TMO vs ABT vs RGEN Stock Comparison

Thermo Fisher Scientific, Abbott Laboratories and Repligen Prices as of Nov 5, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (RVTY) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
ABT Abbott Laboratories
$113.58 +15.7% 1M -8.8% 1Y
Market cap
$196.71B
P/E
41.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$48.23B
Div. yield
2.22%
Medical Devices Healthcare
3 wins
RGEN Repligen Corp
$168.48 -3.6% 1M +15.5% 1Y
Market cap
$9.55B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$805.61M
Div. yield
–
Life Sciences Tools Healthcare
2 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Thermo Fisher Scientific leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Thermo Fisher Scientific 7, Abbott Laboratories 3, Repligen 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionTMOABTRGENLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $250.84B $196.71B $9.55B TMO
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 35.5x 41.9x -805.3x TMO
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 26.1x 20.0x 86.4x ABT
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +8.3% +10.0% +13.8% RGEN
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 14.9% 9.7% -1.5% TMO
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 8.0% 5.7% 0.0% TMO
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 3.1x 2.5x -2.8x RGEN
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.27% 2.22% — ABT
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +19.3% -8.8% +15.5% TMO
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +1.9%/yr -1.8%/yr -8.8%/yr TMO
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 30.3% 28.3% 46.8% ABT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 58/100 55/100 55/100 TMO

Percentile Scorecard

TMOABTRGEN

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisTMOABTRGEN
Valuation 60 #93 of 229 72 #66 of 229 52 #110 of 229
Growth 37 #140 of 221 23 #170 of 221 23 #171 of 221
Profitability 84 #35 of 210 82 #38 of 210 65 #75 of 210
Financial Health 31 #167 of 240 36 #154 of 240 82 #43 of 240
Shareholder Returns 82 #28 of 147 62 #57 of 147 52 #71 of 147
Overall 58 55 55
  • TMO ranked among 247 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics
  • ABT ranked among 247 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics
  • RGEN ranked among 247 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodTMOABTRGENSPY
1 month +3.1%+15.7%-3.6% -5.9%
3 months +16.7%+5.2%+5.7% -4.6%
6 months +42.7%+30.5%+33.3% +0.2%
Year to date +16.8%-9.3%+2.8% +7.5%
1 year +19.3%-8.8%+15.5% +8.2%
3 years +48.8%+19.6%+17.0% +68.3%
3 years, per year +14.2%+6.1%+5.4% +19.0%
5 years +9.8%-8.7%-36.9% +56.5%
5 years, per year +1.9%-1.8%-8.8% +9.4%
10 years +361.9%+190.6%+522.4% +251.5%
10 years, per year +16.5%+11.3%+20.1% +13.4%

Risk

MeasureTMOABTRGENSPY
Volatility, 1Y 30.3%28.3%46.8% 13.6%
Downside volatility, 1Y 29.1%27.6%47.5% 14.2%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.680.071.24 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.64-0.310.33 0.60
Max drawdown, 5Y -41.5%-41.6%-64.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -4.6%-13.0%-13.4% -5.9%
52-week high $709.29$130.59$194.57 $779.14
52-week low $438.34$82.56$102.87 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleTMOABTRGEN
P/E now vs peer median 35.5xmedian 26.9x 41.9xmedian 26.9x -805.3xmedian 26.9x
P/S now vs peer median 5.3xmedian 2.9x 4.1xmedian 2.9x 11.9xmedian 2.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 24.7xmedian 17.5x 21.2xmedian 17.5x 84.3xmedian 17.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 33.0xmedian 26.4x 29.1xmedian 26.4x 89.5xmedian 26.4x
P/B now vs peer median 4.6xmedian 2.3x 3.8xmedian 2.3x 4.6xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median 4.69median 0.88 -14.56median 0.88 28.33median 0.88

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsTMOABTRGEN
Revenue $47.35B $48.23B $805.61M
Gross profit $19.45B $27.46B $430.67M
Operating income $8.47B $6.65B $18.24M
Net income $7.09B $4.70B -$11.80M
Free cash flow $7.60B $6.76B $106.72M
R&D $1.40B $3.31B $57.23M
EPS (diluted) $19.06 $2.70 $-0.21
Cash & equivalents $5.46B $4.05B $726.96M
Total debt $41.37B $31.16B $555.60M
Shares (diluted) 371.00M 1.74B 56.64M
Enterprise value $227.48B $171.17B $6.33B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricTMOABTRGEN
P/E 35.5x 41.9x -805.3x
P/FCF 33.0x 29.1x 89.5x
P/Operating cash flow 26.9x 22.2x 73.6x
P/S 5.3x 4.1x 11.9x
P/B 4.6x 3.8x 4.6x
P/Tangible book 6.8x 6.1x 5.3x
EV/EBITDA 24.7x 21.2x 84.3x
EV/EBIT 33.8x 33.6x 506.9x
EV/Revenue 6.0x 4.6x 11.5x
EV/FCF 37.7x 33.1x 86.6x
EV/Operating cash flow 30.7x 25.2x 71.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 4.69 -14.56 28.33

Growth

14 metrics
MetricTMOABTRGEN
Revenue growth (1Y) 8.3% 10.0% 13.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 2.9% 6.5% 7.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 7.8% 12.1% 33.0%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 4.0% 7.8% 13.3%
Operating income growth (1Y) 12.8% -13.8% 2,185%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 7.2% 3.5% -40.5%
Net income growth (1Y) 7.9% -66.4% -779.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 6.2% -3.1% -28.4%
EPS growth (1Y) 9.7% -66.1% -777.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 7.6% -2.9% -28.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 21.9% -2.9% -0.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 4.5% 10.6% -4.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 24.3% -2.3% -3.0%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 5.1% 14.6% 1.8%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricTMOABTRGEN
Gross margin 41.1% 56.9% 53.5%
EBITDA margin 24.4% 21.9% 13.6%
Operating margin 17.9% 13.8% 2.3%
Pretax margin 16.7% 13.6% 1.0%
Net margin 14.9% 9.7% -1.5%
FCF margin 16.0% 14.0% 13.2%
Operating cash flow margin 19.7% 18.4% 16.1%
Return on equity 13.2% 9.1% -0.6%
Return on assets 6.2% 4.3% -0.4%
Return on invested capital 8.0% 5.7% 0.0%
Return on capital employed 8.5% 7.2% 0.6%
Asset turnover 0.4x 0.4x 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.3x 1.9x -11.0x
Stock comp / revenue 0.7% 1.5% 4.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricTMOABTRGEN
Debt / assets 36.2% 28.8% 19.0%
Debt / equity 0.8x 0.6x 0.3x
Net debt / EBITDA 3.1x 2.5x -2.8x
Debt / FCF 5.4x 4.6x 5.2x
Liabilities / assets 52.1% 52.3% 28.5%
Equity / assets 47.9% 47.7% 71.5%
Interest coverage 5.5x 6.7x 0.8x
Current ratio 1.8x 1.5x 9.9x
Quick ratio 1.2x 0.8x 8.1x
Cash ratio 0.4x 0.3x 6.9x
Altman Z-score 4.09 3.46 7.83

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricTMOABTRGEN
Dividend yield 0.3% 2.2% –
Net buyback yield 1.6% 0.7% -0.2%
Shareholder yield 1.9% 2.9% -0.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) 9.5% 92.0% –
Payout ratio (FCF) 8.9% 64.0% –
Dividend growth (1Y) 8.0% 6.9% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 10.1% 7.4% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusTMOABTRGEN
Forward P/E 26.1xFY2026 20.0xFY2026 86.4xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $25.92FY2026 $5.69FY2026 $1.95FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +13.3%FY2026 +10.5%FY2026 +14.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +2.1% +10.2% +29.2%
Revenue, next fiscal year $50.12BFY2026 $53.00BFY2026 $788.89MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +12.5%FY2026 +19.5%FY2026 +6.9%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -2.7% -2.2% +43.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersTMOABTRGEN
Held by institutions 90.2% 79.2% 100.0%
Institutions holding 2,627 2,983 483
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.8% +0.3% +1.2%
Institutions buying 1,145 1,261 273
Institutions selling 1,145 1,379 141
Buyers to sellers 1.00 0.91 1.94

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

TMOABTRGEN
TMO 1.00 0.25 0.67
ABT 0.25 1.00 0.24
RGEN 0.67 0.24 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, TMO, ABT and RGEN?

Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) is the largest by market capitalisation: Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) $250.84B, Abbott Laboratories (ABT) $196.71B, Repligen (RGEN) $9.55B.

Which stock is cheaper, TMO, ABT and RGEN?

Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) 35.5x, Abbott Laboratories (ABT) 41.9x, Repligen (RGEN) -805.3x). On next year's consensus earnings, Abbott Laboratories (ABT) is cheapest (Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) 26.1x, Abbott Laboratories (ABT) 20.0x, Repligen (RGEN) 86.4x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Repligen (RGEN) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) +8.3%, Abbott Laboratories (ABT) +10.0%, Repligen (RGEN) +13.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) has the highest net margin (Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) 14.9%, Abbott Laboratories (ABT) 9.7%, Repligen (RGEN) -1.5%). On return on invested capital, Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) leads (Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) 8.0%, Abbott Laboratories (ABT) 5.7%, Repligen (RGEN) 0.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) returned the most: Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) +19.3%, Abbott Laboratories (ABT) -8.8%, Repligen (RGEN) +15.5%. Over five years, Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) compounded fastest (Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) +1.9%/yr, Abbott Laboratories (ABT) -1.8%/yr, Repligen (RGEN) -8.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Abbott Laboratories (ABT) has the highest dividend yield: Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) 0.27%, Abbott Laboratories (ABT) 2.22%. Repligen (RGEN) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Abbott Laboratories (ABT) has been the steadiest (Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) 30.3%, Abbott Laboratories (ABT) 28.3%, Repligen (RGEN) 46.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, TMO, ABT and RGEN?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.