TMO vs GLW vs ILMN Stock Comparison

Thermo Fisher Scientific, Corning and Illumina Prices as of Nov 2, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (RVTY) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
GLW Corning Inc /Ny
$123.28 -24.9% 1M +38.4% 1Y
Market cap
$101.01B
P/E
47.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$17.72B
Div. yield
0.01%
Specialty Chemicals Basic Materials
3 wins
ILMN Illumina, Inc.
$226.58 -17.0% 1M +83.4% 1Y
Market cap
$33.99B
P/E
38.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.54B
Div. yield
–
Life Sciences Tools Healthcare
5 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Illumina leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Illumina 5, Thermo Fisher Scientific 4, Corning 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionTMOGLWILMNLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $257.37B $101.01B $33.99B TMO
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 36.4x 47.0x 38.0x TMO
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 27.0x 36.6x 47.7x TMO
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +8.3% +18.8% +5.8% GLW
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 14.9% 12.1% 19.7% ILMN
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 8.0% 11.0% 16.6% ILMN
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 3.1x 1.3x 0.4x ILMN
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.01% 0.00% GLW
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +20.3% +38.4% +83.4% ILMN
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +1.2%/yr +27.2%/yr -11.1%/yr GLW
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 30.0% 74.8% 49.9% TMO
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 59/100 59/100 75/100 ILMN

Percentile Scorecard

TMOGLWILMN

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisTMOGLWILMN
Valuation 60 #91 of 227 24 #72 of 94 59 #94 of 227
Growth 39 #135 of 220 96 #5 of 92 73 #60 of 220
Profitability 83 #36 of 209 85 #14 of 89 99 #4 of 209
Financial Health 31 #166 of 240 59 #40 of 97 60 #96 of 240
Shareholder Returns 83 #25 of 138 31 #50 of 72 82 #26 of 138
Overall 59 59 75
  • TMO ranked among 247 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics
  • GLW ranked among 99 companies in Chemicals
  • ILMN ranked among 247 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodTMOGLWILMNSPY
1 month +4.2%-24.9%-17.0% -2.3%
3 months +18.9%-15.9%+14.3% -0.7%
6 months +47.6%-22.9%+62.6% +4.8%
Year to date +17.8%+40.8%+72.8% +10.3%
1 year +20.3%+38.4%+83.4% +10.3%
3 years +50.1%+341.4%+99.2% +73.0%
3 years, per year +14.5%+64.1%+25.8% +20.1%
5 years +6.3%+232.6%-44.5% +61.9%
5 years, per year +1.2%+27.2%-11.1% +10.1%
10 years +368.3%+448.9%+71.7% +258.6%
10 years, per year +16.7%+18.6%+5.6% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureTMOGLWILMNSPY
Volatility, 1Y 30.0%74.8%49.9% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 28.6%76.3%49.1% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.633.051.06 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.680.511.67 0.80
Max drawdown, 5Y -41.5%-52.1%-82.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -3.7%-51.8%-22.9% -3.5%
52-week high $709.29$255.69$293.69 $779.14
52-week low $438.34$78.03$114.44 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleTMOGLWILMN
P/E now vs peer median 35.8xmedian 28.4x 49.5xmedian 20.8x 38.2xmedian 28.4x
P/S now vs peer median 5.3xmedian 3.0x 6.0xmedian 1.4x 7.5xmedian 3.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 24.9xmedian 18.0x 25.4xmedian 12.6x 28.0xmedian 18.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 33.2xmedian 25.0x 43.2xmedian 15.5x 32.4xmedian 25.0x
P/B now vs peer median 4.6xmedian 2.3x 7.4xmedian 1.7x 10.9xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median 4.73median 0.93 0.92median 1.78 0.93median 0.93

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsTMOGLWILMN
Revenue $47.35B $17.72B $4.54B
Gross profit $19.45B $6.46B $3.08B
Operating income $8.47B $2.92B $960.00M
Net income $7.09B $2.35B $895.00M
Free cash flow $7.60B $2.46B $1.06B
R&D $1.40B $1.18B $975.00M
EPS (diluted) $19.06 $2.47 $5.85
Cash & equivalents $5.46B $2.54B $1.29B
Total debt $41.37B $8.23B $1.79B
Shares (diluted) 371.00M 871.00M 153.00M
Enterprise value $233.88B $92.69B $28.70B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricTMOGLWILMN
P/E 35.8x 49.5x 38.2x
P/FCF 33.2x 43.2x 32.4x
P/Operating cash flow 27.1x 25.3x 27.8x
P/S 5.3x 6.0x 7.5x
P/B 4.6x 7.4x 10.9x
P/Tangible book 6.9x 7.8x 12.4x
EV/EBITDA 24.9x 25.4x 28.0x
EV/EBIT 34.0x 38.3x 36.1x
EV/Revenue 6.1x 6.3x 7.6x
EV/FCF 37.9x 45.5x 32.8x
EV/Operating cash flow 30.9x 26.7x 28.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 4.73 0.92 0.93

Growth

14 metrics
MetricTMOGLWILMN
Revenue growth (1Y) 8.3% 18.8% 5.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 2.9% 10.9% -0.7%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 7.8% 21.4% 8.5%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 4.0% 18.0% 4.4%
Operating income growth (1Y) 12.8% 46.0% 23.1%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 7.2% 48.2% 30.0%
Net income growth (1Y) 7.9% 57.2% 27.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 6.2% 53.6% 40.9%
EPS growth (1Y) 9.7% 56.9% 28.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 7.6% 53.6% 41.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 21.9% 85.0% 9.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 4.5% 30.0% 47.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 24.3% 111.8% 5.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 5.1% 84.0% 126.5%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricTMOGLWILMN
Gross margin 41.1% 36.5% 67.9%
EBITDA margin 24.4% 24.9% 27.3%
Operating margin 17.9% 16.5% 21.2%
Pretax margin 16.7% 15.9% 23.3%
Net margin 14.9% 12.1% 19.7%
FCF margin 16.0% 13.9% 23.3%
Operating cash flow margin 19.7% 23.7% 27.1%
Return on equity 13.2% 17.1% 29.9%
Return on assets 6.2% 7.0% 13.3%
Return on invested capital 8.0% 11.0% 16.6%
Return on capital employed 8.5% 10.8% 17.2%
Asset turnover 0.4x 0.5x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.3x 1.8x 1.4x
Stock comp / revenue 0.7% 2.1% 5.9%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricTMOGLWILMN
Debt / assets 36.2% 24.1% 26.3%
Debt / equity 0.8x 0.6x 0.6x
Net debt / EBITDA 3.1x 1.3x 0.4x
Debt / FCF 5.4x 3.3x 1.7x
Liabilities / assets 52.1% 58.1% 53.8%
Equity / assets 47.9% 41.9% 46.2%
Interest coverage 5.5x 8.0x 9.8x
Current ratio 1.8x 1.7x 2.6x
Quick ratio 1.2x 0.9x 1.8x
Cash ratio 0.4x 0.4x 1.2x
Altman Z-score 4.11 4.90 7.10

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricTMOGLWILMN
Dividend yield 0.3% 0.9% –
Net buyback yield 1.6% -0.5% 1.1%
Shareholder yield 1.9% 0.4% 1.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) 9.5% 43.1% –
Payout ratio (FCF) 8.9% 41.1% –
Dividend growth (1Y) 8.0% 1.9% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 10.1% 1.2% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusTMOGLWILMN
Forward P/E 27.0xFY2026 36.6xFY2026 47.7xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $25.91FY2026 $3.45FY2026 $4.99FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +13.3%FY2026 +36.9%FY2026 +3.1%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +2.0% +24.1% +25.7%
Revenue, next fiscal year $50.12BFY2026 $18.34BFY2026 $4.52BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +12.5%FY2026 +11.8%FY2026 +4.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -2.8% +31.0% +12.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersTMOGLWILMN
Held by institutions 90.2% 73.0% 100.0%
Institutions holding 2,625 2,685 935
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.8% +3.5% +0.0%
Institutions buying 1,144 1,477 464
Institutions selling 1,145 951 331
Buyers to sellers 1.00 1.55 1.40

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

TMOGLWILMN
TMO 1.00 -0.03 0.51
GLW -0.03 1.00 0.07
ILMN 0.51 0.07 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, TMO, GLW and ILMN?

Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) is the largest by market capitalisation: Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) $257.37B, Corning (GLW) $101.01B, Illumina (ILMN) $33.99B.

Which stock is cheaper, TMO, GLW and ILMN?

Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) 36.4x, Corning (GLW) 47.0x, Illumina (ILMN) 38.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) is cheapest (Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) 27.0x, Corning (GLW) 36.6x, Illumina (ILMN) 47.7x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Corning (GLW) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) +8.3%, Corning (GLW) +18.8%, Illumina (ILMN) +5.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Illumina (ILMN) has the highest net margin (Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) 14.9%, Corning (GLW) 12.1%, Illumina (ILMN) 19.7%). On return on invested capital, Illumina (ILMN) leads (Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) 8.0%, Corning (GLW) 11.0%, Illumina (ILMN) 16.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Illumina (ILMN) returned the most: Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) +20.3%, Corning (GLW) +38.4%, Illumina (ILMN) +83.4%. Over five years, Corning (GLW) compounded fastest (Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) +1.2%/yr, Corning (GLW) +27.2%/yr, Illumina (ILMN) -11.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Corning (GLW) has the highest dividend yield: Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) 0.00%, Corning (GLW) 0.01%, Illumina (ILMN) 0.00%. Illumina (ILMN) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) has been the steadiest (Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) 30.0%, Corning (GLW) 74.8%, Illumina (ILMN) 49.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, TMO, GLW and ILMN?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Illumina (ILMN) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.