UWMC vs BSBR vs USB Stock Comparison

UWM Holdings, Banco Santander (Brasil) and Us Bancorp \De\ Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
UWMC UWM Holdings Corp
$1.40 +13.8% 1M -76.1% 1Y
Market cap
$543.42M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$3.58B
Div. yield
–
Mortgage Lending Financial Services
1 win
USB Us Bancorp \De\
$59.72 +0.7% 1M +23.7% 1Y
Market cap
$92.86B
P/E
11.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$29.58B
Div. yield
0.03%
Money Center Banks Financial Services
8 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Us Bancorp \De\ leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Us Bancorp \De\ 8, Banco Santander (Brasil) 1, UWM Holdings 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionUWMCBSBRUSBLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $543.42M $18.49B $92.86B USB
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -14.6x — 11.9x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 7.4x 7.1x 11.6x BSBR
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +26.1% — +6.7% UWMC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -1.0% — 26.4% USB
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 6.3% — 12.6% USB
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 10.6x — 3.8x USB
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.03% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -76.1% -11.2% +23.7% USB
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -27.4%/yr -5.1%/yr -0.2%/yr USB
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 79.6% 38.0% 22.2% USB
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 37/100 — 49/100 USB

Percentile Scorecard

UWMCBSBRUSB

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisUWMCBSBRUSB
Valuation 21 #135 of 170 – 43 #208 of 362
Growth 16 #135 of 160 – 52 #107 of 221
Profitability 32 #102 of 149 – 80 #40 of 200
Financial Health 18 #130 of 158 25 #152 of 203 12 #178 of 203
Shareholder Returns 97 #5 of 135 99 #3 of 342 57 #149 of 342
Overall 37 – 49
  • UWMC ranked among 175 companies in Lending and Credit
  • BSBR ranked among 370 companies in Banking
  • USB ranked among 370 companies in Banking

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodUWMCBSBRUSBSPY
1 month +13.8%-16.0%+0.7% -0.8%
3 months -24.3%-11.6%-5.9% +3.5%
6 months -62.6%-18.9%+6.7% +7.0%
Year to date -68.0%-21.1%+11.9% +12.2%
1 year -76.1%-11.2%+23.7% +13.0%
3 years -71.9%-10.7%+94.9% +86.3%
3 years, per year -34.6%-3.7%+24.9% +23.1%
5 years -79.7%-23.1%-0.9% +68.6%
5 years, per year -27.4%-5.1%-0.2% +11.0%
10 years —-39.3%+35.0% +258.0%
10 years, per year —-4.9%+3.0% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureUWMCBSBRUSBSPY
Volatility, 1Y 79.6%38.0%22.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 89.8%39.3%23.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.441.230.61 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.96-0.301.07 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -89.5%-52.2%-54.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -77.0%-33.1%-8.7% -1.8%
52-week high $6.10$7.20$65.41 $779.14
52-week low $1.00$4.82$45.47 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleUWMCBSBRUSB
P/E now vs peer median -12.7xmedian 11.0x —median 12.1x 11.9xmedian 12.1x
P/S now vs peer median 0.6xmedian 2.6x —median 3.4x 3.1xmedian 3.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 14.9xmedian 13.1x —median 5.0x 7.5xmedian 5.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median -0.5xmedian 6.9x —median 11.0x 7.4xmedian 11.0x
P/B now vs peer median 2.3xmedian 0.7x 1.5xmedian 1.2x 1.4xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.25median 0.32 —median 1.36 0.98median 1.36

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsUWMCBSBRUSB
Revenue $3.58B – $29.58B
Net income -$104.96M – $8.17B
Free cash flow -$4.92B – $12.53B
EPS (diluted) $-0.11 – $5.01
Cash & equivalents $498.41M $5.42B –
Total debt $19.23B $55.96B $96.01B
Shares (diluted) 337.53M 3.93B 1.56B
Enterprise value -$1.75B -$329.54B $92.86B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricUWMCBSBRUSB
P/E -12.7x – 11.9x
P/FCF -0.5x – 7.4x
P/Operating cash flow -0.5x – 7.4x
P/S 0.6x – 3.1x
P/B 2.3x 1.5x 1.4x
P/Tangible book -0.5x 2.0x 1.5x
EV/EBITDA 14.9x – 7.5x
EV/EBIT 16.8x – 7.8x
EV/Revenue 2.2x – 6.4x
EV/FCF -1.6x – 15.1x
EV/Operating cash flow -1.6x – 15.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.25 – 0.98

Growth

14 metrics
MetricUWMCBSBRUSB
Revenue growth (1Y) 26.1% – 6.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 27.3% – 3.2%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – –
Net income growth (1Y) -175.0% – 18.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -31.9% – 12.1%
EPS growth (1Y) -287.6% – 19.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -51.2% – 12.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -103.1% – 68.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -18.2% – -4.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -100.4% – 68.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -18.4% – -4.9%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricUWMCBSBRUSB
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin 14.6% – 85.2%
Operating margin – – –
Pretax margin -3.2% – 34.5%
Net margin -1.0% – 26.4%
FCF margin -137.6% – 42.3%
Operating cash flow margin -135.9% – 42.3%
Return on equity -8.1% – 12.2%
Return on assets -0.6% – 1.1%
Return on invested capital 6.3% – 12.6%
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.2x – 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 46.3x – 1.5x
Stock comp / revenue 1.6% – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricUWMCBSBRUSB
Debt / assets 33.5% 6.3% 13.2%
Debt / equity 6.1x 0.6x 1.4x
Net debt / EBITDA 10.6x – 3.8x
Debt / FCF -1.2x – 7.7x
Liabilities / assets 94.5% 90.1% 90.6%
Equity / assets 5.5% 9.9% 9.4%
Interest coverage 0.8x – 1.7x
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricUWMCBSBRUSB
Dividend yield 21.4% 8.7% 3.5%
Net buyback yield – – 0.7%
Shareholder yield 21.4% 8.7% 4.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 39.5%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 25.7%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 3.2%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 3.8%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusUWMCBSBRUSB
Forward P/E 7.4xFY2026 7.1xFY2026 11.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.19FY2026 $0.68FY2026 $5.17FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +58.3%FY2026 -18.1%FY2026 +11.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +26.3% +30.9% +18.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year $2.26BFY2026 $16.93BFY2026 $30.11BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -5.8%FY2026 +6.4%FY2026 +5.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +37.3% +9.6% +16.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersUWMCBSBRUSB
Held by institutions 79.7% 14.6% 81.6%
Institutions holding 290 88 2,068
Change in shares held, QoQ +31.8% +1.3% +2.1%
Institutions buying 213 52 965
Institutions selling 50 24 760
Buyers to sellers 4.26 2.17 1.27

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

UWMCBSBRUSB
UWMC 1.00 0.13 0.19
BSBR 0.13 1.00 0.28
USB 0.19 0.28 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, UWMC, BSBR and USB?

Us Bancorp \De\ (USB) is the largest by market capitalisation: UWM Holdings (UWMC) $543.42M, Banco Santander (Brasil) (BSBR) $18.49B, Us Bancorp \De\ (USB) $92.86B.

Which company is growing faster?

UWM Holdings (UWMC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: UWM Holdings (UWMC) +26.1%, Us Bancorp \De\ (USB) +6.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Us Bancorp \De\ (USB) has the highest net margin (UWM Holdings (UWMC) -1.0%, Us Bancorp \De\ (USB) 26.4%). On return on invested capital, Us Bancorp \De\ (USB) leads (UWM Holdings (UWMC) 6.3%, Us Bancorp \De\ (USB) 12.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Us Bancorp \De\ (USB) returned the most: UWM Holdings (UWMC) -76.1%, Banco Santander (Brasil) (BSBR) -11.2%, Us Bancorp \De\ (USB) +23.7%. Over five years, Us Bancorp \De\ (USB) compounded fastest (UWM Holdings (UWMC) -27.4%/yr, Banco Santander (Brasil) (BSBR) -5.1%/yr, Us Bancorp \De\ (USB) -0.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: UWM Holdings (UWMC) 0.00%, Banco Santander (Brasil) (BSBR) 0.00%, Us Bancorp \De\ (USB) 0.03%. UWM Holdings (UWMC) and Banco Santander (Brasil) (BSBR) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Us Bancorp \De\ (USB) has been the steadiest (UWM Holdings (UWMC) 79.6%, Banco Santander (Brasil) (BSBR) 38.0%, Us Bancorp \De\ (USB) 22.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, UWMC, BSBR and USB?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Us Bancorp \De\ (USB) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.