UBER vs GRAB vs DASH Stock Comparison

Uber Technologies, Grab Holdings and DoorDash Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (LYFT) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
UBER Uber Technologies, Inc
$66.67 -4.0% 1M -29.5% 1Y
Market cap
$134.60B
P/E
14.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$55.23B
Div. yield
–
Ride-Hailing and Delivery Technology
8 wins
GRAB Grab Holdings Ltd
$2.79 -12.8% 1M -51.2% 1Y
Market cap
$11.05B
P/E
19.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.73B
Div. yield
–
Ride-Hailing and Delivery Technology
2 wins
DASH DoorDash, Inc.
$179.38 -5.2% 1M -29.5% 1Y
Market cap
$73.02B
P/E
86.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$15.89B
Div. yield
–
Ride-Hailing and Delivery Technology
1 win

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Uber Technologies leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Uber Technologies 8, Grab Holdings 2, DoorDash 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionUBERGRABDASHLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $134.60B $11.05B $73.02B UBER
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 14.1x 19.3x 86.8x UBER
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 19.1x 17.4x 64.5x GRAB
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +16.7% +21.5% +33.6% DASH
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 17.3% 15.3% 5.3% UBER
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 17.4% 1.5% — UBER
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.0x -6.5x — GRAB
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -29.5% -51.2% -29.5% UBER
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +7.9%/yr -24.0%/yr -3.5%/yr UBER
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 35.4% 38.9% 49.6% UBER
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 67/100 56/100 54/100 UBER

Percentile Scorecard

UBERGRABDASH

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisUBERGRABDASH
Valuation 60 #67 of 167 46 #91 of 167 26 #124 of 167
Growth 86 #23 of 153 81 #30 of 153 83 #27 of 153
Profitability 78 #34 of 153 45 #84 of 153 63 #58 of 153
Financial Health 48 #94 of 179 51 #89 of 179 57 #77 of 179
Shareholder Returns 63 #35 of 94 – 43 #54 of 94
Overall 67 56 54
  • UBER ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms
  • GRAB ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms
  • DASH ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodUBERGRABDASHSPY
1 month -4.0%-12.8%-5.2% -1.0%
3 months +1.1%-15.7%+3.7% +2.9%
6 months -10.7%-28.5%+1.5% +6.4%
Year to date -18.4%-44.1%-20.8% +11.4%
1 year -29.5%-51.2%-29.5% +13.1%
3 years +50.9%-14.9%+134.9% +79.4%
3 years, per year +14.7%-5.3%+33.0% +21.5%
5 years +46.5%-74.6%-16.1% +67.7%
5 years, per year +7.9%-24.0%-3.5% +10.9%

Risk

MeasureUBERGRABDASHSPY
Volatility, 1Y 35.4%38.9%49.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 35.4%39.5%52.9% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.831.431.43 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.83-1.32-0.60 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -56.6%-86.5%-82.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -33.1%-54.4%-32.6% -2.5%
52-week high $99.72$6.12$266.06 $779.14
52-week low $65.95$2.79$146.60 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleUBERGRABDASH
P/E now vs peer median 14.2xmedian 17.5x 20.0xmedian 17.5x 92.7xmedian 17.5x
P/S now vs peer median 2.5xmedian 1.4x 3.0xmedian 1.4x 4.9xmedian 1.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 19.2xmedian 14.9x 27.4xmedian 14.9x 40.3xmedian 14.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median 13.4xmedian 11.2x 57.4xmedian 11.2x 29.9xmedian 11.2x
P/B now vs peer median 4.8xmedian 1.7x 1.6xmedian 1.7x 7.8xmedian 1.7x
PEG now vs peer median 0.07median 0.42 —median 0.42 2.48median 0.42

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsUBERGRABDASH
Revenue $55.23B $3.73B $15.89B
Gross profit $23.36B $1.63B $8.17B
Operating income $6.70B $120.00M $712.00M
Net income $9.67B $525.00M $841.00M
Free cash flow $10.12B $193.00M $2.60B
R&D $3.74B $417.00M $1.71B
EPS (diluted) $4.67 $0.14 $1.91
Cash & equivalents $4.87B $2.86B $4.42B
Total debt $12.72B $2.99B –
Shares (diluted) 2.05B 4.21B 439.35M
Enterprise value $106.40B -$4.08B $52.39B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricUBERGRABDASH
P/E 14.2x 20.0x 92.7x
P/FCF 13.4x 57.4x 29.9x
P/Operating cash flow 13.0x 85.2x 27.5x
P/S 2.5x 3.0x 4.9x
P/B 4.8x 1.6x 7.8x
P/Tangible book 5.0x 1.6x 9.8x
EV/EBITDA 19.2x 27.4x 40.3x
EV/EBIT 21.4x 74.5x 101.6x
EV/Revenue 2.6x 2.4x 4.6x
EV/FCF 14.2x 46.3x 27.9x
EV/Operating cash flow 13.8x 68.8x 25.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.07 – 2.48

Growth

14 metrics
MetricUBERGRABDASH
Revenue growth (1Y) 16.7% 21.5% 33.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 16.4% 23.6% 27.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 24.4% 23.6% 37.3%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 19.3% 69.9% 32.2%
Operating income growth (1Y) 48.6% 340.0% 31.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 139.2% 28.7% 38.8%
Net income growth (1Y) -23.4% 837.5% 7.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 203.6% 35.1% 38.6%
EPS growth (1Y) -21.3% 82.0% 7.4%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 203.6% – 37.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 18.6% -82.1% 29.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 73.8% 34.4% 40.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 18.5% -76.7% 30.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 79.7% 40.6% 45.2%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricUBERGRABDASH
Gross margin 42.3% 43.6% 51.4%
EBITDA margin 13.5% 8.7% 11.3%
Operating margin 12.1% 3.2% 4.5%
Pretax margin 12.1% 13.9% 5.5%
Net margin 17.3% 15.3% 5.3%
FCF margin 18.3% 5.2% 16.3%
Operating cash flow margin 18.9% 3.5% 17.8%
Return on equity 35.9% 7.9% 8.3%
Return on assets 15.4% 4.2% 4.3%
Return on invested capital 17.4% 1.5% –
Return on capital employed 14.0% 1.7% 5.3%
Asset turnover 0.9x 0.3x 0.8x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.1x 0.2x 3.4x
Stock comp / revenue 3.5% 6.4% 7.0%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricUBERGRABDASH
Debt / assets 19.3% 15.1% –
Debt / equity 0.5x 0.3x –
Net debt / EBITDA 1.0x -6.5x –
Debt / FCF 1.3x 10.5x –
Liabilities / assets 57.1% 49.7% 49.3%
Equity / assets 42.9% 50.3% 50.7%
Interest coverage 14.5x 1.1x –
Current ratio 0.8x 1.5x 1.4x
Quick ratio 0.7x 0.8x 1.1x
Cash ratio 0.4x 0.8x 0.9x
Altman Z-score 3.13 -0.24 5.55

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricUBERGRABDASH
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield 5.0% – 1.3%
Shareholder yield 5.0% – 1.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusUBERGRABDASH
Forward P/E 19.1xFY2026 17.4xFY2026 64.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $3.49FY2026 $0.16FY2026 $2.78FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -26.2%FY2026 +166.7%FY2026 +30.5%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +20.6% +12.5% +79.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $61.46BFY2026 $4.07BFY2026 $18.88BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +18.2%FY2026 +20.9%FY2026 +37.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +15.9% +33.7% +11.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersUBERGRABDASH
Held by institutions 82.5% 75.6% 88.2%
Institutions holding 2,410 483 1,043
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.3% +0.9% +7.4%
Institutions buying 1,184 231 578
Institutions selling 976 168 349
Buyers to sellers 1.21 1.38 1.66

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

UBERGRABDASH
UBER 1.00 0.43 0.48
GRAB 0.43 1.00 0.37
DASH 0.48 0.37 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, UBER, GRAB and DASH?

Uber Technologies (UBER) is the largest by market capitalisation: Uber Technologies (UBER) $134.60B, Grab Holdings (GRAB) $11.05B, DoorDash (DASH) $73.02B.

Which stock is cheaper, UBER, GRAB and DASH?

Uber Technologies (UBER) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Uber Technologies (UBER) 14.1x, Grab Holdings (GRAB) 19.3x, DoorDash (DASH) 86.8x). On next year's consensus earnings, Grab Holdings (GRAB) is cheapest (Uber Technologies (UBER) 19.1x, Grab Holdings (GRAB) 17.4x, DoorDash (DASH) 64.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

DoorDash (DASH) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Uber Technologies (UBER) +16.7%, Grab Holdings (GRAB) +21.5%, DoorDash (DASH) +33.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Uber Technologies (UBER) has the highest net margin (Uber Technologies (UBER) 17.3%, Grab Holdings (GRAB) 15.3%, DoorDash (DASH) 5.3%). On return on invested capital, Uber Technologies (UBER) leads (Uber Technologies (UBER) 17.4%, Grab Holdings (GRAB) 1.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Uber Technologies (UBER) returned the most: Uber Technologies (UBER) -29.5%, Grab Holdings (GRAB) -51.2%, DoorDash (DASH) -29.5%. Over five years, Uber Technologies (UBER) compounded fastest (Uber Technologies (UBER) +7.9%/yr, Grab Holdings (GRAB) -24.0%/yr, DoorDash (DASH) -3.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Uber Technologies (UBER) has been the steadiest (Uber Technologies (UBER) 35.4%, Grab Holdings (GRAB) 38.9%, DoorDash (DASH) 49.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, UBER, GRAB and DASH?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Uber Technologies (UBER) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.