TLSS vs CHRW vs RXO Stock Comparison

Transportation & Logistics Systems, C. H. Robinson Worldwide and Rxo Prices as of Nov 4, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (CYRX) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
RXO RXO, Inc.
$27.87 -2.3% 1M +58.2% 1Y
Market cap
$4.68B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$6.54B
Div. yield
–
Logistics Industrials

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

C. H. Robinson Worldwide leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (C. H. Robinson Worldwide 8, Transportation & Logistics Systems 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionTLSSCHRWRXOLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $824.52M $14.85B $4.68B CHRW
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -887.6x 22.2x -53.2x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 20.8x 199.1x CHRW
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +10.4% +10.1% CHRW
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 3.7% -1.3% CHRW
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 21.3% -2.2% CHRW
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 1.7x 8.4x CHRW
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +1,300.0% -16.2% +58.2% TLSS
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +47.6%/yr +6.5%/yr — TLSS
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 1,832.5% 45.4% 75.8% CHRW
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 31/100 43/100 22/100 CHRW

Percentile Scorecard

TLSSCHRWRXO

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisTLSSCHRWRXO
Valuation 4 #131 of 137 25 #103 of 137 13 #120 of 137
Growth 87 #17 of 127 39 #78 of 127 13 #111 of 127
Profitability – 49 #64 of 125 20 #100 of 125
Financial Health 0 #147 of 147 39 #90 of 147 44 #83 of 147
Shareholder Returns – 65 #32 of 90 –
Overall 31 43 22
  • TLSS ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • CHRW ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • RXO ranked among 150 companies in Transportation

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodTLSSCHRWRXOSPY
1 month +1,300.0%-5.0%-2.3% -5.9%
3 months +1,300.0%-12.5%+37.6% -4.6%
6 months +1,300.0%-25.1%+20.6% +0.2%
Year to date +1,300.0%-20.2%+120.5% +7.5%
1 year +1,300.0%-16.2%+58.2% +8.2%
3 years +1,300.0%+56.5%+52.4% +68.3%
3 years, per year +141.2%+16.1%+15.1% +19.0%
5 years +600.0%+36.8%— +56.5%
5 years, per year +47.6%+6.5%— +9.4%
10 years -97.3%+86.8%— +251.5%
10 years, per year -30.4%+6.4%— +13.4%

Risk

MeasureTLSSCHRWRXOSPY
Volatility, 1Y 1,832.5%45.4%75.8% 13.6%
Downside volatility, 1Y —53.5%83.9% 14.2%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 8.050.721.62 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.71-0.360.77 0.60
Max drawdown, 5Y -92.5%-43.2%-67.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -82.5%-38.7%-4.9% -5.9%
52-week high $0.80$209.42$29.32 $779.14
52-week low $0.01$124.61$10.48 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleTLSSCHRWRXO
P/E now vs peer median -887.6xmedian 14.1x 22.7xmedian 14.1x -53.7xmedian 14.1x
P/S now vs peer median —median 0.9x 0.8xmedian 0.9x 0.7xmedian 0.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 7.8x 16.9xmedian 7.8x 90.5xmedian 7.8x
P/FCF now vs peer median -3,190xmedian 11.7x 28.6xmedian 11.7x -63.0xmedian 11.7x
P/B now vs peer median -38.7xmedian 1.2x 9.4xmedian 1.2x 3.0xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median -14.49median 0.68 1.16median 0.68 0.26median 0.68

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsTLSSCHRWRXO
Revenue – $18.22B $6.54B
Gross profit – $2.86B $1.16B
Operating income -$1.15M $884.59M -$52.00M
Net income -$1.06M $668.81M -$88.00M
Free cash flow -$258.49K $519.78M -$73.00M
EPS (diluted) $0.00 $5.58 $-0.51
Cash & equivalents $29.08K $193.13M $25.00M
Total debt $175.00K $1.87B $496.00M
Shares (diluted) 5.89B 119.75M 172.01M
Enterprise value $824.42M $14.19B $4.60B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricTLSSCHRWRXO
P/E -887.6x 22.7x -53.7x
P/FCF -3,190x 28.6x -63.0x
P/Operating cash flow -3,190x 27.9x -306.5x
P/S – 0.8x 0.7x
P/B -38.7x 9.4x 3.0x
P/Tangible book -38.7x 9.6x 4.2x
EV/EBITDA – 16.9x 90.5x
EV/EBIT -718.9x 18.7x -97.5x
EV/Revenue – 0.9x 0.8x
EV/FCF -3,190x 31.8x -69.4x
EV/Operating cash flow -3,190x 31.0x -337.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -14.49 1.16 0.26

Growth

14 metrics
MetricTLSSCHRWRXO
Revenue growth (1Y) – 10.4% 10.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – -0.4% 17.1%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 3.9% -1.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 1.3% 4.8%
Operating income growth (1Y) 24.9% 10.9% 14.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 31.0% 15.7% -60.9%
Net income growth (1Y) -43.9% 11.5% -11.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 51.8% 19.7% -253.0%
EPS growth (1Y) 73.6% 12.9% -9.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 61.2% 19.7% -210.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 63.4% -39.1% -140.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 55.5% -28.5% -28.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 63.4% -39.4% -305.6%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 57.1% -28.5% -42.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricTLSSCHRWRXO
Gross margin – 15.7% 17.7%
EBITDA margin – 5.4% 0.9%
Operating margin – 4.9% -0.8%
Pretax margin – 4.5% -1.6%
Net margin – 3.7% -1.3%
FCF margin – 2.9% -1.1%
Operating cash flow margin – 2.9% -0.2%
Return on equity – 41.7% -5.8%
Return on assets -4,668% 10.9% -2.5%
Return on invested capital – 21.3% -2.2%
Return on capital employed – 29.2% -2.3%
Asset turnover – 3.0x 1.9x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.2x 0.8x 0.2x
Stock comp / revenue – 0.5% 0.4%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricTLSSCHRWRXO
Debt / assets 572.2% 29.3% 14.2%
Debt / equity 0.0x 1.2x 0.3x
Net debt / EBITDA – 1.7x 8.4x
Debt / FCF -0.7x 3.6x -6.8x
Liabilities / assets 69,686% 75.3% 56.6%
Equity / assets -69,586% 24.7% 43.4%
Interest coverage -57.5x – –
Current ratio 0.0x 1.3x 1.3x
Quick ratio 0.0x 1.3x 1.2x
Cash ratio 0.0x 0.1x 0.0x
Altman Z-score – 6.76 3.16

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricTLSSCHRWRXO
Dividend yield – 2.0% –
Net buyback yield – 4.3% –
Shareholder yield – 6.3% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusTLSSCHRWRXO
Forward P/E – 20.8xFY2026 199.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.00FY2023 $6.16FY2026 $0.14FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +21.0%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after – +17.0% +357.1%
Revenue, next fiscal year $31.69MFY2023 $19.71BFY2026 $7.31BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +21.4%FY2026 +27.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +288.2% +2.5% +0.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersTLSSCHRWRXO
Held by institutions – 100.0% 100.0%
Institutions holding – 893 305
Change in shares held, QoQ – -1.7% -1.3%
Institutions buying – 445 165
Institutions selling – 319 83
Buyers to sellers – 1.39 1.99

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

TLSSCHRWRXO
TLSS – – –
CHRW – 1.00 0.48
RXO – 0.48 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, TLSS, CHRW and RXO?

C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) is the largest by market capitalisation: Transportation & Logistics Systems (TLSS) $824.52M, C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) $14.85B, Rxo (RXO) $4.68B.

Which company is growing faster?

C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) +10.4%, Rxo (RXO) +10.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) has the highest net margin (C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) 3.7%, Rxo (RXO) -1.3%). On return on invested capital, C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) leads (C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) 21.3%, Rxo (RXO) -2.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Transportation & Logistics Systems (TLSS) returned the most: Transportation & Logistics Systems (TLSS) +1,300.0%, C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) -16.2%, Rxo (RXO) +58.2%. Over five years, Transportation & Logistics Systems (TLSS) compounded fastest (Transportation & Logistics Systems (TLSS) +47.6%/yr, C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) +6.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) has been the steadiest (Transportation & Logistics Systems (TLSS) 1,832.5%, C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) 45.4%, Rxo (RXO) 75.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, TLSS, CHRW and RXO?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.