TMO vs IQV vs BIO Stock Comparison

Thermo Fisher Scientific, Iqvia Holdings and Bio-Rad Laboratories Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (DHR) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
IQV Iqvia Holdings Inc.
$274.96 +2.2% 1M +26.2% 1Y
Market cap
$43.94B
P/E
31.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$17.31B
Div. yield
–
Contract Research Healthcare
5 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Iqvia Holdings leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Iqvia Holdings 5, Thermo Fisher Scientific 4, Bio-Rad Laboratories 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionTMOIQVBIOLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $258.21B $43.94B $9.94B TMO
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 36.5x 31.5x 44.7x IQV
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 27.4x 22.6x 38.6x IQV
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +8.3% +8.8% +1.4% IQV
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 8.1% 8.6% BIO
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 8.2% 0.4% IQV
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 3.9x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +27.0% +26.2% +20.2% TMO
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +2.3%/yr +1.0%/yr -13.5%/yr TMO
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 29.8% 40.4% 36.8% TMO
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 51/100 71/100 65/100 IQV

Percentile Scorecard

TMOIQVBIO

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisTMOIQVBIO
Valuation 50 #113 of 227 80 #3 of 11 78 #51 of 227
Growth 41 #130 of 218 80 #3 of 11 22 #171 of 218
Profitability 70 #61 of 202 90 #2 of 11 73 #56 of 202
Financial Health – 33 #9 of 13 69 #73 of 233
Shareholder Returns 44 #73 of 130 – 83 #23 of 130
Overall 51 71 65
  • TMO ranked among 247 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics
  • IQV ranked among 13 companies in Pharma Services
  • BIO ranked among 247 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodTMOIQVBIOSPY
1 month +4.4%+2.2%+1.2% +0.7%
3 months +23.0%+15.6%+17.5% +3.7%
6 months +48.1%+73.6%+37.1% +7.1%
Year to date +22.4%+22.0%+26.8% +12.8%
1 year +27.0%+26.2%+20.2% +11.9%
3 years +63.4%+55.2%+42.6% +85.2%
3 years, per year +17.8%+15.8%+12.6% +22.8%
5 years +12.0%+5.2%-51.7% +67.6%
5 years, per year +2.3%+1.0%-13.5% +10.9%
10 years +381.8%+283.1%+143.6% +262.0%
10 years, per year +17.0%+14.4%+9.3% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureTMOIQVBIOSPY
Volatility, 1Y 29.8%40.4%36.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 28.4%39.3%35.6% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.620.740.77 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.910.650.55 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -41.5%-51.5%-72.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high 0.0%-1.6%-1.6% -1.2%
52-week high $709.29$279.38$390.34 $779.14
52-week low $438.34$156.66$241.71 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleTMOIQVBIO
P/E now vs peer median 37.2xmedian 28.7x 32.5xmedian 36.6x 46.2xmedian 28.7x
P/S now vs peer median 5.5xmedian 3.0x 2.6xmedian 2.6x 4.0xmedian 3.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 17.8x 17.0xmedian 31.1x —median 17.8x
P/FCF now vs peer median 34.0xmedian 26.4x 21.8xmedian 21.8x 29.1xmedian 26.4x
P/B now vs peer median 4.8xmedian 2.4x 6.7xmedian 3.1x 1.4xmedian 2.4x
PEG now vs peer median 4.91median 0.99 2.82median 2.05 1.25median 0.99

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsTMOIQVBIO
Revenue $47.35B $17.31B $2.59B
Gross profit – $5.72B $1.34B
Operating income $8.47B $2.22B $53.10M
Net income $7.09B $1.40B $222.40M
Free cash flow – $2.08B $353.10M
R&D $1.40B – $265.70M
EPS (diluted) $19.06 $8.35 $8.29
Cash & equivalents $5.46B $2.25B $517.00M
Total debt – $16.07B $1.20B
Shares (diluted) 371.00M 167.00M 26.81M
Enterprise value $258.21B $35.20B $3.80B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricTMOIQVBIO
P/E 37.2x 32.5x 46.2x
P/FCF 34.0x 21.8x 29.1x
P/Operating cash flow 28.1x 16.6x 20.8x
P/S 5.5x 2.6x 4.0x
P/B 4.8x 6.7x 1.4x
P/Tangible book 7.1x 22.1x 1.5x
EV/EBITDA – 17.0x –
EV/EBIT – 26.6x 185.6x
EV/Revenue 5.5x 3.4x 3.8x
EV/FCF – 28.4x 27.9x
EV/Operating cash flow 28.1x 21.5x 20.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 4.91 2.82 1.25

Growth

14 metrics
MetricTMOIQVBIO
Revenue growth (1Y) 8.3% 8.8% 1.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 2.9% 5.2% -2.2%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 6.6% -0.4%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 3.4% -3.5%
Operating income growth (1Y) 12.8% 1.7% -76.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 7.2% 6.2% -47.4%
Net income growth (1Y) 7.9% 9.0% -30.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 6.2% 7.8% 36.1%
EPS growth (1Y) 9.7% 11.7% -29.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 7.6% 11.5% 36.9%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 21.9% -2.4% -7.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 4.5% 11.7% 19.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -6.0% -4.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 16.3% 31.9%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricTMOIQVBIO
Gross margin – 33.1% 51.9%
EBITDA margin – 20.0% –
Operating margin – 12.8% 2.1%
Pretax margin – 9.0% 13.5%
Net margin – 8.1% 8.6%
FCF margin – 12.0% 13.6%
Operating cash flow margin 19.7% 15.8% 19.0%
Return on equity 13.2% 21.4% 3.2%
Return on assets 6.2% 4.6% 2.2%
Return on invested capital – 8.2% 0.4%
Return on capital employed – 9.9% 0.6%
Asset turnover 0.4x 0.6x 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.3x 2.0x 2.2x
Stock comp / revenue – 1.8% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricTMOIQVBIO
Debt / assets – 52.7% 11.7%
Debt / equity – 2.4x 0.2x
Net debt / EBITDA – 3.9x –
Debt / FCF – 7.7x 3.4x
Liabilities / assets – 77.7% 30.0%
Equity / assets 47.9% 22.3% 70.0%
Interest coverage – 2.8x 1.1x
Current ratio 1.8x 0.8x 3.1x
Quick ratio – 1.0x 2.1x
Cash ratio – 0.3x 1.7x
Altman Z-score – 2.29 3.61

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricTMOIQVBIO
Dividend yield 0.3% – –
Net buyback yield – 2.6% 1.1%
Shareholder yield 0.3% 2.6% 1.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusTMOIQVBIO
Forward P/E 27.4xFY2026 22.6xFY2026 38.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $25.91FY2026 $12.14FY2026 $9.95FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +13.3%FY2026 +1.8%FY2026 +0.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +2.0% +13.3% -0.2%
Revenue, next fiscal year $50.12BFY2026 $18.58BFY2026 $2.69BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +12.5%FY2026 +13.9%FY2026 +4.2%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -2.8% -3.5% -6.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersTMOIQVBIO
Held by institutions 90.2% 94.1% 72.6%
Institutions holding 2,624 1,084 404
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.8% +0.3% -2.9%
Institutions buying 1,144 531 177
Institutions selling 1,144 424 156
Buyers to sellers 1.00 1.25 1.13

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

TMOIQVBIO
TMO 1.00 0.67 0.57
IQV 0.67 1.00 0.44
BIO 0.57 0.44 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, TMO, IQV and BIO?

Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) is the largest by market capitalisation: Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) $258.21B, Iqvia Holdings (IQV) $43.94B, Bio-Rad Laboratories (BIO) $9.94B.

Which stock is cheaper, TMO, IQV and BIO?

Iqvia Holdings (IQV) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) 36.5x, Iqvia Holdings (IQV) 31.5x, Bio-Rad Laboratories (BIO) 44.7x). On next year's consensus earnings, Iqvia Holdings (IQV) is cheapest (Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) 27.4x, Iqvia Holdings (IQV) 22.6x, Bio-Rad Laboratories (BIO) 38.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Iqvia Holdings (IQV) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) +8.3%, Iqvia Holdings (IQV) +8.8%, Bio-Rad Laboratories (BIO) +1.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Bio-Rad Laboratories (BIO) has the highest net margin (Iqvia Holdings (IQV) 8.1%, Bio-Rad Laboratories (BIO) 8.6%). On return on invested capital, Iqvia Holdings (IQV) leads (Iqvia Holdings (IQV) 8.2%, Bio-Rad Laboratories (BIO) 0.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) returned the most: Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) +27.0%, Iqvia Holdings (IQV) +26.2%, Bio-Rad Laboratories (BIO) +20.2%. Over five years, Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) compounded fastest (Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) +2.3%/yr, Iqvia Holdings (IQV) +1.0%/yr, Bio-Rad Laboratories (BIO) -13.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) has been the steadiest (Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) 29.8%, Iqvia Holdings (IQV) 40.4%, Bio-Rad Laboratories (BIO) 36.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, TMO, IQV and BIO?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Iqvia Holdings (IQV) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.