TSLA vs VRT vs STLA Stock Comparison

Tesla, Vertiv Holdings and Stellantis Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (LI) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
TSLA Tesla, Inc.
$404.22 +13.1% 1M -12.2% 1Y
Market cap
$1.31T
P/E
344.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$103.62B
Div. yield
–
Auto Manufacturers Consumer Discretionary
3 wins
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co
$243.10 -0.4% 1M +27.6% 1Y
Market cap
$93.60B
P/E
44.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$13.12B
Div. yield
0.10%
Electrical Equipment Industrials
6 wins
STLA Stellantis N.V.
$4.70 +1.7% 1M -58.4% 1Y
Market cap
$13.62B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$187.39B
Div. yield
–
Auto Manufacturers Consumer Discretionary
2 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Vertiv Holdings leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Vertiv Holdings 6, Tesla 3, Stellantis 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionTSLAVRTSTLALeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $1.31T $93.60B $13.62B TSLA
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 344.0x 44.6x -0.8x VRT
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 251.1x 35.2x 8.7x STLA
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +11.8% +35.3% +66.9% STLA
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 3.7% 16.0% -9.6% VRT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 3.4% 26.3% -14.7% VRT
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -3.2x -0.3x -0.4x TSLA
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 0.10% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -12.2% +27.6% -58.4% VRT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +1.7%/yr +56.8%/yr -25.1%/yr VRT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 45.7% 67.7% 53.3% TSLA
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 51/100 60/100 43/100 VRT

Percentile Scorecard

TSLAVRTSTLA

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisTSLAVRTSTLA
Valuation 14 #43 of 50 26 #151 of 203 41 #30 of 50
Growth 44 #28 of 49 99 #3 of 188 19 #40 of 49
Profitability 78 #11 of 47 99 #3 of 184 26 #35 of 47
Financial Health 96 #3 of 53 60 #88 of 217 48 #28 of 53
Shareholder Returns 20 #25 of 31 16 #128 of 153 80 #7 of 31
Overall 51 60 43
  • TSLA ranked among 56 companies in Automobiles and Components
  • VRT ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • STLA ranked among 56 companies in Automobiles and Components

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodTSLAVRTSTLASPY
1 month +13.1%-0.4%+1.7% +0.9%
3 months +35.5%+9.0%-21.7% +5.9%
6 months +8.4%-20.6%-39.0% +8.5%
Year to date -10.1%+50.1%-56.8% +13.3%
1 year -12.2%+27.6%-58.4% +12.4%
3 years +95.0%+567.5%-73.9% +88.1%
3 years, per year +25.0%+88.4%-36.2% +23.5%
5 years +8.9%+846.7%-76.4% +68.2%
5 years, per year +1.7%+56.8%-25.1% +11.0%
10 years +2,932.4%—— +263.4%
10 years, per year +40.7%—— +13.8%

Risk

MeasureTSLAVRTSTLASPY
Volatility, 1Y 45.7%67.7%53.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 47.7%67.3%57.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.262.931.25 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.270.41-1.10 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -73.6%-70.2%-86.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -17.5%-35.4%-61.2% -0.9%
52-week high $489.88$376.23$12.12 $779.14
52-week low $298.32$149.83$4.06 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleTSLAVRTSTLA
P/E now vs peer median 344.0xmedian 20.0x 44.6xmedian 25.4x -0.8xmedian 20.0x
P/S now vs peer median 12.6xmedian 0.5x 7.1xmedian 1.9x 0.1xmedian 0.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 117.5xmedian 8.7x 30.3xmedian 14.3x -1.6xmedian 8.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 227.1xmedian 9.4x 29.7xmedian 21.8x -0.8xmedian 9.4x
P/B now vs peer median 15.0xmedian 0.9x 17.0xmedian 2.2x 0.2xmedian 0.9x
PEG now vs peer median -10.56median 1.35 0.44median 1.41 —median 1.35

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsTSLAVRTSTLA
Revenue $103.62B $13.12B $187.39B
Gross profit $19.53B $5.00B $6.49B
Operating income $4.37B $2.64B -$19.12B
Net income $3.86B $2.10B -$17.83B
Free cash flow $5.76B $3.15B -$16.76B
R&D $7.73B – $11.52B
EPS (diluted) $1.07 $5.34 $-6.21
Cash & equivalents $15.22B $3.51B $32.94B
Total debt $9.34B $2.93B $45.18B
Shares (diluted) 3.54B 392.68M 2.89B
Enterprise value $1.14T $82.45B -$147.29B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricTSLAVRTSTLA
P/E 344.0x 44.6x -0.8x
P/FCF 227.1x 29.7x -0.8x
P/Operating cash flow 70.0x 25.5x -2.5x
P/S 12.6x 7.1x 0.1x
P/B 15.0x 17.0x 0.2x
P/Tangible book 15.1x 24.9x 0.3x
EV/EBITDA 117.5x 30.3x -1.6x
EV/EBIT 291.5x 35.1x -1.0x
EV/Revenue 12.3x 7.1x 0.1x
EV/FCF 221.2x 29.5x -1.1x
EV/Operating cash flow 68.2x 25.3x -3.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -10.56 0.44 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricTSLAVRTSTLA
Revenue growth (1Y) 11.8% 35.3% 66.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 3.3% 25.4% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 20.5% 44.3% -25.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -1.1% 30.9% –
Operating income growth (1Y) -22.2% 54.8% -252.5%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -29.8% 52.2% –
Net income growth (1Y) -35.0% 102.9% -398.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -32.0% 102.1% –
EPS growth (1Y) -35.7% 102.0% -444.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -32.6% 101.3% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 18.5% 138.9% 50.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 10.2% 71.6% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 3.2% 133.7% -47.6%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -2.2% 73.1% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricTSLAVRTSTLA
Gross margin 18.9% 38.1% 3.5%
EBITDA margin 10.5% 23.4% -6.2%
Operating margin 4.2% 20.1% -10.2%
Pretax margin 5.0% 19.9% -10.7%
Net margin 3.7% 16.0% -9.6%
FCF margin 5.6% 24.0% -8.9%
Operating cash flow margin 18.0% 27.9% -3.0%
Return on equity 4.5% 40.9% -25.4%
Return on assets 2.6% 12.3% -7.3%
Return on invested capital 3.4% 26.3% -14.7%
Return on capital employed 3.9% 31.7% -13.0%
Asset turnover 0.7x 0.8x 0.8x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 4.8x 1.7x 0.3x
Stock comp / revenue 3.7% 0.4% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricTSLAVRTSTLA
Debt / assets 6.3% 16.1% 18.6%
Debt / equity 0.1x 0.5x 0.6x
Net debt / EBITDA -3.2x -0.3x -0.4x
Debt / FCF 1.6x 0.9x -2.7x
Liabilities / assets 41.1% 69.7% 71.2%
Equity / assets 58.9% 30.3% 28.8%
Interest coverage 13.1x 73.2x –
Current ratio 1.9x 1.4x 1.0x
Quick ratio 1.3x 0.9x 0.5x
Cash ratio 1.2x 0.4x 0.4x
Altman Z-score 14.30 6.06 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricTSLAVRTSTLA
Dividend yield – 0.1% –
Net buyback yield -0.1% -0.1% 5.0%
Shareholder yield -0.1% 0.0% 5.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusTSLAVRTSTLA
Forward P/E 251.1xFY2026 35.2xFY2026 8.7xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.61FY2026 $6.91FY2026 $0.54FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -3.0%FY2026 +64.5%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +32.3% +40.2% +96.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $112.97BFY2026 $14.66BFY2026 $183.40BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +19.1%FY2026 +43.3%FY2026 +1.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +15.2% +20.2% -2.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersTSLAVRTSTLA
Held by institutions 42.6% 81.7% 32.9%
Institutions holding 4,263 2,038 401
Change in shares held, QoQ +7.4% +0.0% -6.0%
Institutions buying 2,374 1,170 201
Institutions selling 1,357 691 126
Buyers to sellers 1.75 1.69 1.60

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

TSLAVRTSTLA
TSLA 1.00 0.35 0.19
VRT 0.35 1.00 0.11
STLA 0.19 0.11 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, TSLA, VRT and STLA?

Tesla (TSLA) is the largest by market capitalisation: Tesla (TSLA) $1.31T, Vertiv Holdings (VRT) $93.60B, Stellantis (STLA) $13.62B.

Which stock is cheaper, TSLA, VRT and STLA?

Vertiv Holdings (VRT) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Tesla (TSLA) 344.0x, Vertiv Holdings (VRT) 44.6x, Stellantis (STLA) -0.8x). On next year's consensus earnings, Stellantis (STLA) is cheapest (Tesla (TSLA) 251.1x, Vertiv Holdings (VRT) 35.2x, Stellantis (STLA) 8.7x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Stellantis (STLA) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Tesla (TSLA) +11.8%, Vertiv Holdings (VRT) +35.3%, Stellantis (STLA) +66.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

Vertiv Holdings (VRT) has the highest net margin (Tesla (TSLA) 3.7%, Vertiv Holdings (VRT) 16.0%, Stellantis (STLA) -9.6%). On return on invested capital, Vertiv Holdings (VRT) leads (Tesla (TSLA) 3.4%, Vertiv Holdings (VRT) 26.3%, Stellantis (STLA) -14.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Vertiv Holdings (VRT) returned the most: Tesla (TSLA) -12.2%, Vertiv Holdings (VRT) +27.6%, Stellantis (STLA) -58.4%. Over five years, Vertiv Holdings (VRT) compounded fastest (Tesla (TSLA) +1.7%/yr, Vertiv Holdings (VRT) +56.8%/yr, Stellantis (STLA) -25.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Vertiv Holdings (VRT) 0.10%, Stellantis (STLA) 0.00%. Tesla (TSLA) and Stellantis (STLA) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Tesla (TSLA) has been the steadiest (Tesla (TSLA) 45.7%, Vertiv Holdings (VRT) 67.7%, Stellantis (STLA) 53.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, TSLA, VRT and STLA?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Vertiv Holdings (VRT) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.