TXN vs MU Stock Comparison

Texas Instruments and Micron Technology Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
TXN Texas Instruments Inc
$284.69 +4.4% 1M +65.3% 1Y
Market cap
$272.29B
P/E
38.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$20.77B
Div. yield
–
Semiconductor Manufacturing Technology
1 win
MU Micron Technology Inc
$877.55 -18.1% 1M +324.5% 1Y
Market cap
$1.02T
P/E
12.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$133.19B
Div. yield
0.00%
Semiconductor Manufacturing Technology
10 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Micron Technology leads on 10 of the 12 questions below (Micron Technology 10, Texas Instruments 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionTXNMULeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $272.29B $1.02T MU
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 38.5x 12.0x MU
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 35.3x 4.8x MU
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +20.3% +256.3% MU
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 34.1% 63.8% MU
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 22.9% 67.7% MU
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.5x -0.4x MU
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +65.3% +324.5% MU
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +7.4%/yr +67.1%/yr MU
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 41.6% 80.8% TXN
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 69/100 88/100 MU

Percentile Scorecard

TXNMU

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisTXNMU
Valuation 57 #41 of 95 87 #13 of 95
Growth 72 #27 of 93 100 #1 of 93
Profitability 98 #3 of 91 100 #1 of 91
Financial Health 44 #58 of 102 73 #28 of 102
Shareholder Returns 75 #20 of 76 77 #18 of 76
Overall 69 88
  • TXN ranked among 104 companies in Semiconductors
  • MU ranked among 104 companies in Semiconductors

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodTXNMUSPY
1 month +4.4%-18.1% -1.0%
3 months +1.8%-4.7% +2.9%
6 months +2.7%+76.7% +6.4%
Year to date +64.1%+207.5% +11.4%
1 year +65.3%+324.5% +13.1%
3 years +93.8%+1,189.2% +79.4%
3 years, per year +24.7%+134.6% +21.5%
5 years +43.0%+1,199.9% +67.7%
5 years, per year +7.4%+67.1% +10.9%
10 years +306.9%+5,080.3% +255.2%
10 years, per year +15.1%+48.4% +13.5%

Risk

MeasureTXNMUSPY
Volatility, 1Y 41.6%80.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 35.3%74.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.443.34 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.574.02 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -33.9%-57.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -14.3%-27.7% -2.5%
52-week high $332.28$1,213.56 $779.14
52-week low $153.33$201.37 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleTXNMU
P/E now vs peer median 36.8xmedian 41.5x 11.6xmedian 41.5x
P/S now vs peer median 12.5xmedian 6.9x 7.5xmedian 6.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 24.8xmedian 27.3x 8.8xmedian 27.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 35.5xmedian 35.6x 16.8xmedian 35.6x
P/B now vs peer median 13.6xmedian 4.2x 7.2xmedian 4.2x
PEG now vs peer median -248.05median 2.31 0.08median 2.31

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsTXNMU
Revenue $20.77B $133.19B
Gross profit $12.51B $107.50B
Operating income $8.47B $99.34B
Net income $7.11B $84.97B
Free cash flow $7.32B $58.96B
R&D $2.10B $5.65B
EPS (diluted) $7.68 $74.34
Cash & equivalents $4.21B $38.36B
Total debt $13.56B $5.18B
Shares (diluted) 921.00M 1.14B
Enterprise value $247.16B $922.69B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricTXNMU
P/E 36.8x 11.6x
P/FCF 35.5x 16.8x
P/Operating cash flow 26.3x 11.1x
P/S 12.5x 7.5x
P/B 13.6x 7.2x
P/Tangible book 13.8x 7.2x
EV/EBITDA 24.8x 8.8x
EV/EBIT 31.4x 9.6x
EV/Revenue 12.8x 7.2x
EV/FCF 36.3x 16.2x
EV/Operating cash flow 26.8x 10.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -248.05 0.08

Growth

14 metrics
MetricTXNMU
Revenue growth (1Y) 20.3% 256.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 4.7% 104.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 26.0% 622.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 2.3% 327.1%
Operating income growth (1Y) 42.8% 916.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 2.0% 168.2%
Net income growth (1Y) 41.0% 895.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 0.1% 154.9%
EPS growth (1Y) 39.9% 879.4%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -0.1% 151.6%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 43.5% 411.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 14.8% 286.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 251.8% 3,435%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 64.4% 126.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricTXNMU
Gross margin 60.2% 80.7%
EBITDA margin 51.7% 81.7%
Operating margin 40.8% 74.6%
Pretax margin 39.1% 74.8%
Net margin 34.1% 63.8%
FCF margin 35.2% 44.3%
Operating cash flow margin 47.7% 67.3%
Return on equity 38.3% 71.0%
Return on assets 19.6% 51.5%
Return on invested capital 22.9% 67.7%
Return on capital employed 25.4% 72.2%
Asset turnover 0.6x 0.8x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.4x 1.1x
Stock comp / revenue 2.0% 1.0%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricTXNMU
Debt / assets 36.8% 2.6%
Debt / equity 0.7x 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.5x -0.4x
Debt / FCF 1.9x 0.1x
Liabilities / assets 47.9% 29.4%
Equity / assets 52.1% 70.6%
Interest coverage 15.0x 937.2x
Current ratio 5.6x 3.3x
Quick ratio 3.6x 2.9x
Cash ratio 2.7x 1.6x
Altman Z-score 12.68 14.04

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricTXNMU
Dividend yield 2.0% 0.1%
Net buyback yield -0.1% 0.1%
Shareholder yield 1.9% 0.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 0.7%
Payout ratio (FCF) – 1.0%
Dividend growth (1Y) – 16.9%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 6.6%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusTXNMU
Forward P/E 35.3xFY2026 4.8xFY2027
EPS, next fiscal year $8.07FY2026 $184.06FY2027
EPS growth, next FY +48.1%FY2026 +143.7%FY2027
EPS growth, the year after +20.6% +17.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $22.56BFY2026 $294.65BFY2027
Revenue growth, next FY +27.6%FY2026 +121.2%FY2027
Revenue growth, the year after +4.9% +15.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersTXNMU
Held by institutions 89.1% 77.9%
Institutions holding 2,863 3,898
Change in shares held, QoQ +3.6% +4.2%
Institutions buying 1,584 2,302
Institutions selling 942 1,431
Buyers to sellers 1.68 1.61

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

TXNMU
TXN 1.00 0.46
MU 0.46 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, TXN and MU?

Micron Technology (MU) is the largest by market capitalisation: Texas Instruments (TXN) $272.29B, Micron Technology (MU) $1.02T.

Which stock is cheaper, TXN and MU?

Micron Technology (MU) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Texas Instruments (TXN) 38.5x, Micron Technology (MU) 12.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Micron Technology (MU) is cheapest (Texas Instruments (TXN) 35.3x, Micron Technology (MU) 4.8x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Micron Technology (MU) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Texas Instruments (TXN) +20.3%, Micron Technology (MU) +256.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Micron Technology (MU) has the highest net margin (Texas Instruments (TXN) 34.1%, Micron Technology (MU) 63.8%). On return on invested capital, Micron Technology (MU) leads (Texas Instruments (TXN) 22.9%, Micron Technology (MU) 67.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Micron Technology (MU) returned the most: Texas Instruments (TXN) +65.3%, Micron Technology (MU) +324.5%. Over five years, Micron Technology (MU) compounded fastest (Texas Instruments (TXN) +7.4%/yr, Micron Technology (MU) +67.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Texas Instruments (TXN) 0.00%, Micron Technology (MU) 0.00%. Texas Instruments (TXN) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Texas Instruments (TXN) has been the steadiest (Texas Instruments (TXN) 41.6%, Micron Technology (MU) 80.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Do TXN and MU move together?

Their daily returns over the past year have a correlation of 0.46, a moderate positive relationship. Holding both diversifies more than two closely linked stocks would.

Which is the better stock, TXN and MU?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Micron Technology (MU) leads on 10. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.