TIGR vs BAC vs XP Stock Comparison

UP Fintech Holding, Bank Of America and Xp Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (TOP) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
TIGR UP Fintech Holding Ltd
$4.16 -10.3% 1M -60.2% 1Y
Market cap
$725.66M
P/E
6.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$687.88M
Div. yield
–
Retail Brokerage Financial Services
3 wins
BAC Bank Of America Corp /De/
$50.68 -10.6% 1M -4.4% 1Y
Market cap
$364.39B
P/E
11.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$121.10B
Div. yield
0.03%
Money Center Banks Financial Services
5 wins
XP XP Inc.
$15.96 -22.2% 1M -9.5% 1Y
Market cap
$8.50B
P/E
8.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.59B
Div. yield
–
Retail Brokerage Financial Services
3 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Bank Of America leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Bank Of America 5, UP Fintech Holding 3, Xp 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionTIGRBACXPLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $725.66M $364.39B $8.50B BAC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 6.1x 11.3x 8.4x TIGR
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 7.8x 11.2x 7.6x XP
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +41.4% +9.7% +24.5% TIGR
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 17.4% 26.5% 63.3% XP
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 13.1% -1.2% BAC
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — -1.6x -73.9x XP
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.03% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -60.2% -4.4% -9.5% BAC
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -10.7%/yr +1.2%/yr -13.9%/yr BAC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 58.1% 21.8% 86.2% BAC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 71/100 70/100 51/100 TIGR

Percentile Scorecard

TIGRBACXP

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisTIGRBACXP
Valuation 99 #2 of 96 96 #17 of 360 65 #34 of 96
Growth 79 #15 of 66 82 #35 of 191 32 #45 of 66
Profitability 65 #23 of 64 73 #46 of 168 62 #25 of 64
Financial Health 42 #54 of 93 24 #133 of 175 12 #82 of 93
Shareholder Returns – 76 #84 of 341 81 #8 of 38
Overall 71 70 51
  • TIGR ranked among 110 companies in Capital Markets
  • BAC ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • XP ranked among 110 companies in Capital Markets

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodTIGRBACXPSPY
1 month -10.3%-10.6%-22.2% -0.2%
3 months -13.3%-19.1%-5.0% +3.9%
6 months -37.9%-3.8%-17.2% +8.2%
Year to date -56.5%-7.9%-2.5% +12.9%
1 year -60.2%-4.4%-9.5% +12.3%
3 years -9.6%+101.4%-21.3% +87.4%
3 years, per year -3.3%+26.3%-7.7% +23.3%
5 years -43.3%+6.1%-52.7% +67.9%
5 years, per year -10.7%+1.2%-13.9% +10.9%
10 years —+199.7%— +261.1%
10 years, per year —+11.6%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureTIGRBACXPSPY
Volatility, 1Y 58.1%21.8%86.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 64.6%25.6%105.1% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.680.721.73 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -1.04-0.20-0.11 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -68.9%-49.0%-70.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -62.6%-21.8%-51.0% -1.2%
52-week high $11.12$64.82$32.60 $779.14
52-week low $4.04$46.72$14.94 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleTIGRBACXP
P/E now vs peer median 6.1xmedian 28.3x 11.3xmedian 12.1x 8.4xmedian 28.3x
P/S now vs peer median 1.1xmedian 2.9x 2.9xmedian 3.4x 5.2xmedian 2.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 1.1xmedian 13.5x 1.4xmedian 5.0x -85.7xmedian 13.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 16.0x 3.8xmedian 10.9x 3.4xmedian 16.0x
P/B now vs peer median 0.8xmedian 2.4x 1.2xmedian 1.2x 1.7xmedian 2.4x
PEG now vs peer median 0.10median 0.54 1.40median 1.34 0.53median 0.54

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsTIGRBACXP
Revenue $687.88M $121.10B $1.59B
Gross profit – – $505.22M
Operating income $163.65M – -$769.94M
Net income $112.10M $33.66B $1.03B
Free cash flow – $94.74B $2.44B
EPS (diluted) $0.64 $4.41 $1.89
Cash & equivalents $542.51M $229.75B $1.54B
Total debt – $399.84B $224.00B
Shares (diluted) 187.18M 7.29B 531.92M
Enterprise value -$1.79B -$2.01T -$13.33B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricTIGRBACXP
P/E 6.1x 11.3x 8.4x
P/FCF – 3.8x 3.4x
P/Operating cash flow – 3.8x 3.3x
P/S 1.1x 2.9x 5.2x
P/B 0.8x 1.2x 1.7x
P/Tangible book 0.8x 1.2x 1.7x
EV/EBITDA 1.1x 1.4x -85.7x
EV/EBIT 1.0x 1.4x -78.5x
EV/Revenue 0.3x 1.4x 38.0x
EV/FCF – 1.8x 24.8x
EV/Operating cash flow – 1.8x 24.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.10 1.40 0.53

Growth

14 metrics
MetricTIGRBACXP
Revenue growth (1Y) 41.4% 9.7% 24.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 39.8% 6.4% 11.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – -100.0%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – -89.1%
Operating income growth (1Y) 136.3% – -100.1%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – -58.7%
Net income growth (1Y) -5.2% 20.5% 27.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 63.1% 4.2% 87.3%
EPS growth (1Y) -18.5% 27.5% 20.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 62.9% 8.0% 15.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 517.8% 30.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 28.5% 24.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 517.8% 30.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 28.5% 24.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricTIGRBACXP
Gross margin – – 31.8%
EBITDA margin 24.9% 99.4% -44.4%
Operating margin 23.8% – -48.4%
Pretax margin 22.9% 36.2% 68.1%
Net margin 17.4% 26.5% 63.3%
FCF margin – 78.2% 153.2%
Operating cash flow margin – 78.2% 155.8%
Return on equity 13.0% 11.2% 24.5%
Return on assets 1.2% 1.0% 1.5%
Return on invested capital – 13.1% -1.2%
Return on capital employed 36.2% – –
Asset turnover 0.1x 0.0x 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 2.8x 2.4x
Stock comp / revenue – 3.4% 3.4%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricTIGRBACXP
Debt / assets – 11.4% 72.2%
Debt / equity – 1.3x 11.9x
Net debt / EBITDA – -1.6x -73.9x
Debt / FCF – 4.2x 23.3x
Liabilities / assets 90.9% 91.4% 93.9%
Equity / assets 9.1% 8.6% 6.1%
Interest coverage 2.3x 1.6x -8.3x
Current ratio 1.1x – –
Quick ratio 0.1x – –
Cash ratio 0.1x – –
Altman Z-score 0.32 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricTIGRBACXP
Dividend yield – 2.3% 2.4%
Net buyback yield – 6.6% –
Shareholder yield 0.0% 8.9% 2.4%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 29.0% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 10.3% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 2.6% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 3.5% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusTIGRBACXP
Forward P/E 7.8xFY2026 11.2xFY2026 7.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.53FY2026 $4.52FY2026 $2.10FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -47.5%FY2026 +18.6%FY2026 +17.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +35.8% +19.9% +11.9%
Revenue, next fiscal year $591.32MFY2026 $127.79BFY2026 $3.94BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -3.4%FY2026 +13.0%FY2026 +17.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +7.5% -2.4% +5.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersTIGRBACXP
Held by institutions 33.7% 75.0% 63.1%
Institutions holding 117 3,614 318
Change in shares held, QoQ +6.6% +0.7% +0.1%
Institutions buying 65 1,827 146
Institutions selling 36 1,342 132
Buyers to sellers 1.81 1.36 1.11

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

TIGRBACXP
TIGR 1.00 0.22 0.22
BAC 0.22 1.00 0.16
XP 0.22 0.16 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, TIGR, BAC and XP?

Bank Of America (BAC) is the largest by market capitalisation: UP Fintech Holding (TIGR) $725.66M, Bank Of America (BAC) $364.39B, Xp (XP) $8.50B.

Which stock is cheaper, TIGR, BAC and XP?

UP Fintech Holding (TIGR) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (UP Fintech Holding (TIGR) 6.1x, Bank Of America (BAC) 11.3x, Xp (XP) 8.4x). On next year's consensus earnings, Xp (XP) is cheapest (UP Fintech Holding (TIGR) 7.8x, Bank Of America (BAC) 11.2x, Xp (XP) 7.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

UP Fintech Holding (TIGR) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: UP Fintech Holding (TIGR) +41.4%, Bank Of America (BAC) +9.7%, Xp (XP) +24.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Xp (XP) has the highest net margin (UP Fintech Holding (TIGR) 17.4%, Bank Of America (BAC) 26.5%, Xp (XP) 63.3%). On return on invested capital, Bank Of America (BAC) leads (Bank Of America (BAC) 13.1%, Xp (XP) -1.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Bank Of America (BAC) returned the most: UP Fintech Holding (TIGR) -60.2%, Bank Of America (BAC) -4.4%, Xp (XP) -9.5%. Over five years, Bank Of America (BAC) compounded fastest (UP Fintech Holding (TIGR) -10.7%/yr, Bank Of America (BAC) +1.2%/yr, Xp (XP) -13.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: UP Fintech Holding (TIGR) 0.00%, Bank Of America (BAC) 0.03%, Xp (XP) 0.00%. UP Fintech Holding (TIGR) and Xp (XP) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Bank Of America (BAC) has been the steadiest (UP Fintech Holding (TIGR) 58.1%, Bank Of America (BAC) 21.8%, Xp (XP) 86.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, TIGR, BAC and XP?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Bank Of America (BAC) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.