UL vs MKC vs GIS Stock Comparison

Unilever, Mccormick and General Mills Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (CAG) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
UL Unilever Plc
$66.22 +6.5% 1M -5.5% 1Y
Market cap
$143.34B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$64.28B
Div. yield
–
Packaged Foods Consumer Staples
4 wins
MKC Mccormick & Co Inc
$48.13 -2.0% 1M -28.6% 1Y
Market cap
$12.93B
P/E
8.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.69B
Div. yield
0.04%
Packaged Foods Consumer Staples
5 wins
GIS General Mills Inc
$34.36 -4.1% 1M -28.3% 1Y
Market cap
$18.09B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$18.30B
Div. yield
0.07%
Packaged Foods Consumer Staples
2 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Mccormick leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Mccormick 5, Unilever 4, General Mills 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionULMKCGISLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $143.34B $12.93B $18.09B UL
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only — 8.7x -20.2x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 19.3x 16.4x 10.8x GIS
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -2.6% +13.2% -4.5% MKC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 19.4% -4.9% MKC
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 6.0% -1.0% MKC
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 3.6x 37.7x MKC
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.04% 0.07% GIS
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -5.5% -28.6% -28.3% UL
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +1.9%/yr -9.8%/yr -11.3%/yr UL
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 24.9% 31.4% 30.2% UL
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 19/100 72/100 31/100 MKC

Percentile Scorecard

ULMKCGIS

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisULMKCGIS
Valuation 0 #45 of 45 61 #18 of 45 39 #28 of 45
Growth – 83 #8 of 42 2 #41 of 42
Profitability – 92 #4 of 40 44 #23 of 40
Financial Health 41 #28 of 47 52 #23 of 47 17 #39 of 47
Shareholder Returns 17 #26 of 31 70 #10 of 31 53 #15 of 31
Overall 19 72 31
  • UL ranked among 48 companies in Branded Foods
  • MKC ranked among 48 companies in Branded Foods
  • GIS ranked among 48 companies in Branded Foods

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodULMKCGISSPY
1 month +6.5%-2.0%-4.1% -1.0%
3 months +8.6%-3.6%-4.6% +2.9%
6 months +13.9%-6.6%-1.7% +6.4%
Year to date +1.3%-29.3%-26.1% +11.4%
1 year -5.5%-28.6%-28.3% +13.1%
3 years +21.3%-22.7%-46.0% +79.4%
3 years, per year +6.6%-8.2%-18.6% +21.5%
5 years +9.6%-40.4%-45.2% +67.7%
5 years, per year +1.9%-9.8%-11.3% +10.9%
10 years +38.4%+2.9%-43.4% +255.2%
10 years, per year +3.3%+0.3%-5.5% +13.5%

Risk

MeasureULMKCGISSPY
Volatility, 1Y 24.9%31.4%30.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 24.3%34.4%30.9% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.03-0.34-0.36 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.22-0.91-0.94 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -26.2%-57.7%-65.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -11.2%-32.8%-29.9% -2.5%
52-week high $74.59$71.65$49.01 $779.14
52-week low $55.05$44.15$31.66 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleULMKCGIS
P/E now vs peer median —median 20.7x 8.7xmedian 20.7x -20.6xmedian 20.7x
P/S now vs peer median 2.2xmedian 0.7x 1.7xmedian 0.7x 1.0xmedian 0.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 12.4x 13.5xmedian 12.4x 90.2xmedian 12.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 14.0x 14.0xmedian 14.0x 11.9xmedian 14.0x
P/B now vs peer median 7.8xmedian 1.5x 1.7xmedian 1.5x 2.5xmedian 1.5x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.42 0.27median 0.42 0.61median 0.42

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsULMKCGIS
Revenue $64.28B $7.69B $18.30B
Gross profit – $3.00B $6.15B
Operating income – $1.03B -$206.40M
Net income – $1.51B -$893.70M
Free cash flow – $925.90M $1.55B
EPS (diluted) – $5.53 $-1.66
Cash & equivalents $5.40B $331.10M $433.10M
Total debt $112.81B $5.02B $55.73B
Shares (diluted) 2.20B 269.40M 537.90M
Enterprise value $94.79B $12.00B $15.74B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricULMKCGIS
P/E – 8.7x -20.6x
P/FCF – 14.0x 11.9x
P/Operating cash flow – 11.4x 8.9x
P/S 2.2x 1.7x 1.0x
P/B 7.8x 1.7x 2.5x
P/Tangible book -92.6x 4.9x 24.4x
EV/EBITDA – 13.5x 90.2x
EV/EBIT – 17.1x -152.9x
EV/Revenue 2.5x 2.3x 1.7x
EV/FCF – 19.1x 20.4x
EV/Operating cash flow – 15.5x 15.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.27 0.61

Growth

14 metrics
MetricULMKCGIS
Revenue growth (1Y) -2.6% 13.2% -4.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 147.1% 5.2% -3.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 15.7% -6.5%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 7.4% -3.6%
Operating income growth (1Y) – -3.2% -104.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 3.5% -27.3%
Net income growth (1Y) – 93.3% -130.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 32.7% -33.2%
EPS growth (1Y) – 91.5% -130.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 32.2% -33.9%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 29.8% -23.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 2.4% -9.3%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 41.3% -26.3%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 5.9% -8.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricULMKCGIS
Gross margin – 39.1% 33.6%
EBITDA margin – 17.0% 1.9%
Operating margin – 13.4% -1.1%
Pretax margin – 10.8% -3.8%
Net margin – 19.4% -4.9%
FCF margin – 12.0% 8.5%
Operating cash flow margin – 14.8% 11.3%
Return on equity – 19.0% -12.0%
Return on assets – 8.7% -3.0%
Return on invested capital – 6.0% -1.0%
Return on capital employed – 8.5% -0.9%
Asset turnover 0.8x 0.5x 0.6x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 0.8x -2.3x
Stock comp / revenue – 0.6% 0.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricULMKCGIS
Debt / assets 31.2% 30.1% 45.0%
Debt / equity 1.5x 0.7x 1.8x
Net debt / EBITDA – 3.6x 37.7x
Debt / FCF – 5.4x 8.8x
Liabilities / assets 79.0% 54.4% 75.3%
Equity / assets 21.0% 45.6% 24.7%
Interest coverage – 4.6x –
Current ratio 0.7x 0.7x 0.7x
Quick ratio 0.7x 0.3x 0.3x
Cash ratio 0.4x 0.1x 0.1x
Altman Z-score – 1.82 1.94

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricULMKCGIS
Dividend yield 3.2% 4.0% 7.1%
Net buyback yield – -0.1% –
Shareholder yield 3.2% 3.9% 7.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 33.6% -147.1%
Payout ratio (FCF) – 54.8% 85.0%
Dividend growth (1Y) – 6.9% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 7.1% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusULMKCGIS
Forward P/E 19.3xFY2026 16.4xFY2026 10.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $3.44FY2026 $2.93FY2026 $3.19FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -6.0%FY2026 -2.3%FY2026 -10.1%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +8.1% +11.9% -4.7%
Revenue, next fiscal year $55.09BFY2026 $7.53BFY2026 $18.94BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -8.2%FY2026 +10.1%FY2026 +2.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +7.7% +12.6% -11.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersULMKCGIS
Held by institutions 11.8% 88.9% 87.2%
Institutions holding 1,190 948 1,331
Change in shares held, QoQ +7.2% +4.8% +3.7%
Institutions buying 576 478 724
Institutions selling 440 342 427
Buyers to sellers 1.31 1.40 1.70

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ULMKCGIS
UL 1.00 0.46 0.46
MKC 0.46 1.00 0.59
GIS 0.46 0.59 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, UL, MKC and GIS?

Unilever (UL) is the largest by market capitalisation: Unilever (UL) $143.34B, Mccormick (MKC) $12.93B, General Mills (GIS) $18.09B.

Which company is growing faster?

Mccormick (MKC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Unilever (UL) -2.6%, Mccormick (MKC) +13.2%, General Mills (GIS) -4.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Mccormick (MKC) has the highest net margin (Mccormick (MKC) 19.4%, General Mills (GIS) -4.9%). On return on invested capital, Mccormick (MKC) leads (Mccormick (MKC) 6.0%, General Mills (GIS) -1.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Unilever (UL) returned the most: Unilever (UL) -5.5%, Mccormick (MKC) -28.6%, General Mills (GIS) -28.3%. Over five years, Unilever (UL) compounded fastest (Unilever (UL) +1.9%/yr, Mccormick (MKC) -9.8%/yr, General Mills (GIS) -11.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

General Mills (GIS) has the highest dividend yield: Unilever (UL) 0.00%, Mccormick (MKC) 0.04%, General Mills (GIS) 0.07%. Unilever (UL) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Unilever (UL) has been the steadiest (Unilever (UL) 24.9%, Mccormick (MKC) 31.4%, General Mills (GIS) 30.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, UL, MKC and GIS?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Mccormick (MKC) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.