TT vs EMR vs CARR Stock Comparison

Trane Technologies, Emerson Electric and Carrier Global Prices as of Nov 2, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (LII) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
TT Trane Technologies plc
$413.35 -10.9% 1M -7.9% 1Y
Market cap
$90.48B
P/E
28.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$23.23B
Div. yield
0.99%
HVAC Industrials
7 wins
EMR Emerson Electric Co
$165.98 +2.7% 1M +18.9% 1Y
Market cap
$92.58B
P/E
36.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$18.64B
Div. yield
1.34%
Pumps and Valves Industrials
3 wins
CARR CARRIER GLOBAL Corp
$55.18 +0.1% 1M -7.2% 1Y
Market cap
$45.15B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$22.79B
Div. yield
1.74%
HVAC Industrials
2 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Trane Technologies leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Trane Technologies 7, Emerson Electric 3, Carrier Global 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionTTEMRCARRLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $90.48B $92.58B $45.15B EMR
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 28.9x 36.0x -25.2x TT
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 26.4x 24.6x 18.7x CARR
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +10.3% +4.8% +3.3% TT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 13.6% 13.8% -7.9% EMR
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 25.7% 10.9% -4.6% TT
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.7x 1.8x 52.2x TT
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.99% 1.34% 1.74% CARR
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -7.9% +18.9% -7.2% EMR
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +18.3%/yr +11.8%/yr +1.2%/yr TT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 29.8% 32.0% 35.5% TT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 59/100 44/100 34/100 TT

Percentile Scorecard

TTEMRCARR

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisTTEMRCARR
Valuation 15 #47 of 55 33 #137 of 203 30 #39 of 55
Growth 74 #14 of 51 40 #114 of 189 38 #32 of 51
Profitability 92 #5 of 51 84 #30 of 187 16 #43 of 51
Financial Health 59 #25 of 59 31 #154 of 221 16 #50 of 59
Shareholder Returns 55 #19 of 41 33 #102 of 152 70 #13 of 41
Overall 59 44 34
  • TT ranked among 59 companies in Construction Products
  • EMR ranked among 223 companies in Machinery
  • CARR ranked among 59 companies in Construction Products

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodTTEMRCARRSPY
1 month -10.9%+2.7%+0.1% -2.3%
3 months -10.4%+7.2%-12.7% -0.7%
6 months -15.0%+22.5%-16.3% +4.8%
Year to date +6.2%+25.1%+4.4% +10.3%
1 year -7.9%+18.9%-7.2% +10.3%
3 years +89.6%+80.5%+9.2% +73.0%
3 years, per year +23.8%+21.8%+3.0% +20.1%
5 years +131.8%+74.2%+6.2% +61.9%
5 years, per year +18.3%+11.8%+1.2% +10.1%
10 years +691.9%+231.7%— +258.6%
10 years, per year +23.0%+12.7%— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureTTEMRCARRSPY
Volatility, 1Y 29.8%32.0%35.5% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 31.8%33.7%36.6% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.231.551.25 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.260.59-0.20 0.80
Max drawdown, 5Y -40.3%-29.9%-40.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -17.9%-2.8%-27.4% -3.5%
52-week high $503.46$170.76$76.00 $779.14
52-week low $376.43$123.30$50.36 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleTTEMRCARR
P/E now vs peer median 28.9xmedian 21.6x 36.0xmedian 25.6x -25.2xmedian 21.6x
P/S now vs peer median 3.9xmedian 1.6x 5.0xmedian 1.9x 2.0xmedian 1.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 20.5xmedian 13.2x 16.8xmedian 14.4x 284.9xmedian 13.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median 23.5xmedian 17.4x 26.7xmedian 22.5x 19.0xmedian 17.4x
P/B now vs peer median 9.9xmedian 2.9x 4.5xmedian 2.2x 4.3xmedian 2.9x
PEG now vs peer median 1.54median 1.00 -0.87median 1.36 0.48median 1.00

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsTTEMRCARR
Revenue $23.23B $18.64B $22.79B
Gross profit $8.13B $9.91B $6.59B
Operating income $4.16B $4.68B -$1.09B
Net income $3.18B $2.58B -$1.73B
Free cash flow $3.86B $3.46B $2.38B
R&D – – $605.00M
EPS (diluted) $14.23 $4.59 $-2.19
Cash & equivalents $1.23B $2.18B $1.35B
Total debt $4.22B $13.11B $11.47B
Shares (diluted) 221.40M 561.10M 821.80M
Enterprise value $85.12B $85.34B $39.89B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricTTEMRCARR
P/E 28.9x 36.0x -25.2x
P/FCF 23.5x 26.7x 19.0x
P/Operating cash flow 21.4x 23.7x 15.8x
P/S 3.9x 5.0x 2.0x
P/B 9.9x 4.5x 4.3x
P/Tangible book 16.0x 7.9x 9.2x
EV/EBITDA 20.5x 16.8x 284.9x
EV/EBIT 22.5x 22.1x -50.8x
EV/Revenue 4.0x 5.6x 2.4x
EV/FCF 24.2x 29.9x 23.2x
EV/Operating cash flow 22.1x 26.4x 19.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.54 -0.87 0.48

Growth

14 metrics
MetricTTEMRCARR
Revenue growth (1Y) 10.3% 4.8% 3.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 10.3% 7.6% 11.1%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 6.0% 5.7% 12.3%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 0.9% 11.0% 28.1%
Operating income growth (1Y) 5.2% 9.2% -138.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 14.3% 13.6% -39.5%
Net income growth (1Y) 7.6% -3.0% -142.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 17.1% -42.0% -49.6%
EPS growth (1Y) 8.9% -2.2% -147.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 18.8% -41.6% -52.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 42.8% 4.4% 55.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 23.4% 10.1% 2.3%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 50.8% 4.4% 75.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 25.7% 9.4% 0.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricTTEMRCARR
Gross margin 35.0% 53.2% 28.9%
EBITDA margin 19.7% 33.1% 0.9%
Operating margin 17.9% 25.1% -4.8%
Pretax margin 16.9% 17.6% -6.4%
Net margin 13.6% 13.8% -7.9%
FCF margin 16.6% 18.6% 10.4%
Operating cash flow margin 18.2% 21.0% 12.5%
Return on equity 35.7% 12.7% -14.0%
Return on assets 13.3% 6.1% -4.7%
Return on invested capital 25.7% 10.9% -4.6%
Return on capital employed 25.8% 14.9% -4.1%
Asset turnover 1.0x 0.4x 0.6x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.3x 1.5x -1.7x
Stock comp / revenue 0.4% 1.3% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricTTEMRCARR
Debt / assets 17.7% 31.1% 34.2%
Debt / equity 0.5x 0.6x 1.1x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.7x 1.8x 52.2x
Debt / FCF 1.1x 3.8x 4.8x
Liabilities / assets 61.8% 51.7% 69.0%
Equity / assets 38.2% 48.3% 31.0%
Interest coverage 19.2x – –
Current ratio 1.1x 0.9x 1.0x
Quick ratio 0.7x 0.5x 0.6x
Cash ratio 0.2x 0.2x 0.2x
Altman Z-score 5.92 4.70 2.15

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricTTEMRCARR
Dividend yield 1.0% 1.3% 1.7%
Net buyback yield 1.7% 1.0% 3.6%
Shareholder yield 2.7% 2.3% 5.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) 28.4% 47.8% -45.6%
Payout ratio (FCF) 23.4% 35.6% 33.1%
Dividend growth (1Y) 10.3% 3.1% 6.5%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 10.6% 0.7% 10.1%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusTTEMRCARR
Forward P/E 26.4xFY2026 24.6xFY2026 18.7xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $15.64FY2026 $6.75FY2026 $2.95FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +19.8%FY2026 +12.5%FY2026 +13.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +10.2% +15.3% +9.2%
Revenue, next fiscal year $25.40BFY2026 $18.13BFY2026 $22.69BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +19.1%FY2026 +0.6%FY2026 +4.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +7.8% +15.3% +5.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersTTEMRCARR
Held by institutions 87.0% 82.1% 87.4%
Institutions holding 1,812 2,293 1,630
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.3% +0.9% +1.0%
Institutions buying 895 1,082 807
Institutions selling 580 799 544
Buyers to sellers 1.54 1.35 1.48

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

TTEMRCARR
TT 1.00 0.58 0.66
EMR 0.58 1.00 0.55
CARR 0.66 0.55 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, TT, EMR and CARR?

Emerson Electric (EMR) is the largest by market capitalisation: Trane Technologies (TT) $90.48B, Emerson Electric (EMR) $92.58B, Carrier Global (CARR) $45.15B.

Which stock is cheaper, TT, EMR and CARR?

Trane Technologies (TT) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Trane Technologies (TT) 28.9x, Emerson Electric (EMR) 36.0x, Carrier Global (CARR) -25.2x). On next year's consensus earnings, Carrier Global (CARR) is cheapest (Trane Technologies (TT) 26.4x, Emerson Electric (EMR) 24.6x, Carrier Global (CARR) 18.7x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Trane Technologies (TT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Trane Technologies (TT) +10.3%, Emerson Electric (EMR) +4.8%, Carrier Global (CARR) +3.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Emerson Electric (EMR) has the highest net margin (Trane Technologies (TT) 13.6%, Emerson Electric (EMR) 13.8%, Carrier Global (CARR) -7.9%). On return on invested capital, Trane Technologies (TT) leads (Trane Technologies (TT) 25.7%, Emerson Electric (EMR) 10.9%, Carrier Global (CARR) -4.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Emerson Electric (EMR) returned the most: Trane Technologies (TT) -7.9%, Emerson Electric (EMR) +18.9%, Carrier Global (CARR) -7.2%. Over five years, Trane Technologies (TT) compounded fastest (Trane Technologies (TT) +18.3%/yr, Emerson Electric (EMR) +11.8%/yr, Carrier Global (CARR) +1.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Carrier Global (CARR) has the highest dividend yield: Trane Technologies (TT) 0.99%, Emerson Electric (EMR) 1.34%, Carrier Global (CARR) 1.74%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Trane Technologies (TT) has been the steadiest (Trane Technologies (TT) 29.8%, Emerson Electric (EMR) 32.0%, Carrier Global (CARR) 35.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, TT, EMR and CARR?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Trane Technologies (TT) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.