USB vs UWMC vs GS Stock Comparison

Us Bancorp \De\, UWM Holdings and Goldman Sachs Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (HSBC) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
USB Us Bancorp \De\
$59.75 +0.7% 1M +25.0% 1Y
Market cap
$92.54B
P/E
11.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$29.58B
Div. yield
0.03%
Money Center Banks Financial Services
7 wins
UWMC UWM Holdings Corp
$1.55 +26.0% 1M -73.5% 1Y
Market cap
$511.35M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$3.58B
Div. yield
–
Mortgage Lending Financial Services
2 wins
GS Goldman Sachs Group Inc
$912.08 -2.5% 1M +15.5% 1Y
Market cap
$277.57B
P/E
13.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$69.70B
Div. yield
–
Money Center Banks Financial Services
2 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Us Bancorp \De\ leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Us Bancorp \De\ 7, Goldman Sachs 2, UWM Holdings 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionUSBUWMCGSLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $92.54B $511.35M $277.57B GS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 11.9x -13.8x 13.0x USB
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 11.6x 8.2x 12.1x UWMC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +6.7% +26.1% +18.7% UWMC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 26.4% -1.0% — USB
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 12.6% 6.3% — USB
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 3.8x 10.6x — USB
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.03% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +25.0% -73.5% +15.5% USB
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -0.4%/yr -25.6%/yr +17.1%/yr GS
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 22.2% 80.1% 31.9% USB
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 48/100 36/100 47/100 USB

Percentile Scorecard

USBUWMCGS

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisUSBUWMCGS
Valuation 42 #210 of 360 20 #136 of 169 18 #294 of 360
Growth 50 #97 of 191 16 #135 of 160 96 #8 of 191
Profitability 80 #34 of 168 32 #102 of 149 –
Financial Health 12 #154 of 175 18 #130 of 158 –
Shareholder Returns 54 #156 of 341 95 #8 of 136 27 #251 of 341
Overall 48 36 47
  • USB ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • UWMC ranked among 174 companies in Lending and Credit
  • GS ranked among 368 companies in Banking

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodUSBUWMCGSSPY
1 month +0.7%+26.0%-2.5% -0.2%
3 months -7.3%-17.1%-11.7% +3.9%
6 months +6.3%-57.5%-1.6% +8.2%
Year to date +12.0%-64.6%+3.8% +12.9%
1 year +25.0%-73.5%+15.5% +12.3%
3 years +95.0%-68.9%+214.6% +87.4%
3 years, per year +25.0%-32.3%+46.6% +23.3%
5 years -1.9%-77.1%+119.9% +67.9%
5 years, per year -0.4%-25.6%+17.1% +10.9%
10 years +33.7%—+413.1% +261.1%
10 years, per year +2.9%—+17.8% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureUSBUWMCGSSPY
Volatility, 1Y 22.2%80.1%31.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 23.2%89.8%32.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.611.481.63 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.13-0.920.48 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -54.7%-89.5%-34.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -8.7%-74.6%-20.8% -1.2%
52-week high $65.41$6.10$1,152.07 $779.14
52-week low $45.47$1.00$773.70 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleUSBUWMCGS
P/E now vs peer median 11.9xmedian 12.1x -14.1xmedian 11.1x 12.8xmedian 12.1x
P/S now vs peer median 3.1xmedian 3.4x 0.7xmedian 2.6x 3.8xmedian 3.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 7.5xmedian 5.0x 15.3xmedian 13.5x —median 5.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 7.4xmedian 10.9x -0.5xmedian 7.0x -6.4xmedian 10.9x
P/B now vs peer median 1.4xmedian 1.2x 2.5xmedian 0.7x 2.1xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.98median 1.34 0.28median 0.32 0.26median 1.34

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsUSBUWMCGS
Revenue $29.58B $3.58B $69.70B
Net income $8.17B -$104.96M –
Free cash flow $12.53B -$4.92B –
EPS (diluted) $5.01 $-0.11 $69.89
Cash & equivalents – $498.41M $177.00B
Total debt $96.01B $19.23B –
Shares (diluted) 1.56B 337.53M 304.90M
Enterprise value $92.54B -$1.79B $277.57B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricUSBUWMCGS
P/E 11.9x -14.1x 12.8x
P/FCF 7.4x -0.5x -6.4x
P/Operating cash flow 7.4x -0.5x –
P/S 3.1x 0.7x 3.8x
P/B 1.4x 2.5x 2.1x
P/Tangible book 1.5x -0.6x 2.1x
EV/EBITDA 7.5x 15.3x –
EV/EBIT 7.8x 17.3x –
EV/Revenue 6.4x 2.2x 3.8x
EV/FCF 15.1x -1.6x –
EV/Operating cash flow 15.1x -1.6x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.98 0.28 0.26

Growth

14 metrics
MetricUSBUWMCGS
Revenue growth (1Y) 6.7% 26.1% 18.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 3.2% 27.3% 15.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – –
Net income growth (1Y) 18.4% -175.0% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 12.1% -31.9% –
EPS growth (1Y) 19.9% -287.6% 39.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 12.2% -51.2% 49.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 68.8% -103.1% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -4.9% -18.2% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 68.8% -100.4% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -4.9% -18.4% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricUSBUWMCGS
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin 85.2% 14.6% –
Operating margin – – –
Pretax margin 34.5% -3.2% –
Net margin 26.4% -1.0% –
FCF margin 42.3% -137.6% –
Operating cash flow margin 42.3% -135.9% –
Return on equity 12.2% -8.1% –
Return on assets 1.1% -0.6% –
Return on invested capital 12.6% 6.3% –
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.0x 0.2x 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.5x 46.3x –
Stock comp / revenue – 1.6% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricUSBUWMCGS
Debt / assets 13.2% 33.5% –
Debt / equity 1.4x 6.1x –
Net debt / EBITDA 3.8x 10.6x –
Debt / FCF 7.7x -1.2x –
Liabilities / assets 90.6% 94.5% 94.3%
Equity / assets 9.4% 5.5% 5.7%
Interest coverage 1.7x 0.8x –
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricUSBUWMCGS
Dividend yield 3.5% 19.4% 2.0%
Net buyback yield 0.7% – –
Shareholder yield 4.2% 19.4% 2.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) 39.5% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 25.7% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) 3.2% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 3.8% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusUSBUWMCGS
Forward P/E 11.6xFY2026 8.2xFY2026 12.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $5.17FY2026 $0.19FY2026 $75.07FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +11.9%FY2026 +58.3%FY2026 +46.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +18.8% +26.3% -6.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year $30.11BFY2026 $2.26BFY2026 $68.80BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +5.1%FY2026 -5.8%FY2026 +18.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +16.7% +37.3% +4.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersUSBUWMCGS
Held by institutions 81.6% 17.0% 72.1%
Institutions holding 2,068 290 3,149
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.1% +31.8% +1.1%
Institutions buying 965 213 1,552
Institutions selling 760 50 1,124
Buyers to sellers 1.27 4.26 1.38

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

USBUWMCGS
USB 1.00 0.19 0.48
UWMC 0.19 1.00 0.18
GS 0.48 0.18 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, USB, UWMC and GS?

Goldman Sachs (GS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Us Bancorp \De\ (USB) $92.54B, UWM Holdings (UWMC) $511.35M, Goldman Sachs (GS) $277.57B.

Which stock is cheaper, USB, UWMC and GS?

Us Bancorp \De\ (USB) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Us Bancorp \De\ (USB) 11.9x, UWM Holdings (UWMC) -13.8x, Goldman Sachs (GS) 13.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, UWM Holdings (UWMC) is cheapest (Us Bancorp \De\ (USB) 11.6x, UWM Holdings (UWMC) 8.2x, Goldman Sachs (GS) 12.1x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

UWM Holdings (UWMC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Us Bancorp \De\ (USB) +6.7%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) +26.1%, Goldman Sachs (GS) +18.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Us Bancorp \De\ (USB) has the highest net margin (Us Bancorp \De\ (USB) 26.4%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) -1.0%). On return on invested capital, Us Bancorp \De\ (USB) leads (Us Bancorp \De\ (USB) 12.6%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) 6.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Us Bancorp \De\ (USB) returned the most: Us Bancorp \De\ (USB) +25.0%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) -73.5%, Goldman Sachs (GS) +15.5%. Over five years, Goldman Sachs (GS) compounded fastest (Us Bancorp \De\ (USB) -0.4%/yr, UWM Holdings (UWMC) -25.6%/yr, Goldman Sachs (GS) +17.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Us Bancorp \De\ (USB) 0.03%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) 0.00%, Goldman Sachs (GS) 0.00%. UWM Holdings (UWMC) and Goldman Sachs (GS) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Us Bancorp \De\ (USB) has been the steadiest (Us Bancorp \De\ (USB) 22.2%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) 80.1%, Goldman Sachs (GS) 31.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, USB, UWMC and GS?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Us Bancorp \De\ (USB) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.