TRI vs DSGX vs JG Stock Comparison

Thomson Reuters, Descartes Systems and Aurora Mobile Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
TRI Thomson Reuters Corp /Can/
$116.35 +20.9% 1M -23.9% 1Y
Market cap
$50.70B
P/E
31.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.83B
Div. yield
-0.01%
Compliance Software Technology
2 wins
JG Aurora Mobile Ltd
$6.63 +8.3% 1M -15.4% 1Y
Market cap
$25.66M
P/E
18.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$56.24M
Div. yield
–
Developer Tools Technology
4 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Aurora Mobile leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Aurora Mobile 4, Descartes Systems 4, Thomson Reuters 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionTRIDSGXJGLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $50.70B $7.84B $25.66M TRI
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 31.3x 41.7x 18.8x JG
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 27.3x 41.5x — TRI
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +7.0% +13.2% +15.2% JG
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 20.7% 24.3% 2.4% DSGX
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.2x — -16.2x JG
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield -0.01% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -23.9% +2.6% -15.4% DSGX
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -1.4%/yr +2.4%/yr -25.8%/yr DSGX
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 51.5% 40.7% 79.5% DSGX
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 55/100 67/100 74/100 JG

Percentile Scorecard

TRIDSGXJG

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisTRIDSGXJG
Valuation 50 #51 of 101 43 #51 of 89 93 #10 of 124
Growth 25 #73 of 97 65 #29 of 81 74 #30 of 113
Profitability 99 #2 of 93 97 #3 of 76 83 #19 of 109
Financial Health 65 #39 of 108 84 #16 of 93 46 #69 of 127
Shareholder Returns 39 #39 of 63 45 #28 of 50 –
Overall 55 67 74
  • TRI ranked among 114 companies in Business Applications
  • DSGX ranked among 98 companies in Vertical Software
  • JG ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodTRIDSGXJGSPY
1 month +20.9%+15.8%+8.3% +0.7%
3 months +17.7%+23.4%+18.6% +3.7%
6 months +21.6%+27.6%-7.1% +7.1%
Year to date -11.8%+5.0%+6.1% +12.8%
1 year -23.9%+2.6%-15.4% +11.9%
3 years -3.4%+28.6%+163.1% +85.2%
3 years, per year -1.2%+8.7%+38.1% +22.8%
5 years -6.9%+12.5%-77.4% +67.6%
5 years, per year -1.4%+2.4%-25.8% +10.9%
10 years +183.7%+340.3%— +262.0%
10 years, per year +11.0%+16.0%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureTRIDSGXJGSPY
Volatility, 1Y 51.5%40.7%79.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 52.0%37.1%82.2% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.160.33-0.31 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.460.06-0.19 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -64.3%-48.7%-94.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -25.3%-3.0%-24.7% -1.2%
52-week high $155.72$94.87$8.80 $779.14
52-week low $76.55$62.82$3.71 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleTRIDSGXJG
P/E now vs peer median 32.2xmedian 28.0x 42.0xmedian 39.2x 23.0xmedian 39.0x
P/S now vs peer median 6.6xmedian 2.8x 10.2xmedian 2.4x 0.7xmedian 4.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 25.8xmedian 16.9x 23.0xmedian 17.3x 11.6xmedian 32.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 16.2xmedian 15.9x 26.6xmedian 20.3x —median 27.4x
P/B now vs peer median 4.7xmedian 3.2x 4.8xmedian 1.8x 3.1xmedian 3.2x
PEG now vs peer median 3.11median 0.89 2.39median 1.52 0.82median 1.23

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsTRIDSGXJG
Revenue $7.83B $775.17M $56.24M
Gross profit – $601.59M $38.72M
Operating income $2.33B $243.60M $1.04M
Net income $1.68B $188.01M $809.07K
Free cash flow $3.19B $297.47M –
R&D – $109.17M $16.16M
EPS (diluted) $3.61 $2.15 $0.23
Cash & equivalents $577.00M $401.06M $22.42M
Total debt $3.26B – $737.00K
Shares (diluted) 449.53M 87.58M 6.03M
Enterprise value $47.48B $6.43B -$62.71M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricTRIDSGXJG
P/E 32.2x 42.0x 23.0x
P/FCF 16.2x 26.6x –
P/Operating cash flow 17.9x 25.9x –
P/S 6.6x 10.2x 0.7x
P/B 4.7x 4.8x 3.1x
P/Tangible book 6.4x 6.0x 3.4x
EV/EBITDA 25.8x 23.0x 11.6x
EV/EBIT 23.3x 30.9x 12.6x
EV/Revenue 6.9x 9.7x 0.3x
EV/FCF 17.0x 25.3x –
EV/Operating cash flow 18.8x 24.6x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 3.11 2.39 0.82

Growth

14 metrics
MetricTRIDSGXJG
Revenue growth (1Y) 7.0% 13.2% 15.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 5.2% 13.8% 8.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 15.5% 21.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 14.4% 9.4%
Operating income growth (1Y) 9.1% 30.1% 215.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -0.5% 19.8% 27.5%
Net income growth (1Y) 4.7% 26.9% 218.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -6.8% 18.3% 27.6%
EPS growth (1Y) 8.4% 26.4% 895.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 10.4% 17.6% 28.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 14.5% 28.6% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 10.1% 14.7% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 13.0% 30.3% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 9.0% 15.7% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricTRIDSGXJG
Gross margin – 77.6% 68.8%
EBITDA margin 26.9% 42.1% 2.6%
Operating margin 29.7% 31.4% 1.8%
Pretax margin 46.5% 32.7% 2.4%
Net margin 20.7% 24.3% 2.4%
FCF margin 40.7% 38.4% –
Operating cash flow margin 36.9% 39.4% –
Return on equity – 11.4% 7.4%
Return on assets – – 1.7%
Return on invested capital – – –
Return on capital employed – – 10.4%
Asset turnover – – 1.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.7x 1.6x –
Stock comp / revenue – 3.5% 0.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricTRIDSGXJG
Debt / assets 18.0% – 1.2%
Debt / equity 0.3x – 0.1x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.2x – -16.2x
Debt / FCF 1.0x – –
Liabilities / assets 38.5% 15.9% 78.4%
Equity / assets 61.5% 84.1% 21.6%
Interest coverage 116.5x 168.0x 209.7x
Current ratio 0.5x 2.0x 0.7x
Quick ratio -2.5x 1.9x 0.7x
Cash ratio 0.2x 1.5x 0.5x
Altman Z-score 5.88 16.58 -2.16

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricTRIDSGXJG
Dividend yield 3.5% – –
Net buyback yield -2.2% 0.2% –
Shareholder yield 1.2% 0.2% –
Payout ratio (earnings) 30.9% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 16.3% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) -10.6% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) -8.5% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusTRIDSGXJG
Forward P/E 27.3xFY2026 41.5xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $4.47FY2026 $2.20FY2026 $0.00FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +12.6%FY2026 +17.6%FY2026 -100.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +8.1% +18.2% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $7.73BFY2026 $889.11MFY2026 $54.81MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +3.8%FY2026 +22.0%FY2026 +2.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +15.5% +1.6% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersTRIDSGXJG
Held by institutions 90.1% 82.0% –
Institutions holding 421 342 –
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.6% +3.7% –
Institutions buying 408 167 –
Institutions selling 9 139 –
Buyers to sellers 45.33 1.20 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

TRIDSGXJG
TRI 1.00 0.63 0.00
DSGX 0.63 1.00 0.06
JG 0.00 0.06 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, TRI, DSGX and JG?

Thomson Reuters (TRI) is the largest by market capitalisation: Thomson Reuters (TRI) $50.70B, Descartes Systems (DSGX) $7.84B, Aurora Mobile (JG) $25.66M.

Which stock is cheaper, TRI, DSGX and JG?

Aurora Mobile (JG) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Thomson Reuters (TRI) 31.3x, Descartes Systems (DSGX) 41.7x, Aurora Mobile (JG) 18.8x). On next year's consensus earnings, Thomson Reuters (TRI) is cheapest (Thomson Reuters (TRI) 27.3x, Descartes Systems (DSGX) 41.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Aurora Mobile (JG) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Thomson Reuters (TRI) +7.0%, Descartes Systems (DSGX) +13.2%, Aurora Mobile (JG) +15.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Descartes Systems (DSGX) has the highest net margin (Thomson Reuters (TRI) 20.7%, Descartes Systems (DSGX) 24.3%, Aurora Mobile (JG) 2.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Descartes Systems (DSGX) returned the most: Thomson Reuters (TRI) -23.9%, Descartes Systems (DSGX) +2.6%, Aurora Mobile (JG) -15.4%. Over five years, Descartes Systems (DSGX) compounded fastest (Thomson Reuters (TRI) -1.4%/yr, Descartes Systems (DSGX) +2.4%/yr, Aurora Mobile (JG) -25.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Descartes Systems (DSGX) has been the steadiest (Thomson Reuters (TRI) 51.5%, Descartes Systems (DSGX) 40.7%, Aurora Mobile (JG) 79.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, TRI, DSGX and JG?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Aurora Mobile (JG) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.