TX vs GWAV vs ASTL Stock Comparison

Ternium, Greenwave Technology Solutions and Algoma Steel Prices as of Nov 4, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (PKX) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
TX Ternium S.A.
$51.45 -11.2% 1M +44.9% 1Y
Market cap
$94.91B
P/E
99.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$16.69B
Div. yield
–
Steel Basic Materials
8 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Ternium leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Ternium 8, Greenwave Technology Solutions 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionTXGWAVASTLLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $94.91B $1.70M $516.33M TX
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 99.0x -0.1x -1.1x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 8.2x — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +6.3% +71.8% -36.9% GWAV
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 5.7% -27.7% -38.2% TX
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 8.5% — 0.0% TX
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -2.7x -2.1x 0.5x TX
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +44.9% -62.4% +27.6% TX
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +5.9%/yr -90.7%/yr -14.2%/yr TX
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 31.8% 102.8% 68.8% TX
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 59/100 38/100 31/100 TX

Percentile Scorecard

TXGWAVASTL

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisTXGWAVASTL
Valuation 46 #91 of 168 41 #100 of 168 55 #77 of 168
Growth 48 #79 of 152 64 #56 of 152 6 #143 of 152
Profitability 57 #54 of 123 34 #81 of 123 27 #90 of 123
Financial Health 51 #81 of 165 12 #146 of 165 38 #102 of 165
Shareholder Returns 92 #10 of 117 – –
Overall 59 38 31
  • TX ranked among 177 companies in Metals and Mining
  • GWAV ranked among 177 companies in Metals and Mining
  • ASTL ranked among 177 companies in Metals and Mining

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodTXGWAVASTLSPY
1 month -11.2%-11.4%+18.4% -1.0%
3 months -4.2%-40.3%+18.2% -0.4%
6 months +6.3%-45.6%+3.5% +4.5%
Year to date +34.7%-59.9%+28.5% +12.4%
1 year +44.9%-62.4%+27.6% +13.6%
3 years +40.5%-100.0%-28.7% +76.4%
3 years, per year +12.0%-94.0%-10.7% +20.8%
5 years +33.0%-100.0%-53.6% +63.7%
5 years, per year +5.9%-90.7%-14.2% +10.4%
10 years +105.2%-100.0%— +267.7%
10 years, per year +7.5%-76.8%— +13.9%

Risk

MeasureTXGWAVASTLSPY
Volatility, 1Y 31.8%102.8%68.8% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 30.3%105.9%70.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.000.941.99 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.41-0.610.40 1.06
Max drawdown, 5Y -50.4%-100.0%-75.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -13.8%-73.8%-9.1% -1.6%
52-week high $59.66$8.00$5.80 $779.14
52-week low $35.26$1.91$3.28 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleTXGWAVASTL
P/E now vs peer median 105.4xmedian 13.4x -0.1xmedian 13.4x -1.2xmedian 13.4x
P/S now vs peer median 6.2xmedian 3.0x 0.0xmedian 3.0x 0.5xmedian 3.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 41.4xmedian 7.7x -2.4xmedian 7.7x -1.3xmedian 7.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 36.2xmedian 13.3x -0.5xmedian 13.3x 37.5xmedian 13.3x
P/B now vs peer median 8.2xmedian 2.3x 0.1xmedian 2.3x 2.8xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.19 0.00median 0.19 —median 0.19

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsTXGWAVASTL
Revenue $16.69B $60.56M $1.22B
Gross profit $3.27B $19.15M -$302.52M
Operating income $1.55B -$15.21M -$203.70M
Net income $1.38B -$16.76M -$190.93M
Free cash flow $2.85B -$3.45M $14.76M
EPS (diluted) – $-20.20 $-4.27
Cash & equivalents $10.42B $654.99K $152.40M
Total debt $4.10B $10.85M $600.00K
Shares (diluted) – 829.63K 108.70M
Enterprise value $63.17B -$2.81M $197.98M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricTXGWAVASTL
P/E 105.4x -0.1x -1.2x
P/FCF 36.2x -0.5x 37.5x
P/Operating cash flow 63.9x -0.8x 18.2x
P/S 6.2x 0.0x 0.5x
P/B 8.2x 0.1x 2.8x
P/Tangible book 8.2x 0.2x 2.8x
EV/EBITDA 41.4x -2.4x -1.3x
EV/EBIT 62.3x -0.8x -0.7x
EV/Revenue 5.8x 0.2x 0.3x
EV/FCF 34.0x -3.5x 27.2x
EV/Operating cash flow 60.0x -5.7x 13.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.00 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricTXGWAVASTL
Revenue growth (1Y) 6.3% 71.8% -36.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 1.0% 23.9% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 48.6% 46.8% -119.5%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 1.8% 16.4% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 164.2% 51.0% -129.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -5.5% -3.4% –
Net income growth (1Y) 196.3% 48.8% -138.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 40.9% 8.7% –
EPS growth (1Y) – 69.1% -193.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – -64.7% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -28.5% 65.6% -86.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -16.9% 0.4% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -33.7% 79.3% -83.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -8.8% 19.0% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricTXGWAVASTL
Gross margin 19.6% 31.6% -24.9%
EBITDA margin 14.0% -8.1% -25.4%
Operating margin 9.3% -25.1% -16.8%
Pretax margin 9.0% -27.7% -20.4%
Net margin 5.7% -27.7% -38.2%
FCF margin 17.1% -5.7% 1.2%
Operating cash flow margin 9.7% -3.5% 2.5%
Return on equity 11.1% -73.5% -419.8%
Return on assets 5.5% -31.4% -26.6%
Return on invested capital 8.5% – 0.0%
Return on capital employed 7.5% -64.6% -43.3%
Asset turnover 0.7x 1.1x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.2x 0.1x -0.2x
Stock comp / revenue – – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricTXGWAVASTL
Debt / assets 16.3% 20.6% 0.0%
Debt / equity 0.3x 0.5x 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA -2.7x -2.1x 0.5x
Debt / FCF 1.4x -3.1x 0.0x
Liabilities / assets 50.3% 59.8% 90.1%
Equity / assets 49.7% 40.2% 9.9%
Interest coverage 7.7x -10.0x -8.5x
Current ratio 2.6x 0.2x 2.5x
Quick ratio 6.2x 0.1x 1.0x
Cash ratio 2.6x 0.0x 0.5x
Altman Z-score – -14.25 -0.80

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricTXGWAVASTL
Dividend yield 4.3% – –
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield 4.3% – 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusTXGWAVASTL
Forward P/E 8.2xFY2026 – –
EPS, next fiscal year $6.25FY2026 – $-2.25FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +184.1%FY2026 – –
EPS growth, the year after +32.0% – –
Revenue, next fiscal year $18.50BFY2026 – $766.90MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +18.5%FY2026 – -49.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +5.1% – +70.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersTXGWAVASTL
Held by institutions 1.4% 1.8% 66.4%
Institutions holding 165 7 95
Change in shares held, QoQ +17.2% -52.2% +0.2%
Institutions buying 107 2 41
Institutions selling 36 1 36
Buyers to sellers 2.97 2.00 1.14

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

TXGWAVASTL
TX 1.00 -0.07 0.36
GWAV -0.07 1.00 -0.02
ASTL 0.36 -0.02 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, TX, GWAV and ASTL?

Ternium (TX) is the largest by market capitalisation: Ternium (TX) $94.91B, Greenwave Technology Solutions (GWAV) $1.70M, Algoma Steel (ASTL) $516.33M.

Which company is growing faster?

Greenwave Technology Solutions (GWAV) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Ternium (TX) +6.3%, Greenwave Technology Solutions (GWAV) +71.8%, Algoma Steel (ASTL) -36.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

Ternium (TX) has the highest net margin (Ternium (TX) 5.7%, Greenwave Technology Solutions (GWAV) -27.7%, Algoma Steel (ASTL) -38.2%). On return on invested capital, Ternium (TX) leads (Ternium (TX) 8.5%, Algoma Steel (ASTL) 0.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Ternium (TX) returned the most: Ternium (TX) +44.9%, Greenwave Technology Solutions (GWAV) -62.4%, Algoma Steel (ASTL) +27.6%. Over five years, Ternium (TX) compounded fastest (Ternium (TX) +5.9%/yr, Greenwave Technology Solutions (GWAV) -90.7%/yr, Algoma Steel (ASTL) -14.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Ternium (TX) has been the steadiest (Ternium (TX) 31.8%, Greenwave Technology Solutions (GWAV) 102.8%, Algoma Steel (ASTL) 68.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, TX, GWAV and ASTL?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Ternium (TX) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.