TRNO vs OMAB vs PLD Stock Comparison

Terreno Realty, Central North Airport and Prologis Prices as of Nov 2, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (STAG) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
TRNO Terreno Realty Corp
$66.77 +3.4% 1M +16.9% 1Y
Market cap
$7.19B
P/E
18.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$502.88M
Div. yield
3.19%
Industrial REITs Real Estate
5 wins
PLD Prologis, Inc.
$129.68 +0.6% 1M +4.5% 1Y
Market cap
$123.26B
P/E
28.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$9.36B
Div. yield
3.25%
Industrial REITs Real Estate
1 win

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Terreno Realty leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Terreno Realty 5, Central North Airport 4, Prologis 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionTRNOOMABPLDLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $7.19B $5.06B $123.26B PLD
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 18.4x 17.0x 28.8x OMAB
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 32.4x 15.9x 36.4x OMAB
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +18.0% — +7.2% TRNO
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 76.9% — 45.4% TRNO
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — 5.0% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — 4.3x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 3.19% 5.17% 3.25% OMAB
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +16.9% +6.2% +4.5% TRNO
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -2.6%/yr +16.7%/yr -2.6%/yr OMAB
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 19.6% 31.3% 20.6% TRNO
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 56/100 45/100 50/100 TRNO

Percentile Scorecard

TRNOOMABPLD

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisTRNOOMABPLD
Valuation 8 #133 of 145 27 #100 of 137 9 #132 of 145
Growth 89 #17 of 144 – 66 #49 of 144
Profitability 29 #100 of 140 – 76 #35 of 140
Financial Health 98 #4 of 146 35 #96 of 147 88 #19 of 146
Shareholder Returns 54 #61 of 132 73 #24 of 85 12 #116 of 132
Overall 56 45 50
  • TRNO ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs
  • OMAB ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • PLD ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodTRNOOMABPLDSPY
1 month +3.4%+11.2%+0.6% -2.3%
3 months -6.9%-1.9%-10.1% -0.7%
6 months +3.4%+0.8%-6.5% +4.8%
Year to date +13.7%-3.7%+1.6% +10.3%
1 year +16.9%+6.2%+4.5% +10.3%
3 years +19.3%+59.0%+21.7% +73.0%
3 years, per year +6.1%+16.7%+6.8% +20.1%
5 years -12.1%+116.6%-12.2% +61.9%
5 years, per year -2.6%+16.7%-2.6% +10.1%
10 years +166.1%+137.0%+160.1% +258.6%
10 years, per year +10.3%+9.0%+10.0% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureTRNOOMABPLDSPY
Volatility, 1Y 19.6%31.3%20.6% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 19.4%27.7%20.7% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.341.050.38 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.860.200.22 0.80
Max drawdown, 5Y -40.6%-42.1%-48.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -11.1%-22.4%-13.5% -3.5%
52-week high $75.07$134.98$149.92 $779.14
52-week low $57.77$88.75$122.40 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleTRNOOMABPLD
P/E now vs peer median 18.4xmedian 26.3x 17.0xmedian 16.1x 28.8xmedian 26.3x
P/S now vs peer median 14.3xmedian 4.2x 5.7xmedian 0.9x 13.2xmedian 4.2x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 14.4x —median 8.1x 19.7xmedian 14.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median -10.5xmedian 23.9x 12.5xmedian 11.4x -168.3xmedian 23.9x
P/B now vs peer median 1.6xmedian 1.3x 8.0xmedian 1.2x 2.0xmedian 1.3x
PEG now vs peer median 0.66median 1.98 —median 0.75 2.48median 1.98

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsTRNOOMABPLD
Revenue $502.88M – $9.36B
Operating income – – $5.13B
Net income $388.59M – $4.53B
Free cash flow -$686.58M – -$732.42M
EPS (diluted) $3.63 – $4.39
Cash & equivalents $51.21M $172.32M $2.27B
Total debt $942.47M $756.57M $36.83B
Shares (diluted) 106.67M – 968.51M
Enterprise value $7.00B $4.55B $121.65B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricTRNOOMABPLD
P/E 18.4x 17.0x 28.8x
P/FCF -10.5x 12.5x -168.3x
P/Operating cash flow 25.1x – 22.2x
P/S 14.3x 5.7x 13.2x
P/B 1.6x 8.0x 2.0x
P/Tangible book 1.6x -10.2x 2.0x
EV/EBITDA – – 19.7x
EV/EBIT – – 30.7x
EV/Revenue 16.1x – 16.9x
EV/FCF -11.8x – -215.5x
EV/Operating cash flow 28.2x – 28.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.66 – 2.48

Growth

14 metrics
MetricTRNOOMABPLD
Revenue growth (1Y) 18.0% – 7.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 18.7% – 5.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – – 23.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – 11.7%
Net income growth (1Y) 52.9% – 32.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 38.9% – 12.3%
EPS growth (1Y) 47.6% – 31.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 27.8% – 11.6%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 17.8% – 7.0%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 19.6% – -0.2%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -78.6% – -124.9%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -16.2% – 32.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricTRNOOMABPLD
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin – – 85.6%
Operating margin – – 54.8%
Pretax margin – – 52.0%
Net margin 76.9% – 45.4%
FCF margin -136.5% – -7.8%
Operating cash flow margin 57.0% – 59.3%
Return on equity – – 7.6%
Return on assets – – 4.4%
Return on invested capital – – 5.0%
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.1x – 0.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.7x – 1.2x
Stock comp / revenue 3.6% – 2.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricTRNOOMABPLD
Debt / assets 16.5% 44.0% 35.5%
Debt / equity 0.2x 1.2x 0.6x
Net debt / EBITDA – – 4.3x
Debt / FCF -1.4x – -50.3x
Liabilities / assets 22.4% 63.1% 41.9%
Equity / assets 77.6% 36.9% 58.1%
Interest coverage – – 4.8x
Current ratio – 1.3x –
Quick ratio – 1.2x –
Cash ratio – 0.7x –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricTRNOOMABPLD
Dividend yield 3.2% 5.2% 3.3%
Net buyback yield -4.3% – –
Shareholder yield -1.1% 5.2% 3.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) 55.0% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) -31.1% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) 11.4% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 21.2% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusTRNOOMABPLD
Forward P/E 32.4xFY2026 15.9xFY2026 36.4xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $2.06FY2026 $6.60FY2026 $3.56FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -47.4%FY2026 +3.3%FY2026 0.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -8.7% +28.5% +2.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year $544.31MFY2026 $933.64MFY2026 $8.99BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +14.3%FY2026 +1.1%FY2026 +10.2%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +1.0% +19.6% +1.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersTRNOOMABPLD
Held by institutions 100.0% 12.3% 94.5%
Institutions holding 384 163 1,726
Change in shares held, QoQ +3.0% +5.4% +1.5%
Institutions buying 202 77 970
Institutions selling 126 59 531
Buyers to sellers 1.60 1.31 1.83

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

TRNOOMABPLD
TRNO 1.00 0.18 0.75
OMAB 0.18 1.00 0.16
PLD 0.75 0.16 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, TRNO, OMAB and PLD?

Prologis (PLD) is the largest by market capitalisation: Terreno Realty (TRNO) $7.19B, Central North Airport (OMAB) $5.06B, Prologis (PLD) $123.26B.

Which stock is cheaper, TRNO, OMAB and PLD?

Central North Airport (OMAB) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Terreno Realty (TRNO) 18.4x, Central North Airport (OMAB) 17.0x, Prologis (PLD) 28.8x). On next year's consensus earnings, Central North Airport (OMAB) is cheapest (Terreno Realty (TRNO) 32.4x, Central North Airport (OMAB) 15.9x, Prologis (PLD) 36.4x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Terreno Realty (TRNO) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Terreno Realty (TRNO) +18.0%, Prologis (PLD) +7.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Terreno Realty (TRNO) has the highest net margin (Terreno Realty (TRNO) 76.9%, Prologis (PLD) 45.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Terreno Realty (TRNO) returned the most: Terreno Realty (TRNO) +16.9%, Central North Airport (OMAB) +6.2%, Prologis (PLD) +4.5%. Over five years, Central North Airport (OMAB) compounded fastest (Terreno Realty (TRNO) -2.6%/yr, Central North Airport (OMAB) +16.7%/yr, Prologis (PLD) -2.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Central North Airport (OMAB) has the highest dividend yield: Terreno Realty (TRNO) 3.19%, Central North Airport (OMAB) 5.17%, Prologis (PLD) 3.25%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Terreno Realty (TRNO) has been the steadiest (Terreno Realty (TRNO) 19.6%, Central North Airport (OMAB) 31.3%, Prologis (PLD) 20.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, TRNO, OMAB and PLD?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Terreno Realty (TRNO) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.