TRI vs CLBT vs LZ Stock Comparison

Thomson Reuters, Cellebrite DI and Legalzoom.Com Prices as of Nov 4, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (LAW) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
TRI Thomson Reuters Corp /Can/
$117.23 +20.8% 1M -20.0% 1Y
Market cap
$52.87B
P/E
33.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.88B
Div. yield
-0.01%
Compliance Software Technology
6 wins
CLBT Cellebrite DI Ltd.
$12.43 +11.0% 1M -21.8% 1Y
Market cap
$2.97B
P/E
50.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$514.29M
Div. yield
–
Cybersecurity Software Technology
4 wins
LZ Legalzoom.Com, Inc.
$6.90 +17.5% 1M -30.4% 1Y
Market cap
$993.91M
P/E
48.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$797.48M
Div. yield
–
Compliance Software Technology
1 win

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Thomson Reuters leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Thomson Reuters 6, Cellebrite DI 4, Legalzoom.Com 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionTRICLBTLZLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $52.87B $2.97B $993.91M TRI
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 33.3x 50.5x 48.7x TRI
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 26.2x 46.0x 10.1x LZ
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +8.7% +17.8% +9.6% CLBT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 20.1% 11.4% 2.6% TRI
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 2,275.5% 7.9% — TRI
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.0x -3.5x — CLBT
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield -0.01% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -20.0% -21.8% -30.4% TRI
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -0.9%/yr +3.5%/yr -22.8%/yr CLBT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 52.7% 63.5% 64.8% TRI
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 58/100 69/100 65/100 CLBT

Percentile Scorecard

TRICLBTLZ

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisTRICLBTLZ
Valuation 50 #50 of 99 75 #32 of 124 86 #15 of 99
Growth 22 #77 of 98 77 #27 of 114 38 #61 of 98
Profitability 99 #2 of 96 90 #12 of 111 71 #29 of 96
Financial Health 79 #24 of 111 65 #46 of 128 39 #68 of 111
Shareholder Returns 38 #42 of 67 38 #46 of 73 94 #5 of 67
Overall 58 69 65
  • TRI ranked among 113 companies in Business Applications
  • CLBT ranked among 136 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • LZ ranked among 113 companies in Business Applications

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodTRICLBTLZSPY
1 month +20.8%+11.0%+17.5% -1.0%
3 months +18.9%-20.5%-14.8% -0.4%
6 months +27.8%-5.6%+9.9% +4.5%
Year to date -11.1%-31.1%-30.5% +12.4%
1 year -20.0%-21.8%-30.4% +13.6%
3 years -8.0%+70.7%-34.7% +76.4%
3 years, per year -2.7%+19.5%-13.2% +20.8%
5 years -4.4%+18.9%-72.6% +63.7%
5 years, per year -0.9%+3.5%-22.8% +10.4%
10 years +176.1%—— +267.7%
10 years, per year +10.7%—— +13.9%

Risk

MeasureTRICLBTLZSPY
Volatility, 1Y 52.7%63.5%64.8% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 53.5%70.4%78.7% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.140.520.51 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.38-0.34-0.47 1.06
Max drawdown, 5Y -64.3%-63.3%-78.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -20.0%-35.5%-36.9% -1.6%
52-week high $146.60$19.28$10.93 $779.14
52-week low $76.55$10.44$5.43 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleTRICLBTLZ
P/E now vs peer median 33.1xmedian 25.3x 51.1xmedian 41.0x 56.5xmedian 25.3x
P/S now vs peer median 6.6xmedian 2.8x 6.0xmedian 4.4x 1.4xmedian 2.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 25.7xmedian 16.5x 36.1xmedian 28.9x 11.5xmedian 16.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 17.1xmedian 16.1x 19.5xmedian 23.9x 8.4xmedian 16.1x
P/B now vs peer median -2.9xmedian 2.8x 5.8xmedian 3.1x 8.5xmedian 2.8x
PEG now vs peer median 5.88median 0.84 1.11median 1.36 1.34median 0.84

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsTRICLBTLZ
Revenue $7.88B $514.29M $797.48M
Gross profit – $426.66M $538.78M
Operating income $2.14B $55.86M $39.58M
Net income $1.54B $58.76M $20.41M
Free cash flow $3.04B $158.73M $136.78M
R&D – $129.82M –
EPS (diluted) $3.53 $0.24 $0.12
Cash & equivalents $1.39B $141.25M $181.70M
Total debt $4.09B $24.57M –
Shares (diluted) 449.53M 249.90M 168.94M
Enterprise value $48.84B $1.71B $258.73M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricTRICLBTLZ
P/E 33.1x 51.1x 56.5x
P/FCF 17.1x 19.5x 8.4x
P/Operating cash flow 19.1x 19.7x 7.1x
P/S 6.6x 6.0x 1.4x
P/B -2.9x 5.8x 8.5x
P/Tangible book -2.4x 7.4x 9.4x
EV/EBITDA 25.7x 36.1x 11.5x
EV/EBIT 25.4x 50.6x 24.4x
EV/Revenue 6.9x 5.5x 1.2x
EV/FCF 17.9x 17.8x 7.1x
EV/Operating cash flow 19.9x 18.0x 6.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 5.88 1.11 1.34

Growth

14 metrics
MetricTRICLBTLZ
Revenue growth (1Y) 8.7% 17.8% 9.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 5.3% 20.5% 7.1%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 15.8% 12.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 20.9% 8.8%
Operating income growth (1Y) -4.4% -9.7% 55.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -3.8% 61.2% 27.4%
Net income growth (1Y) -8.9% 138.9% -8.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -10.9% 51.0% 34.9%
EPS growth (1Y) 4.9% 132.6% 1.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 5.6% 46.2% 42.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 13.7% -2.2% -13.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 6.1% 34.9% 9.2%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 12.2% -0.9% -12.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 5.6% 31.9% 13.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricTRICLBTLZ
Gross margin – 83.0% 67.6%
EBITDA margin 26.9% 15.2% 10.5%
Operating margin 27.1% 10.9% 5.0%
Pretax margin 43.7% 14.7% 5.6%
Net margin 20.1% 11.4% 2.6%
FCF margin 38.6% 30.9% 17.2%
Operating cash flow margin 34.6% 30.6% 20.2%
Return on equity – 11.2% 15.5%
Return on assets – 6.0% 4.3%
Return on invested capital 2,276% 7.9% –
Return on capital employed 41.3% 9.2% 26.1%
Asset turnover – 0.5x 1.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.8x 2.7x 7.9x
Stock comp / revenue – 11.1% 11.1%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricTRICLBTLZ
Debt / assets – 2.5% –
Debt / equity -0.2x 0.0x –
Net debt / EBITDA 1.0x -3.5x –
Debt / FCF 1.3x 0.2x –
Liabilities / assets 44.7% 45.9% 71.4%
Equity / assets 55.3% 54.1% 28.6%
Interest coverage 142.6x – 23.6x
Current ratio 1.0x 1.6x 0.7x
Quick ratio 0.8x 1.3x 0.7x
Cash ratio -0.1x 0.8x 0.6x
Altman Z-score – 4.96 0.15

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricTRICLBTLZ
Dividend yield 3.4% – –
Net buyback yield -1.4% -0.4% 12.6%
Shareholder yield 2.0% -0.4% 12.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) 34.6% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 17.5% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) -8.1% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) -8.6% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusTRICLBTLZ
Forward P/E 26.2xFY2026 46.0xFY2026 10.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $4.47FY2026 $0.27FY2026 $0.68FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +12.6%FY2026 -12.9%FY2026 +9.7%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +8.1% +33.3% +25.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year $7.73BFY2026 $593.75MFY2026 $847.19MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +3.8%FY2026 +24.8%FY2026 +12.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +15.5% +14.1% -6.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersTRICLBTLZ
Held by institutions 90.1% 51.5% 96.0%
Institutions holding 421 200 242
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.6% -1.2% -0.5%
Institutions buying 408 118 122
Institutions selling 9 60 97
Buyers to sellers 45.33 1.97 1.26

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

TRICLBTLZ
TRI 1.00 0.35 0.50
CLBT 0.35 1.00 0.24
LZ 0.50 0.24 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, TRI, CLBT and LZ?

Thomson Reuters (TRI) is the largest by market capitalisation: Thomson Reuters (TRI) $52.87B, Cellebrite DI (CLBT) $2.97B, Legalzoom.Com (LZ) $993.91M.

Which stock is cheaper, TRI, CLBT and LZ?

Thomson Reuters (TRI) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Thomson Reuters (TRI) 33.3x, Cellebrite DI (CLBT) 50.5x, Legalzoom.Com (LZ) 48.7x). On next year's consensus earnings, Legalzoom.Com (LZ) is cheapest (Thomson Reuters (TRI) 26.2x, Cellebrite DI (CLBT) 46.0x, Legalzoom.Com (LZ) 10.1x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Cellebrite DI (CLBT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Thomson Reuters (TRI) +8.7%, Cellebrite DI (CLBT) +17.8%, Legalzoom.Com (LZ) +9.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Thomson Reuters (TRI) has the highest net margin (Thomson Reuters (TRI) 20.1%, Cellebrite DI (CLBT) 11.4%, Legalzoom.Com (LZ) 2.6%). On return on invested capital, Thomson Reuters (TRI) leads (Thomson Reuters (TRI) 2,275.5%, Cellebrite DI (CLBT) 7.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Thomson Reuters (TRI) returned the most: Thomson Reuters (TRI) -20.0%, Cellebrite DI (CLBT) -21.8%, Legalzoom.Com (LZ) -30.4%. Over five years, Cellebrite DI (CLBT) compounded fastest (Thomson Reuters (TRI) -0.9%/yr, Cellebrite DI (CLBT) +3.5%/yr, Legalzoom.Com (LZ) -22.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Thomson Reuters (TRI) has been the steadiest (Thomson Reuters (TRI) 52.7%, Cellebrite DI (CLBT) 63.5%, Legalzoom.Com (LZ) 64.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, TRI, CLBT and LZ?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Thomson Reuters (TRI) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.