UWMC vs BSBR vs CFG Stock Comparison

UWM Holdings, Banco Santander (Brasil) and Citizens Financial Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
UWMC UWM Holdings Corp
$1.48 +18.4% 1M -73.8% 1Y
Market cap
$2.37B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$3.58B
Div. yield
20.27%
Mortgage Lending Financial Services
3 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Citizens Financial leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Citizens Financial 6, UWM Holdings 3, Banco Santander (Brasil) 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionUWMCBSBRCFGLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $2.37B $34.14B $27.70B BSBR
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -13.4x — 13.0x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 7.8x 6.7x 12.1x BSBR
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +26.1% — +10.6% UWMC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -1.0% — 23.8% CFG
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 6.3% — 12.0% CFG
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 10.6x — 2.6x CFG
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 20.27% 9.19% 2.10% UWMC
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -73.8% -18.2% +30.4% CFG
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -26.3%/yr -5.6%/yr +6.8%/yr CFG
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 80.1% 38.3% 25.1% CFG
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 35/100 — 30/100 UWMC

Percentile Scorecard

UWMCBSBRCFG

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisUWMCBSBRCFG
Valuation 19 #138 of 169 – 21 #287 of 361
Growth 16 #134 of 159 – 21 #121 of 153
Profitability 31 #101 of 146 – 28 #93 of 128
Financial Health 17 #127 of 153 33 #94 of 140 30 #99 of 140
Shareholder Returns 94 #9 of 135 99 #3 of 335 49 #172 of 335
Overall 35 – 30
  • UWMC ranked among 174 companies in Lending and Credit
  • BSBR ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • CFG ranked among 368 companies in Banking

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodUWMCBSBRCFGSPY
1 month +18.4%-19.5%+2.9% +0.7%
3 months -20.9%-9.7%-8.3% +3.7%
6 months -58.2%-22.0%+1.1% +7.1%
Year to date -66.2%-25.2%+12.6% +12.8%
1 year -73.8%-18.2%+30.4% +11.9%
3 years -69.6%-13.1%+181.1% +85.2%
3 years, per year -32.8%-4.6%+41.2% +22.8%
5 years -78.2%-25.2%+38.8% +67.6%
5 years, per year -26.3%-5.6%+6.8% +10.9%
10 years —-42.2%+149.5% +262.0%
10 years, per year —-5.3%+9.6% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureUWMCBSBRCFGSPY
Volatility, 1Y 80.1%38.3%25.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 89.7%40.3%25.4% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.471.210.87 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.92-0.481.21 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -89.5%-52.2%-59.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -75.7%-36.5%-12.0% -1.2%
52-week high $6.10$7.20$74.73 $779.14
52-week low $1.00$4.55$49.71 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleUWMCBSBRCFG
P/E now vs peer median -13.4xmedian 11.7x —median 12.2x 13.0xmedian 12.2x
P/S now vs peer median 0.7xmedian 2.7x —median 3.4x 3.1xmedian 3.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 15.1xmedian 13.1x —median 5.3x 6.6xmedian 5.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median -0.5xmedian 6.5x —median 10.8x 25.3xmedian 10.8x
P/B now vs peer median 2.4xmedian 0.7x 1.4xmedian 1.2x 1.1xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.26median 0.33 —median 1.34 2.03median 1.34

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsUWMCBSBRCFG
Revenue $3.58B – $8.93B
Net income -$104.96M – $2.27B
Free cash flow -$4.92B – $1.09B
EPS (diluted) $-0.11 – $4.99
Cash & equivalents $498.41M $5.42B –
Total debt $19.23B $15.65B $17.83B
Shares (diluted) 337.53M 3.93B 425.66M
Enterprise value $929.08M -$313.53B $27.70B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricUWMCBSBRCFG
P/E -13.4x – 13.0x
P/FCF -0.5x – 25.3x
P/Operating cash flow -0.5x – 22.0x
P/S 0.7x – 3.1x
P/B 2.4x 1.4x 1.1x
P/Tangible book -0.5x 1.9x 1.1x
EV/EBITDA 15.1x – 6.6x
EV/EBIT 17.0x – 7.0x
EV/Revenue 2.2x – 5.1x
EV/FCF -1.6x – 41.7x
EV/Operating cash flow -1.6x – 36.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.26 – 2.03

Growth

14 metrics
MetricUWMCBSBRCFG
Revenue growth (1Y) 26.1% – 10.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 27.3% – 1.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – –
Net income growth (1Y) -175.0% – 33.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -31.9% – 3.1%
EPS growth (1Y) -287.6% – 38.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -51.2% – 6.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -103.1% – -55.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -18.2% – -30.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -100.4% – -59.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -18.4% – -32.9%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricUWMCBSBRCFG
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin 14.6% – 77.7%
Operating margin – – –
Pretax margin -3.2% – 32.3%
Net margin -1.0% – 23.8%
FCF margin -137.6% – 12.2%
Operating cash flow margin -135.9% – 14.1%
Return on equity -8.1% – 8.8%
Return on assets -0.6% – 1.0%
Return on invested capital 6.3% – 12.0%
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.2x – 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 46.3x – 0.6x
Stock comp / revenue 1.6% – 1.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricUWMCBSBRCFG
Debt / assets 33.5% 6.3% 7.6%
Debt / equity 6.1x 0.6x 0.7x
Net debt / EBITDA 10.6x – 2.6x
Debt / FCF -1.2x – 16.3x
Liabilities / assets 94.5% 90.1% 89.3%
Equity / assets 5.5% 9.9% 10.7%
Interest coverage 0.8x – 1.8x
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricUWMCBSBRCFG
Dividend yield 20.3% 9.2% 2.1%
Net buyback yield – – 4.2%
Shareholder yield 20.3% 9.2% 6.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 35.0%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 72.6%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 6.7%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – -1.1%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusUWMCBSBRCFG
Forward P/E 7.8xFY2026 6.7xFY2026 12.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.19FY2026 $0.68FY2026 $5.42FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +58.3%FY2026 -18.1%FY2026 +40.4%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +26.3% +30.9% +27.1%
Revenue, next fiscal year $2.26BFY2026 $16.93BFY2026 $8.59BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -5.8%FY2026 +6.4%FY2026 +4.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +37.3% +9.6% +11.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersUWMCBSBRCFG
Held by institutions 17.0% 14.6% 96.7%
Institutions holding 291 88 1,098
Change in shares held, QoQ +31.8% +1.3% +2.9%
Institutions buying 214 52 634
Institutions selling 50 24 314
Buyers to sellers 4.28 2.17 2.02

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

UWMCBSBRCFG
UWMC 1.00 0.14 0.24
BSBR 0.14 1.00 0.33
CFG 0.24 0.33 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, UWMC, BSBR and CFG?

Banco Santander (Brasil) (BSBR) is the largest by market capitalisation: UWM Holdings (UWMC) $2.37B, Banco Santander (Brasil) (BSBR) $34.14B, Citizens Financial (CFG) $27.70B.

Which company is growing faster?

UWM Holdings (UWMC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: UWM Holdings (UWMC) +26.1%, Citizens Financial (CFG) +10.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Citizens Financial (CFG) has the highest net margin (UWM Holdings (UWMC) -1.0%, Citizens Financial (CFG) 23.8%). On return on invested capital, Citizens Financial (CFG) leads (UWM Holdings (UWMC) 6.3%, Citizens Financial (CFG) 12.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Citizens Financial (CFG) returned the most: UWM Holdings (UWMC) -73.8%, Banco Santander (Brasil) (BSBR) -18.2%, Citizens Financial (CFG) +30.4%. Over five years, Citizens Financial (CFG) compounded fastest (UWM Holdings (UWMC) -26.3%/yr, Banco Santander (Brasil) (BSBR) -5.6%/yr, Citizens Financial (CFG) +6.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

UWM Holdings (UWMC) has the highest dividend yield: UWM Holdings (UWMC) 20.27%, Banco Santander (Brasil) (BSBR) 9.19%, Citizens Financial (CFG) 2.10%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Citizens Financial (CFG) has been the steadiest (UWM Holdings (UWMC) 80.1%, Banco Santander (Brasil) (BSBR) 38.3%, Citizens Financial (CFG) 25.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, UWMC, BSBR and CFG?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Citizens Financial (CFG) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.