UWMC vs AGM vs BETR Stock Comparison

UWM Holdings, Federal Agricultural Mortgage and Better Home & Finance Holding Prices as of Nov 5, 2026 Peers: Industry group
UWMC UWM Holdings Corp
$1.63 +34.7% 1M -71.2% 1Y
Market cap
$2.61B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$3.58B
Div. yield
18.40%
Mortgage Lending Financial Services
3 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Federal Agricultural Mortgage leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Federal Agricultural Mortgage 6, UWM Holdings 3, Better Home & Finance Holding 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionUWMCAGMBETRLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $2.61B $2.16B $360.08M UWMC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -14.8x 10.8x -2.0x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 14.8x 9.2x — AGM
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +26.1% +14.7% +48.7% BETR
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -1.0% 44.9% -94.5% AGM
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 6.3% 3.6% -17.1% UWMC
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 10.6x — -5.0x BETR
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 18.40% 3.17% — UWMC
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -71.2% +16.7% -69.0% AGM
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -25.4%/yr +8.2%/yr -48.0%/yr AGM
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 80.5% 30.8% 124.0% AGM
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 35/100 43/100 18/100 AGM

Percentile Scorecard

UWMCAGMBETR

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisUWMCAGMBETR
Valuation 19 #137 of 168 30 #118 of 168 5 #159 of 168
Growth 16 #137 of 163 62 #62 of 163 72 #47 of 163
Profitability 29 #109 of 154 67 #52 of 154 6 #145 of 154
Financial Health 18 #133 of 161 8 #149 of 161 9 #147 of 161
Shareholder Returns 93 #11 of 136 51 #67 of 136 1 #135 of 136
Overall 35 43 18
  • UWMC ranked among 173 companies in Lending and Credit
  • AGM ranked among 173 companies in Lending and Credit
  • BETR ranked among 173 companies in Lending and Credit

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodUWMCAGMBETRSPY
1 month +34.7%-7.1%+69.2% -5.9%
3 months +38.1%-16.3%+14.0% -4.6%
6 months -51.8%+8.8%-37.8% +0.2%
Year to date -62.8%+13.1%-41.8% +7.5%
1 year -71.2%+16.7%-69.0% +8.2%
3 years -68.0%+23.4%-19.4% +68.3%
3 years, per year -31.6%+7.3%-7.0% +19.0%
5 years -76.9%+48.3%-96.2% +56.5%
5 years, per year -25.4%+8.2%-48.0% +9.4%
10 years —+393.7%— +251.5%
10 years, per year —+17.3%— +13.4%

Risk

MeasureUWMCAGMBETRSPY
Volatility, 1Y 80.5%30.8%124.0% 13.6%
Downside volatility, 1Y 90.5%34.0%133.7% 14.2%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.310.622.34 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.880.54-0.56 0.60
Max drawdown, 5Y -89.5%-35.8%-99.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -73.3%-17.6%-71.3% -5.9%
52-week high $6.10$241.09$66.07 $779.14
52-week low $1.00$139.00$8.12 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleUWMCAGMBETR
P/E now vs peer median -14.8xmedian 11.9x 10.8xmedian 11.9x -2.0xmedian 11.9x
P/S now vs peer median 0.7xmedian 2.7x 4.8xmedian 2.7x 1.9xmedian 2.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 15.6xmedian 12.1x —median 12.1x -8.2xmedian 12.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median -0.5xmedian 5.4x 7.0xmedian 5.4x -2.3xmedian 5.4x
P/B now vs peer median 2.7xmedian 0.7x 1.2xmedian 0.7x 6.2xmedian 0.7x
PEG now vs peer median 0.29median 0.34 1.11median 0.34 -0.06median 0.34

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsUWMCAGMBETR
Revenue $3.58B $445.56M $190.37M
Net income -$104.96M $229.00M -$179.95M
Free cash flow -$4.92B $310.06M -$156.15M
R&D – – $30.88M
EPS (diluted) $-0.11 $18.38 $-9.65
Cash & equivalents $498.41M $1.04B $102.25M
Total debt $6.02B $34.78B $653.14M
Shares (diluted) 337.53M 10.88M 18.65M
Enterprise value $1.17B -$1.49B -$195.19M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricUWMCAGMBETR
P/E -14.8x 10.8x -2.0x
P/FCF -0.5x 7.0x -2.3x
P/Operating cash flow -0.5x 7.0x -2.3x
P/S 0.7x 4.8x 1.9x
P/B 2.7x 1.2x 6.2x
P/Tangible book -0.6x 1.2x 8.9x
EV/EBITDA 15.6x – -8.2x
EV/EBIT 17.6x 23.1x -7.4x
EV/Revenue 2.3x 80.6x 4.8x
EV/FCF -1.7x 115.8x -5.8x
EV/Operating cash flow -1.7x 115.8x -5.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.29 1.11 -0.06

Growth

14 metrics
MetricUWMCAGMBETR
Revenue growth (1Y) 26.1% 14.7% 48.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 27.3% 11.7% 33.5%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – –
Net income growth (1Y) -175.0% 8.6% 10.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -31.9% 8.5% 33.4%
EPS growth (1Y) -287.6% 8.2% 26.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -51.2% 9.7% 34.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -103.1% 37.4% 32.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -18.2% -12.5% -30.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -100.4% 37.5% 32.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -18.4% -12.5% -30.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricUWMCAGMBETR
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin 14.6% – -58.2%
Operating margin – – –
Pretax margin -3.2% 62.9% -84.9%
Net margin -1.0% 44.9% -94.5%
FCF margin -137.6% 69.6% -82.0%
Operating cash flow margin -135.9% 69.6% -81.5%
Return on equity -8.1% 12.8% -541.6%
Return on assets -0.6% 0.6% -11.6%
Return on invested capital 6.3% 3.6% -17.1%
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.2x 0.0x 0.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 46.3x 1.4x 0.9x
Stock comp / revenue 1.6% 1.9% 26.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricUWMCAGMBETR
Debt / assets 33.5% 88.5% 42.3%
Debt / equity 6.1x 18.8x 11.3x
Net debt / EBITDA 10.6x – -5.0x
Debt / FCF -1.2x 112.2x -4.2x
Liabilities / assets 94.5% 95.3% 96.2%
Equity / assets 5.5% 4.7% 3.8%
Interest coverage 0.8x 1.2x -3.2x
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricUWMCAGMBETR
Dividend yield 18.4% 3.2% –
Net buyback yield – -4.2% -31.3%
Shareholder yield 18.4% -1.0% -31.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 41.2% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 30.4% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 9.4% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 9.6% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusUWMCAGMBETR
Forward P/E 14.8xFY2026 9.2xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $0.11FY2026 $21.54FY2026 $-7.36FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -8.3%FY2026 +29.3%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +81.8% +2.3% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $2.48BFY2026 $449.96MFY2026 $212.53MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +3.2%FY2026 +9.7%FY2026 +28.9%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +36.4% +28.6% +18.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersUWMCAGMBETR
Held by institutions 17.0% 74.1% 32.4%
Institutions holding 291 256 90
Change in shares held, QoQ +31.8% +1.5% +15.6%
Institutions buying 214 148 54
Institutions selling 50 71 21
Buyers to sellers 4.28 2.08 2.57

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

UWMCAGMBETR
UWMC 1.00 0.20 0.25
AGM 0.20 1.00 0.17
BETR 0.25 0.17 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, UWMC, AGM and BETR?

UWM Holdings (UWMC) is the largest by market capitalisation: UWM Holdings (UWMC) $2.61B, Federal Agricultural Mortgage (AGM) $2.16B, Better Home & Finance Holding (BETR) $360.08M.

Which company is growing faster?

Better Home & Finance Holding (BETR) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: UWM Holdings (UWMC) +26.1%, Federal Agricultural Mortgage (AGM) +14.7%, Better Home & Finance Holding (BETR) +48.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Federal Agricultural Mortgage (AGM) has the highest net margin (UWM Holdings (UWMC) -1.0%, Federal Agricultural Mortgage (AGM) 44.9%, Better Home & Finance Holding (BETR) -94.5%). On return on invested capital, UWM Holdings (UWMC) leads (UWM Holdings (UWMC) 6.3%, Federal Agricultural Mortgage (AGM) 3.6%, Better Home & Finance Holding (BETR) -17.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Federal Agricultural Mortgage (AGM) returned the most: UWM Holdings (UWMC) -71.2%, Federal Agricultural Mortgage (AGM) +16.7%, Better Home & Finance Holding (BETR) -69.0%. Over five years, Federal Agricultural Mortgage (AGM) compounded fastest (UWM Holdings (UWMC) -25.4%/yr, Federal Agricultural Mortgage (AGM) +8.2%/yr, Better Home & Finance Holding (BETR) -48.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

UWM Holdings (UWMC) has the highest dividend yield: UWM Holdings (UWMC) 18.40%, Federal Agricultural Mortgage (AGM) 3.17%. Better Home & Finance Holding (BETR) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Federal Agricultural Mortgage (AGM) has been the steadiest (UWM Holdings (UWMC) 80.5%, Federal Agricultural Mortgage (AGM) 30.8%, Better Home & Finance Holding (BETR) 124.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, UWMC, AGM and BETR?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Federal Agricultural Mortgage (AGM) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.