UWMC vs FIGR vs BETR Stock Comparison

UWM Holdings, Figure Technology Solutions and Better Home & Finance Holding Prices as of Nov 5, 2026 Peers: Industry group
UWMC UWM Holdings Corp
$1.63 +34.7% 1M -71.2% 1Y
Market cap
$511.35M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$3.58B
Div. yield
–
Mortgage Lending Financial Services
3 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Figure Technology Solutions leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Figure Technology Solutions 6, UWM Holdings 3, Better Home & Finance Holding 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionUWMCFIGRBETRLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $511.35M $5.07B $359.37M FIGR
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -13.8x 21.4x -2.0x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 14.8x 19.5x — UWMC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +26.1% +88.8% +48.7% FIGR
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -1.0% 33.5% -94.5% FIGR
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 6.3% 8.9% -17.1% FIGR
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 10.6x — -5.0x BETR
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -71.2% -46.0% -69.0% FIGR
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -25.4%/yr — -48.0%/yr UWMC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 80.5% 94.3% 124.0% UWMC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 35/100 54/100 18/100 FIGR

Percentile Scorecard

UWMCFIGRBETR

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisUWMCFIGRBETR
Valuation 19 #137 of 168 17 #140 of 168 5 #159 of 168
Growth 16 #137 of 163 98 #4 of 163 72 #47 of 163
Profitability 29 #109 of 154 69 #48 of 154 6 #145 of 154
Financial Health 18 #133 of 161 81 #31 of 161 9 #147 of 161
Shareholder Returns 93 #11 of 136 4 #131 of 136 1 #135 of 136
Overall 35 54 18
  • UWMC ranked among 173 companies in Lending and Credit
  • FIGR ranked among 173 companies in Lending and Credit
  • BETR ranked among 173 companies in Lending and Credit

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodUWMCFIGRBETRSPY
1 month +34.7%-23.6%+69.2% -5.9%
3 months +38.1%-26.9%+14.0% -4.6%
6 months -51.8%-44.3%-37.8% +0.2%
Year to date -62.8%-48.8%-41.8% +7.5%
1 year -71.2%-46.0%-69.0% +8.2%
3 years -68.0%—-19.4% +68.3%
3 years, per year -31.6%—-7.0% +19.0%
5 years -76.9%—-96.2% +56.5%
5 years, per year -25.4%—-48.0% +9.4%

Risk

MeasureUWMCFIGRBETRSPY
Volatility, 1Y 80.5%94.3%124.0% 13.6%
Downside volatility, 1Y 90.5%91.0%133.7% 14.2%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.312.552.34 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.88-0.49-0.56 0.60
Max drawdown, 5Y -89.5%-71.7%-99.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -73.3%-71.7%-71.3% -5.9%
52-week high $6.10$73.91$66.07 $779.14
52-week low $1.00$20.90$8.12 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleUWMCFIGRBETR
P/E now vs peer median -14.8xmedian 11.9x 19.5xmedian 11.9x -2.0xmedian 11.9x
P/S now vs peer median 0.7xmedian 2.7x 6.6xmedian 2.7x 1.9xmedian 2.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 15.6xmedian 12.1x —median 12.1x -8.2xmedian 12.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median -0.5xmedian 5.4x -54.0xmedian 5.4x -2.3xmedian 5.4x
P/B now vs peer median 2.7xmedian 0.7x 3.3xmedian 0.7x 6.2xmedian 0.7x
PEG now vs peer median 0.29median 0.34 —median 0.34 -0.06median 0.34

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsUWMCFIGRBETR
Revenue $3.58B $708.87M $190.37M
Gross profit – $620.58M –
Operating income – $201.41M –
Net income -$104.96M $237.39M -$179.95M
Free cash flow -$4.92B -$86.49M -$156.15M
R&D – $62.64M $30.88M
EPS (diluted) $-0.11 $0.96 $-9.65
Cash & equivalents $498.41M $1.44B $102.25M
Total debt $6.02B $963.50M $653.14M
Shares (diluted) 337.53M 246.97M 18.65M
Enterprise value -$1.79B -$125.85M -$195.91M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricUWMCFIGRBETR
P/E -14.8x 19.5x -2.0x
P/FCF -0.5x -54.0x -2.3x
P/Operating cash flow -0.5x -54.0x -2.3x
P/S 0.7x 6.6x 1.9x
P/B 2.7x 3.3x 6.2x
P/Tangible book -0.6x 3.7x 8.9x
EV/EBITDA 15.6x – -8.2x
EV/EBIT 17.6x 20.9x -7.4x
EV/Revenue 2.3x 5.9x 4.8x
EV/FCF -1.7x -48.6x -5.8x
EV/Operating cash flow -1.7x -48.6x -5.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.29 – -0.06

Growth

14 metrics
MetricUWMCFIGRBETR
Revenue growth (1Y) 26.1% 88.8% 48.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 27.3% – 33.5%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 90.5% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – 229.5% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – –
Net income growth (1Y) -175.0% 279.9% 10.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -31.9% – 33.4%
EPS growth (1Y) -287.6% 36.1% 26.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -51.2% – 34.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -103.1% – 32.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -18.2% – -30.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -100.4% – 32.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -18.4% – -30.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricUWMCFIGRBETR
Gross margin – 87.5% –
EBITDA margin 14.6% – -58.2%
Operating margin – 28.4% –
Pretax margin -3.2% 28.3% -84.9%
Net margin -1.0% 33.5% -94.5%
FCF margin -137.6% -12.2% -82.0%
Operating cash flow margin -135.9% -12.2% -81.5%
Return on equity -8.1% 17.6% -541.6%
Return on assets -0.6% 8.3% -11.6%
Return on invested capital 6.3% 8.9% -17.1%
Return on capital employed – 12.7% –
Asset turnover 0.2x 0.2x 0.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 46.3x -0.4x 0.9x
Stock comp / revenue 1.6% 15.4% 26.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricUWMCFIGRBETR
Debt / assets 33.5% 31.9% 42.3%
Debt / equity 6.1x 0.7x 11.3x
Net debt / EBITDA 10.6x – -5.0x
Debt / FCF -1.2x -11.1x -4.2x
Liabilities / assets 94.5% 53.2% 96.2%
Equity / assets 5.5% 46.8% 3.8%
Interest coverage 0.8x 3.2x -3.2x
Current ratio – 1.9x –
Quick ratio – 1.2x –
Cash ratio – 1.1x –
Altman Z-score – 2.62 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricUWMCFIGRBETR
Dividend yield 18.4% – –
Net buyback yield – -14.7% -31.3%
Shareholder yield 18.4% -14.7% -31.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusUWMCFIGRBETR
Forward P/E 14.8xFY2026 19.5xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $0.11FY2026 $1.07FY2026 $-7.36FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -8.3%FY2026 +98.1%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +81.8% +34.6% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $2.48BFY2026 $833.08MFY2026 $212.53MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +3.2%FY2026 +61.8%FY2026 +28.9%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +36.4% +49.1% +18.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersUWMCFIGRBETR
Held by institutions 17.0% 66.8% 32.4%
Institutions holding 291 307 90
Change in shares held, QoQ +31.8% +16.9% +15.6%
Institutions buying 214 196 54
Institutions selling 50 82 21
Buyers to sellers 4.28 2.39 2.57

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

UWMCFIGRBETR
UWMC 1.00 0.14 0.25
FIGR 0.14 1.00 0.24
BETR 0.25 0.24 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, UWMC, FIGR and BETR?

Figure Technology Solutions (FIGR) is the largest by market capitalisation: UWM Holdings (UWMC) $511.35M, Figure Technology Solutions (FIGR) $5.07B, Better Home & Finance Holding (BETR) $359.37M.

Which company is growing faster?

Figure Technology Solutions (FIGR) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: UWM Holdings (UWMC) +26.1%, Figure Technology Solutions (FIGR) +88.8%, Better Home & Finance Holding (BETR) +48.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Figure Technology Solutions (FIGR) has the highest net margin (UWM Holdings (UWMC) -1.0%, Figure Technology Solutions (FIGR) 33.5%, Better Home & Finance Holding (BETR) -94.5%). On return on invested capital, Figure Technology Solutions (FIGR) leads (UWM Holdings (UWMC) 6.3%, Figure Technology Solutions (FIGR) 8.9%, Better Home & Finance Holding (BETR) -17.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Figure Technology Solutions (FIGR) returned the most: UWM Holdings (UWMC) -71.2%, Figure Technology Solutions (FIGR) -46.0%, Better Home & Finance Holding (BETR) -69.0%. Over five years, UWM Holdings (UWMC) compounded fastest (UWM Holdings (UWMC) -25.4%/yr, Better Home & Finance Holding (BETR) -48.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, UWM Holdings (UWMC) has been the steadiest (UWM Holdings (UWMC) 80.5%, Figure Technology Solutions (FIGR) 94.3%, Better Home & Finance Holding (BETR) 124.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, UWMC, FIGR and BETR?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Figure Technology Solutions (FIGR) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.