TTMI vs ASX vs PLXS Stock Comparison

Ttm Technologies, ASE Technology Holding and Plexus Prices as of Nov 2, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (JBL) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
TTMI Ttm Technologies Inc
$76.58 -41.9% 1M +14.0% 1Y
Market cap
$8.07B
P/E
30.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.83B
Div. yield
–
Electronic Manufacturing Services Technology
4 wins
PLXS Plexus Corp
$209.42 -23.3% 1M +49.7% 1Y
Market cap
$5.59B
P/E
30.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.60B
Div. yield
–
Electronic Manufacturing Services Technology
2 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

ASE Technology Holding leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (ASE Technology Holding 5, Ttm Technologies 4, Plexus 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionTTMIASXPLXSLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $8.07B $87.18B $5.59B ASX
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 30.1x 35.0x 30.2x TTMI
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 14.5x 30.9x 19.8x TTMI
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +37.6% +24.1% +14.2% TTMI
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 7.0% 9.8% 4.0% ASX
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 10.1% 12.6% 11.3% ASX
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.3x 1.4x -0.1x PLXS
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 1.02% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +14.0% +144.9% +49.7% ASX
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +40.5%/yr +40.4%/yr +17.7%/yr TTMI
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 90.5% 58.9% 43.0% PLXS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 60/100 64/100 52/100 ASX

Percentile Scorecard

TTMIASXPLXS

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisTTMIASXPLXS
Valuation 65 #40 of 112 82 #18 of 94 51 #56 of 112
Growth 90 #12 of 108 89 #11 of 92 43 #62 of 108
Profitability 60 #42 of 104 69 #29 of 90 54 #48 of 104
Financial Health 26 #86 of 116 16 #85 of 101 40 #70 of 116
Shareholder Returns – 63 #28 of 74 72 #23 of 80
Overall 60 64 52
  • TTMI ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • ASX ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors
  • PLXS ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodTTMIASXPLXSSPY
1 month -41.9%-17.4%-23.3% -2.3%
3 months -36.8%+6.9%-19.7% -0.7%
6 months -51.4%+21.5%-20.2% +4.8%
Year to date +11.0%+143.5%+42.5% +10.3%
1 year +14.0%+144.9%+49.7% +10.3%
3 years +423.1%+388.3%+111.4% +73.0%
3 years, per year +73.7%+69.7%+28.4% +20.1%
5 years +447.4%+445.3%+126.2% +61.9%
5 years, per year +40.5%+40.4%+17.7% +10.1%
10 years +479.7%+580.7%+358.5% +258.6%
10 years, per year +19.2%+21.1%+16.4% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureTTMIASXPLXSSPY
Volatility, 1Y 90.5%58.9%43.0% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 97.9%64.7%46.8% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 3.822.731.79 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.152.461.16 0.80
Max drawdown, 5Y -66.6%-43.1%-34.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -65.4%-17.7%-31.1% -3.5%
52-week high $221.47$47.62$303.82 $779.14
52-week low $58.45$13.75$132.74 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleTTMIASXPLXS
P/E now vs peer median 30.1xmedian 29.9x 35.0xmedian 41.3x 30.2xmedian 29.9x
P/S now vs peer median 2.1xmedian 2.8x 3.5xmedian 6.6x 1.2xmedian 2.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 15.1xmedian 18.5x 17.5xmedian 26.2x 18.1xmedian 18.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 545.7xmedian 28.0x 5.6xmedian 37.7x 90.3xmedian 28.0x
P/B now vs peer median 4.0xmedian 2.8x 6.6xmedian 4.3x 3.7xmedian 2.8x
PEG now vs peer median 0.13median 1.00 1.41median 1.81 3.59median 1.00

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsTTMIASXPLXS
Revenue $3.83B $24.92B $4.60B
Gross profit $850.77M $5.18B $461.48M
Operating income $424.51M $2.83B $230.67M
Net income $268.52M $3.27B $185.41M
Free cash flow $14.79M $15.64B $61.87M
R&D $32.31M $1.26B –
EPS (diluted) $2.49 $1.10 $6.79
Cash & equivalents $876.35M $2.78B $314.05M
Total debt $1.64B $10.90B $275.46M
Shares (diluted) 107.70M 2.21B 27.29M
Enterprise value $5.77B $75.52B $4.41B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricTTMIASXPLXS
P/E 30.1x 35.0x 30.2x
P/FCF 545.7x 5.6x 90.3x
P/Operating cash flow 24.0x 13.4x 32.7x
P/S 2.1x 3.5x 1.2x
P/B 4.0x 6.6x 3.7x
P/Tangible book 4.5x 7.8x 3.7x
EV/EBITDA 15.1x 17.5x 18.1x
EV/EBIT 20.8x 33.5x 24.1x
EV/Revenue 2.3x 3.8x 1.2x
EV/FCF 597.6x 6.1x 89.7x
EV/Operating cash flow 26.3x 14.6x 32.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.13 1.41 3.59

Growth

14 metrics
MetricTTMIASXPLXS
Revenue growth (1Y) 37.6% 24.1% 14.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 17.9% 8.9% 2.2%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 51.3% 53.2% 12.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 25.9% 17.2% 4.5%
Operating income growth (1Y) 120.0% 100.1% 13.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 94.7% 22.2% 4.0%
Net income growth (1Y) 103.5% 110.4% 14.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 230.0% 18.9% 7.5%
EPS growth (1Y) 100.0% 114.2% 15.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 225.7% 24.7% 8.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 6.6% 92.0% -49.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 19.6% 31.3%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -58.7% 86.3% -75.3%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 39.2% 70.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricTTMIASXPLXS
Gross margin 22.2% 20.8% 10.0%
EBITDA margin 15.3% 21.8% 6.7%
Operating margin 11.1% 11.4% 5.0%
Pretax margin 9.0% 12.0% 4.7%
Net margin 7.0% 9.8% 4.0%
FCF margin 0.4% 62.8% 1.3%
Operating cash flow margin 8.8% 26.1% 3.7%
Return on equity 13.5% 25.7% 12.3%
Return on assets 5.4% 9.0% 5.3%
Return on invested capital 10.1% 12.6% 11.3%
Return on capital employed 13.2% 9.0% 14.9%
Asset turnover 0.8x 0.7x 1.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.3x 2.0x 0.9x
Stock comp / revenue 1.9% – 1.0%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricTTMIASXPLXS
Debt / assets 29.6% 27.9% 7.6%
Debt / equity 0.8x 0.8x 0.2x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.3x 1.4x -0.1x
Debt / FCF 111.2x 0.7x 4.5x
Liabilities / assets 63.3% 66.0% 57.9%
Equity / assets 36.7% 34.0% 42.1%
Interest coverage 9.2x 10.9x 18.0x
Current ratio 1.7x 0.3x 1.5x
Quick ratio 1.4x 1.8x 0.7x
Cash ratio 0.5x 0.7x 0.2x
Altman Z-score 2.88 – 4.20

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricTTMIASXPLXS
Dividend yield – 1.0% –
Net buyback yield – – 1.5%
Shareholder yield – 1.0% 1.5%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusTTMIASXPLXS
Forward P/E 14.5xFY2026 30.9xFY2026 19.8xFY2027
EPS, next fiscal year $5.29FY2026 $1.27FY2026 $10.58FY2027
EPS growth, next FY +115.0%FY2026 +126.8%FY2026 +39.6%FY2027
EPS growth, the year after +53.3% +37.8% +1.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $4.26BFY2026 $24.36BFY2026 $5.37BFY2027
Revenue growth, next FY +46.4%FY2026 +19.6%FY2026 +8.1%FY2027
Revenue growth, the year after +60.2% +32.0% +20.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersTTMIASXPLXS
Held by institutions 92.4% 6.9% 99.7%
Institutions holding 640 484 449
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.6% -2.5% -0.6%
Institutions buying 396 310 246
Institutions selling 204 133 135
Buyers to sellers 1.94 2.33 1.82

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

TTMIASXPLXS
TTMI 1.00 0.63 0.68
ASX 0.63 1.00 0.61
PLXS 0.68 0.61 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, TTMI, ASX and PLXS?

ASE Technology Holding (ASX) is the largest by market capitalisation: Ttm Technologies (TTMI) $8.07B, ASE Technology Holding (ASX) $87.18B, Plexus (PLXS) $5.59B.

Which stock is cheaper, TTMI, ASX and PLXS?

Ttm Technologies (TTMI) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Ttm Technologies (TTMI) 30.1x, ASE Technology Holding (ASX) 35.0x, Plexus (PLXS) 30.2x). On next year's consensus earnings, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) is cheapest (Ttm Technologies (TTMI) 14.5x, ASE Technology Holding (ASX) 30.9x, Plexus (PLXS) 19.8x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Ttm Technologies (TTMI) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Ttm Technologies (TTMI) +37.6%, ASE Technology Holding (ASX) +24.1%, Plexus (PLXS) +14.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

ASE Technology Holding (ASX) has the highest net margin (Ttm Technologies (TTMI) 7.0%, ASE Technology Holding (ASX) 9.8%, Plexus (PLXS) 4.0%). On return on invested capital, ASE Technology Holding (ASX) leads (Ttm Technologies (TTMI) 10.1%, ASE Technology Holding (ASX) 12.6%, Plexus (PLXS) 11.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year ASE Technology Holding (ASX) returned the most: Ttm Technologies (TTMI) +14.0%, ASE Technology Holding (ASX) +144.9%, Plexus (PLXS) +49.7%. Over five years, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) compounded fastest (Ttm Technologies (TTMI) +40.5%/yr, ASE Technology Holding (ASX) +40.4%/yr, Plexus (PLXS) +17.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: ASE Technology Holding (ASX) 1.02%. Ttm Technologies (TTMI) and Plexus (PLXS) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Plexus (PLXS) has been the steadiest (Ttm Technologies (TTMI) 90.5%, ASE Technology Holding (ASX) 58.9%, Plexus (PLXS) 43.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, TTMI, ASX and PLXS?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, ASE Technology Holding (ASX) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.