TTE vs XOM vs PSX Stock Comparison

TotalEnergies SE, ExxonMobil Holdings and Phillips 66 Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (OXY) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
TTE TotalEnergies SE
$94.06 +7.3% 1M +51.2% 1Y
Market cap
$209.10B
P/E
18.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$115.93B
Div. yield
–
Integrated Oil and Gas Energy
5 wins
XOM ExxonMobil Holdings Corp
$183.18 +13.5% 1M +57.3% 1Y
Market cap
$774.01B
P/E
23.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$368.76B
Div. yield
0.02%
Integrated Oil and Gas Energy
2 wins
PSX Phillips 66
$273.67 +8.5% 1M +98.3% 1Y
Market cap
$110.67B
P/E
8.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$172.89B
Div. yield
0.02%
Integrated Oil and Gas Energy
5 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Phillips 66 leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Phillips 66 5, TotalEnergies SE 5, ExxonMobil Holdings 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionTTEXOMPSXLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $209.10B $774.01B $110.67B XOM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 18.6x 23.6x 8.8x PSX
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 8.1x 13.0x 8.5x TTE
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +13.8% +9.1% +28.8% PSX
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 9.7% 8.9% 7.3% TTE
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 21.6% 11.1% 25.3% PSX
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.4x 0.4x 0.7x TTE
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.02% 0.02% XOM
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +51.2% +57.3% +98.3% PSX
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +13.4%/yr +23.2%/yr +29.6%/yr PSX
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 24.9% 26.0% 32.7% TTE
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 77/100 49/100 70/100 TTE

Percentile Scorecard

TTEXOMPSX

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisTTEXOMPSX
Valuation 80 #21 of 99 29 #71 of 99 70 #30 of 99
Growth 85 #15 of 97 47 #52 of 97 99 #2 of 97
Profitability 79 #21 of 96 54 #45 of 96 56 #43 of 96
Financial Health 51 #51 of 102 77 #24 of 102 55 #46 of 102
Shareholder Returns 90 #9 of 77 40 #47 of 77 71 #23 of 77
Overall 77 49 70
  • TTE ranked among 103 companies in Oil and Gas Upstream
  • XOM ranked among 103 companies in Oil and Gas Upstream
  • PSX ranked among 103 companies in Oil and Gas Upstream

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodTTEXOMPSXSPY
1 month +7.3%+13.5%+8.5% +0.7%
3 months +8.1%+16.6%+29.9% +3.7%
6 months +1.5%+18.7%+52.8% +7.1%
Year to date +43.8%+52.2%+112.1% +12.8%
1 year +51.2%+57.3%+98.3% +11.9%
3 years +40.5%+73.0%+143.4% +85.2%
3 years, per year +12.0%+20.1%+34.5% +22.8%
5 years +87.7%+184.1%+266.0% +67.6%
5 years, per year +13.4%+23.2%+29.6% +10.9%
10 years +94.9%+116.1%+241.5% +262.0%
10 years, per year +6.9%+8.0%+13.1% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureTTEXOMPSXSPY
Volatility, 1Y 24.9%26.0%32.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 24.7%26.3%30.8% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.34-0.69-0.36 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 2.052.213.01 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -28.4%-20.7%-46.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high 0.0%-0.7%-7.9% -1.2%
52-week high $94.06$184.54$297.20 $779.14
52-week low $60.99$113.68$127.75 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleTTEXOMPSX
P/E now vs peer median 18.3xmedian 11.9x 23.3xmedian 11.9x 8.6xmedian 11.9x
P/S now vs peer median 1.8xmedian 2.0x 2.0xmedian 2.0x 0.6xmedian 2.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 3.3xmedian 5.9x 10.4xmedian 5.9x 6.1xmedian 5.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median 5.2xmedian 10.0x 24.7xmedian 10.0x 8.6xmedian 10.0x
P/B now vs peer median 1.5xmedian 1.5x 2.8xmedian 1.5x 3.0xmedian 1.5x
PEG now vs peer median 3.48median 1.36 -1.65median 1.36 0.38median 1.36

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsTTEXOMPSX
Revenue $115.93B $368.76B $172.89B
Gross profit $115.93B – $30.05B
Operating income $53.96B – $16.93B
Net income $22.70B $33.73B $12.66B
Free cash flow $39.83B $30.55B $12.36B
R&D $228.00M $973.00M –
EPS (diluted) $4.37 $7.41 $31.52
Cash & equivalents $34.21B $10.59B $5.85B
Total debt $62.99B $42.37B $18.53B
Shares (diluted) 2.57B 4.42B 398.95M
Enterprise value $80.18B $730.49B $94.46B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricTTEXOMPSX
P/E 18.3x 23.3x 8.6x
P/FCF 5.2x 24.7x 8.6x
P/Operating cash flow 5.2x 12.6x 7.1x
P/S 1.8x 2.0x 0.6x
P/B 1.5x 2.8x 3.0x
P/Tangible book 1.5x 2.8x 3.1x
EV/EBITDA 3.3x 10.4x 6.1x
EV/EBIT 4.3x 17.0x 7.1x
EV/Revenue 2.0x 2.1x 0.7x
EV/FCF 5.8x 25.7x 9.7x
EV/Operating cash flow 5.8x 13.1x 7.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 3.48 -1.65 0.38

Growth

14 metrics
MetricTTEXOMPSX
Revenue growth (1Y) 13.8% 9.1% 28.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -0.8% -0.7% 4.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 13.8% – 82.1%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 12.9% – 9.9%
Operating income growth (1Y) 9.1% – 480.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 7.9% – 15.0%
Net income growth (1Y) 57.1% 4.4% 678.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 4.5% -14.1% 16.7%
EPS growth (1Y) 72.0% 5.6% 749.4%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 5.3% -14.1% 22.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 36.4% 10.0% 341.0%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 10.0% -4.1% 16.2%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 96.6% 4.9% 814.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 10.9% -13.0% 17.3%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricTTEXOMPSX
Gross margin 100.0% – 17.4%
EBITDA margin 60.0% 20.5% 11.3%
Operating margin 46.5% – 9.8%
Pretax margin 28.3% 12.3% 9.1%
Net margin 9.7% 8.9% 7.3%
FCF margin 34.4% 8.3% 7.1%
Operating cash flow margin 34.6% 16.2% 8.7%
Return on equity 8.5% 12.8% 37.1%
Return on assets 3.5% 7.3% 15.1%
Return on invested capital 21.6% 11.1% 25.3%
Return on capital employed 26.1% 12.3% 26.8%
Asset turnover 0.4x 0.8x 2.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.8x 1.8x 1.2x
Stock comp / revenue – – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricTTEXOMPSX
Debt / assets 18.4% 9.1% 21.6%
Debt / equity 0.5x 0.2x 0.5x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.4x 0.4x 0.7x
Debt / FCF 1.6x 1.4x 1.5x
Liabilities / assets 59.9% 42.7% 58.7%
Equity / assets 40.1% 57.3% 41.3%
Interest coverage 23,502,608x 59.5x 14.9x
Current ratio 1.1x 1.1x 1.3x
Quick ratio 0.5x 0.8x 0.9x
Cash ratio 0.3x 0.1x 0.3x
Altman Z-score – 4.92 4.70

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricTTEXOMPSX
Dividend yield 5.5% 2.2% 1.8%
Net buyback yield 1.1% 2.7% 2.8%
Shareholder yield 6.6% 5.0% 4.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 51.1% 15.8%
Payout ratio (FCF) – 56.4% 16.2%
Dividend growth (1Y) – 0.0% 4.8%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 5.0% 2.1%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusTTEXOMPSX
Forward P/E 8.1xFY2026 13.0xFY2026 8.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $11.64FY2026 $14.10FY2026 $32.20FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +68.9%FY2026 +101.7%FY2026 +400.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -7.9% -15.5% -1.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $203.15BFY2026 $448.73BFY2026 $165.53BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +11.4%FY2026 +35.1%FY2026 +21.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +3.2% -12.5% -4.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersTTEXOMPSX
Held by institutions 46.3% 63.9% 78.8%
Institutions holding 1,003 4,230 2,104
Change in shares held, QoQ +3.8% -2.2% +1.3%
Institutions buying 457 2,043 969
Institutions selling 355 1,746 729
Buyers to sellers 1.29 1.17 1.33

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

TTEXOMPSX
TTE 1.00 0.64 0.35
XOM 0.64 1.00 0.59
PSX 0.35 0.59 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, TTE, XOM and PSX?

ExxonMobil Holdings (XOM) is the largest by market capitalisation: TotalEnergies SE (TTE) $209.10B, ExxonMobil Holdings (XOM) $774.01B, Phillips 66 (PSX) $110.67B.

Which stock is cheaper, TTE, XOM and PSX?

Phillips 66 (PSX) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (TotalEnergies SE (TTE) 18.6x, ExxonMobil Holdings (XOM) 23.6x, Phillips 66 (PSX) 8.8x). On next year's consensus earnings, TotalEnergies SE (TTE) is cheapest (TotalEnergies SE (TTE) 8.1x, ExxonMobil Holdings (XOM) 13.0x, Phillips 66 (PSX) 8.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Phillips 66 (PSX) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: TotalEnergies SE (TTE) +13.8%, ExxonMobil Holdings (XOM) +9.1%, Phillips 66 (PSX) +28.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

TotalEnergies SE (TTE) has the highest net margin (TotalEnergies SE (TTE) 9.7%, ExxonMobil Holdings (XOM) 8.9%, Phillips 66 (PSX) 7.3%). On return on invested capital, Phillips 66 (PSX) leads (TotalEnergies SE (TTE) 21.6%, ExxonMobil Holdings (XOM) 11.1%, Phillips 66 (PSX) 25.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Phillips 66 (PSX) returned the most: TotalEnergies SE (TTE) +51.2%, ExxonMobil Holdings (XOM) +57.3%, Phillips 66 (PSX) +98.3%. Over five years, Phillips 66 (PSX) compounded fastest (TotalEnergies SE (TTE) +13.4%/yr, ExxonMobil Holdings (XOM) +23.2%/yr, Phillips 66 (PSX) +29.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

ExxonMobil Holdings (XOM) has the highest dividend yield: TotalEnergies SE (TTE) 0.00%, ExxonMobil Holdings (XOM) 0.02%, Phillips 66 (PSX) 0.02%. TotalEnergies SE (TTE) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, TotalEnergies SE (TTE) has been the steadiest (TotalEnergies SE (TTE) 24.9%, ExxonMobil Holdings (XOM) 26.0%, Phillips 66 (PSX) 32.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, TTE, XOM and PSX?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Phillips 66 (PSX) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.