TMO vs BDX vs ILMN Stock Comparison

Thermo Fisher Scientific, Becton Dickinson and Illumina Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (TECH) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
BDX Becton Dickinson & Co
$196.39 +6.8% 1M +5.7% 1Y
Market cap
$53.75B
P/E
57.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$23.25B
Div. yield
–
Medical Supplies Healthcare
3 wins
ILMN Illumina, Inc.
$271.04 +0.4% 1M +170.7% 1Y
Market cap
$42.23B
P/E
51.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.49B
Div. yield
–
Life Sciences Tools Healthcare
4 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Thermo Fisher Scientific leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Thermo Fisher Scientific 4, Illumina 4, Becton Dickinson 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionTMOBDXILMNLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $258.87B $53.75B $42.23B TMO
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 36.6x 57.1x 51.2x TMO
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 26.4x 15.1x 54.3x BDX
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +8.3% +17.4% +4.9% BDX
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 4.0% 18.4% ILMN
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 5.3% 15.1% ILMN
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 3.2x 0.7x ILMN
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +19.6% +5.7% +170.7% ILMN
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +2.3%/yr -4.3%/yr -7.5%/yr TMO
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 29.9% 31.9% 50.4% TMO
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 51/100 67/100 65/100 BDX

Percentile Scorecard

TMOBDXILMN

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisTMOBDXILMN
Valuation 49 #116 of 228 90 #24 of 228 52 #111 of 228
Growth 40 #133 of 221 47 #117 of 221 44 #124 of 221
Profitability 70 #63 of 208 78 #46 of 208 97 #7 of 208
Financial Health – 27 #176 of 239 51 #118 of 239
Shareholder Returns 44 #77 of 137 95 #8 of 137 84 #23 of 137
Overall 51 67 65
  • TMO ranked among 248 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics
  • BDX ranked among 248 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics
  • ILMN ranked among 248 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodTMOBDXILMNSPY
1 month +1.7%+6.8%+0.4% -0.8%
3 months +22.4%+23.6%+43.1% +3.5%
6 months +46.3%+30.7%+110.9% +7.0%
Year to date +18.2%+1.2%+106.6% +12.2%
1 year +19.6%+5.7%+170.7% +13.0%
3 years +58.7%-21.9%+155.1% +86.3%
3 years, per year +16.7%-7.9%+36.7% +23.1%
5 years +11.8%-19.8%-32.4% +68.6%
5 years, per year +2.3%-4.3%-7.5% +11.0%
10 years +362.6%+17.2%+99.1% +258.0%
10 years, per year +16.6%+1.6%+7.1% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureTMOBDXILMNSPY
Volatility, 1Y 29.9%31.9%50.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 28.3%33.1%39.1% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.620.340.81 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.660.183.39 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -41.5%-50.4%-82.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -1.7%-6.5%-7.7% -1.8%
52-week high $696.55$210.02$293.69 $779.14
52-week low $438.34$140.71$95.03 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleTMOBDXILMN
P/E now vs peer median 35.9xmedian 30.6x 57.3xmedian 30.6x 49.6xmedian 30.6x
P/S now vs peer median 5.3xmedian 3.0x 2.3xmedian 3.0x 9.1xmedian 3.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 17.5x 14.0xmedian 17.5x 36.2xmedian 17.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 34.0xmedian 23.3x 16.7xmedian 23.3x 44.0xmedian 23.3x
P/B now vs peer median 4.6xmedian 2.4x 2.2xmedian 2.4x 14.4xmedian 2.4x
PEG now vs peer median 4.74median 0.87 -3.93median 0.87 1.65median 0.87

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsTMOBDXILMN
Revenue $47.35B $23.25B $4.49B
Gross profit – $10.91B $2.98B
Operating income $8.47B $2.48B $882.00M
Net income $7.09B $941.00M $825.00M
Free cash flow – $3.20B $931.00M
R&D $1.40B $1.37B $960.00M
EPS (diluted) $19.06 $3.42 $5.39
Cash & equivalents $5.46B $708.00M $1.04B
Total debt – $72.81B $1.99B
Shares (diluted) 371.00M 275.16M 153.00M
Enterprise value $258.87B $50.90B $37.00B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricTMOBDXILMN
P/E 35.9x 57.3x 49.6x
P/FCF 34.0x 16.7x 44.0x
P/Operating cash flow 27.2x 13.5x 37.4x
P/S 5.3x 2.3x 9.1x
P/B 4.6x 2.2x 14.4x
P/Tangible book 6.9x 2.2x 16.9x
EV/EBITDA – 14.0x 36.2x
EV/EBIT – 28.0x 47.3x
EV/Revenue 5.3x 3.0x 9.3x
EV/FCF – 21.7x 44.8x
EV/Operating cash flow 27.2x 17.6x 38.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 4.74 -3.93 1.65

Growth

14 metrics
MetricTMOBDXILMN
Revenue growth (1Y) 8.3% 17.4% 4.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 2.9% 6.9% -1.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 23.7% 4.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 8.5% 2.9%
Operating income growth (1Y) 12.8% 13.0% -31.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 7.2% 3.3% 28.3%
Net income growth (1Y) 7.9% -40.6% -34.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 6.2% -17.3% 30.0%
EPS growth (1Y) 9.7% -38.0% -32.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 7.6% -14.6% 30.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 21.9% 43.5% -5.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 4.5% 14.5% 38.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 54.2% -9.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 22.5% 105.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricTMOBDXILMN
Gross margin – 46.9% 66.4%
EBITDA margin – 21.4% 25.7%
Operating margin – 10.7% 19.6%
Pretax margin – 8.4% 22.6%
Net margin – 4.0% 18.4%
FCF margin – 13.8% 20.7%
Operating cash flow margin 19.7% 17.0% 24.4%
Return on equity 13.2% 3.9% 29.9%
Return on assets 6.2% 1.9% 12.5%
Return on invested capital – 5.3% 15.1%
Return on capital employed – 6.0% 17.5%
Asset turnover 0.4x 0.5x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.3x 4.2x 1.3x
Stock comp / revenue – 1.2% 5.9%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricTMOBDXILMN
Debt / assets – 33.1% 29.9%
Debt / equity – 0.7x 0.7x
Net debt / EBITDA – 3.2x 0.7x
Debt / FCF – 5.2x 2.1x
Liabilities / assets – 51.9% 57.3%
Equity / assets 47.9% 48.1% 42.7%
Interest coverage – 4.2x 8.9x
Current ratio 1.8x 0.9x 1.8x
Quick ratio – 0.3x 1.2x
Cash ratio – 0.1x 0.7x
Altman Z-score – 2.29 7.77

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricTMOBDXILMN
Dividend yield 0.3% 2.1% –
Net buyback yield – 4.7% 1.2%
Shareholder yield 0.3% 6.8% 1.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusTMOBDXILMN
Forward P/E 26.4xFY2026 15.1xFY2026 54.3xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $25.91FY2026 $12.99FY2026 $4.99FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +13.3%FY2026 +14.8%FY2026 +3.1%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +2.0% -2.9% +25.7%
Revenue, next fiscal year $50.12BFY2026 $18.11BFY2026 $4.52BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +12.5%FY2026 -17.1%FY2026 +4.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -2.8% +11.6% +12.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersTMOBDXILMN
Held by institutions 90.2% 96.1% 100.0%
Institutions holding 2,621 1,442 933
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.8% +0.6% +0.0%
Institutions buying 1,141 688 463
Institutions selling 1,144 543 330
Buyers to sellers 1.00 1.27 1.40

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

TMOBDXILMN
TMO 1.00 0.32 0.50
BDX 0.32 1.00 0.05
ILMN 0.50 0.05 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, TMO, BDX and ILMN?

Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) is the largest by market capitalisation: Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) $258.87B, Becton Dickinson (BDX) $53.75B, Illumina (ILMN) $42.23B.

Which stock is cheaper, TMO, BDX and ILMN?

Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) 36.6x, Becton Dickinson (BDX) 57.1x, Illumina (ILMN) 51.2x). On next year's consensus earnings, Becton Dickinson (BDX) is cheapest (Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) 26.4x, Becton Dickinson (BDX) 15.1x, Illumina (ILMN) 54.3x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Becton Dickinson (BDX) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) +8.3%, Becton Dickinson (BDX) +17.4%, Illumina (ILMN) +4.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

Illumina (ILMN) has the highest net margin (Becton Dickinson (BDX) 4.0%, Illumina (ILMN) 18.4%). On return on invested capital, Illumina (ILMN) leads (Becton Dickinson (BDX) 5.3%, Illumina (ILMN) 15.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Illumina (ILMN) returned the most: Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) +19.6%, Becton Dickinson (BDX) +5.7%, Illumina (ILMN) +170.7%. Over five years, Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) compounded fastest (Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) +2.3%/yr, Becton Dickinson (BDX) -4.3%/yr, Illumina (ILMN) -7.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) has been the steadiest (Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) 29.9%, Becton Dickinson (BDX) 31.9%, Illumina (ILMN) 50.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, TMO, BDX and ILMN?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.