UWMC vs FMCC vs FIGR Stock Comparison

UWM Holdings, Federal Home Loan Mortgage and Figure Technology Solutions Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
UWMC UWM Holdings Corp
$1.48 +18.4% 1M -73.8% 1Y
Market cap
$529.91M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$3.58B
Div. yield
–
Mortgage Lending Financial Services
1 win

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Federal Home Loan Mortgage leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Federal Home Loan Mortgage 4, Figure Technology Solutions 4, UWM Holdings 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionUWMCFMCCFIGRLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $529.91M $13.42B $4.77B FMCC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -14.3x -536.8x 20.1x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 7.8x 0.9x 22.0x FMCC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +26.1% +3.6% +88.8% FIGR
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -1.0% — 33.5% FIGR
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 6.3% — 8.9% FIGR
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 10.6x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -73.8% -60.2% -44.6% FIGR
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -26.3%/yr +35.5%/yr — FMCC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 80.1% 85.7% 94.1% UWMC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 35/100 69/100 54/100 FMCC

Percentile Scorecard

UWMCFMCCFIGR

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisUWMCFMCCFIGR
Valuation 19 #138 of 169 99 #2 of 169 14 #145 of 169
Growth 16 #134 of 159 70 #49 of 159 99 #2 of 159
Profitability 31 #101 of 146 37 #92 of 146 72 #42 of 146
Financial Health 17 #127 of 153 – 80 #31 of 153
Shareholder Returns 94 #9 of 135 – 4 #130 of 135
Overall 35 69 54
  • UWMC ranked among 174 companies in Lending and Credit
  • FMCC ranked among 174 companies in Lending and Credit
  • FIGR ranked among 174 companies in Lending and Credit

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodUWMCFMCCFIGRSPY
1 month +18.4%+9.4%-19.5% +0.7%
3 months -20.9%-28.0%-8.6% +3.7%
6 months -58.2%-42.8%-32.8% +7.1%
Year to date -66.2%-60.0%-42.2% +12.8%
1 year -73.8%-60.2%-44.6% +11.9%
3 years -69.6%+534.4%— +85.2%
3 years, per year -32.8%+85.2%— +22.8%
5 years -78.2%+356.2%— +67.6%
5 years, per year -26.3%+35.5%— +10.9%
10 years —+153.7%— +262.0%
10 years, per year —+9.8%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureUWMCFMCCFIGRSPY
Volatility, 1Y 80.1%85.7%94.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 89.7%72.5%90.1% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.471.232.62 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.92-0.70-0.47 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -89.5%-78.9%-70.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -75.7%-64.2%-68.1% -1.2%
52-week high $6.10$11.33$73.91 $779.14
52-week low $1.00$2.98$21.91 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleUWMCFMCCFIGR
P/E now vs peer median -13.4xmedian 11.7x -525.2xmedian 11.7x 22.0xmedian 11.7x
P/S now vs peer median 0.7xmedian 2.7x 0.5xmedian 2.7x 7.4xmedian 2.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 15.1xmedian 13.1x —median 13.1x —median 13.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median -0.5xmedian 6.5x 0.8xmedian 6.5x -61.0xmedian 6.5x
P/B now vs peer median 2.4xmedian 0.7x 0.2xmedian 0.7x 3.7xmedian 0.7x
PEG now vs peer median 0.26median 0.33 -30.58median 0.33 —median 0.33

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsUWMCFMCCFIGR
Revenue $3.58B $24.70B $708.87M
Gross profit – – $620.58M
Operating income – – $201.41M
Net income -$104.96M – $237.39M
Free cash flow -$4.92B – -$86.49M
R&D – – $62.64M
EPS (diluted) $-0.11 $-0.01 $0.96
Cash & equivalents $498.41M $4.56B $1.44B
Total debt $19.23B – $963.50M
Shares (diluted) 337.53M 3.23B 246.97M
Enterprise value -$1.77B $13.42B -$430.65M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricUWMCFMCCFIGR
P/E -13.4x -525.2x 22.0x
P/FCF -0.5x 0.8x -61.0x
P/Operating cash flow -0.5x – -61.0x
P/S 0.7x 0.5x 7.4x
P/B 2.4x 0.2x 3.7x
P/Tangible book -0.5x 0.2x 4.2x
EV/EBITDA 15.1x – –
EV/EBIT 17.0x – 23.8x
EV/Revenue 2.2x 0.5x 6.8x
EV/FCF -1.6x – -55.5x
EV/Operating cash flow -1.6x – -55.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.26 -30.58 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricUWMCFMCCFIGR
Revenue growth (1Y) 26.1% 3.6% 88.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 27.3% 6.1% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – 90.5%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – – 229.5%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – –
Net income growth (1Y) -175.0% – 279.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -31.9% – –
EPS growth (1Y) -287.6% 26.5% 36.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -51.2% 17.2% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -103.1% – –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -18.2% – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -100.4% – –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -18.4% – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricUWMCFMCCFIGR
Gross margin – – 87.5%
EBITDA margin 14.6% – –
Operating margin – – 28.4%
Pretax margin -3.2% – 28.3%
Net margin -1.0% – 33.5%
FCF margin -137.6% – -12.2%
Operating cash flow margin -135.9% – -12.2%
Return on equity -8.1% 16.9% 17.6%
Return on assets -0.6% 0.4% 8.3%
Return on invested capital 6.3% – 8.9%
Return on capital employed – – 12.7%
Asset turnover 0.2x 0.0x 0.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 46.3x – -0.4x
Stock comp / revenue 1.6% – 15.4%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricUWMCFMCCFIGR
Debt / assets 33.5% – 31.9%
Debt / equity 6.1x – 0.7x
Net debt / EBITDA 10.6x – –
Debt / FCF -1.2x – -11.1x
Liabilities / assets 94.5% 97.7% 53.2%
Equity / assets 5.5% 2.3% 46.8%
Interest coverage 0.8x – 3.2x
Current ratio – – 1.9x
Quick ratio – – 1.2x
Cash ratio – – 1.1x
Altman Z-score – – 2.84

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricUWMCFMCCFIGR
Dividend yield 20.3% – –
Net buyback yield – – -13.1%
Shareholder yield 20.3% 0.0% -13.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusUWMCFMCCFIGR
Forward P/E 7.8xFY2026 0.9xFY2026 22.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.19FY2026 $4.33FY2026 $1.07FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +58.3%FY2026 +30.4%FY2026 +98.1%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +26.3% -12.7% +34.6%
Revenue, next fiscal year $2.26BFY2026 $23.94BFY2026 $841.68MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -5.8%FY2026 +2.9%FY2026 +63.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +37.3% +2.2% +50.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersUWMCFMCCFIGR
Held by institutions 17.0% 0.0% 66.8%
Institutions holding 291 12 307
Change in shares held, QoQ +31.8% +48.6% +16.9%
Institutions buying 214 5 196
Institutions selling 50 1 82
Buyers to sellers 4.28 5.00 2.39

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

UWMCFMCCFIGR
UWMC 1.00 0.04 0.15
FMCC 0.04 1.00 0.07
FIGR 0.15 0.07 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, UWMC, FMCC and FIGR?

Federal Home Loan Mortgage (FMCC) is the largest by market capitalisation: UWM Holdings (UWMC) $529.91M, Federal Home Loan Mortgage (FMCC) $13.42B, Figure Technology Solutions (FIGR) $4.77B.

Which company is growing faster?

Figure Technology Solutions (FIGR) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: UWM Holdings (UWMC) +26.1%, Federal Home Loan Mortgage (FMCC) +3.6%, Figure Technology Solutions (FIGR) +88.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Figure Technology Solutions (FIGR) has the highest net margin (UWM Holdings (UWMC) -1.0%, Figure Technology Solutions (FIGR) 33.5%). On return on invested capital, Figure Technology Solutions (FIGR) leads (UWM Holdings (UWMC) 6.3%, Figure Technology Solutions (FIGR) 8.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Figure Technology Solutions (FIGR) returned the most: UWM Holdings (UWMC) -73.8%, Federal Home Loan Mortgage (FMCC) -60.2%, Figure Technology Solutions (FIGR) -44.6%. Over five years, Federal Home Loan Mortgage (FMCC) compounded fastest (UWM Holdings (UWMC) -26.3%/yr, Federal Home Loan Mortgage (FMCC) +35.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, UWM Holdings (UWMC) has been the steadiest (UWM Holdings (UWMC) 80.1%, Federal Home Loan Mortgage (FMCC) 85.7%, Figure Technology Solutions (FIGR) 94.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, UWMC, FMCC and FIGR?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Federal Home Loan Mortgage (FMCC) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.