URG vs NNE vs ISOU Stock Comparison

Ur-Energy, Nano Nuclear Energy and IsoEnergy Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
URG Ur-Energy Inc
$0.89 -20.5% 1M -46.7% 1Y
Market cap
$338.27M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$35.08M
Div. yield
–
Uranium Energy
2 wins
ISOU IsoEnergy Ltd.
$8.82 -5.5% 1M -10.9% 1Y
Market cap
$437.63M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$2.13M
Div. yield
–
Uranium Energy
4 wins

Head to Head

7 decided of 12

IsoEnergy leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (IsoEnergy 4, Ur-Energy 2, Nano Nuclear Energy 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionURGNNEISOULeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $338.27M $601.19M $437.63M NNE
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -3.8x — -32.4x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -20.5% — +35.8% ISOU
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -252.3% — -631.9% URG
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -46.7% -74.5% -10.9% ISOU
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -12.6%/yr — -9.6%/yr ISOU
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 71.2% 88.9% 75.3% URG
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 21/100 — 52/100 ISOU

Percentile Scorecard

URGNNEISOU

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisURGNNEISOU
Valuation 5 #22 of 23 – 36 #15 of 23
Growth 35 #14 of 21 – 85 #4 of 21
Profitability 12 #16 of 18 – 18 #15 of 18
Financial Health 19 #18 of 22 – 76 #6 of 22
Shareholder Returns 33 #7 of 10 – 44 #6 of 10
Overall 21 – 52
  • URG ranked among 25 companies in Coal and Uranium
  • NNE ranked among 25 companies in Coal and Uranium
  • ISOU ranked among 25 companies in Coal and Uranium

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodURGNNEISOUSPY
1 month -20.5%-22.7%-5.5% +0.7%
3 months -28.8%-26.8%-9.5% +3.7%
6 months -50.3%-47.8%-26.4% +7.1%
Year to date -36.0%-49.1%-3.1% +12.8%
1 year -46.7%-74.5%-10.9% +11.9%
3 years -43.7%—-14.9% +85.2%
3 years, per year -17.4%—-5.2% +22.8%
5 years -48.9%—-39.8% +67.6%
5 years, per year -12.6%—-9.6% +10.9%
10 years +72.8%—— +262.0%
10 years, per year +5.6%—— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureURGNNEISOUSPY
Volatility, 1Y 71.2%88.9%75.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 73.6%87.4%77.6% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.534.113.04 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.66-0.84-0.14 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -73.3%-79.1%-76.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -57.6%-74.5%-33.3% -1.2%
52-week high $2.10$47.83$13.22 $779.14
52-week low $0.81$11.86$7.47 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleURGNNEISOU
P/E now vs peer median -4.0xmedian 27.1x —median 27.1x -33.4xmedian 27.1x
P/S now vs peer median 10.1xmedian 7.3x 131.7xmedian 7.3x 227.0xmedian 7.3x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -3.7xmedian 29.1x —median 29.1x -32.5xmedian 29.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median -3.4xmedian 10.3x —median 10.3x -28.1xmedian 10.3x
P/B now vs peer median 5.1xmedian 1.2x —median 1.2x 1.3xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.08median 50.94 —median 50.94 —median 50.94

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsURGNNEISOU
Revenue $35.08M – $2.13M
Gross profit $3.87M – –
Operating income -$76.55M – -$11.51M
Net income -$88.51M – -$9.04M
Free cash flow -$104.46M – -$17.23M
EPS (diluted) $-0.22 – $-0.26
Cash & equivalents $95.25M $298.47M $86.47M
Shares (diluted) 397.45M 52.35M 51.67M
Enterprise value -$56.47M -$688.54M $11.81M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricURGNNEISOU
P/E -4.0x – -33.4x
P/FCF -3.4x – -28.1x
P/Operating cash flow -5.7x – –
P/S 10.1x 131.7x 227.0x
P/B 5.1x – 1.3x
P/Tangible book 5.1x – 1.3x
EV/EBITDA -3.7x – -32.5x
EV/EBIT -3.4x – -32.0x
EV/Revenue 7.4x – 172.3x
EV/FCF -2.5x – -21.3x
EV/Operating cash flow -4.1x – –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.08 – –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricURGNNEISOU
Revenue growth (1Y) -20.5% – 35.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 75.5% – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 139.4% – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 37.5% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) -14.3% – 45.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -52.2% – –
Net income growth (1Y) -47.7% – 55.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -262.2% – –
EPS growth (1Y) -35.6% – 38.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -48.9% – –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -12.1% – –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -55.2% – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -45.8% – -3.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -78.2% – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricURGNNEISOU
Gross margin 11.0% – –
EBITDA margin -197.0% – -529.6%
Operating margin -218.2% – -539.3%
Pretax margin -231.0% – -534.7%
Net margin -252.3% – -631.9%
FCF margin -297.8% – -807.0%
Operating cash flow margin -177.7% – –
Return on equity -106.7% – -3.7%
Return on assets -28.8% – -3.6%
Return on invested capital – – –
Return on capital employed -30.5% – –
Asset turnover 0.1x – 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.7x – –
Stock comp / revenue 7.3% – 303.7%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricURGNNEISOU
Debt / assets – – –
Debt / equity – – –
Net debt / EBITDA – – –
Debt / FCF – – –
Liabilities / assets 74.5% – 3.6%
Equity / assets 25.5% – 96.4%
Interest coverage -10.8x – -117.8x
Current ratio 4.0x – –
Quick ratio 3.2x – –
Cash ratio 3.2x – –
Altman Z-score -1.54 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricURGNNEISOU
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield -13.2% – -12.9%
Shareholder yield -13.2% – -12.9%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusURGNNEISOU
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.17FY2026 $-0.76FY2026 $-0.18FY2026
Revenue, next fiscal year $69.48MFY2026 $1.84MFY2026 $0.00FY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +155.3%FY2026 – –
Revenue growth, the year after +69.4% +313.6% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersURGNNEISOU
Held by institutions 69.8% 42.6% 31.8%
Institutions holding 163 237 48
Change in shares held, QoQ +13.9% -0.8% +25.1%
Institutions buying 104 128 32
Institutions selling 32 55 11
Buyers to sellers 3.25 2.33 2.91

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

URGNNEISOU
URG 1.00 0.57 0.68
NNE 0.57 1.00 0.62
ISOU 0.68 0.62 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, URG, NNE and ISOU?

Nano Nuclear Energy (NNE) is the largest by market capitalisation: Ur-Energy (URG) $338.27M, Nano Nuclear Energy (NNE) $601.19M, IsoEnergy (ISOU) $437.63M.

Which company is growing faster?

IsoEnergy (ISOU) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Ur-Energy (URG) -20.5%, IsoEnergy (ISOU) +35.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Ur-Energy (URG) has the highest net margin (Ur-Energy (URG) -252.3%, IsoEnergy (ISOU) -631.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year IsoEnergy (ISOU) returned the most: Ur-Energy (URG) -46.7%, Nano Nuclear Energy (NNE) -74.5%, IsoEnergy (ISOU) -10.9%. Over five years, IsoEnergy (ISOU) compounded fastest (Ur-Energy (URG) -12.6%/yr, IsoEnergy (ISOU) -9.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Ur-Energy (URG) has been the steadiest (Ur-Energy (URG) 71.2%, Nano Nuclear Energy (NNE) 88.9%, IsoEnergy (ISOU) 75.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, URG, NNE and ISOU?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, IsoEnergy (ISOU) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.