VNOM vs FANG vs DMLP Stock Comparison

Viper Energy, Diamondback Energy and Dorchester Minerals Prices as of Nov 5, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (COP) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
VNOM Viper Energy, Inc.
$39.70 -4.5% 1M +8.6% 1Y
Market cap
$14.36B
P/E
27.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.28B
Div. yield
4.11%
Oil and Gas Royalties Energy
3 wins
FANG Diamondback Energy, Inc.
$179.58 -2.9% 1M +30.8% 1Y
Market cap
$50.15B
P/E
24.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$18.61B
Div. yield
2.37%
Oil and Gas Exploration and Production Energy
4 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Dorchester Minerals leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Dorchester Minerals 5, Diamondback Energy 4, Viper Energy 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionVNOMFANGDMLPLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $14.36B $50.15B $1.37B FANG
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 27.9x 24.5x 13.3x DMLP
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 14.1x 8.1x — FANG
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +92.1% +21.1% +38.2% VNOM
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 12.1% 11.0% 48.1% DMLP
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 5.6% 3.3% — VNOM
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.4x 1.7x — VNOM
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 4.11% 2.37% 12.42% DMLP
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +8.6% +30.8% +18.6% FANG
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +9.6%/yr +7.3%/yr FANG
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 29.5% 33.2% 25.0% DMLP
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 66/100 51/100 69/100 DMLP

Percentile Scorecard

VNOMFANGDMLP

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisVNOMFANGDMLP
Valuation 24 #75 of 98 44 #55 of 98 25 #74 of 98
Growth 95 #6 of 97 54 #45 of 97 78 #22 of 97
Profitability 68 #31 of 94 50 #48 of 94 99 #2 of 94
Financial Health 73 #28 of 101 46 #55 of 101 99 #2 of 101
Shareholder Returns 71 #24 of 79 60 #32 of 79 45 #44 of 79
Overall 66 51 69
  • VNOM ranked among 103 companies in Oil and Gas Upstream
  • FANG ranked among 103 companies in Oil and Gas Upstream
  • DMLP ranked among 103 companies in Oil and Gas Upstream

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodVNOMFANGDMLPSPY
1 month -4.5%-2.9%-6.4% -5.9%
3 months -4.1%-5.3%+5.6% -4.6%
6 months -15.5%-5.7%+4.5% +0.2%
Year to date +2.8%+19.5%+21.9% +7.5%
1 year +8.6%+30.8%+18.6% +8.2%
3 years —+12.1%-2.1% +68.3%
3 years, per year —+3.9%-0.7% +19.0%
5 years —+57.8%+41.9% +56.5%
5 years, per year —+9.6%+7.3% +9.4%
10 years —+95.9%+84.8% +251.5%
10 years, per year —+7.0%+6.3% +13.4%

Risk

MeasureVNOMFANGDMLPSPY
Volatility, 1Y 29.5%33.2%25.0% 13.6%
Downside volatility, 1Y 32.3%33.0%26.7% 14.2%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.25-0.50-0.30 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.290.930.74 0.60
Max drawdown, 5Y -36.6%-43.5%-40.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -22.1%-16.0%-11.2% -5.9%
52-week high $50.95$213.69$30.69 $779.14
52-week low $35.84$137.29$21.26 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleVNOMFANGDMLP
P/E now vs peer median 27.9xmedian 10.1x 24.5xmedian 10.1x 13.3xmedian 10.1x
P/S now vs peer median 6.3xmedian 1.7x 2.7xmedian 1.7x 6.6xmedian 1.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 10.0xmedian 5.1x 8.2xmedian 5.1x —median 5.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median 23.2xmedian 8.9x 12.5xmedian 8.9x 8.3xmedian 8.9x
P/B now vs peer median 1.4xmedian 1.3x 1.1xmedian 1.3x 4.7xmedian 1.3x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.94 -0.96median 0.94 —median 0.94

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsVNOMFANGDMLP
Revenue $2.28B $18.61B $208.22M
Operating income $826.00M $2.35B –
Net income $600.00M $2.32B $103.78M
Free cash flow $618.00M $4.03B $165.39M
EPS (diluted) $1.42 $7.33 –
Cash & equivalents $10.00M $558.00M $55.70M
Total debt $2.39B $13.23B –
Shares (diluted) 193.99M 279.96M –
Enterprise value $19.58B $55.02B $1.17B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricVNOMFANGDMLP
P/E 27.9x 24.5x 13.3x
P/FCF 23.2x 12.5x 8.3x
P/Operating cash flow 8.6x 4.8x 8.3x
P/S 6.3x 2.7x 6.6x
P/B 1.4x 1.1x 4.7x
P/Tangible book 1.4x 1.1x 4.7x
EV/EBITDA 10.0x 8.2x –
EV/EBIT 20.3x 26.8x –
EV/Revenue 7.3x 3.4x 6.3x
EV/FCF 27.1x 15.6x 8.0x
EV/Operating cash flow 10.1x 6.1x 8.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – -0.96 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricVNOMFANGDMLP
Revenue growth (1Y) 92.1% 21.1% 38.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 31.3% 11.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 220.2% -57.0% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -20.2% –
Net income growth (1Y) 91.7% -49.6% 97.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – -11.5% –
EPS growth (1Y) -13.5% -49.5% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) – -25.7% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 104.6% 18.3% 27.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 21.8% 6.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 131.4% 467.9% 27.5%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 64.9% 6.8%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricVNOMFANGDMLP
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin 73.0% 40.9% –
Operating margin 36.2% 12.6% –
Pretax margin 31.4% 14.8% –
Net margin 12.1% 11.0% 48.1%
FCF margin 27.1% 21.6% 79.4%
Operating cash flow margin 72.7% 55.7% 79.4%
Return on equity 5.8% 4.9% –
Return on assets 4.8% 3.1% –
Return on invested capital 5.6% 3.3% –
Return on capital employed 6.6% 3.6% –
Asset turnover 0.2x 0.3x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.8x 4.5x 1.6x
Stock comp / revenue – – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricVNOMFANGDMLP
Debt / assets 18.4% 18.3% –
Debt / equity 0.2x 0.3x –
Net debt / EBITDA 1.4x 1.7x –
Debt / FCF 3.9x 3.3x –
Liabilities / assets 19.4% 37.4% 3.7%
Equity / assets 80.6% 62.6% 96.3%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 5.9x 0.5x 10.6x
Quick ratio 5.5x 0.5x 10.6x
Cash ratio 0.1x 0.1x 7.0x
Altman Z-score 3.81 1.58 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricVNOMFANGDMLP
Dividend yield 4.1% 2.4% 12.4%
Net buyback yield 2.9% 2.7% –
Shareholder yield 7.0% 5.1% 12.4%
Payout ratio (earnings) 77.7% – 154.8%
Payout ratio (FCF) 75.4% – 97.1%
Dividend growth (1Y) 45.2% – 6.2%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 3.2%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusVNOMFANGDMLP
Forward P/E 14.1xFY2026 8.1xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $2.81FY2026 $22.08FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY +69.3%FY2026 +65.1%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after -5.0% -6.3% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $2.57BFY2026 $18.84BFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY +83.3%FY2026 +40.1%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after +2.0% -8.0% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersVNOMFANGDMLP
Held by institutions 100.0% 71.6% 22.9%
Institutions holding 497 1,192 154
Change in shares held, QoQ +5.4% +8.6% +6.3%
Institutions buying 265 609 65
Institutions selling 150 396 30
Buyers to sellers 1.77 1.54 2.17

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

VNOMFANGDMLP
VNOM 1.00 0.78 0.47
FANG 0.78 1.00 0.49
DMLP 0.47 0.49 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, VNOM, FANG and DMLP?

Diamondback Energy (FANG) is the largest by market capitalisation: Viper Energy (VNOM) $14.36B, Diamondback Energy (FANG) $50.15B, Dorchester Minerals (DMLP) $1.37B.

Which stock is cheaper, VNOM, FANG and DMLP?

Dorchester Minerals (DMLP) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Viper Energy (VNOM) 27.9x, Diamondback Energy (FANG) 24.5x, Dorchester Minerals (DMLP) 13.3x). On next year's consensus earnings, Diamondback Energy (FANG) is cheapest (Viper Energy (VNOM) 14.1x, Diamondback Energy (FANG) 8.1x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Viper Energy (VNOM) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Viper Energy (VNOM) +92.1%, Diamondback Energy (FANG) +21.1%, Dorchester Minerals (DMLP) +38.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Dorchester Minerals (DMLP) has the highest net margin (Viper Energy (VNOM) 12.1%, Diamondback Energy (FANG) 11.0%, Dorchester Minerals (DMLP) 48.1%). On return on invested capital, Viper Energy (VNOM) leads (Viper Energy (VNOM) 5.6%, Diamondback Energy (FANG) 3.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Diamondback Energy (FANG) returned the most: Viper Energy (VNOM) +8.6%, Diamondback Energy (FANG) +30.8%, Dorchester Minerals (DMLP) +18.6%. Over five years, Diamondback Energy (FANG) compounded fastest (Diamondback Energy (FANG) +9.6%/yr, Dorchester Minerals (DMLP) +7.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Dorchester Minerals (DMLP) has the highest dividend yield: Viper Energy (VNOM) 4.11%, Diamondback Energy (FANG) 2.37%, Dorchester Minerals (DMLP) 12.42%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Dorchester Minerals (DMLP) has been the steadiest (Viper Energy (VNOM) 29.5%, Diamondback Energy (FANG) 33.2%, Dorchester Minerals (DMLP) 25.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, VNOM, FANG and DMLP?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Dorchester Minerals (DMLP) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.