TER vs VHUB vs ASML Stock Comparison

Teradyne, VenHub Global and Asml Holding Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (FORM) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
TER Teradyne, Inc
$313.24 -21.9% 1M +117.0% 1Y
Market cap
$48.98B
P/E
54.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.00B
Div. yield
0.16%
Test and Measurement Technology
6 wins
ASML Asml Holding Nv
$1,662.85 -6.1% 1M +58.0% 1Y
Market cap
$640.89B
P/E
59.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$37.62B
Div. yield
0.67%
Semiconductor Equipment Technology
4 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Teradyne leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Teradyne 6, Asml Holding 4). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionTERVHUBASMLLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $48.98B $23.50M $640.89B ASML
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 54.2x -0.4x 59.1x TER
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 32.5x — 34.9x TER
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +74.9% — +22.9% TER
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — -11,799.2% 29.1% ASML
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.16% — 0.67% ASML
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +117.0% — +58.0% TER
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +17.8%/yr — +15.4%/yr TER
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 78.7% 162.5% 46.8% ASML
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 60/100 2/100 47/100 TER

Percentile Scorecard

TERVHUBASML

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisTERVHUBASML
Valuation 18 #91 of 111 0 #13 of 13 17 #78 of 94
Growth 95 #6 of 108 9 #11 of 12 82 #17 of 92
Profitability 87 #14 of 104 0 #12 of 12 80 #19 of 90
Financial Health 65 #41 of 115 0 #13 of 13 14 #85 of 99
Shareholder Returns 35 #51 of 78 – 43 #42 of 73
Overall 60 2 47
  • TER ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • VHUB ranked among 14 companies in Robotics and Automation
  • ASML ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodTERVHUBASMLSPY
1 month -21.9%-53.6%-6.1% +0.9%
3 months -1.9%-62.9%+7.2% +5.9%
6 months +2.3%-60.6%+19.3% +8.5%
Year to date +61.8%—+55.4% +13.3%
1 year +117.0%—+58.0% +12.4%
3 years +273.6%—+181.8% +88.1%
3 years, per year +55.2%—+41.3% +23.5%
5 years +126.6%—+104.6% +68.2%
5 years, per year +17.8%—+15.4% +11.0%
10 years +1,257.2%—+1,476.8% +263.4%
10 years, per year +29.8%—+31.8% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureTERVHUBASMLSPY
Volatility, 1Y 78.7%162.5%46.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 85.4%197.8%46.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 3.381.592.27 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.49—1.24 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -59.7%-96.8%-56.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -35.3%-96.8%-16.4% -0.9%
52-week high $483.84$8.08$1,989.44 $779.14
52-week low $144.38$0.26$966.57 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleTERVHUBASML
P/E now vs peer median 54.2xmedian 33.5x -0.4x 59.1xmedian 46.0x
P/S now vs peer median 9.8xmedian 2.8x 46.5xmedian 17.8x 17.0xmedian 7.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 19.6x -0.5x —median 28.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 80.9xmedian 29.8x -1.4xmedian 14.9x 51.2xmedian 41.4x
P/B now vs peer median 13.3xmedian 2.9x -444.5xmedian 1.1x 27.8xmedian 4.6x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.10 — 2.44median 2.30

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsTERVHUBASML
Revenue $5.00B $505.29K $37.62B
Gross profit $2.97B -$111.65K $19.58B
Operating income $1.61B -$42.78M –
Net income $1.38B -$59.62M –
Free cash flow – -$16.53M –
R&D $598.20M $1.05M –
EPS (diluted) – $-0.69 $28.13
Cash & equivalents $460.74M $2.56M $15.17B
Total debt – – $5.16B
Shares (diluted) 157.69M 86.30M 388.90M
Enterprise value $49.03B $15.05M $596.58B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricTERVHUBASML
P/E 54.2x -0.4x 59.1x
P/FCF 80.9x -1.4x 51.2x
P/Operating cash flow 36.8x -1.5x –
P/S 9.8x 46.5x 17.0x
P/B 13.3x -444.5x 27.8x
P/Tangible book 13.6x -444.5x 28.6x
EV/EBITDA – -0.5x –
EV/EBIT – -0.5x –
EV/Revenue 9.8x 41.4x 16.8x
EV/FCF – -1.3x –
EV/Operating cash flow 36.8x -1.3x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – – 2.44

Growth

14 metrics
MetricTERVHUBASML
Revenue growth (1Y) 74.9% – 22.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 22.2% – 19.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 76.1% – 24.9%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 23.4% – 20.6%
Operating income growth (1Y) 214.6% -193.6% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 43.5% – –
Net income growth (1Y) 211.2% -76.7% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 39.9% – –
EPS growth (1Y) – 42.3% 35.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – – 24.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 96.9% – –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 36.8% – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – – –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricTERVHUBASML
Gross margin – -22.1% 52.0%
EBITDA margin – -8,423% –
Operating margin – -8,466% –
Pretax margin – -10,867% –
Net margin – -11,799% 29.1%
FCF margin – -3,271% –
Operating cash flow margin 26.6% -3,074% –
Return on equity 38.7% -3,339% –
Return on assets 26.7% -559.7% –
Return on invested capital – – –
Return on capital employed – -1,898% –
Asset turnover 1.0x 0.1x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.0x 0.3x –
Stock comp / revenue 1.6% 6,401% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricTERVHUBASML
Debt / assets – – 8.7%
Debt / equity – – 0.2x
Net debt / EBITDA – – –
Debt / FCF – – –
Liabilities / assets 31.4% 100.7% 61.2%
Equity / assets 67.7% -0.7% 38.8%
Interest coverage – -3.5x –
Current ratio 2.1x 0.8x 1.3x
Quick ratio – 0.3x 0.7x
Cash ratio – 0.3x 0.5x
Altman Z-score – -34.71 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricTERVHUBASML
Dividend yield 0.2% – 0.7%
Net buyback yield – -80.3% –
Shareholder yield 0.2% -80.3% 0.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusTERVHUBASML
Forward P/E 32.5xFY2026 – 34.9xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $9.65FY2026 – $47.62FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +143.7%FY2026 – +61.2%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +25.7% – +42.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year $5.01BFY2026 – $47.18BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +57.1%FY2026 – +20.9%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +18.9% – +42.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersTERVHUBASML
Held by institutions 97.3% – 19.8%
Institutions holding 1,419 – 2,493
Change in shares held, QoQ +5.2% – +8.0%
Institutions buying 828 – 1,360
Institutions selling 456 – 782
Buyers to sellers 1.82 – 1.74

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

TERVHUBASML
TER 1.00 -0.07 0.72
VHUB -0.07 1.00 0.03
ASML 0.72 0.03 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, TER, VHUB and ASML?

Asml Holding (ASML) is the largest by market capitalisation: Teradyne (TER) $48.98B, VenHub Global (VHUB) $23.50M, Asml Holding (ASML) $640.89B.

Which stock is cheaper, TER, VHUB and ASML?

Teradyne (TER) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Teradyne (TER) 54.2x, VenHub Global (VHUB) -0.4x, Asml Holding (ASML) 59.1x). On next year's consensus earnings, Teradyne (TER) is cheapest (Teradyne (TER) 32.5x, Asml Holding (ASML) 34.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Teradyne (TER) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Teradyne (TER) +74.9%, Asml Holding (ASML) +22.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

Asml Holding (ASML) has the highest net margin (VenHub Global (VHUB) -11,799.2%, Asml Holding (ASML) 29.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Teradyne (TER) returned the most: Teradyne (TER) +117.0%, Asml Holding (ASML) +58.0%. Over five years, Teradyne (TER) compounded fastest (Teradyne (TER) +17.8%/yr, Asml Holding (ASML) +15.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Asml Holding (ASML) has the highest dividend yield: Teradyne (TER) 0.16%, Asml Holding (ASML) 0.67%. VenHub Global (VHUB) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Asml Holding (ASML) has been the steadiest (Teradyne (TER) 78.7%, VenHub Global (VHUB) 162.5%, Asml Holding (ASML) 46.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, TER, VHUB and ASML?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Teradyne (TER) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.