VTRS ranked among 672 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology
  • AMPH ranked among 672 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology
  • GRML ranked among 672 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodVTRSAMPHGRMLSPY
1 month +5.0%-2.1%-61.1% -0.2%
3 months +4.8%+26.9%+2,750.0% +3.9%
6 months +26.3%+17.2%+1,163.9% +8.2%
Year to date +50.4%-4.5%+1,872.3% +12.9%
1 year +79.7%+6.4%+946.3% +12.3%
3 years +113.5%-42.7%-46.7% +87.4%
3 years, per year +28.8%-17.0%-18.9% +23.3%
5 years +40.4%+41.0%— +67.9%
5 years, per year +7.0%+7.1%— +10.9%
10 years -50.8%+39.0%— +261.1%
10 years, per year -6.8%+3.3%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureVTRSAMPHGRMLSPY
Volatility, 1Y 32.4%54.2%444.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 29.6%66.4%158.3% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.700.582.76 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 2.460.122.13 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -52.9%-74.0%-99.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high 0.0%-13.0%-61.7% -1.2%
52-week high $18.72$29.40$14.89 $779.14
52-week low $10.11$16.87$0.17 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleVTRSAMPHGRML
P/E now vs peer median -53.0xmedian 17.2x 14.2xmedian 17.2x -0.7xmedian 17.2x
P/S now vs peer median 1.5xmedian 9.0x 1.5xmedian 9.0x —median 9.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 12.5xmedian 16.3x 8.1xmedian 16.3x —median 16.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 11.0xmedian 18.7x 7.1xmedian 18.7x -1.0xmedian 18.7x
P/B now vs peer median 1.5xmedian 2.2x 1.4xmedian 2.2x 0.2xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median 1.73median 0.33 -5.55median 0.33 0.01median 0.33

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsVTRSAMPHGRML
Revenue $14.74B $730.02M –
Gross profit $5.13B $348.11M –
Operating income -$87.30M $114.29M -$18.67M
Net income -$410.70M $78.55M -$21.77M
Free cash flow $1.95B $152.89M -$14.22M
R&D $1.02B $94.57M $1.28M
EPS (diluted) $-0.35 $1.78 $-8.60
Cash & equivalents $886.50M $223.61M $9.34M
Total debt $13.35B $612.05M $2.07M
Shares (diluted) 1.16B 44.23M 2.53M
Enterprise value $16.96B $2.81M -$20.11M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricVTRSAMPHGRML
P/E -53.0x 14.2x -0.7x
P/FCF 11.0x 7.1x -1.0x
P/Operating cash flow 9.2x 5.9x -1.0x
P/S 1.5x 1.5x –
P/B 1.5x 1.4x 0.2x
P/Tangible book 36.8x 1.5x 1.6x
EV/EBITDA 12.5x 8.1x –
EV/EBIT -389.1x 12.3x -0.3x
EV/Revenue 2.3x 1.9x –
EV/FCF 17.4x 9.2x -0.4x
EV/Operating cash flow 14.6x 7.6x -0.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.73 -5.55 0.01

Growth

14 metrics
MetricVTRSAMPHGRML
Revenue growth (1Y) 4.4% 1.0% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -1.9% 10.5% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) -0.7% -3.4% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -6.0% 8.0% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 96.6% -37.1% -127.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -27.6% -4.5% -166.2%
Net income growth (1Y) 88.2% -41.7% -91.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -30.5% -8.3% -125.4%
EPS growth (1Y) 88.1% -36.5% 48.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -30.6% -2.6% -48.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 12.9% 15.6% -158.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -3.0% 12.1% -236.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 11.6% 36.3% -158.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -3.6% 15.0% -236.9%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricVTRSAMPHGRML
Gross margin 34.8% 47.7% –
EBITDA margin 18.4% 23.9% –
Operating margin -0.6% 15.7% –
Pretax margin -4.5% 14.0% –
Net margin -2.8% 10.8% –
FCF margin 13.3% 20.9% –
Operating cash flow margin 15.8% 25.3% –
Return on equity -2.8% 10.2% -39.8%
Return on assets -1.1% 4.6% -34.9%
Return on invested capital -0.2% 6.4% –
Return on capital employed -0.3% 8.0% -30.5%
Asset turnover 0.4x 0.4x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -5.7x 2.4x 0.7x
Stock comp / revenue 1.2% 4.0% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricVTRSAMPHGRML
Debt / assets 38.1% 35.1% 0.5%
Debt / equity 0.9x 0.8x 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA 4.6x 1.8x –
Debt / FCF 6.8x 4.0x 0.0x
Liabilities / assets 59.3% 55.9% 10.9%
Equity / assets 40.7% 44.1% 89.1%
Interest coverage -0.2x 4.4x -2,872x
Current ratio 1.6x 2.4x 10.1x
Quick ratio 0.7x 1.7x 7.7x
Cash ratio 0.1x 1.1x 7.7x
Altman Z-score 1.15 2.12 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricVTRSAMPHGRML
Dividend yield 2.6% – –
Net buyback yield 1.4% 9.0% -50.3%
Shareholder yield 4.0% 9.0% -50.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusVTRSAMPHGRML
Forward P/E 7.1xFY2026 8.3xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $2.62FY2026 $3.09FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY +11.5%FY2026 -4.9%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after -1.5% +9.4% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $15.31BFY2026 $790.23MFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY +7.0%FY2026 +9.8%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after -4.8% -5.4% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersVTRSAMPHGRML
Held by institutions 89.9% 64.8% 12.0%
Institutions holding 1,028 209 47
Change in shares held, QoQ +5.6% -11.7% +96.3%
Institutions buying 486 96 34
Institutions selling 318 74 2
Buyers to sellers 1.53 1.30 17.00

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

VTRSAMPHGRML
VTRS 1.00 0.35 0.08
AMPH 0.35 1.00 0.02
GRML 0.08 0.02 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, VTRS, AMPH and GRML?

Viatris (VTRS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Viatris (VTRS) $21.95B, Amphastar Pharmaceuticals (AMPH) $1.14B, Greenland Mines (GRML) $13.77M.

Which company is growing faster?

Viatris (VTRS) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Viatris (VTRS) +4.4%, Amphastar Pharmaceuticals (AMPH) +1.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Amphastar Pharmaceuticals (AMPH) has the highest net margin (Viatris (VTRS) -2.8%, Amphastar Pharmaceuticals (AMPH) 10.8%). On return on invested capital, Amphastar Pharmaceuticals (AMPH) leads (Viatris (VTRS) -0.2%, Amphastar Pharmaceuticals (AMPH) 6.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Greenland Mines (GRML) returned the most: Viatris (VTRS) +79.7%, Amphastar Pharmaceuticals (AMPH) +6.4%, Greenland Mines (GRML) +946.3%. Over five years, Amphastar Pharmaceuticals (AMPH) compounded fastest (Viatris (VTRS) +7.0%/yr, Amphastar Pharmaceuticals (AMPH) +7.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Viatris (VTRS) has been the steadiest (Viatris (VTRS) 32.4%, Amphastar Pharmaceuticals (AMPH) 54.2%, Greenland Mines (GRML) 444.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, VTRS, AMPH and GRML?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Amphastar Pharmaceuticals (AMPH) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.