TTMI vs JBL vs FLEX Stock Comparison

Ttm Technologies, Jabil and Flex Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (FN) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
TTMI Ttm Technologies Inc
$86.78 -32.8% 1M +47.3% 1Y
Market cap
$9.44B
P/E
39.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.38B
Div. yield
–
Electronic Manufacturing Services Technology
6 wins
JBL Jabil Inc
$283.43 -10.5% 1M +34.2% 1Y
Market cap
$30.82B
P/E
29.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$35.95B
Div. yield
–
Electronic Manufacturing Services Technology
4 wins
FLEX Flex Ltd.
$83.35 -27.3% 1M +28.9% 1Y
Market cap
$34.08B
P/E
35.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$29.27B
Div. yield
–
Electronic Manufacturing Services Technology
1 win

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Ttm Technologies leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Ttm Technologies 6, Jabil 4, Flex 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionTTMIJBLFLEXLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $9.44B $30.82B $34.08B FLEX
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 39.9x 29.6x 35.0x JBL
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 16.4x 16.4x 17.1x TTMI
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +27.6% +20.6% +12.2% TTMI
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 7.0% 2.9% 3.3% TTMI
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 10.6% 25.9% 11.3% JBL
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.0x 0.7x 1.5x JBL
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +47.3% +34.2% +28.9% TTMI
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +46.2%/yr +36.4%/yr +45.2%/yr TTMI
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 90.4% 47.7% 69.0% JBL
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 60/100 58/100 55/100 TTMI

Percentile Scorecard

TTMIJBLFLEX

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisTTMIJBLFLEX
Valuation 52 #54 of 112 71 #33 of 112 64 #41 of 112
Growth 88 #14 of 109 67 #37 of 109 51 #54 of 109
Profitability 61 #41 of 104 67 #35 of 104 55 #47 of 104
Financial Health 37 #74 of 116 18 #95 of 116 19 #94 of 116
Shareholder Returns – 66 #28 of 81 88 #11 of 81
Overall 60 58 55
  • TTMI ranked among 122 companies in Computer Hardware
  • JBL ranked among 122 companies in Computer Hardware
  • FLEX ranked among 122 companies in Computer Hardware

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodTTMIJBLFLEXSPY
1 month -32.8%-10.5%-27.3% -0.2%
3 months -20.2%-6.5%-26.4% +3.9%
6 months -36.9%-14.3%-4.4% +8.2%
Year to date +25.8%+24.3%+38.0% +12.9%
1 year +47.3%+34.2%+28.9% +12.3%
3 years +653.3%+131.3%+330.1% +87.4%
3 years, per year +96.1%+32.3%+62.7% +23.3%
5 years +566.0%+372.2%+545.1% +67.9%
5 years, per year +46.2%+36.4%+45.2% +10.9%
10 years +536.2%+1,216.4%+696.8% +261.1%
10 years, per year +20.3%+29.4%+23.1% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureTTMIJBLFLEXSPY
Volatility, 1Y 90.4%47.7%69.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 97.7%52.8%64.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 3.812.203.11 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.520.720.42 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -66.6%-36.9%-52.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -60.8%-26.5%-48.6% -1.2%
52-week high $221.47$385.63$162.07 $779.14
52-week low $58.45$192.49$54.51 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleTTMIJBLFLEX
P/E now vs peer median 38.2xmedian 33.2x 28.8xmedian 33.2x 31.4xmedian 33.2x
P/S now vs peer median 2.7xmedian 2.8x 0.8xmedian 2.8x 1.1xmedian 2.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 19.6xmedian 20.0x 13.1xmedian 20.0x 21.4xmedian 20.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median -603.8xmedian 29.8x 21.6xmedian 29.8x 37.3xmedian 29.8x
P/B now vs peer median 4.7xmedian 3.0x 18.3xmedian 3.0x 5.6xmedian 3.0x
PEG now vs peer median 0.81median 1.17 1.65median 1.17 2.17median 1.17

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsTTMIJBLFLEX
Revenue $3.38B $35.95B $29.27B
Gross profit $715.64M $3.32B $2.74B
Operating income $334.16M $1.70B $1.45B
Net income $236.78M $1.04B $973.00M
Free cash flow -$15.14M $1.37B $826.00M
R&D $29.71M $30.00M –
EPS (diluted) $2.20 $9.75 $2.60
Cash & equivalents $507.91M $1.74B $2.84B
Total debt $3.72B $3.38B $5.22B
Shares (diluted) 107.58M 106.90M 374.00M
Enterprise value $7.53B $24.32B $23.54B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricTTMIJBLFLEX
P/E 38.2x 28.8x 31.4x
P/FCF -603.8x 21.6x 37.3x
P/Operating cash flow 28.3x 14.8x 19.7x
P/S 2.7x 0.8x 1.1x
P/B 4.7x 18.3x 5.6x
P/Tangible book 5.1x 29.2x 6.5x
EV/EBITDA 19.6x 13.1x 21.4x
EV/EBIT 28.8x 18.3x 22.9x
EV/Revenue 2.8x 0.9x 1.1x
EV/FCF -634.6x 22.7x 40.2x
EV/Operating cash flow 29.8x 15.6x 21.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.81 1.65 2.17

Growth

14 metrics
MetricTTMIJBLFLEX
Revenue growth (1Y) 27.6% 20.6% 12.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 12.3% 1.2% 1.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 33.6% 25.4% 21.3%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 18.5% 5.0% 11.7%
Operating income growth (1Y) 94.3% 44.2% 16.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 47.1% 3.5% 14.0%
Net income growth (1Y) 154.1% 58.6% 9.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 48.5% 8.4% -2.5%
EPS growth (1Y) 147.7% 64.5% 11.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 47.2% 17.4% 14.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 35.5% 22.1% -0.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 4.9% 19.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -185.8% 17.2% -25.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 25.0% 54.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricTTMIJBLFLEX
Gross margin 21.2% 9.2% 9.4%
EBITDA margin 14.5% 6.6% 5.3%
Operating margin 9.9% 4.7% 5.0%
Pretax margin 7.8% 3.9% 4.4%
Net margin 7.0% 2.9% 3.3%
FCF margin -0.4% 3.8% 2.8%
Operating cash flow margin 9.6% 5.6% 5.3%
Return on equity 12.6% 70.7% 18.3%
Return on assets 5.6% 4.1% 4.1%
Return on invested capital 10.6% 25.9% 11.3%
Return on capital employed 11.4% 43.1% 13.9%
Asset turnover 0.8x 1.4x 1.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.4x 1.9x 1.6x
Stock comp / revenue 1.8% – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricTTMIJBLFLEX
Debt / assets 22.0% 12.3% 20.7%
Debt / equity 0.5x 2.1x 0.9x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.0x 0.7x 1.5x
Debt / FCF -64.3x 2.5x 6.3x
Liabilities / assets 56.2% 94.1% 78.2%
Equity / assets 43.8% 5.9% 21.8%
Interest coverage 7.6x – 6.5x
Current ratio 1.8x 1.0x 1.4x
Quick ratio 1.4x 0.4x 0.6x
Cash ratio 0.4x 0.1x 0.2x
Altman Z-score 3.86 2.57 2.66

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricTTMIJBLFLEX
Dividend yield – 0.1% –
Net buyback yield – 3.5% 2.3%
Shareholder yield – 3.6% 2.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusTTMIJBLFLEX
Forward P/E 16.4xFY2026 16.4xFY2027 17.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $5.29FY2026 $17.25FY2027 $4.88FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +115.0%FY2026 +31.8%FY2027 +47.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +53.3% +36.2% +38.7%
Revenue, next fiscal year $4.26BFY2026 $46.50BFY2027 $36.41BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +46.4%FY2026 +29.3%FY2027 +30.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +60.2% +17.4% +29.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersTTMIJBLFLEX
Held by institutions 92.4% 96.9% 94.3%
Institutions holding 638 1,120 1,106
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.6% +3.2% -0.8%
Institutions buying 396 618 674
Institutions selling 202 373 342
Buyers to sellers 1.96 1.66 1.97

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

TTMIJBLFLEX
TTMI 1.00 0.68 0.62
JBL 0.68 1.00 0.78
FLEX 0.62 0.78 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, TTMI, JBL and FLEX?

Flex (FLEX) is the largest by market capitalisation: Ttm Technologies (TTMI) $9.44B, Jabil (JBL) $30.82B, Flex (FLEX) $34.08B.

Which stock is cheaper, TTMI, JBL and FLEX?

Jabil (JBL) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Ttm Technologies (TTMI) 39.9x, Jabil (JBL) 29.6x, Flex (FLEX) 35.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) is cheapest (Ttm Technologies (TTMI) 16.4x, Jabil (JBL) 16.4x, Flex (FLEX) 17.1x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Ttm Technologies (TTMI) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Ttm Technologies (TTMI) +27.6%, Jabil (JBL) +20.6%, Flex (FLEX) +12.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Ttm Technologies (TTMI) has the highest net margin (Ttm Technologies (TTMI) 7.0%, Jabil (JBL) 2.9%, Flex (FLEX) 3.3%). On return on invested capital, Jabil (JBL) leads (Ttm Technologies (TTMI) 10.6%, Jabil (JBL) 25.9%, Flex (FLEX) 11.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Ttm Technologies (TTMI) returned the most: Ttm Technologies (TTMI) +47.3%, Jabil (JBL) +34.2%, Flex (FLEX) +28.9%. Over five years, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) compounded fastest (Ttm Technologies (TTMI) +46.2%/yr, Jabil (JBL) +36.4%/yr, Flex (FLEX) +45.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Jabil (JBL) has been the steadiest (Ttm Technologies (TTMI) 90.4%, Jabil (JBL) 47.7%, Flex (FLEX) 69.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, TTMI, JBL and FLEX?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.