UWMC vs USB vs WD Stock Comparison

UWM Holdings, Us Bancorp \De\ and Walker & Dunlop Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
UWMC UWM Holdings Corp
$1.40 +13.8% 1M -76.1% 1Y
Market cap
$492.79M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$3.58B
Div. yield
–
Mortgage Lending Financial Services
2 wins
USB Us Bancorp \De\
$59.72 +0.7% 1M +23.7% 1Y
Market cap
$92.33B
P/E
11.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$29.58B
Div. yield
0.03%
Money Center Banks Financial Services
8 wins
WD Walker & Dunlop, Inc.
$34.20 -10.0% 1M -60.1% 1Y
Market cap
$1.15B
P/E
29.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.29B
Div. yield
0.08%
Mortgage Lending Financial Services
2 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Us Bancorp \De\ leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Us Bancorp \De\ 8, UWM Holdings 2, Walker & Dunlop 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionUWMCUSBWDLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $492.79M $92.33B $1.15B USB
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -13.3x 11.8x 29.9x USB
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 6.7x 11.6x 8.1x UWMC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +26.1% +6.7% +8.0% UWMC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -1.0% 26.4% 3.0% USB
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 6.3% 12.6% 3.8% USB
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 10.6x 3.8x 1.8x WD
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.03% 0.08% WD
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -76.1% +23.7% -60.1% USB
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -27.4%/yr -0.2%/yr -23.3%/yr USB
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 79.6% 22.2% 46.5% USB
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 37/100 49/100 48/100 USB

Percentile Scorecard

UWMCUSBWD

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisUWMCUSBWD
Valuation 21 #135 of 170 43 #208 of 362 50 #86 of 170
Growth 16 #135 of 160 52 #107 of 221 35 #104 of 160
Profitability 32 #102 of 149 80 #40 of 200 39 #92 of 149
Financial Health 18 #130 of 158 12 #178 of 203 71 #46 of 158
Shareholder Returns 97 #5 of 135 57 #149 of 342 44 #76 of 135
Overall 37 49 48
  • UWMC ranked among 175 companies in Lending and Credit
  • USB ranked among 370 companies in Banking
  • WD ranked among 175 companies in Lending and Credit

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodUWMCUSBWDSPY
1 month +13.8%+0.7%-10.0% -0.8%
3 months -24.3%-5.9%-30.6% +3.5%
6 months -62.6%+6.7%-32.8% +7.0%
Year to date -68.0%+11.9%-43.1% +12.2%
1 year -76.1%+23.7%-60.1% +13.0%
3 years -71.9%+94.9%-47.3% +86.3%
3 years, per year -34.6%+24.9%-19.2% +23.1%
5 years -79.7%-0.9%-73.4% +68.6%
5 years, per year -27.4%-0.2%-23.3% +11.0%
10 years —+35.0%+42.0% +258.0%
10 years, per year —+3.0%+3.6% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureUWMCUSBWDSPY
Volatility, 1Y 79.6%22.2%46.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 89.8%23.2%53.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.440.611.05 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.961.07-1.29 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -89.5%-54.7%-79.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -77.0%-8.7%-59.9% -1.8%
52-week high $6.10$65.41$85.36 $779.14
52-week low $1.00$45.47$31.67 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleUWMCUSBWD
P/E now vs peer median -12.7xmedian 11.0x 11.9xmedian 12.1x 29.6xmedian 11.0x
P/S now vs peer median 0.6xmedian 2.6x 3.1xmedian 3.4x 0.9xmedian 2.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 14.9xmedian 13.1x 7.5xmedian 5.0x 4.8xmedian 13.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median -0.5xmedian 6.9x 7.4xmedian 11.0x -8.7xmedian 6.9x
P/B now vs peer median 2.3xmedian 0.7x 1.4xmedian 1.2x 0.7xmedian 0.7x
PEG now vs peer median 0.25median 0.32 0.98median 1.36 -0.83median 0.32

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsUWMCUSBWD
Revenue $3.58B $29.58B $1.29B
Net income -$104.96M $8.17B $41.08M
Free cash flow -$4.92B $12.53B -$131.24M
EPS (diluted) $-0.11 $5.01 $1.15
Cash & equivalents $498.41M – $160.86M
Total debt $19.23B $96.01B $820.95M
Shares (diluted) 337.53M 1.56B 33.28M
Enterprise value -$1.80B $92.33B $219.55M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricUWMCUSBWD
P/E -12.7x 11.9x 29.6x
P/FCF -0.5x 7.4x -8.7x
P/Operating cash flow -0.5x 7.4x -9.5x
P/S 0.6x 3.1x 0.9x
P/B 2.3x 1.4x 0.7x
P/Tangible book -0.5x 1.5x 1.2x
EV/EBITDA 14.9x 7.5x 4.8x
EV/EBIT 16.8x 7.8x 13.8x
EV/Revenue 2.2x 6.4x 1.4x
EV/FCF -1.6x 15.1x -13.7x
EV/Operating cash flow -1.6x 15.1x -15.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.25 0.98 -0.83

Growth

14 metrics
MetricUWMCUSBWD
Revenue growth (1Y) 26.1% 6.7% 8.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 27.3% 3.2% 5.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – –
Net income growth (1Y) -175.0% 18.4% -61.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -31.9% 12.1% -33.1%
EPS growth (1Y) -287.6% 19.9% -65.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -51.2% 12.2% -35.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -103.1% 68.8% 37.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -18.2% -4.9% 7.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -100.4% 68.8% 35.3%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -18.4% -4.9% 8.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricUWMCUSBWD
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin 14.6% 85.2% 29.3%
Operating margin – – –
Pretax margin -3.2% 34.5% 4.3%
Net margin -1.0% 26.4% 3.0%
FCF margin -137.6% 42.3% -10.2%
Operating cash flow margin -135.9% 42.3% -9.3%
Return on equity -8.1% 12.2% 2.4%
Return on assets -0.6% 1.1% 0.7%
Return on invested capital 6.3% 12.6% 3.8%
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.2x 0.0x 0.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 46.3x 1.5x -2.9x
Stock comp / revenue 1.6% – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricUWMCUSBWD
Debt / assets 33.5% 13.2% 16.8%
Debt / equity 6.1x 1.4x 0.5x
Net debt / EBITDA 10.6x 3.8x 1.8x
Debt / FCF -1.2x 7.7x -6.3x
Liabilities / assets 94.5% 90.6% 64.9%
Equity / assets 5.5% 9.4% 35.1%
Interest coverage 0.8x 1.7x 1.7x
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricUWMCUSBWD
Dividend yield 21.4% 3.5% 7.9%
Net buyback yield – 0.7% 1.8%
Shareholder yield 21.4% 4.2% 9.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 39.5% 226.6%
Payout ratio (FCF) – 25.7% -70.9%
Dividend growth (1Y) – 3.2% 3.1%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 3.8% 4.2%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusUWMCUSBWD
Forward P/E 6.7xFY2026 11.6xFY2026 8.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.21FY2026 $5.17FY2026 $4.23FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +75.0%FY2026 +11.9%FY2026 +157.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +19.0% +18.8% +15.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $2.23BFY2026 $30.11BFY2026 $1.21BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -7.0%FY2026 +5.1%FY2026 -1.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +30.9% +16.7% +9.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersUWMCUSBWD
Held by institutions 79.7% 81.6% 89.0%
Institutions holding 290 2,068 265
Change in shares held, QoQ +31.8% +2.1% +3.5%
Institutions buying 213 965 160
Institutions selling 50 760 59
Buyers to sellers 4.26 1.27 2.71

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

UWMCUSBWD
UWMC 1.00 0.19 0.37
USB 0.19 1.00 0.28
WD 0.37 0.28 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, UWMC, USB and WD?

Us Bancorp \De\ (USB) is the largest by market capitalisation: UWM Holdings (UWMC) $492.79M, Us Bancorp \De\ (USB) $92.33B, Walker & Dunlop (WD) $1.15B.

Which stock is cheaper, UWMC, USB and WD?

Us Bancorp \De\ (USB) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (UWM Holdings (UWMC) -13.3x, Us Bancorp \De\ (USB) 11.8x, Walker & Dunlop (WD) 29.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, UWM Holdings (UWMC) is cheapest (UWM Holdings (UWMC) 6.7x, Us Bancorp \De\ (USB) 11.6x, Walker & Dunlop (WD) 8.1x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

UWM Holdings (UWMC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: UWM Holdings (UWMC) +26.1%, Us Bancorp \De\ (USB) +6.7%, Walker & Dunlop (WD) +8.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Us Bancorp \De\ (USB) has the highest net margin (UWM Holdings (UWMC) -1.0%, Us Bancorp \De\ (USB) 26.4%, Walker & Dunlop (WD) 3.0%). On return on invested capital, Us Bancorp \De\ (USB) leads (UWM Holdings (UWMC) 6.3%, Us Bancorp \De\ (USB) 12.6%, Walker & Dunlop (WD) 3.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Us Bancorp \De\ (USB) returned the most: UWM Holdings (UWMC) -76.1%, Us Bancorp \De\ (USB) +23.7%, Walker & Dunlop (WD) -60.1%. Over five years, Us Bancorp \De\ (USB) compounded fastest (UWM Holdings (UWMC) -27.4%/yr, Us Bancorp \De\ (USB) -0.2%/yr, Walker & Dunlop (WD) -23.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Walker & Dunlop (WD) has the highest dividend yield: UWM Holdings (UWMC) 0.00%, Us Bancorp \De\ (USB) 0.03%, Walker & Dunlop (WD) 0.08%. UWM Holdings (UWMC) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Us Bancorp \De\ (USB) has been the steadiest (UWM Holdings (UWMC) 79.6%, Us Bancorp \De\ (USB) 22.2%, Walker & Dunlop (WD) 46.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, UWMC, USB and WD?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Us Bancorp \De\ (USB) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.