UWMC vs CFG vs FITB Stock Comparison

UWM Holdings, Citizens Financial and Fifth Third Bancorp Prices as of Nov 4, 2026 Peers: Industry group
UWMC UWM Holdings Corp
$1.68 +29.2% 1M -70.9% 1Y
Market cap
$2.69B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$3.58B
Div. yield
17.86%
Mortgage Lending Financial Services
3 wins
FITB Fifth Third Bancorp
$54.73 +7.7% 1M +29.8% 1Y
Market cap
$49.66B
P/E
20.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$11.72B
Div. yield
2.96%
Regional Banks Financial Services
4 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Citizens Financial leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Citizens Financial 5, Fifth Third Bancorp 4, UWM Holdings 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionUWMCCFGFITBLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $2.69B $27.76B $49.66B FITB
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -15.3x 13.1x 20.6x CFG
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 8.8x 12.2x 17.4x UWMC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +26.1% +10.6% +32.5% FITB
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -1.0% 23.8% 20.6% CFG
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 6.3% 12.0% 11.1% CFG
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 10.6x 2.6x -0.3x FITB
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 17.86% 2.88% 2.96% UWMC
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -70.9% +29.9% +29.8% CFG
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -25.0%/yr +6.6%/yr +4.4%/yr CFG
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 80.5% 25.6% 25.1% FITB
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 34/100 23/100 29/100 UWMC

Percentile Scorecard

UWMCCFGFITB

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisUWMCCFGFITB
Valuation 18 #138 of 167 19 #292 of 360 14 #309 of 360
Growth 15 #138 of 162 13 #299 of 344 16 #291 of 344
Profitability 30 #108 of 153 15 #295 of 345 16 #290 of 345
Financial Health 17 #133 of 160 20 #273 of 339 37 #214 of 339
Shareholder Returns 93 #11 of 138 47 #186 of 352 60 #141 of 352
Overall 34 23 29
  • UWMC ranked among 172 companies in Lending and Credit
  • CFG ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • FITB ranked among 368 companies in Banking

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodUWMCCFGFITBSPY
1 month +29.2%+2.5%+7.7% -1.0%
3 months -8.2%-10.4%-4.9% -0.4%
6 months -51.9%+0.4%+7.7% +4.5%
Year to date -61.6%+12.8%+16.9% +12.4%
1 year -70.9%+29.9%+29.8% +13.6%
3 years -69.0%+151.8%+106.8% +76.4%
3 years, per year -32.3%+36.1%+27.4% +20.8%
5 years -76.2%+37.9%+24.2% +63.7%
5 years, per year -25.0%+6.6%+4.4% +10.4%
10 years —+149.5%+158.0% +267.7%
10 years, per year —+9.6%+9.9% +13.9%

Risk

MeasureUWMCCFGFITBSPY
Volatility, 1Y 80.5%25.6%25.1% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 90.4%25.9%24.9% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.400.900.71 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.881.171.19 1.06
Max drawdown, 5Y -89.5%-59.4%-54.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -72.5%-11.8%-7.8% -1.6%
52-week high $6.10$74.73$59.36 $779.14
52-week low $1.00$49.71$41.12 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleUWMCCFGFITB
P/E now vs peer median -15.3xmedian 12.0x 13.1xmedian 12.7x 20.6xmedian 12.7x
P/S now vs peer median 0.8xmedian 2.6x 3.1xmedian 3.5x 4.2xmedian 3.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 15.7xmedian 13.2x 6.6xmedian 4.9x 5.6xmedian 4.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median -0.5xmedian 5.5x 25.4xmedian 11.0x 17.8xmedian 11.0x
P/B now vs peer median 2.7xmedian 0.7x 1.1xmedian 1.3x 1.5xmedian 1.3x
PEG now vs peer median 0.30median 0.34 2.04median 1.33 -2.25median 1.33

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsUWMCCFGFITB
Revenue $3.58B $8.93B $11.72B
Net income -$104.96M $2.27B $2.56B
Free cash flow -$4.92B $1.09B $2.79B
EPS (diluted) $-0.11 $4.99 $2.64
Cash & equivalents $498.41M – $4.09B
Total debt $6.02B $17.83B $18.14B
Shares (diluted) 337.53M 425.66M 917.10M
Enterprise value $1.25B $27.76B -$38.58B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricUWMCCFGFITB
P/E -15.3x 13.1x 20.6x
P/FCF -0.5x 25.4x 17.8x
P/Operating cash flow -0.6x 22.1x 14.4x
P/S 0.8x 3.1x 4.2x
P/B 2.7x 1.1x 1.5x
P/Tangible book -0.6x 1.1x 1.6x
EV/EBITDA 15.7x 6.6x 5.6x
EV/EBIT 17.7x 7.0x 6.2x
EV/Revenue 2.3x 5.1x 4.0x
EV/FCF -1.7x 41.7x 16.9x
EV/Operating cash flow -1.7x 36.2x 13.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.30 2.04 -2.25

Growth

14 metrics
MetricUWMCCFGFITB
Revenue growth (1Y) 26.1% 10.6% 32.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 27.3% 1.9% 9.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – –
Net income growth (1Y) -175.0% 33.1% 6.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -31.9% 3.1% 0.1%
EPS growth (1Y) -287.6% 38.9% -21.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -51.2% 6.4% -9.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -103.1% -55.9% -0.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -18.2% -30.4% -8.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -100.4% -59.8% -4.6%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -18.4% -32.9% -11.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricUWMCCFGFITB
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin 14.6% 77.7% 71.3%
Operating margin – – –
Pretax margin -3.2% 32.3% 27.8%
Net margin -1.0% 23.8% 20.6%
FCF margin -137.6% 12.2% 23.8%
Operating cash flow margin -135.9% 14.1% 29.5%
Return on equity -8.1% 8.8% 7.6%
Return on assets -0.6% 1.0% 0.9%
Return on invested capital 6.3% 12.0% 11.1%
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.2x 0.0x 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 46.3x 0.6x 1.3x
Stock comp / revenue 1.6% 1.5% 2.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricUWMCCFGFITB
Debt / assets 33.5% 7.6% 6.0%
Debt / equity 6.1x 0.7x 0.5x
Net debt / EBITDA 10.6x 2.6x -0.3x
Debt / FCF -1.2x 16.3x 6.5x
Liabilities / assets 94.5% 89.3% 88.9%
Equity / assets 5.5% 10.7% 11.1%
Interest coverage 0.8x 1.8x 1.7x
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricUWMCCFGFITB
Dividend yield 17.9% 2.9% 3.0%
Net buyback yield – 4.2% –
Shareholder yield 17.9% 7.1% 3.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 35.0% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 72.6% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 6.7% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – -1.1% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusUWMCCFGFITB
Forward P/E 8.8xFY2026 12.2xFY2026 17.4xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.19FY2026 $5.42FY2026 $3.15FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +58.3%FY2026 +40.4%FY2026 -10.8%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +26.3% +27.1% +61.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $2.26BFY2026 $8.59BFY2026 $12.18BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -5.8%FY2026 +4.1%FY2026 +34.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +37.3% +11.4% +23.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersUWMCCFGFITB
Held by institutions 17.0% 96.7% 90.8%
Institutions holding 291 1,099 1,307
Change in shares held, QoQ +31.8% +2.9% +3.9%
Institutions buying 214 634 692
Institutions selling 50 315 409
Buyers to sellers 4.28 2.01 1.69

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

UWMCCFGFITB
UWMC 1.00 0.23 0.19
CFG 0.23 1.00 0.86
FITB 0.19 0.86 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, UWMC, CFG and FITB?

Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) is the largest by market capitalisation: UWM Holdings (UWMC) $2.69B, Citizens Financial (CFG) $27.76B, Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) $49.66B.

Which stock is cheaper, UWMC, CFG and FITB?

Citizens Financial (CFG) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (UWM Holdings (UWMC) -15.3x, Citizens Financial (CFG) 13.1x, Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) 20.6x). On next year's consensus earnings, UWM Holdings (UWMC) is cheapest (UWM Holdings (UWMC) 8.8x, Citizens Financial (CFG) 12.2x, Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) 17.4x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: UWM Holdings (UWMC) +26.1%, Citizens Financial (CFG) +10.6%, Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) +32.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Citizens Financial (CFG) has the highest net margin (UWM Holdings (UWMC) -1.0%, Citizens Financial (CFG) 23.8%, Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) 20.6%). On return on invested capital, Citizens Financial (CFG) leads (UWM Holdings (UWMC) 6.3%, Citizens Financial (CFG) 12.0%, Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) 11.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Citizens Financial (CFG) returned the most: UWM Holdings (UWMC) -70.9%, Citizens Financial (CFG) +29.9%, Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) +29.8%. Over five years, Citizens Financial (CFG) compounded fastest (UWM Holdings (UWMC) -25.0%/yr, Citizens Financial (CFG) +6.6%/yr, Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) +4.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

UWM Holdings (UWMC) has the highest dividend yield: UWM Holdings (UWMC) 17.86%, Citizens Financial (CFG) 2.88%, Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) 2.96%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) has been the steadiest (UWM Holdings (UWMC) 80.5%, Citizens Financial (CFG) 25.6%, Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) 25.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, UWMC, CFG and FITB?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Citizens Financial (CFG) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.