TRC vs KANP vs JOE Stock Comparison

Tejon Ranch, Kaanapali Land and St Joe Prices as of Nov 5, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (FPH) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
TRC Tejon Ranch Co
$16.80 +2.9% 1M +5.2% 1Y
Market cap
$453.96M
P/E
59.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$67.48M
Div. yield
–
Real Estate Development Real Estate
1 win
KANP Kaanapali Land Llc
$29.70 -1.0% 1M -11.3% 1Y
Market cap
$53.24M
P/E
5.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$21.83M
Div. yield
–
Real Estate Development Real Estate
4 wins
JOE ST JOE Co
$69.86 +5.8% 1M +17.4% 1Y
Market cap
$3.95B
P/E
32.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$542.95M
Div. yield
0.92%
Real Estate Development Real Estate
4 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

St Joe leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (St Joe 4, Kaanapali Land 4, Tejon Ranch 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionTRCKANPJOELeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $453.96M $53.24M $3.95B JOE
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 59.2x 5.2x 32.7x KANP
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 98.8x — 36.0x JOE
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +45.4% +1,110.9% +11.1% KANP
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 11.4% 48.2% 22.3% KANP
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 0.3% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 7.7x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% — 0.92% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +5.2% -11.3% +17.4% JOE
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -3.8%/yr +4.3%/yr +7.1%/yr JOE
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 21.5% 35.0% 28.3% TRC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 63/100 98/100 66/100 KANP

Percentile Scorecard

TRCKANPJOE

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisTRCKANPJOE
Valuation 32 #26 of 38 100 #1 of 38 57 #17 of 38
Growth 82 #7 of 34 100 #1 of 34 73 #10 of 34
Profitability 57 #14 of 31 93 #3 of 31 83 #6 of 31
Financial Health 81 #8 of 38 – 62 #15 of 38
Shareholder Returns – – 57 #7 of 15
Overall 63 98 66
  • TRC ranked among 41 companies in Property Developers
  • KANP ranked among 41 companies in Property Developers
  • JOE ranked among 41 companies in Property Developers

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodTRCKANPJOESPY
1 month +2.9%-1.0%+5.8% -5.9%
3 months +1.6%-1.0%+3.8% -4.6%
6 months -18.0%+16.4%+7.4% +0.2%
Year to date +6.5%+8.0%+17.7% +7.5%
1 year +5.2%-11.3%+17.4% +8.2%
3 years +3.4%+24.3%+43.4% +68.3%
3 years, per year +1.1%+7.5%+12.8% +19.0%
5 years -17.5%+23.2%+40.8% +56.5%
5 years, per year -3.8%+4.3%+7.1% +9.4%
10 years -18.7%+3.3%+308.5% +251.5%
10 years, per year -2.1%+0.3%+15.1% +13.4%

Risk

MeasureTRCKANPJOESPY
Volatility, 1Y 21.5%35.0%28.3% 13.6%
Downside volatility, 1Y 21.1%72.0%26.5% 14.2%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.150.200.56 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.24-0.320.62 0.60
Max drawdown, 5Y -32.4%-42.0%-48.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -18.0%-14.4%-4.0% -5.9%
52-week high $20.48$34.68$72.79 $779.14
52-week low $15.66$25.50$55.71 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleTRCKANPJOE
P/E now vs peer median 59.2xmedian 7.4x 5.2xmedian 7.4x 32.7xmedian 7.4x
P/S now vs peer median 6.7xmedian 4.9x 2.4xmedian 4.9x 7.3xmedian 4.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 48.7xmedian 11.2x 3.2xmedian 11.2x 17.4xmedian 11.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median -28.4xmedian 5.6x 3.1xmedian 5.6x 25.1xmedian 5.6x
P/B now vs peer median 0.9xmedian 0.5x 0.6xmedian 0.5x 5.1xmedian 0.5x
PEG now vs peer median 2.17median 0.54 0.17median 0.54 3.15median 0.54

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsTRCKANPJOE
Revenue $67.48M $21.83M $542.95M
Gross profit – $9.58M $250.51M
Operating income $3.88M $4.63M $173.94M
Net income $7.67M $10.53M $120.57M
Free cash flow -$15.97M $16.94M $157.37M
EPS (diluted) $0.28 $5.71 $2.14
Cash & equivalents $2.61M $37.96M $117.86M
Total debt $94.44M – –
Shares (diluted) 27.07M 1.85M 56.76M
Enterprise value $401.19M -$56.32M $3.46B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricTRCKANPJOE
P/E 59.2x 5.2x 32.7x
P/FCF -28.4x 3.1x 25.1x
P/Operating cash flow 25.9x 3.0x 21.0x
P/S 6.7x 2.4x 7.3x
P/B 0.9x 0.6x 5.1x
P/Tangible book 0.9x 0.6x 5.1x
EV/EBITDA 48.7x 3.2x 17.4x
EV/EBIT 139.0x 3.3x 22.0x
EV/Revenue 8.0x 0.7x 7.1x
EV/FCF -33.8x 0.9x 24.4x
EV/Operating cash flow 30.8x 0.9x 20.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.17 0.17 3.15

Growth

14 metrics
MetricTRCKANPJOE
Revenue growth (1Y) 45.4% 1,111% 11.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 63.4% 14.2%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 2,581% 21.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 67.8% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 147.8% 181.8% 31.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 66.2% 25.0% 27.6%
Net income growth (1Y) 157.7% 392.9% 15.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 27.7% 30.5% 10.4%
EPS growth (1Y) 156.3% 392.9% 18.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 27.2% 30.5% 10.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 91.0% 524.9% 6.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -6.5% 84.6% 19.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 71.7% 369.6% 6.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -94.4% 78.9% 52.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricTRCKANPJOE
Gross margin – 43.9% 46.1%
EBITDA margin 16.4% 21.9% 40.6%
Operating margin 5.8% 21.2% 32.0%
Pretax margin 14.1% 45.9% 29.8%
Net margin 11.4% 48.2% 22.3%
FCF margin -23.7% 77.6% 29.0%
Operating cash flow margin 25.9% 80.5% 34.7%
Return on equity 1.5% 11.8% 15.6%
Return on assets 1.2% 10.8% 8.0%
Return on invested capital 0.3% – –
Return on capital employed 0.6% – –
Asset turnover 0.1x 0.2x 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.3x 1.7x 1.6x
Stock comp / revenue 2.7% – 0.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricTRCKANPJOE
Debt / assets 14.6% – –
Debt / equity 0.2x – –
Net debt / EBITDA 7.7x – –
Debt / FCF -5.9x – –
Liabilities / assets 23.2% 8.6% 48.4%
Equity / assets 76.8% 91.4% 51.6%
Interest coverage – – 6.2x
Current ratio 1.8x – –
Quick ratio 1.4x – –
Cash ratio 0.5x – –
Altman Z-score 2.21 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricTRCKANPJOE
Dividend yield – – 0.9%
Net buyback yield – – 2.0%
Shareholder yield 0.0% – 3.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 30.4%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 23.3%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 12.6%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 14.5%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusTRCKANPJOE
Forward P/E 98.8xFY2026 – 36.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.17FY2026 – $1.94FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +1,600.0%FY2026 – +45.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +147.1% – –
Revenue, next fiscal year $57.93MFY2026 – $544.86MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +16.8%FY2026 – +40.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +23.5% – –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersTRCKANPJOE
Held by institutions 78.6% – 87.6%
Institutions holding 127 – 320
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.9% – -0.2%
Institutions buying 61 – 160
Institutions selling 30 – 97
Buyers to sellers 2.03 – 1.65

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

TRCKANPJOE
TRC 1.00 -0.11 0.30
KANP -0.11 1.00 -0.03
JOE 0.30 -0.03 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, TRC, KANP and JOE?

St Joe (JOE) is the largest by market capitalisation: Tejon Ranch (TRC) $453.96M, Kaanapali Land (KANP) $53.24M, St Joe (JOE) $3.95B.

Which stock is cheaper, TRC, KANP and JOE?

Kaanapali Land (KANP) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Tejon Ranch (TRC) 59.2x, Kaanapali Land (KANP) 5.2x, St Joe (JOE) 32.7x). On next year's consensus earnings, St Joe (JOE) is cheapest (Tejon Ranch (TRC) 98.8x, St Joe (JOE) 36.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Kaanapali Land (KANP) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Tejon Ranch (TRC) +45.4%, Kaanapali Land (KANP) +1,110.9%, St Joe (JOE) +11.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Kaanapali Land (KANP) has the highest net margin (Tejon Ranch (TRC) 11.4%, Kaanapali Land (KANP) 48.2%, St Joe (JOE) 22.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year St Joe (JOE) returned the most: Tejon Ranch (TRC) +5.2%, Kaanapali Land (KANP) -11.3%, St Joe (JOE) +17.4%. Over five years, St Joe (JOE) compounded fastest (Tejon Ranch (TRC) -3.8%/yr, Kaanapali Land (KANP) +4.3%/yr, St Joe (JOE) +7.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Tejon Ranch (TRC) 0.00%, St Joe (JOE) 0.92%. Tejon Ranch (TRC) and Kaanapali Land (KANP) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Tejon Ranch (TRC) has been the steadiest (Tejon Ranch (TRC) 21.5%, Kaanapali Land (KANP) 35.0%, St Joe (JOE) 28.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, TRC, KANP and JOE?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, St Joe (JOE) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.