TER vs ASML vs FORM Stock Comparison

Teradyne, Asml Holding and Formfactor Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (EMR) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
TER Teradyne, Inc
$313.24 -21.9% 1M +117.0% 1Y
Market cap
$48.98B
P/E
54.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.00B
Div. yield
0.16%
Test and Measurement Technology
2 wins
ASML Asml Holding Nv
$1,662.85 -6.1% 1M +58.0% 1Y
Market cap
$640.89B
P/E
59.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$37.62B
Div. yield
0.67%
Semiconductor Equipment Technology
3 wins
FORM Formfactor Inc
$110.31 -15.8% 1M +160.0% 1Y
Market cap
$8.62B
P/E
49.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$980.10M
Div. yield
–
Test and Measurement Technology
4 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Formfactor leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Formfactor 4, Asml Holding 3, Teradyne 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionTERASMLFORMLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $48.98B $640.89B $8.62B ASML
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 54.2x 59.1x 49.6x FORM
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 32.5x 34.9x 35.0x TER
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +74.9% +22.9% +29.1% TER
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 29.1% — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.16% 0.67% — ASML
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +117.0% +58.0% +160.0% FORM
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +17.8%/yr +15.4%/yr +22.6%/yr FORM
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 78.7% 46.8% 87.2% ASML
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 60/100 47/100 72/100 FORM

Percentile Scorecard

TERASMLFORM

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisTERASMLFORM
Valuation 18 #91 of 111 17 #78 of 94 32 #76 of 111
Growth 95 #6 of 108 82 #17 of 92 97 #4 of 108
Profitability 87 #14 of 104 80 #19 of 90 73 #29 of 104
Financial Health 65 #41 of 115 14 #85 of 99 88 #15 of 115
Shareholder Returns 35 #51 of 78 43 #42 of 73 –
Overall 60 47 72
  • TER ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • ASML ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors
  • FORM ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodTERASMLFORMSPY
1 month -21.9%-6.1%-15.8% +0.9%
3 months -1.9%+7.2%+32.2% +5.9%
6 months +2.3%+19.3%-18.6% +8.5%
Year to date +61.8%+55.4%+97.8% +13.3%
1 year +117.0%+58.0%+160.0% +12.4%
3 years +273.6%+181.8%+238.6% +88.1%
3 years, per year +55.2%+41.3%+50.2% +23.5%
5 years +126.6%+104.6%+177.3% +68.2%
5 years, per year +17.8%+15.4%+22.6% +11.0%
10 years +1,257.2%+1,476.8%+1,097.7% +263.4%
10 years, per year +29.8%+31.8%+28.2% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureTERASMLFORMSPY
Volatility, 1Y 78.7%46.8%87.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 85.4%46.6%87.7% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 3.382.273.00 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.491.241.84 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -59.7%-56.9%-62.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -35.3%-16.4%-31.0% -0.9%
52-week high $483.84$1,989.44$159.93 $779.14
52-week low $144.38$966.57$42.42 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleTERASMLFORM
P/E now vs peer median 54.2xmedian 33.5x 59.1xmedian 46.0x 49.6xmedian 33.5x
P/S now vs peer median 9.8xmedian 2.8x 17.0xmedian 7.9x 8.8xmedian 2.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 19.6x —median 28.3x —median 19.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median 80.9xmedian 29.8x 51.2xmedian 41.4x 74.4xmedian 29.8x
P/B now vs peer median 13.3xmedian 2.9x 27.8xmedian 4.6x 7.3xmedian 2.9x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.10 2.44median 2.30 0.25median 1.10

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsTERASMLFORM
Revenue $5.00B $37.62B $980.10M
Gross profit $2.97B $19.58B $461.88M
Operating income $1.61B – $179.53M
Net income $1.38B – $173.63M
R&D $598.20M – $121.79M
EPS (diluted) – $28.13 $2.18
Cash & equivalents $460.74M $15.17B $138.18M
Total debt – $5.16B –
Shares (diluted) 157.69M 388.90M 79.61M
Enterprise value $49.03B $596.58B $8.62B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricTERASMLFORM
P/E 54.2x 59.1x 49.6x
P/FCF 80.9x 51.2x 74.4x
P/Operating cash flow 36.8x – 33.5x
P/S 9.8x 17.0x 8.8x
P/B 13.3x 27.8x 7.3x
P/Tangible book 13.6x 28.6x 7.4x
EV/EBITDA – – –
EV/EBIT – – –
EV/Revenue 9.8x 16.8x 8.8x
EV/FCF – – –
EV/Operating cash flow 36.8x – 33.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 2.44 0.25

Growth

14 metrics
MetricTERASMLFORM
Revenue growth (1Y) 74.9% 22.9% 29.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 22.2% 19.4% 14.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 76.1% 24.9% 58.4%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 23.4% 20.6% 25.1%
Operating income growth (1Y) 214.6% – 333.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 43.5% – 143.4%
Net income growth (1Y) 211.2% – 325.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 39.9% – 196.9%
EPS growth (1Y) – 35.2% 315.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 24.2% 195.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 96.9% – 144.0%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 36.8% – 50.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – – –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricTERASMLFORM
Gross margin – 52.0% –
EBITDA margin – – –
Operating margin – – –
Pretax margin – – –
Net margin – 29.1% –
FCF margin – – –
Operating cash flow margin 26.6% – 26.2%
Return on equity 38.7% – 14.8%
Return on assets 26.7% – 12.2%
Return on invested capital – – –
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 1.0x 0.7x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.0x – 1.5x
Stock comp / revenue 1.6% – 3.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricTERASMLFORM
Debt / assets – 8.7% –
Debt / equity – 0.2x –
Net debt / EBITDA – – –
Debt / FCF – – –
Liabilities / assets 31.4% 61.2% 17.5%
Equity / assets 67.7% 38.8% 82.5%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 2.1x 1.3x 3.7x
Quick ratio – 0.7x –
Cash ratio – 0.5x –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricTERASMLFORM
Dividend yield 0.2% 0.7% –
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield 0.2% 0.7% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusTERASMLFORM
Forward P/E 32.5xFY2026 34.9xFY2026 35.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $9.65FY2026 $47.62FY2026 $3.15FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +143.7%FY2026 +61.2%FY2026 +142.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +25.7% +42.0% +31.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $5.01BFY2026 $47.18BFY2026 $982.39MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +57.1%FY2026 +20.9%FY2026 +25.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +18.9% +42.9% +21.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersTERASMLFORM
Held by institutions 97.3% 19.8% 92.0%
Institutions holding 1,419 2,493 509
Change in shares held, QoQ +5.2% +8.0% -3.7%
Institutions buying 828 1,360 304
Institutions selling 456 782 168
Buyers to sellers 1.82 1.74 1.81

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

TERASMLFORM
TER 1.00 0.72 0.74
ASML 0.72 1.00 0.70
FORM 0.74 0.70 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, TER, ASML and FORM?

Asml Holding (ASML) is the largest by market capitalisation: Teradyne (TER) $48.98B, Asml Holding (ASML) $640.89B, Formfactor (FORM) $8.62B.

Which stock is cheaper, TER, ASML and FORM?

Formfactor (FORM) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Teradyne (TER) 54.2x, Asml Holding (ASML) 59.1x, Formfactor (FORM) 49.6x). On next year's consensus earnings, Teradyne (TER) is cheapest (Teradyne (TER) 32.5x, Asml Holding (ASML) 34.9x, Formfactor (FORM) 35.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Teradyne (TER) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Teradyne (TER) +74.9%, Asml Holding (ASML) +22.9%, Formfactor (FORM) +29.1%.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Formfactor (FORM) returned the most: Teradyne (TER) +117.0%, Asml Holding (ASML) +58.0%, Formfactor (FORM) +160.0%. Over five years, Formfactor (FORM) compounded fastest (Teradyne (TER) +17.8%/yr, Asml Holding (ASML) +15.4%/yr, Formfactor (FORM) +22.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Asml Holding (ASML) has the highest dividend yield: Teradyne (TER) 0.16%, Asml Holding (ASML) 0.67%. Formfactor (FORM) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Asml Holding (ASML) has been the steadiest (Teradyne (TER) 78.7%, Asml Holding (ASML) 46.8%, Formfactor (FORM) 87.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, TER, ASML and FORM?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Formfactor (FORM) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.