TS vs BKR vs LCII Stock Comparison

Tenaris, Baker Hughes and Lci Industries Prices as of Nov 5, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (MLI) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
TS Tenaris Sa
$56.41 -0.8% 1M +40.6% 1Y
Market cap
$60.47B
P/E
30.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$12.16B
Div. yield
3.16%
Metal Fabrication Industrials
7 wins
BKR Baker Hughes Co
$46.20 -19.1% 1M -1.8% 1Y
Market cap
$45.88B
P/E
15.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$28.74B
Div. yield
1.49%
Oilfield Services Energy
1 win
LCII Lci Industries
$102.54 +24.7% 1M -7.2% 1Y
Market cap
$2.49B
P/E
12.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.98B
Div. yield
4.49%
Metal Fabrication Industrials
4 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Tenaris leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Tenaris 7, Lci Industries 4, Baker Hughes 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionTSBKRLCIILeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $60.47B $45.88B $2.49B TS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 30.1x 15.8x 12.5x LCII
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 14.2x 18.7x 12.5x LCII
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +2.8% +3.7% -0.2% BKR
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 16.2% 10.1% 5.0% TS
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 13.0% 8.3% 9.7% TS
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -3.5x 2.9x 1.4x TS
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 3.16% 1.49% 4.49% LCII
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +40.6% -1.8% -7.2% TS
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +18.0%/yr +13.3%/yr -7.4%/yr TS
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 28.9% 35.4% 37.3% TS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 59/100 43/100 69/100 LCII

Percentile Scorecard

TSBKRLCII

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisTSBKRLCII
Valuation 40 #122 of 204 26 #35 of 47 97 #8 of 204
Growth 16 #161 of 191 67 #15 of 44 50 #97 of 191
Profitability 80 #39 of 189 70 #13 of 41 61 #74 of 189
Financial Health 98 #5 of 221 13 #40 of 46 52 #107 of 221
Shareholder Returns 61 #63 of 159 39 #20 of 32 87 #22 of 159
Overall 59 43 69
  • TS ranked among 223 companies in Machinery
  • BKR ranked among 48 companies in Oilfield Services and Equipment
  • LCII ranked among 223 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodTSBKRLCIISPY
1 month -0.8%-19.1%+24.7% -5.9%
3 months +5.6%-26.4%-3.1% -4.6%
6 months -4.3%-27.3%-11.9% +0.2%
Year to date +46.7%+1.4%-15.5% +7.5%
1 year +40.6%-1.8%-7.2% +8.2%
3 years +59.4%+32.2%-9.1% +68.3%
3 years, per year +16.8%+9.8%-3.1% +19.0%
5 years +128.3%+86.3%-31.9% +56.5%
5 years, per year +18.0%+13.3%-7.4% +9.4%
10 years +97.7%—+18.4% +251.5%
10 years, per year +7.1%—+1.7% +13.4%

Risk

MeasureTSBKRLCIISPY
Volatility, 1Y 28.9%35.4%37.3% 13.6%
Downside volatility, 1Y 30.0%37.6%36.3% 14.2%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.280.690.81 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.41-0.05-0.19 0.60
Max drawdown, 5Y -33.7%-47.2%-53.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -11.9%-33.7%-34.7% -5.9%
52-week high $64.02$69.67$157.13 $779.14
52-week low $37.76$44.47$78.16 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleTSBKRLCII
P/E now vs peer median 30.1xmedian 23.4x 15.8xmedian 22.0x 12.5xmedian 23.4x
P/S now vs peer median 5.0xmedian 1.7x 1.6xmedian 1.1x 0.6xmedian 1.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 17.7xmedian 13.4x 12.1xmedian 8.1x 7.3xmedian 13.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median 22.0xmedian 21.9x 14.2xmedian 14.2x 9.6xmedian 21.9x
P/B now vs peer median 3.5xmedian 2.1x 2.2xmedian 1.4x 1.7xmedian 2.1x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.02 0.77median 0.45 0.20median 1.02

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsTSBKRLCII
Revenue $12.16B $28.74B $3.98B
Gross profit $4.12B $6.83B $1.04B
Operating income $2.23B $3.43B $301.50M
Net income $2.04B $2.93B $198.86M
Free cash flow $2.75B $3.23B $259.70M
R&D – $573.00M –
EPS (diluted) – $2.90 $8.14
Cash & equivalents $9.55B $4.07B $245.62M
Total debt -$336.57M $18.26B $852.40M
Shares (diluted) – 998.00M 24.42M
Enterprise value $31.99B $8.03B $1.67B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricTSBKRLCII
P/E 30.1x 15.8x 12.5x
P/FCF 22.0x 14.2x 9.6x
P/Operating cash flow 26.4x 10.2x 7.9x
P/S 5.0x 1.6x 0.6x
P/B 3.5x 2.2x 1.7x
P/Tangible book 3.5x 4.3x 2.3x
EV/EBITDA 17.7x 12.1x 7.3x
EV/EBIT 22.7x 17.5x 10.3x
EV/Revenue 4.2x 2.1x 0.8x
EV/FCF 18.4x 18.6x 11.9x
EV/Operating cash flow 22.1x 13.3x 9.8x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.77 0.20

Growth

14 metrics
MetricTSBKRLCII
Revenue growth (1Y) 2.8% 3.7% -0.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -6.9% 5.4% 1.2%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 2.2% 3.2% 10.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -13.9% 5.8% 11.1%
Operating income growth (1Y) -2.6% 3.8% 15.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -20.9% 13.8% 45.6%
Net income growth (1Y) 0.4% 0.0% 11.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -17.4% 19.9% 59.0%
EPS growth (1Y) – -0.4% 11.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 20.5% 61.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -0.7% 35.2% -11.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -17.6% 14.2% -14.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -7.9% 54.5% -16.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -16.1% 19.5% -15.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricTSBKRLCII
Gross margin 33.9% 23.8% 26.2%
EBITDA margin 23.5% 17.2% 10.6%
Operating margin 18.3% 11.9% 7.6%
Pretax margin 20.6% 11.2% 6.8%
Net margin 16.2% 10.1% 5.0%
FCF margin 22.6% 11.2% 6.5%
Operating cash flow margin 18.8% 15.7% 7.9%
Return on equity 11.9% 14.4% 13.8%
Return on assets 9.9% 5.2% 6.1%
Return on invested capital 13.0% 8.3% 9.7%
Return on capital employed 11.0% 8.9% 11.1%
Asset turnover 0.6x 0.5x 1.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.1x 1.5x 1.6x
Stock comp / revenue – 0.7% 0.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricTSBKRLCII
Debt / assets -1.6% 30.9% 26.6%
Debt / equity 0.0x 0.9x 0.6x
Net debt / EBITDA -3.5x 2.9x 1.4x
Debt / FCF -0.1x 5.7x 3.3x
Liabilities / assets 18.2% 65.2% 54.4%
Equity / assets 81.8% 34.8% 45.6%
Interest coverage 43.8x – –
Current ratio – 1.2x 2.8x
Quick ratio 34.6x 0.8x 1.2x
Cash ratio 28.4x 0.2x 0.5x
Altman Z-score – 1.45 3.37

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricTSBKRLCII
Dividend yield 3.2% 1.5% 4.5%
Net buyback yield -1.0% – 0.3%
Shareholder yield 2.1% 1.5% 4.8%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 31.1% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 28.2% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 2.2% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 5.5% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusTSBKRLCII
Forward P/E 14.2xFY2026 18.7xFY2026 12.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $3.97FY2026 $2.47FY2026 $8.18FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +8.5%FY2026 -5.0%FY2026 +9.7%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +1.3% +10.5% +18.7%
Revenue, next fiscal year $12.98BFY2026 $31.01BFY2026 $4.16BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +8.3%FY2026 +11.8%FY2026 +1.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -6.2% -1.7% +4.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersTSBKRLCII
Held by institutions 3.6% 97.3% 100.0%
Institutions holding 285 1,151 360
Change in shares held, QoQ -2.4% +5.2% -3.1%
Institutions buying 154 577 181
Institutions selling 80 430 123
Buyers to sellers 1.93 1.34 1.47

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

TSBKRLCII
TS 1.00 0.51 -0.06
BKR 0.51 1.00 -0.05
LCII -0.06 -0.05 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, TS, BKR and LCII?

Tenaris (TS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Tenaris (TS) $60.47B, Baker Hughes (BKR) $45.88B, Lci Industries (LCII) $2.49B.

Which stock is cheaper, TS, BKR and LCII?

Lci Industries (LCII) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Tenaris (TS) 30.1x, Baker Hughes (BKR) 15.8x, Lci Industries (LCII) 12.5x). On next year's consensus earnings, Lci Industries (LCII) is cheapest (Tenaris (TS) 14.2x, Baker Hughes (BKR) 18.7x, Lci Industries (LCII) 12.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Baker Hughes (BKR) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Tenaris (TS) +2.8%, Baker Hughes (BKR) +3.7%, Lci Industries (LCII) -0.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Tenaris (TS) has the highest net margin (Tenaris (TS) 16.2%, Baker Hughes (BKR) 10.1%, Lci Industries (LCII) 5.0%). On return on invested capital, Tenaris (TS) leads (Tenaris (TS) 13.0%, Baker Hughes (BKR) 8.3%, Lci Industries (LCII) 9.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Tenaris (TS) returned the most: Tenaris (TS) +40.6%, Baker Hughes (BKR) -1.8%, Lci Industries (LCII) -7.2%. Over five years, Tenaris (TS) compounded fastest (Tenaris (TS) +18.0%/yr, Baker Hughes (BKR) +13.3%/yr, Lci Industries (LCII) -7.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Lci Industries (LCII) has the highest dividend yield: Tenaris (TS) 3.16%, Baker Hughes (BKR) 1.49%, Lci Industries (LCII) 4.49%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Tenaris (TS) has been the steadiest (Tenaris (TS) 28.9%, Baker Hughes (BKR) 35.4%, Lci Industries (LCII) 37.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, TS, BKR and LCII?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Tenaris (TS) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.