UWMC vs ING vs AGM Stock Comparison

UWM Holdings, Ing Groep and Federal Agricultural Mortgage Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
UWMC UWM Holdings Corp
$1.55 +26.0% 1M -73.5% 1Y
Market cap
$2.49B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$3.58B
Div. yield
19.35%
Mortgage Lending Financial Services
4 wins
ING Ing Groep Nv
$32.56 -10.9% 1M +34.0% 1Y
Market cap
$94.50B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
4.67%
Money Center Banks Financial Services
4 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Ing Groep leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Ing Groep 4, UWM Holdings 4, Federal Agricultural Mortgage 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionUWMCINGAGMLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $2.49B $94.50B $2.21B ING
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -14.1x — 11.1x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 8.2x 12.1x 9.5x UWMC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +26.1% — +14.7% UWMC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -1.0% — 44.9% AGM
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 6.3% — 3.6% UWMC
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 10.6x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 19.35% 4.67% 3.09% UWMC
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -73.5% +34.0% +25.6% ING
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -25.6%/yr +16.3%/yr +10.5%/yr ING
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 80.1% 27.8% 31.0% ING
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 36/100 — 44/100 AGM

Percentile Scorecard

UWMCINGAGM

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisUWMCINGAGM
Valuation 20 #136 of 169 – 29 #120 of 169
Growth 16 #135 of 160 – 62 #61 of 160
Profitability 32 #102 of 149 – 70 #45 of 149
Financial Health 18 #130 of 158 22 #136 of 175 8 #146 of 158
Shareholder Returns 95 #8 of 136 93 #24 of 341 52 #66 of 136
Overall 36 – 44
  • UWMC ranked among 174 companies in Lending and Credit
  • ING ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • AGM ranked among 174 companies in Lending and Credit

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodUWMCINGAGMSPY
1 month +26.0%-10.9%-4.5% -0.2%
3 months -17.1%-2.2%-4.1% +3.9%
6 months -57.5%+15.9%+16.7% +8.2%
Year to date -64.6%+16.3%+16.2% +12.9%
1 year -73.5%+34.0%+25.6% +12.3%
3 years -68.9%+157.8%+40.7% +87.4%
3 years, per year -32.3%+37.1%+12.1% +23.3%
5 years -77.1%+112.5%+64.9% +67.9%
5 years, per year -25.6%+16.3%+10.5% +10.9%
10 years —+148.4%+389.3% +261.1%
10 years, per year —+9.5%+17.2% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureUWMCINGAGMSPY
Volatility, 1Y 80.1%27.8%31.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 89.8%26.7%33.7% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.481.350.57 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.921.230.83 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -89.5%-47.4%-35.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -74.6%-12.6%-15.4% -1.2%
52-week high $6.10$37.26$241.09 $779.14
52-week low $1.00$24.17$139.00 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleUWMCINGAGM
P/E now vs peer median -14.1xmedian 11.1x —median 12.1x 11.1xmedian 11.1x
P/S now vs peer median 0.7xmedian 2.6x —median 3.4x 5.0xmedian 2.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 15.3xmedian 13.5x —median 5.0x —median 13.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median -0.5xmedian 7.0x —median 10.9x 7.1xmedian 7.0x
P/B now vs peer median 2.5xmedian 0.7x 1.5xmedian 1.2x 1.2xmedian 0.7x
PEG now vs peer median 0.28median 0.32 —median 1.34 1.14median 0.32

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsUWMCINGAGM
Revenue $3.58B – $445.56M
Net income -$104.96M – $229.00M
Free cash flow -$4.92B – $310.06M
EPS (diluted) $-0.11 – $18.38
Cash & equivalents $498.41M $74.19B $1.04B
Total debt $19.23B $21.78B $34.78B
Shares (diluted) 337.53M 2.99B 10.88M
Enterprise value $1.04B -$447.64B -$1.43B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricUWMCINGAGM
P/E -14.1x – 11.1x
P/FCF -0.5x – 7.1x
P/Operating cash flow -0.5x – 7.1x
P/S 0.7x – 5.0x
P/B 2.5x 1.5x 1.2x
P/Tangible book -0.6x 1.6x 1.2x
EV/EBITDA 15.3x – –
EV/EBIT 17.3x – 23.1x
EV/Revenue 2.2x – 80.7x
EV/FCF -1.6x – 116.0x
EV/Operating cash flow -1.6x – 116.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.28 – 1.14

Growth

14 metrics
MetricUWMCINGAGM
Revenue growth (1Y) 26.1% – 14.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 27.3% – 11.7%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – –
Net income growth (1Y) -175.0% – 8.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -31.9% – 8.5%
EPS growth (1Y) -287.6% – 8.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -51.2% – 9.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -103.1% – 37.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -18.2% – -12.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -100.4% – 37.5%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -18.4% – -12.5%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricUWMCINGAGM
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin 14.6% – –
Operating margin – – –
Pretax margin -3.2% – 62.9%
Net margin -1.0% – 44.9%
FCF margin -137.6% – 69.6%
Operating cash flow margin -135.9% – 69.6%
Return on equity -8.1% – 12.8%
Return on assets -0.6% – 0.6%
Return on invested capital 6.3% – 3.6%
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.2x – 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 46.3x – 1.4x
Stock comp / revenue 1.6% – 1.9%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricUWMCINGAGM
Debt / assets 33.5% 1.6% 88.5%
Debt / equity 6.1x 0.4x 18.8x
Net debt / EBITDA 10.6x – –
Debt / FCF -1.2x – 112.2x
Liabilities / assets 94.5% 95.3% 95.3%
Equity / assets 5.5% 4.7% 4.7%
Interest coverage 0.8x – 1.2x
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricUWMCINGAGM
Dividend yield 19.4% 4.7% 3.1%
Net buyback yield – – -4.1%
Shareholder yield 19.4% 4.7% -1.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 41.2%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 30.4%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 9.4%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 9.6%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusUWMCINGAGM
Forward P/E 8.2xFY2026 12.1xFY2026 9.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.19FY2026 $2.68FY2026 $21.54FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +58.3%FY2026 +5.9%FY2026 +29.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +26.3% +18.3% +2.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $2.26BFY2026 $27.20BFY2026 $449.96MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -5.8%FY2026 -1.0%FY2026 +9.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +37.3% +3.2% +28.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersUWMCINGAGM
Held by institutions 17.0% 4.5% 86.3%
Institutions holding 290 589 256
Change in shares held, QoQ +31.8% -19.0% +1.5%
Institutions buying 213 319 148
Institutions selling 50 154 71
Buyers to sellers 4.26 2.07 2.08

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

UWMCINGAGM
UWMC 1.00 0.12 0.21
ING 0.12 1.00 0.18
AGM 0.21 0.18 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, UWMC, ING and AGM?

Ing Groep (ING) is the largest by market capitalisation: UWM Holdings (UWMC) $2.49B, Ing Groep (ING) $94.50B, Federal Agricultural Mortgage (AGM) $2.21B.

Which company is growing faster?

UWM Holdings (UWMC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: UWM Holdings (UWMC) +26.1%, Federal Agricultural Mortgage (AGM) +14.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Federal Agricultural Mortgage (AGM) has the highest net margin (UWM Holdings (UWMC) -1.0%, Federal Agricultural Mortgage (AGM) 44.9%). On return on invested capital, UWM Holdings (UWMC) leads (UWM Holdings (UWMC) 6.3%, Federal Agricultural Mortgage (AGM) 3.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Ing Groep (ING) returned the most: UWM Holdings (UWMC) -73.5%, Ing Groep (ING) +34.0%, Federal Agricultural Mortgage (AGM) +25.6%. Over five years, Ing Groep (ING) compounded fastest (UWM Holdings (UWMC) -25.6%/yr, Ing Groep (ING) +16.3%/yr, Federal Agricultural Mortgage (AGM) +10.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

UWM Holdings (UWMC) has the highest dividend yield: UWM Holdings (UWMC) 19.35%, Ing Groep (ING) 4.67%, Federal Agricultural Mortgage (AGM) 3.09%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Ing Groep (ING) has been the steadiest (UWM Holdings (UWMC) 80.1%, Ing Groep (ING) 27.8%, Federal Agricultural Mortgage (AGM) 31.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, UWMC, ING and AGM?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Ing Groep (ING) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.