U vs FIS vs QTWO Stock Comparison

Unity Software, Fidelity National Information Services and Q2 Holdings Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (FIG) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
U Unity Software Inc.
$39.24 -1.2% 1M +5.7% 1Y
Market cap
$16.49B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$2.03B
Div. yield
–
Developer Tools Technology
QTWO Q2 Holdings, Inc.
$65.27 +18.5% 1M +6.8% 1Y
Market cap
$4.17B
P/E
37.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$870.26M
Div. yield
–
Digital Banking Technology
4 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Fidelity National Information Services leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Fidelity National Information Services 7, Q2 Holdings 4). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionUFISQTWOLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $16.49B $19.85B $4.17B FIS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -28.1x 5.9x 37.8x FIS
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 5.9x 23.6x FIS
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +14.0% +18.3% +13.1% FIS
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -29.0% 27.6% 12.7% FIS
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -17.2% 3.9% 15.7% QTWO
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 13.2x 4.9x — FIS
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.04% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +5.7% -39.4% +6.8% QTWO
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -23.7%/yr -19.6%/yr -3.6%/yr QTWO
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 74.7% 34.2% 44.7% FIS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 47/100 69/100 74/100 QTWO

Percentile Scorecard

UFISQTWO

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisUFISQTWO
Valuation 59 #51 of 124 97 #4 of 101 62 #38 of 99
Growth 41 #67 of 113 84 #16 of 97 87 #13 of 94
Profitability 49 #56 of 109 66 #32 of 93 88 #12 of 90
Financial Health 52 #62 of 127 21 #86 of 108 75 #27 of 105
Shareholder Returns 36 #41 of 63 74 #17 of 63 59 #25 of 60
Overall 47 69 74
  • U ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • FIS ranked among 114 companies in Business Applications
  • QTWO ranked among 109 companies in Fintech

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodUFISQTWOSPY
1 month -1.2%+11.8%+18.5% +0.7%
3 months +17.8%-19.0%+10.5% +3.7%
6 months +48.5%-19.9%+28.6% +7.1%
Year to date -11.2%-43.9%-9.5% +12.8%
1 year +5.7%-39.4%+6.8% +11.9%
3 years +56.5%-23.0%+123.9% +85.2%
3 years, per year +16.1%-8.3%+30.8% +22.8%
5 years -74.1%-66.3%-16.8% +67.6%
5 years, per year -23.7%-19.6%-3.6% +10.9%
10 years —-49.9%+131.0% +262.0%
10 years, per year —-6.7%+8.7% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureUFISQTWOSPY
Volatility, 1Y 74.7%34.2%44.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 81.2%36.7%42.4% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.180.260.31 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.08-1.150.15 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -93.1%-73.4%-76.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -20.7%-44.8%-13.5% -1.2%
52-week high $49.47$67.54$75.49 $779.14
52-week low $17.13$32.43$42.09 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleUFISQTWO
P/E now vs peer median -29.2xmedian 39.0x 5.7xmedian 28.0x 36.8xmedian 19.5x
P/S now vs peer median 8.5xmedian 4.6x 1.6xmedian 2.8x 4.6xmedian 2.2x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -114.2xmedian 32.7x 9.5xmedian 16.9x 22.6xmedian 17.8x
P/FCF now vs peer median 32.1xmedian 27.4x 6.8xmedian 15.9x 17.3xmedian 16.1x
P/B now vs peer median 5.7xmedian 3.2x 1.2xmedian 3.2x 6.1xmedian 2.0x
PEG now vs peer median -1.49median 1.23 0.19median 0.89 0.76median 0.98

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsUFISQTWO
Revenue $2.03B $12.20B $870.26M
Gross profit $1.32B $4.39B $508.24M
Operating income -$616.00M $1.92B $107.85M
Net income -$588.01M $3.38B $110.16M
Free cash flow $538.39M $2.82B $232.99M
R&D $1.03B – $164.98M
EPS (diluted) $-1.34 $6.52 $1.73
Cash & equivalents $2.35B $744.00M $116.31M
Total debt $557.17M $21.17B –
Shares (diluted) 437.90M 517.00M 63.53M
Enterprise value $8.04B $17.18B $3.13B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricUFISQTWO
P/E -29.2x 5.7x 36.8x
P/FCF 32.1x 6.8x 17.3x
P/Operating cash flow 31.2x 6.5x 16.4x
P/S 8.5x 1.6x 4.6x
P/B 5.7x 1.2x 6.1x
P/Tangible book 6.0x 1.6x 6.9x
EV/EBITDA -114.2x 9.5x 22.6x
EV/EBIT -25.1x 20.7x 36.2x
EV/Revenue 7.6x 3.3x 4.5x
EV/FCF 28.7x 14.1x 16.8x
EV/Operating cash flow 27.9x 13.3x 15.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -1.49 0.19 0.76

Growth

14 metrics
MetricUFISQTWO
Revenue growth (1Y) 14.0% 18.3% 13.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 3.9% 7.7% 12.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -0.6% 15.9% 23.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 2.1% 7.2% 20.9%
Operating income growth (1Y) -23.8% 10.2% 402.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 13.7% 10.6% 45.4%
Net income growth (1Y) -35.5% 2,836% 247.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 15.8% 28.9% 50.1%
EPS growth (1Y) -29.1% 2,957% 281.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 19.7% 29.3% 48.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 45.5% 31.6% 35.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 110.7% 85.1% 46.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 51.7% 32.4% 33.5%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 83.0% 100.7% 48.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricUFISQTWO
Gross margin 64.9% 35.9% 58.4%
EBITDA margin -6.7% 34.3% 19.9%
Operating margin -30.4% 15.7% 12.4%
Pretax margin -29.0% 11.1% 13.4%
Net margin -29.0% 27.6% 12.7%
FCF margin 26.5% 23.1% 26.8%
Operating cash flow margin 27.3% 24.4% 28.2%
Return on equity -19.5% 21.1% 16.9%
Return on assets -8.9% 7.7% 11.2%
Return on invested capital -17.2% 3.9% 15.7%
Return on capital employed -12.3% 5.6% 15.2%
Asset turnover 0.3x 0.3x 0.9x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -0.9x 0.9x 2.2x
Stock comp / revenue 16.9% 1.5% 9.3%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricUFISQTWO
Debt / assets 8.4% 48.0% –
Debt / equity 0.2x 1.3x –
Net debt / EBITDA 13.2x 4.9x –
Debt / FCF 1.0x 7.5x –
Liabilities / assets 54.4% 63.6% 34.5%
Equity / assets 45.6% 36.4% 65.5%
Interest coverage -25.5x 3.2x 26.8x
Current ratio 2.0x 0.5x 1.0x
Quick ratio 1.9x 0.4x 0.8x
Cash ratio 1.5x 0.1x 0.4x
Altman Z-score 2.20 0.05 7.48

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricUFISQTWO
Dividend yield – 4.6% –
Net buyback yield -0.6% 3.7% 3.9%
Shareholder yield -0.6% 8.4% 3.9%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 25.9% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 31.0% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 6.3% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusUFISQTWO
Forward P/E – 5.9xFY2026 23.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.70FY2026 $6.37FY2026 $2.77FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +10.8%FY2026 +8.6%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +6.8% +30.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $2.13BFY2026 $12.98BFY2026 $850.92MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +15.3%FY2026 +21.5%FY2026 +7.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +30.9% +4.6% +17.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersUFISQTWO
Held by institutions 84.7% 98.7% 100.0%
Institutions holding 559 857 329
Change in shares held, QoQ +8.0% +3.5% +4.9%
Institutions buying 307 415 180
Institutions selling 161 332 109
Buyers to sellers 1.91 1.25 1.65

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

UFISQTWO
U 1.00 0.26 0.26
FIS 0.26 1.00 0.54
QTWO 0.26 0.54 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, U, FIS and QTWO?

Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Unity Software (U) $16.49B, Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) $19.85B, Q2 Holdings (QTWO) $4.17B.

Which stock is cheaper, U, FIS and QTWO?

Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Unity Software (U) -28.1x, Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) 5.9x, Q2 Holdings (QTWO) 37.8x). On next year's consensus earnings, Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) is cheapest (Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) 5.9x, Q2 Holdings (QTWO) 23.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Unity Software (U) +14.0%, Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) +18.3%, Q2 Holdings (QTWO) +13.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) has the highest net margin (Unity Software (U) -29.0%, Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) 27.6%, Q2 Holdings (QTWO) 12.7%). On return on invested capital, Q2 Holdings (QTWO) leads (Unity Software (U) -17.2%, Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) 3.9%, Q2 Holdings (QTWO) 15.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Q2 Holdings (QTWO) returned the most: Unity Software (U) +5.7%, Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) -39.4%, Q2 Holdings (QTWO) +6.8%. Over five years, Q2 Holdings (QTWO) compounded fastest (Unity Software (U) -23.7%/yr, Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) -19.6%/yr, Q2 Holdings (QTWO) -3.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Unity Software (U) 0.00%, Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) 0.04%, Q2 Holdings (QTWO) 0.00%. Unity Software (U) and Q2 Holdings (QTWO) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) has been the steadiest (Unity Software (U) 74.7%, Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) 34.2%, Q2 Holdings (QTWO) 44.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, U, FIS and QTWO?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.