TRI vs UI vs CLBT Stock Comparison

Thomson Reuters, Ubiquiti and Cellebrite DI Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (CLVT) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
TRI Thomson Reuters Corp /Can/
$116.09 +19.3% 1M -28.3% 1Y
Market cap
$51.66B
P/E
32.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.83B
Div. yield
3.47%
Compliance Software Technology
5 wins
UI Ubiquiti Inc.
$601.71 +8.5% 1M -21.1% 1Y
Market cap
$36.42B
P/E
37.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.27B
Div. yield
0.57%
Networking Equipment Technology
5 wins
CLBT Cellebrite DI Ltd.
$11.92 +7.7% 1M -35.5% 1Y
Market cap
$2.97B
P/E
49.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$514.29M
Div. yield
–
Cybersecurity Software Technology
2 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Thomson Reuters leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Thomson Reuters 5, Ubiquiti 5, Cellebrite DI 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionTRIUICLBTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $51.66B $36.42B $2.97B TRI
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 32.1x 37.9x 49.0x TRI
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 26.0x 31.9x 44.1x TRI
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +7.0% +27.2% +17.8% UI
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 20.7% 29.3% 11.4% UI
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 72.8% 7.9% UI
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.2x — -3.5x CLBT
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 3.47% 0.57% — TRI
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -28.3% -21.1% -35.5% UI
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -1.5%/yr +14.5%/yr +1.3%/yr UI
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 51.8% 53.7% 63.9% TRI
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 56/100 68/100 71/100 CLBT

Percentile Scorecard

TRIUICLBT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisTRIUICLBT
Valuation 51 #50 of 101 27 #81 of 111 78 #28 of 124
Growth 25 #73 of 97 88 #14 of 108 78 #26 of 113
Profitability 99 #2 of 94 99 #2 of 104 93 #9 of 109
Financial Health 66 #37 of 108 75 #30 of 115 66 #44 of 127
Shareholder Returns 40 #39 of 64 52 #38 of 78 40 #38 of 63
Overall 56 68 71
  • TRI ranked among 114 companies in Business Applications
  • UI ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • CLBT ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodTRIUICLBTSPY
1 month +19.3%+8.5%+7.7% +0.9%
3 months +9.2%+15.3%-20.9% +5.9%
6 months +24.4%-38.0%-6.2% +8.5%
Year to date -12.0%+8.7%-33.9% +13.3%
1 year -28.3%-21.1%-35.5% +12.4%
3 years -1.5%+415.7%+84.8% +88.1%
3 years, per year -0.5%+72.8%+22.7% +23.5%
5 years -7.1%+96.9%+6.7% +68.2%
5 years, per year -1.5%+14.5%+1.3% +11.0%
10 years +183.1%+1,053.1%— +263.4%
10 years, per year +11.0%+27.7%— +13.8%

Risk

MeasureTRIUICLBTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 51.8%53.7%63.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 52.4%59.5%70.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.161.640.55 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.55-0.39-0.56 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -64.3%-70.0%-65.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -28.3%-44.5%-38.2% -0.9%
52-week high $161.88$1,084.50$19.28 $779.14
52-week low $76.55$515.44$10.44 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleTRIUICLBT
P/E now vs peer median 32.1xmedian 27.6x 37.9xmedian 33.5x 49.0xmedian 37.9x
P/S now vs peer median 6.6xmedian 2.7x 11.1xmedian 2.8x 5.8xmedian 4.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 25.7xmedian 17.4x 29.7xmedian 19.6x 34.5xmedian 34.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 16.2xmedian 15.8x 40.1xmedian 29.8x 18.7xmedian 26.6x
P/B now vs peer median 4.6xmedian 3.2x 25.3xmedian 2.9x 5.5xmedian 3.4x
PEG now vs peer median 3.10median 0.84 1.15median 1.10 1.06median 1.24

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsTRIUICLBT
Revenue $7.83B $3.27B $514.29M
Gross profit – $1.51B $426.66M
Operating income $2.33B $1.19B $55.86M
Net income $1.68B $960.30M $58.76M
Free cash flow $3.19B $908.94M $158.73M
R&D – $204.17M $129.82M
EPS (diluted) $3.61 $15.85 $0.24
Cash & equivalents $577.00M $522.58M $141.25M
Total debt $3.26B $180.81M $71.94M
Shares (diluted) 449.53M 60.57M 249.90M
Enterprise value $48.44B $34.96B $1.71B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricTRIUICLBT
P/E 32.1x 37.9x 49.0x
P/FCF 16.2x 40.1x 18.7x
P/Operating cash flow 17.9x 39.2x 18.9x
P/S 6.6x 11.1x 5.8x
P/B 4.6x 25.3x 5.5x
P/Tangible book 6.4x 25.3x 7.1x
EV/EBITDA 25.7x 29.7x 34.5x
EV/EBIT 23.3x 30.2x 48.4x
EV/Revenue 6.9x 10.9x 5.3x
EV/FCF 17.0x 39.4x 17.0x
EV/Operating cash flow 18.8x 38.6x 17.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 3.10 1.15 1.06

Growth

14 metrics
MetricTRIUICLBT
Revenue growth (1Y) 7.0% 27.2% 17.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 5.2% 19.0% 20.5%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 35.3% 15.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 25.7% 20.9%
Operating income growth (1Y) 9.1% 41.8% -9.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -0.5% 29.6% 61.2%
Net income growth (1Y) 4.7% 34.9% 138.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -6.8% 33.1% 51.0%
EPS growth (1Y) 8.4% 34.8% 132.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 10.4% 33.0% 46.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 14.5% 45.1% -2.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 10.1% 103.2% 34.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 13.0% 44.9% -0.9%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 9.0% 95.4% 31.9%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricTRIUICLBT
Gross margin – 46.2% 83.0%
EBITDA margin 26.9% 36.8% 15.2%
Operating margin 29.7% 36.2% 10.9%
Pretax margin 46.5% 36.1% 14.7%
Net margin 20.7% 29.3% 11.4%
FCF margin 40.7% 27.8% 30.9%
Operating cash flow margin 36.9% 28.4% 30.6%
Return on equity – 72.7% 11.2%
Return on assets – 49.1% 6.0%
Return on invested capital – 72.8% 7.9%
Return on capital employed – 89.1% 9.2%
Asset turnover – 1.7x 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.7x 1.0x 2.7x
Stock comp / revenue – 0.2% 11.1%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricTRIUICLBT
Debt / assets 18.0% – 2.5%
Debt / equity 0.3x – 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.2x – -3.5x
Debt / FCF 1.0x – 0.2x
Liabilities / assets 38.5% 34.5% 45.9%
Equity / assets 61.5% 65.5% 54.1%
Interest coverage 116.5x – –
Current ratio 0.5x 2.9x 1.6x
Quick ratio -2.5x 1.5x 1.3x
Cash ratio 0.2x 1.0x 0.8x
Altman Z-score 5.87 33.66 4.79

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricTRIUICLBT
Dividend yield 3.5% 0.6% –
Net buyback yield -2.2% – -0.4%
Shareholder yield 1.2% 0.6% -0.4%
Payout ratio (earnings) 30.9% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 16.3% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) -10.6% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) -8.5% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusTRIUICLBT
Forward P/E 26.0xFY2026 31.9xFY2027 44.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $4.47FY2026 $18.88FY2027 $0.27FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +12.6%FY2026 +18.4%FY2027 -12.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +8.1% +9.2% +33.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $7.73BFY2026 $4.12BFY2027 $593.75MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +3.8%FY2026 +25.9%FY2027 +24.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +15.5% +5.9% +14.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersTRIUICLBT
Held by institutions 90.1% 4.9% 51.4%
Institutions holding 421 354 199
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.6% +8.0% -1.4%
Institutions buying 408 163 117
Institutions selling 9 139 60
Buyers to sellers 45.33 1.17 1.95

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

TRIUICLBT
TRI 1.00 -0.09 0.37
UI -0.09 1.00 0.01
CLBT 0.37 0.01 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, TRI, UI and CLBT?

Thomson Reuters (TRI) is the largest by market capitalisation: Thomson Reuters (TRI) $51.66B, Ubiquiti (UI) $36.42B, Cellebrite DI (CLBT) $2.97B.

Which stock is cheaper, TRI, UI and CLBT?

Thomson Reuters (TRI) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Thomson Reuters (TRI) 32.1x, Ubiquiti (UI) 37.9x, Cellebrite DI (CLBT) 49.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Thomson Reuters (TRI) is cheapest (Thomson Reuters (TRI) 26.0x, Ubiquiti (UI) 31.9x, Cellebrite DI (CLBT) 44.1x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Ubiquiti (UI) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Thomson Reuters (TRI) +7.0%, Ubiquiti (UI) +27.2%, Cellebrite DI (CLBT) +17.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Ubiquiti (UI) has the highest net margin (Thomson Reuters (TRI) 20.7%, Ubiquiti (UI) 29.3%, Cellebrite DI (CLBT) 11.4%). On return on invested capital, Ubiquiti (UI) leads (Ubiquiti (UI) 72.8%, Cellebrite DI (CLBT) 7.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Ubiquiti (UI) returned the most: Thomson Reuters (TRI) -28.3%, Ubiquiti (UI) -21.1%, Cellebrite DI (CLBT) -35.5%. Over five years, Ubiquiti (UI) compounded fastest (Thomson Reuters (TRI) -1.5%/yr, Ubiquiti (UI) +14.5%/yr, Cellebrite DI (CLBT) +1.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Thomson Reuters (TRI) has the highest dividend yield: Thomson Reuters (TRI) 3.47%, Ubiquiti (UI) 0.57%. Cellebrite DI (CLBT) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Thomson Reuters (TRI) has been the steadiest (Thomson Reuters (TRI) 51.8%, Ubiquiti (UI) 53.7%, Cellebrite DI (CLBT) 63.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, TRI, UI and CLBT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Thomson Reuters (TRI) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.