UWMC vs CFG vs ING Stock Comparison

UWM Holdings, Citizens Financial and Ing Groep Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
UWMC UWM Holdings Corp
$1.40 +13.8% 1M -76.1% 1Y
Market cap
$497.85M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$3.58B
Div. yield
–
Mortgage Lending Financial Services
2 wins
ING Ing Groep Nv
$32.33 -11.5% 1M +34.9% 1Y
Market cap
$97.18B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Money Center Banks Financial Services
3 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Citizens Financial leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Citizens Financial 5, Ing Groep 3, UWM Holdings 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionUWMCCFGINGLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $497.85M $27.64B $97.18B ING
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -13.4x 13.9x — –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 7.4x 12.1x 12.1x UWMC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +26.1% +11.0% — UWMC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -1.0% 22.7% — CFG
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 6.3% 12.3% — CFG
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 10.6x 2.4x — CFG
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.03% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -76.1% +25.3% +34.9% ING
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -27.4%/yr +6.5%/yr +16.4%/yr ING
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 79.6% 25.3% 27.8% CFG
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 37/100 37/100 — CFG

Percentile Scorecard

UWMCCFGING

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisUWMCCFGING
Valuation 21 #135 of 170 27 #263 of 362 –
Growth 16 #135 of 160 36 #142 of 221 –
Profitability 32 #102 of 149 37 #126 of 200 –
Financial Health 18 #130 of 158 32 #139 of 203 22 #159 of 203
Shareholder Returns 97 #5 of 135 53 #161 of 342 93 #24 of 342
Overall 37 37 –
  • UWMC ranked among 175 companies in Lending and Credit
  • CFG ranked among 370 companies in Banking
  • ING ranked among 370 companies in Banking

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodUWMCCFGINGSPY
1 month +13.8%-0.3%-11.5% -0.8%
3 months -24.3%-8.1%-3.5% +3.5%
6 months -62.6%+0.9%+15.2% +7.0%
Year to date -68.0%+11.9%+15.5% +12.2%
1 year -76.1%+25.3%+34.9% +13.0%
3 years -71.9%+185.8%+156.0% +86.3%
3 years, per year -34.6%+41.9%+36.8% +23.1%
5 years -79.7%+37.3%+113.3% +68.6%
5 years, per year -27.4%+6.5%+16.4% +11.0%
10 years —+143.2%+148.9% +258.0%
10 years, per year —+9.3%+9.5% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureUWMCCFGINGSPY
Volatility, 1Y 79.6%25.3%27.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 89.8%25.6%26.7% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.440.871.35 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.961.001.25 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -89.5%-59.4%-47.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -77.0%-12.5%-13.2% -1.8%
52-week high $6.10$74.73$37.26 $779.14
52-week low $1.00$49.71$24.17 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleUWMCCFGING
P/E now vs peer median -12.7xmedian 11.0x 13.9xmedian 12.1x —median 12.1x
P/S now vs peer median 0.6xmedian 2.6x 3.2xmedian 3.4x —median 3.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 14.9xmedian 13.1x 6.5xmedian 5.0x —median 5.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median -0.5xmedian 6.9x 11.7xmedian 11.0x —median 11.0x
P/B now vs peer median 2.3xmedian 0.7x 1.1xmedian 1.2x 1.5xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.25median 0.32 12.62median 1.36 —median 1.36

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsUWMCCFGING
Revenue $3.58B $8.73B –
Net income -$104.96M $2.13B –
Free cash flow -$4.92B $2.35B –
EPS (diluted) $-0.11 $4.65 –
Cash & equivalents $498.41M – $74.19B
Total debt $19.23B $16.35B $21.78B
Shares (diluted) 337.53M 426.68M 2.99B
Enterprise value -$1.80B $27.64B -$446.27B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricUWMCCFGING
P/E -12.7x 13.9x –
P/FCF -0.5x 11.7x –
P/Operating cash flow -0.5x 11.0x –
P/S 0.6x 3.2x –
P/B 2.3x 1.1x 1.5x
P/Tangible book -0.5x 1.1x 1.6x
EV/EBITDA 14.9x 6.5x –
EV/EBIT 16.8x 6.9x –
EV/Revenue 2.2x 5.0x –
EV/FCF -1.6x 18.7x –
EV/Operating cash flow -1.6x 17.6x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.25 12.62 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricUWMCCFGING
Revenue growth (1Y) 26.1% 11.0% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 27.3% 0.5% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – –
Net income growth (1Y) -175.0% 33.5% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) -31.9% -2.3% –
EPS growth (1Y) -287.6% 39.7% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) -51.2% 1.1% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -103.1% 94.5% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -18.2% -24.1% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -100.4% 103.4% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -18.4% -24.9% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricUWMCCFGING
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin 14.6% 78.0% –
Operating margin – – –
Pretax margin -3.2% 31.1% –
Net margin -1.0% 22.7% –
FCF margin -137.6% 27.0% –
Operating cash flow margin -135.9% 28.7% –
Return on equity -8.1% 8.1% –
Return on assets -0.6% 0.9% –
Return on invested capital 6.3% 12.3% –
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.2x 0.0x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 46.3x 1.2x –
Stock comp / revenue 1.6% 1.5% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricUWMCCFGING
Debt / assets 33.5% 7.0% 1.6%
Debt / equity 6.1x 0.6x 0.4x
Net debt / EBITDA 10.6x 2.4x –
Debt / FCF -1.2x 6.9x –
Liabilities / assets 94.5% 88.8% 95.3%
Equity / assets 5.5% 11.2% 4.7%
Interest coverage 0.8x 1.7x –
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricUWMCCFGING
Dividend yield 21.4% 2.8% 4.7%
Net buyback yield – 2.6% –
Shareholder yield 21.4% 5.5% 4.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 36.7% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 33.1% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 4.1% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – -2.0% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusUWMCCFGING
Forward P/E 7.4xFY2026 12.1xFY2026 12.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.19FY2026 $5.42FY2026 $2.68FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +58.3%FY2026 +40.4%FY2026 +5.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +26.3% +27.1% +18.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $2.26BFY2026 $8.59BFY2026 $27.20BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -5.8%FY2026 +4.1%FY2026 -1.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +37.3% +11.4% +3.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersUWMCCFGING
Held by institutions 79.7% 96.7% 4.5%
Institutions holding 290 1,097 589
Change in shares held, QoQ +31.8% +2.9% -19.0%
Institutions buying 213 633 319
Institutions selling 50 314 154
Buyers to sellers 4.26 2.02 2.07

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

UWMCCFGING
UWMC 1.00 0.25 0.12
CFG 0.25 1.00 0.49
ING 0.12 0.49 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, UWMC, CFG and ING?

Ing Groep (ING) is the largest by market capitalisation: UWM Holdings (UWMC) $497.85M, Citizens Financial (CFG) $27.64B, Ing Groep (ING) $97.18B.

Which company is growing faster?

UWM Holdings (UWMC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: UWM Holdings (UWMC) +26.1%, Citizens Financial (CFG) +11.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Citizens Financial (CFG) has the highest net margin (UWM Holdings (UWMC) -1.0%, Citizens Financial (CFG) 22.7%). On return on invested capital, Citizens Financial (CFG) leads (UWM Holdings (UWMC) 6.3%, Citizens Financial (CFG) 12.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Ing Groep (ING) returned the most: UWM Holdings (UWMC) -76.1%, Citizens Financial (CFG) +25.3%, Ing Groep (ING) +34.9%. Over five years, Ing Groep (ING) compounded fastest (UWM Holdings (UWMC) -27.4%/yr, Citizens Financial (CFG) +6.5%/yr, Ing Groep (ING) +16.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: UWM Holdings (UWMC) 0.00%, Citizens Financial (CFG) 0.03%, Ing Groep (ING) 0.00%. UWM Holdings (UWMC) and Ing Groep (ING) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Citizens Financial (CFG) has been the steadiest (UWM Holdings (UWMC) 79.6%, Citizens Financial (CFG) 25.3%, Ing Groep (ING) 27.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, UWMC, CFG and ING?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Citizens Financial (CFG) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.