TXN vs NXPI vs UMC Stock Comparison

Texas Instruments, NXP Semiconductors and United Microelectronics Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
TXN Texas Instruments Inc
$284.69 +4.4% 1M +65.3% 1Y
Market cap
$272.29B
P/E
38.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$20.77B
Div. yield
–
Semiconductor Manufacturing Technology
4 wins
NXPI NXP Semiconductors N.V.
$234.92 -0.2% 1M +6.4% 1Y
Market cap
$62.07B
P/E
20.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$13.19B
Div. yield
0.02%
Semiconductor Manufacturing Technology
1 win
UMC United Microelectronics Corp
$18.87 -23.6% 1M +150.9% 1Y
Market cap
$46.91B
P/E
17.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$13.76B
Div. yield
–
Semiconductor Manufacturing Technology
6 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

United Microelectronics leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (United Microelectronics 6, Texas Instruments 4, NXP Semiconductors 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionTXNNXPIUMCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $272.29B $62.07B $46.91B TXN
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 38.5x 20.9x 17.8x UMC
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 35.3x 15.0x 17.0x NXPI
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +20.3% +8.8% +85.6% UMC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 34.1% 22.6% 19.1% TXN
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 22.9% 14.8% 10.6% TXN
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.5x 1.6x -0.9x UMC
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.02% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +65.3% +6.4% +150.9% UMC
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +7.4%/yr +3.3%/yr +13.0%/yr UMC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 41.6% 47.6% 64.4% TXN
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 69/100 55/100 72/100 UMC

Percentile Scorecard

TXNNXPIUMC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisTXNNXPIUMC
Valuation 57 #41 of 95 78 #22 of 95 83 #17 of 95
Growth 72 #27 of 93 47 #50 of 93 59 #39 of 93
Profitability 98 #3 of 91 80 #19 of 91 72 #26 of 91
Financial Health 44 #58 of 102 5 #97 of 102 55 #46 of 102
Shareholder Returns 75 #20 of 76 64 #28 of 76 91 #8 of 76
Overall 69 55 72
  • TXN ranked among 104 companies in Semiconductors
  • NXPI ranked among 104 companies in Semiconductors
  • UMC ranked among 104 companies in Semiconductors

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodTXNNXPIUMCSPY
1 month +4.4%-0.2%-23.6% -1.0%
3 months +1.8%-12.7%-3.2% +2.9%
6 months +2.7%-3.7%+53.7% +6.4%
Year to date +64.1%+8.2%+140.1% +11.4%
1 year +65.3%+6.4%+150.9% +13.1%
3 years +93.8%+27.9%+153.6% +79.4%
3 years, per year +24.7%+8.6%+36.4% +21.5%
5 years +43.0%+17.5%+84.1% +67.7%
5 years, per year +7.4%+3.3%+13.0% +10.9%
10 years +306.9%+131.0%+920.0% +255.2%
10 years, per year +15.1%+8.7%+26.1% +13.5%

Risk

MeasureTXNNXPIUMCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 41.6%47.6%64.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 35.3%41.8%56.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.441.731.77 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.570.142.34 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -33.9%-47.2%-57.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -14.3%-29.4%-32.6% -2.5%
52-week high $332.28$332.67$28.01 $779.14
52-week low $153.33$184.19$7.02 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleTXNNXPIUMC
P/E now vs peer median 36.8xmedian 41.5x 19.9xmedian 41.5x 17.5xmedian 41.5x
P/S now vs peer median 12.5xmedian 6.9x 4.5xmedian 6.9x 3.5xmedian 6.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 24.8xmedian 27.3x 13.4xmedian 27.3x 12.6xmedian 27.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 35.5xmedian 35.6x 21.1xmedian 35.6x 24.0xmedian 35.6x
P/B now vs peer median 13.6xmedian 4.2x 5.0xmedian 4.2x 3.4xmedian 4.2x
PEG now vs peer median -248.05median 2.31 5.97median 2.31 25.61median 2.31

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsTXNNXPIUMC
Revenue $20.77B $13.19B $13.76B
Gross profit $12.51B $7.38B $2.47B
Operating income $8.47B $4.21B $1.60B
Net income $7.11B $3.03B $2.62B
Free cash flow $7.32B $2.81B $1.98B
R&D $2.10B $2.43B $609.13M
EPS (diluted) $7.68 $11.71 $1.07
Cash & equivalents $4.21B $3.22B $3.91B
Total debt $13.56B $10.98B $4.90B
Shares (diluted) 921.00M 254.02M 2.47B
Enterprise value $247.16B $48.42B $32.16B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricTXNNXPIUMC
P/E 36.8x 19.9x 17.5x
P/FCF 35.5x 21.1x 24.0x
P/Operating cash flow 26.3x 18.9x 13.5x
P/S 12.5x 4.5x 3.5x
P/B 13.6x 5.0x 3.4x
P/Tangible book 13.8x 5.7x 3.4x
EV/EBITDA 24.8x 13.4x 12.6x
EV/EBIT 31.4x 15.9x 27.8x
EV/Revenue 12.8x 5.1x 3.2x
EV/FCF 36.3x 23.9x 22.4x
EV/Operating cash flow 26.8x 21.4x 12.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -248.05 5.97 25.61

Growth

14 metrics
MetricTXNNXPIUMC
Revenue growth (1Y) 20.3% 8.8% 85.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 4.7% 0.0% 18.5%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 26.0% 10.8% 11.3%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 2.3% -0.6% -10.1%
Operating income growth (1Y) 42.8% 37.0% 9.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 2.0% 4.0% -16.5%
Net income growth (1Y) 41.0% 38.4% 104.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 0.1% 2.5% -0.2%
EPS growth (1Y) 39.9% 38.4% 116.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -0.1% 3.3% 0.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 43.5% 24.5% 17.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 14.8% -4.6% -3.7%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 251.8% 42.0% 447.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 64.4% 2.0% -7.5%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricTXNNXPIUMC
Gross margin 60.2% 56.0% 18.0%
EBITDA margin 51.7% 37.9% 25.6%
Operating margin 40.8% 32.0% 11.6%
Pretax margin 39.1% 28.9% 30.3%
Net margin 34.1% 22.6% 19.1%
FCF margin 35.2% 21.3% 14.4%
Operating cash flow margin 47.7% 23.7% 25.6%
Return on equity 38.3% 26.3% 19.7%
Return on assets 19.6% 11.3% 13.2%
Return on invested capital 22.9% 14.8% 10.6%
Return on capital employed 25.4% 18.2% 9.7%
Asset turnover 0.6x 0.5x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.4x 1.0x 1.3x
Stock comp / revenue 2.0% 3.3% 0.1%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricTXNNXPIUMC
Debt / assets 36.8% 41.2% 3.5%
Debt / equity 0.7x 0.9x 0.1x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.5x 1.6x -0.9x
Debt / FCF 1.9x 3.9x 0.4x
Liabilities / assets 47.9% 55.9% 33.3%
Equity / assets 52.1% 44.1% 66.7%
Interest coverage 15.0x – 30.3x
Current ratio 5.6x 2.0x 2.2x
Quick ratio 3.6x 1.2x 1.6x
Cash ratio 2.7x 0.9x 1.2x
Altman Z-score 12.68 3.58 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricTXNNXPIUMC
Dividend yield 2.0% 1.7% 2.1%
Net buyback yield -0.1% 0.9% –
Shareholder yield 1.9% 2.6% 2.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 33.7% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 36.4% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – -1.0% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 3.3% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusTXNNXPIUMC
Forward P/E 35.3xFY2026 15.0xFY2026 17.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $8.07FY2026 $15.65FY2026 $1.11FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +48.1%FY2026 +32.5%FY2026 +109.4%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +20.6% +19.3% -2.7%
Revenue, next fiscal year $22.56BFY2026 $13.39BFY2026 $8.57BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +27.6%FY2026 +9.1%FY2026 +12.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +4.9% +23.5% +25.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersTXNNXPIUMC
Held by institutions 89.1% 95.1% 7.1%
Institutions holding 2,863 1,253 362
Change in shares held, QoQ +3.6% +1.9% +3.2%
Institutions buying 1,584 663 220
Institutions selling 942 416 109
Buyers to sellers 1.68 1.59 2.02

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

TXNNXPIUMC
TXN 1.00 0.70 0.31
NXPI 0.70 1.00 0.39
UMC 0.31 0.39 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, TXN, NXPI and UMC?

Texas Instruments (TXN) is the largest by market capitalisation: Texas Instruments (TXN) $272.29B, NXP Semiconductors (NXPI) $62.07B, United Microelectronics (UMC) $46.91B.

Which stock is cheaper, TXN, NXPI and UMC?

United Microelectronics (UMC) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Texas Instruments (TXN) 38.5x, NXP Semiconductors (NXPI) 20.9x, United Microelectronics (UMC) 17.8x). On next year's consensus earnings, NXP Semiconductors (NXPI) is cheapest (Texas Instruments (TXN) 35.3x, NXP Semiconductors (NXPI) 15.0x, United Microelectronics (UMC) 17.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

United Microelectronics (UMC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Texas Instruments (TXN) +20.3%, NXP Semiconductors (NXPI) +8.8%, United Microelectronics (UMC) +85.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Texas Instruments (TXN) has the highest net margin (Texas Instruments (TXN) 34.1%, NXP Semiconductors (NXPI) 22.6%, United Microelectronics (UMC) 19.1%). On return on invested capital, Texas Instruments (TXN) leads (Texas Instruments (TXN) 22.9%, NXP Semiconductors (NXPI) 14.8%, United Microelectronics (UMC) 10.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year United Microelectronics (UMC) returned the most: Texas Instruments (TXN) +65.3%, NXP Semiconductors (NXPI) +6.4%, United Microelectronics (UMC) +150.9%. Over five years, United Microelectronics (UMC) compounded fastest (Texas Instruments (TXN) +7.4%/yr, NXP Semiconductors (NXPI) +3.3%/yr, United Microelectronics (UMC) +13.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Texas Instruments (TXN) 0.00%, NXP Semiconductors (NXPI) 0.02%, United Microelectronics (UMC) 0.00%. Texas Instruments (TXN) and United Microelectronics (UMC) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Texas Instruments (TXN) has been the steadiest (Texas Instruments (TXN) 41.6%, NXP Semiconductors (NXPI) 47.6%, United Microelectronics (UMC) 64.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, TXN, NXPI and UMC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, United Microelectronics (UMC) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.