VBNK vs WFC vs GS Stock Comparison

VersaBank, Wells Fargo & Company and Goldman Sachs Prices as of Nov 2, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (TD) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
VBNK VersaBank
$21.71 -3.1% 1M +82.9% 1Y
Market cap
$693.54M
P/E
28.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$107.38M
Div. yield
0.50%
Money Center Banks Financial Services
3 wins
WFC Wells Fargo & Company/Mn
$85.90 +6.8% 1M -1.2% 1Y
Market cap
$257.86B
P/E
11.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$87.23B
Div. yield
2.15%
Money Center Banks Financial Services
5 wins
GS Goldman Sachs Group Inc
$898.67 -0.5% 1M +13.8% 1Y
Market cap
$261.91B
P/E
13.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$66.20B
Div. yield
2.00%
Money Center Banks Financial Services
4 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Wells Fargo & Company leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Wells Fargo & Company 5, Goldman Sachs 4, VersaBank 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionVBNKWFCGSLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $693.54M $257.86B $261.91B GS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 28.0x 11.8x 13.5x WFC
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 18.1x 11.0x 12.0x WFC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +28.2% +5.4% +17.8% VBNK
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 22.8% 25.2% 30.3% GS
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 25.0% 15.1% 14.1% VBNK
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 2.8x -5.5x GS
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.50% 2.15% 2.00% WFC
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +82.9% -1.2% +13.8% VBNK
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +12.1%/yr +10.6%/yr +16.6%/yr GS
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 39.7% 25.9% 32.2% WFC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 14/100 46/100 35/100 WFC

Percentile Scorecard

VBNKWFCGS

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisVBNKWFCGS
Valuation 7 #333 of 359 39 #219 of 359 12 #315 of 359
Growth 8 #312 of 340 52 #165 of 340 48 #179 of 340
Profitability 16 #289 of 343 54 #157 of 343 16 #288 of 343
Financial Health 23 #259 of 338 6 #319 of 338 12 #297 of 338
Shareholder Returns 13 #306 of 351 80 #70 of 351 89 #41 of 351
Overall 14 46 35
  • VBNK ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • WFC ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • GS ranked among 368 companies in Banking

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodVBNKWFCGSSPY
1 month -3.1%+6.8%-0.5% -2.3%
3 months +10.8%-2.3%-12.5% -0.7%
6 months +21.5%+8.5%-0.5% +4.8%
Year to date +44.9%-7.8%+2.2% +10.3%
1 year +82.9%-1.2%+13.8% +10.3%
3 years +183.4%+106.4%+174.3% +73.0%
3 years, per year +41.6%+27.3%+40.0% +20.1%
5 years +77.1%+65.2%+115.0% +61.9%
5 years, per year +12.1%+10.6%+16.6% +10.1%
10 years —+89.9%+408.9% +258.6%
10 years, per year —+6.6%+17.7% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureVBNKWFCGSSPY
Volatility, 1Y 39.7%25.9%32.2% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 35.8%29.4%32.9% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.800.671.66 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 2.09-0.050.43 0.80
Max drawdown, 5Y -51.4%-38.7%-33.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -8.5%-10.9%-22.0% -3.5%
52-week high $23.72$96.39$1,152.07 $779.14
52-week low $11.26$73.42$773.70 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleVBNKWFCGS
P/E now vs peer median 28.0xmedian 12.7x 11.8xmedian 12.7x 13.5xmedian 12.7x
P/S now vs peer median 6.5xmedian 3.5x 3.0xmedian 3.5x 4.0xmedian 3.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 4.9x 6.1xmedian 4.9x -2.8xmedian 4.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median 101.3xmedian 11.4x 8.9xmedian 11.4x -6.3xmedian 11.4x
P/B now vs peer median 1.7xmedian 1.2x 1.4xmedian 1.2x 2.1xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.46 0.82median 1.46 0.34median 1.46

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsVBNKWFCGS
Revenue $107.38M $87.23B $66.20B
Net income $24.43M $22.97B $20.97B
Free cash flow $6.84M $28.91B -$41.52B
EPS (diluted) – $7.20 $65.75
Cash & equivalents $349.76M – $187.27B
Total debt $74.08M $221.04B $437.87B
Shares (diluted) – 3.05B 304.90M
Enterprise value -$953.34M $259.98B -$3.30T

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricVBNKWFCGS
P/E 28.0x 11.8x 13.5x
P/FCF 101.3x 8.9x -6.3x
P/Operating cash flow 61.3x 8.9x -6.7x
P/S 6.5x 3.0x 4.0x
P/B 1.7x 1.4x 2.1x
P/Tangible book 1.7x 1.4x 2.1x
EV/EBITDA – 6.1x -2.8x
EV/EBIT 2.4x 6.8x -2.9x
EV/Revenue 3.9x 5.5x -4.2x
EV/FCF 61.1x 16.6x 6.7x
EV/Operating cash flow 37.0x 16.6x 7.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.82 0.34

Growth

14 metrics
MetricVBNKWFCGS
Revenue growth (1Y) 28.2% 5.4% 17.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 11.6% 2.0% 13.2%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – –
Net income growth (1Y) 18.8% 9.1% 34.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -3.2% 6.8% 33.3%
EPS growth (1Y) – 16.2% 41.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 14.4% 40.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -90.0% 303.3% -72.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -58.5% -0.6% -53.7%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -93.9% 303.3% -66.9%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -64.9% -0.6% -58.3%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricVBNKWFCGS
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin – 89.8% 146.8%
Operating margin – – –
Pretax margin 33.2% 31.7% 39.7%
Net margin 22.8% 25.2% 30.3%
FCF margin 6.4% 33.1% -62.7%
Operating cash flow margin 10.5% 33.1% -59.5%
Return on equity 6.1% 12.9% 17.1%
Return on assets 0.5% 1.0% 1.0%
Return on invested capital 25.0% 15.1% 14.1%
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.0x 0.0x 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.5x 1.3x -1.9x
Stock comp / revenue 0.0% – 5.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricVBNKWFCGS
Debt / assets 1.5% 9.8% 20.6%
Debt / equity 0.2x 1.2x 3.6x
Net debt / EBITDA – 2.8x -5.5x
Debt / FCF 10.8x 7.6x -10.5x
Liabilities / assets 91.8% 92.1% 94.2%
Equity / assets 8.2% 7.9% 5.8%
Interest coverage 1.3x 1.6x 1.4x
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricVBNKWFCGS
Dividend yield 0.5% 2.2% 2.0%
Net buyback yield -0.8% 5.4% 6.2%
Shareholder yield -0.3% 7.6% 8.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) 9.5% 24.6% –
Payout ratio (FCF) 33.9% 19.6% –
Dividend growth (1Y) -2.9% 5.6% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) -5.0% 6.7% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusVBNKWFCGS
Forward P/E 18.1xFY2026 11.0xFY2026 12.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.20FY2026 $7.82FY2026 $75.07FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +44.6%FY2026 +24.9%FY2026 +46.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +69.2% +7.3% -6.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year $114.67MFY2026 $94.32BFY2026 $68.80BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +29.0%FY2026 +12.7%FY2026 +18.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +41.9% +4.3% +4.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersVBNKWFCGS
Held by institutions 36.8% 76.8% 72.1%
Institutions holding 51 2,880 3,152
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.8% +1.1% +1.1%
Institutions buying 29 1,293 1,554
Institutions selling 13 1,136 1,125
Buyers to sellers 2.23 1.14 1.38

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

VBNKWFCGS
VBNK 1.00 0.23 0.19
WFC 0.23 1.00 0.44
GS 0.19 0.44 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, VBNK, WFC and GS?

Goldman Sachs (GS) is the largest by market capitalisation: VersaBank (VBNK) $693.54M, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) $257.86B, Goldman Sachs (GS) $261.91B.

Which stock is cheaper, VBNK, WFC and GS?

Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (VersaBank (VBNK) 28.0x, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) 11.8x, Goldman Sachs (GS) 13.5x). On next year's consensus earnings, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) is cheapest (VersaBank (VBNK) 18.1x, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) 11.0x, Goldman Sachs (GS) 12.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

VersaBank (VBNK) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: VersaBank (VBNK) +28.2%, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) +5.4%, Goldman Sachs (GS) +17.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Goldman Sachs (GS) has the highest net margin (VersaBank (VBNK) 22.8%, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) 25.2%, Goldman Sachs (GS) 30.3%). On return on invested capital, VersaBank (VBNK) leads (VersaBank (VBNK) 25.0%, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) 15.1%, Goldman Sachs (GS) 14.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year VersaBank (VBNK) returned the most: VersaBank (VBNK) +82.9%, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) -1.2%, Goldman Sachs (GS) +13.8%. Over five years, Goldman Sachs (GS) compounded fastest (VersaBank (VBNK) +12.1%/yr, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) +10.6%/yr, Goldman Sachs (GS) +16.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) has the highest dividend yield: VersaBank (VBNK) 0.50%, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) 2.15%, Goldman Sachs (GS) 2.00%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) has been the steadiest (VersaBank (VBNK) 39.7%, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) 25.9%, Goldman Sachs (GS) 32.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, VBNK, WFC and GS?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.