UHAL vs WW vs BLNK Stock Comparison

U-Haul Holding, Ww International and Blink Charging Prices as of Nov 4, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (FLYE) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
UHAL U-Haul Holding Co /NV/
$60.84 -0.5% 1M +13.5% 1Y
Market cap
$11.92B
P/E
86.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$6.09B
Div. yield
–
Car Rental Consumer Discretionary
7 wins
WW Ww International, Inc.
$12.13 -18.4% 1M -60.9% 1Y
Market cap
$121.26M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Personal Services Consumer Discretionary
BLNK Blink Charging Co.
$0.45 -18.2% 1M -69.6% 1Y
Market cap
$64.70M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$96.55M
Div. yield
–
EV Charging Industrials
2 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

U-Haul Holding leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (U-Haul Holding 7, Blink Charging 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionUHALWWBLNKLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $11.92B $121.26M $64.70M UHAL
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 86.6x — -1.3x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 52.4x — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +3.0% — -5.9% UHAL
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 2.3% — -52.5% UHAL
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 1.9% — -100.0% UHAL
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 4.0x — 0.8x BLNK
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +13.5% -60.9% -69.6% UHAL
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -4.3%/yr — -57.3%/yr UHAL
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 34.5% 95.2% 82.2% UHAL
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 38/100 — 56/100 BLNK

Percentile Scorecard

UHALWWBLNK

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisUHALWWBLNK
Valuation 46 #16 of 29 – 39 #39 of 63
Growth 16 #22 of 26 – 90 #7 of 60
Profitability 44 #15 of 26 – 43 #33 of 57
Financial Health 72 #9 of 30 39 #25 of 40 54 #34 of 72
Shareholder Returns 11 #17 of 19 – –
Overall 38 – 56
  • UHAL ranked among 31 companies in Travel and Lodging
  • WW ranked among 40 companies in Consumer Services
  • BLNK ranked among 72 companies in Clean Energy Equipment

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodUHALWWBLNKSPY
1 month -0.5%-18.4%-18.2% -1.0%
3 months -18.0%-21.3%-18.2% -0.4%
6 months +16.8%+2.8%-47.7% +4.5%
Year to date +20.7%-58.5%-32.8% +12.4%
1 year +13.5%-60.9%-69.6% +13.6%
3 years +15.6%—-83.5% +76.4%
3 years, per year +5.0%—-45.1% +20.8%
5 years -19.9%—-98.6% +63.7%
5 years, per year -4.3%—-57.3% +10.4%
10 years +92.8%—-96.9% +267.7%
10 years, per year +6.8%—-29.3% +13.9%

Risk

MeasureUHALWWBLNKSPY
Volatility, 1Y 34.5%95.2%82.2% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 34.9%98.8%81.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.802.413.03 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.39-0.64-0.85 1.06
Max drawdown, 5Y -46.2%-79.7%-99.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -19.1%-64.8%-72.6% -1.6%
52-week high $75.25$34.43$1.64 $779.14
52-week low $42.19$9.12$0.38 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleUHALWWBLNK
P/E now vs peer median 86.6xmedian 23.3x —median 12.6x -1.3xmedian 26.4x
P/S now vs peer median 2.0xmedian 1.5x —median 1.1x 0.7xmedian 2.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 10.8xmedian 15.4x —median 8.5x -0.7xmedian 19.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median -9.7xmedian 17.8x —median 11.1x -5.0xmedian 29.9x
P/B now vs peer median 1.6xmedian 2.5x 0.4xmedian 1.9x 1.4xmedian 1.8x
PEG now vs peer median -1.16median 0.36 —median 0.29 -0.03median 0.71

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsUHALWWBLNK
Revenue $6.09B – $96.55M
Gross profit $5.85B – $28.68M
Operating income $425.80M – -$51.16M
Net income $137.66M – -$48.32M
Free cash flow -$1.23B – -$12.82M
EPS (diluted) $0.70 – $-0.35
Cash & equivalents $1.10B $160.28M $34.00M
Total debt $8.11B $465.47M $265.00K
Shares (diluted) 196.08M 9.99M 144.26M
Enterprise value $7.43B -$586.10M -$69.97M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricUHALWWBLNK
P/E 86.6x – -1.3x
P/FCF -9.7x – -5.0x
P/Operating cash flow 6.5x – -11.4x
P/S 2.0x – 0.7x
P/B 1.6x 0.4x 1.4x
P/Tangible book 1.6x -0.7x 1.5x
EV/EBITDA 10.8x – -0.7x
EV/EBIT 44.4x – -0.6x
EV/Revenue 3.1x – 0.3x
EV/FCF -15.3x – -2.4x
EV/Operating cash flow 10.4x – -5.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -1.16 – -0.03

Growth

14 metrics
MetricUHALWWBLNK
Revenue growth (1Y) 3.0% – -5.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 1.6% – 0.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 3.0% – 12.9%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 1.6% – 0.7%
Operating income growth (1Y) -36.2% – 76.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -31.9% – 25.7%
Net income growth (1Y) -56.2% – 77.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -45.3% – 27.2%
EPS growth (1Y) -56.2% – 83.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -74.6% – 44.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 14.2% – 88.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 5.8% – 63.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 31.7% – 76.6%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 1.9% – 53.2%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricUHALWWBLNK
Gross margin 96.0% – 29.7%
EBITDA margin 28.7% – -43.6%
Operating margin 7.0% – -53.0%
Pretax margin 3.2% – -49.8%
Net margin 2.3% – -52.5%
FCF margin -20.3% – -13.3%
Operating cash flow margin 30.0% – -5.9%
Return on equity 1.8% – -99.5%
Return on assets 0.6% – -39.7%
Return on invested capital 1.9% – -100.0%
Return on capital employed – – -76.4%
Asset turnover 0.3x – 0.8x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 13.3x – 0.1x
Stock comp / revenue – – 3.1%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricUHALWWBLNK
Debt / assets 37.4% 49.2% 0.2%
Debt / equity 1.1x 1.5x 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA 4.0x – 0.8x
Debt / FCF -6.6x – 0.0x
Liabilities / assets 64.6% 66.4% 60.9%
Equity / assets 35.4% 33.6% 39.1%
Interest coverage 1.1x – –
Current ratio – 1.7x 1.2x
Quick ratio – 1.4x 0.9x
Cash ratio – 1.3x 0.6x
Altman Z-score – – -9.58

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricUHALWWBLNK
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield 0.2% – –
Shareholder yield 0.2% 0.0% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusUHALWWBLNK
Forward P/E 52.4xFY2026 – –
EPS, next fiscal year $1.16FY2026 $-3.38FY2026 $-0.21FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +383.3%FY2026 – –
EPS growth, the year after +71.6% – –
Revenue, next fiscal year $6.63BFY2026 $656.64MFY2026 $90.27MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +9.7%FY2026 -7.6%FY2026 -12.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -2.5% -9.3% +20.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersUHALWWBLNK
Held by institutions 4.6% 77.9% 12.1%
Institutions holding 228 78 114
Change in shares held, QoQ +24.0% +8.1% -26.4%
Institutions buying 129 35 38
Institutions selling 50 17 27
Buyers to sellers 2.58 2.06 1.41

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

UHALWWBLNK
UHAL 1.00 0.12 0.23
WW 0.12 1.00 0.28
BLNK 0.23 0.28 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, UHAL, WW and BLNK?

U-Haul Holding (UHAL) is the largest by market capitalisation: U-Haul Holding (UHAL) $11.92B, Ww International (WW) $121.26M, Blink Charging (BLNK) $64.70M.

Which company is growing faster?

U-Haul Holding (UHAL) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: U-Haul Holding (UHAL) +3.0%, Blink Charging (BLNK) -5.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

U-Haul Holding (UHAL) has the highest net margin (U-Haul Holding (UHAL) 2.3%, Blink Charging (BLNK) -52.5%). On return on invested capital, U-Haul Holding (UHAL) leads (U-Haul Holding (UHAL) 1.9%, Blink Charging (BLNK) -100.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year U-Haul Holding (UHAL) returned the most: U-Haul Holding (UHAL) +13.5%, Ww International (WW) -60.9%, Blink Charging (BLNK) -69.6%. Over five years, U-Haul Holding (UHAL) compounded fastest (U-Haul Holding (UHAL) -4.3%/yr, Blink Charging (BLNK) -57.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, U-Haul Holding (UHAL) has been the steadiest (U-Haul Holding (UHAL) 34.5%, Ww International (WW) 95.2%, Blink Charging (BLNK) 82.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, UHAL, WW and BLNK?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, U-Haul Holding (UHAL) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.