TXG vs ILMN vs DHR Stock Comparison

10x Genomics, Illumina and Danaher Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (TECH) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
TXG 10x Genomics, Inc.
$83.62 -5.5% 1M +526.8% 1Y
Market cap
$10.89B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$616.91M
Div. yield
–
Life Sciences Tools Healthcare
1 win
ILMN Illumina, Inc.
$288.79 +6.2% 1M +195.3% 1Y
Market cap
$43.61B
P/E
52.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.49B
Div. yield
–
Life Sciences Tools Healthcare
5 wins
DHR Danaher Corp /De/
$234.09 +2.9% 1M +7.9% 1Y
Market cap
$164.54B
P/E
41.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$25.11B
Div. yield
0.65%
Life Sciences Tools Healthcare
5 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Danaher leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Danaher 5, Illumina 5, 10x Genomics 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionTXGILMNDHRLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $10.89B $43.61B $164.54B DHR
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -144.7x 52.9x 41.2x DHR
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 57.9x 25.7x DHR
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -4.3% +4.9% +4.6% ILMN
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -12.2% 18.4% 15.9% ILMN
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 15.1% 5.7% ILMN
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 0.7x 2.9x ILMN
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — — 0.65% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +526.8% +195.3% +7.9% TXG
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -12.3%/yr -6.5%/yr -5.6%/yr DHR
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 74.2% 50.4% 30.6% DHR
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 61/100 65/100 60/100 ILMN

Percentile Scorecard

TXGILMNDHR

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisTXGILMNDHR
Valuation 44 #128 of 227 50 #115 of 227 69 #72 of 227
Growth 66 #76 of 219 46 #119 of 219 22 #172 of 219
Profitability 62 #78 of 205 97 #8 of 205 88 #26 of 205
Financial Health 68 #77 of 237 51 #116 of 237 46 #129 of 237
Shareholder Returns 68 #44 of 135 83 #24 of 135 75 #34 of 135
Overall 61 65 60
  • TXG ranked among 247 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics
  • ILMN ranked among 247 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics
  • DHR ranked among 247 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodTXGILMNDHRSPY
1 month -5.5%+6.2%+2.9% +0.9%
3 months +80.5%+48.2%+19.1% +5.9%
6 months +314.0%+139.9%+30.9% +8.5%
Year to date +412.7%+120.2%+2.3% +13.3%
1 year +526.8%+195.3%+7.9% +12.4%
3 years +129.7%+171.8%+24.6% +88.1%
3 years, per year +32.0%+39.6%+7.6% +23.5%
5 years -48.1%-28.5%-24.9% +68.2%
5 years, per year -12.3%-6.5%-5.6% +11.0%
10 years —+114.2%+199.4% +263.4%
10 years, per year —+7.9%+11.6% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureTXGILMNDHRSPY
Volatility, 1Y 74.2%50.4%30.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 66.3%39.0%31.7% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.240.830.45 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 7.103.880.26 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -96.1%-82.9%-50.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -14.4%-1.7%-3.3% -0.9%
52-week high $97.74$293.69$242.05 $779.14
52-week low $12.44$95.03$161.91 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleTXGILMNDHR
P/E now vs peer median -144.7xmedian 28.8x 52.9xmedian 28.8x 41.2xmedian 28.8x
P/S now vs peer median 17.7xmedian 3.0x 9.7xmedian 3.0x 6.6xmedian 3.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -244.2xmedian 17.4x 38.5xmedian 17.4x 24.4xmedian 17.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median 89.7xmedian 25.7x 46.8xmedian 25.7x 30.1xmedian 25.7x
P/B now vs peer median 13.2xmedian 2.4x 15.4xmedian 2.4x 3.1xmedian 2.4x
PEG now vs peer median -5.39median 1.03 1.75median 1.03 -3.29median 1.03

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsTXGILMNDHR
Revenue $616.91M $4.49B $25.11B
Gross profit $432.03M $2.98B $14.69B
Operating income -$88.38M $882.00M $5.13B
Net income -$75.13M $825.00M $4.00B
Free cash flow $121.44M $931.00M $5.47B
R&D $226.80M $960.00M $1.62B
EPS (diluted) $-0.58 $5.39 $5.66
Cash & equivalents – $1.04B $4.35B
Total debt – $1.99B $26.56B
Shares (diluted) 129.98M 153.00M 707.60M
Enterprise value $10.70B $38.37B $148.36B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricTXGILMNDHR
P/E -144.7x 52.9x 41.2x
P/FCF 89.7x 46.8x 30.1x
P/Operating cash flow 85.7x 39.8x 24.8x
P/S 17.7x 9.7x 6.6x
P/B 13.2x 15.4x 3.1x
P/Tangible book 14.3x 18.0x 5.3x
EV/EBITDA -244.2x 38.5x 24.4x
EV/EBIT -122.7x 50.4x 36.4x
EV/Revenue 17.6x 9.9x 7.4x
EV/FCF 89.3x 47.7x 34.2x
EV/Operating cash flow 85.3x 40.6x 28.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -5.39 1.75 -3.29

Growth

14 metrics
MetricTXGILMNDHR
Revenue growth (1Y) -4.3% 4.9% 4.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 2.8% -1.0% -0.5%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -3.5% 4.6% 2.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 1.1% 2.9% -0.9%
Operating income growth (1Y) 12.1% -31.8% 16.1%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 20.9% 28.3% -7.1%
Net income growth (1Y) 11.2% -34.4% 17.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 24.2% 30.0% -14.3%
EPS growth (1Y) 14.9% -32.7% 19.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 26.8% 30.1% -12.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 89.8% -5.1% 7.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 135.5% 38.1% -7.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 113.5% -9.7% 12.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 44.7% 105.0% -9.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricTXGILMNDHR
Gross margin 70.0% 66.4% 58.5%
EBITDA margin -7.2% 25.7% 30.5%
Operating margin -14.3% 19.6% 20.4%
Pretax margin -12.1% 22.6% 19.0%
Net margin -12.2% 18.4% 15.9%
FCF margin 19.7% 20.7% 21.8%
Operating cash flow margin 20.6% 24.4% 26.4%
Return on equity -9.2% 29.9% 7.6%
Return on assets -7.3% 12.5% 4.5%
Return on invested capital – 15.1% 5.7%
Return on capital employed -9.8% 17.5% 6.4%
Asset turnover 0.6x 0.7x 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -1.7x 1.3x 1.7x
Stock comp / revenue 16.0% 5.9% 1.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricTXGILMNDHR
Debt / assets – 29.9% 28.8%
Debt / equity – 0.7x 0.5x
Net debt / EBITDA – 0.7x 2.9x
Debt / FCF – 2.1x 4.9x
Liabilities / assets 19.9% 57.3% 43.1%
Equity / assets 80.1% 42.7% 56.9%
Interest coverage – 8.9x 17.6x
Current ratio 5.7x 1.8x 1.7x
Quick ratio 0.8x 1.2x 1.0x
Cash ratio 0.4x 0.7x 0.5x
Altman Z-score 30.83 8.19 3.74

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricTXGILMNDHR
Dividend yield – – 0.6%
Net buyback yield -0.1% 1.2% 1.8%
Shareholder yield -0.1% 1.2% 2.4%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusTXGILMNDHR
Forward P/E – 57.9xFY2026 25.7xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.79FY2026 $4.99FY2026 $9.11FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +3.1%FY2026 +16.8%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +25.7% +8.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year $580.42MFY2026 $4.52BFY2026 $27.01BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -9.7%FY2026 +4.1%FY2026 +9.9%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +24.6% +12.0% -1.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersTXGILMNDHR
Held by institutions 100.0% 100.0% 81.9%
Institutions holding 389 933 2,117
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.4% +0.0% +1.1%
Institutions buying 197 463 839
Institutions selling 137 330 1,015
Buyers to sellers 1.44 1.40 0.83

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

TXGILMNDHR
TXG 1.00 0.51 0.33
ILMN 0.51 1.00 0.33
DHR 0.33 0.33 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, TXG, ILMN and DHR?

Danaher (DHR) is the largest by market capitalisation: 10x Genomics (TXG) $10.89B, Illumina (ILMN) $43.61B, Danaher (DHR) $164.54B.

Which stock is cheaper, TXG, ILMN and DHR?

Danaher (DHR) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (10x Genomics (TXG) -144.7x, Illumina (ILMN) 52.9x, Danaher (DHR) 41.2x). On next year's consensus earnings, Danaher (DHR) is cheapest (Illumina (ILMN) 57.9x, Danaher (DHR) 25.7x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Illumina (ILMN) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: 10x Genomics (TXG) -4.3%, Illumina (ILMN) +4.9%, Danaher (DHR) +4.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Illumina (ILMN) has the highest net margin (10x Genomics (TXG) -12.2%, Illumina (ILMN) 18.4%, Danaher (DHR) 15.9%). On return on invested capital, Illumina (ILMN) leads (Illumina (ILMN) 15.1%, Danaher (DHR) 5.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year 10x Genomics (TXG) returned the most: 10x Genomics (TXG) +526.8%, Illumina (ILMN) +195.3%, Danaher (DHR) +7.9%. Over five years, Danaher (DHR) compounded fastest (10x Genomics (TXG) -12.3%/yr, Illumina (ILMN) -6.5%/yr, Danaher (DHR) -5.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Danaher (DHR) 0.65%. 10x Genomics (TXG) and Illumina (ILMN) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Danaher (DHR) has been the steadiest (10x Genomics (TXG) 74.2%, Illumina (ILMN) 50.4%, Danaher (DHR) 30.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, TXG, ILMN and DHR?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Danaher (DHR) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.