TECH vs ILMN vs DHR Stock Comparison

Bio-Techne, Illumina and Danaher Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (A) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
TECH BIO-TECHNE Corp
$72.55 +0.0% 1M +9.8% 1Y
Market cap
$11.34B
P/E
62.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.22B
Div. yield
0.00%
Life Sciences Tools Healthcare
1 win
ILMN Illumina, Inc.
$269.42 +5.5% 1M +169.5% 1Y
Market cap
$40.91B
P/E
49.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.49B
Div. yield
–
Life Sciences Tools Healthcare
5 wins
DHR Danaher Corp /De/
$230.44 +3.9% 1M +3.5% 1Y
Market cap
$164.19B
P/E
41.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$25.11B
Div. yield
–
Life Sciences Tools Healthcare
5 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Danaher leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Danaher 5, Illumina 5, Bio-Techne 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionTECHILMNDHRLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $11.34B $40.91B $164.19B DHR
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 62.3x 49.6x 41.0x DHR
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 33.6x 53.9x 25.5x DHR
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -0.4% +4.9% +4.6% ILMN
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 15.0% 18.4% 15.9% ILMN
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 8.3% 15.1% 5.7% ILMN
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.2x 0.7x 2.9x TECH
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +9.8% +169.5% +3.5% ILMN
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -10.5%/yr -7.5%/yr -6.0%/yr DHR
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 43.6% 50.3% 30.6% DHR
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 65/100 65/100 60/100 ILMN

Percentile Scorecard

TECHILMNDHR

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisTECHILMNDHR
Valuation 57 #99 of 228 52 #111 of 228 67 #75 of 228
Growth 39 #137 of 222 43 #126 of 222 20 #178 of 222
Profitability 94 #14 of 210 97 #7 of 210 88 #27 of 210
Financial Health 86 #34 of 241 51 #118 of 241 46 #131 of 241
Shareholder Returns 49 #71 of 138 84 #23 of 138 77 #32 of 138
Overall 65 65 60
  • TECH ranked among 248 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics
  • ILMN ranked among 248 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics
  • DHR ranked among 248 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodTECHILMNDHRSPY
1 month +0.0%+5.5%+3.9% -1.0%
3 months +1.3%+38.8%+20.3% +2.9%
6 months +33.9%+110.7%+30.0% +6.4%
Year to date +23.4%+105.4%+0.7% +11.4%
1 year +9.8%+169.5%+3.5% +13.1%
3 years +14.0%+138.6%+17.1% +79.4%
3 years, per year +4.5%+33.6%+5.4% +21.5%
5 years -42.6%-32.3%-26.5% +67.7%
5 years, per year -10.5%-7.5%-6.0% +10.9%
10 years +176.5%+95.3%+187.4% +255.2%
10 years, per year +10.7%+6.9%+11.1% +13.5%

Risk

MeasureTECHILMNDHRSPY
Volatility, 1Y 43.6%50.3%30.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 43.4%39.1%31.7% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.750.800.44 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.233.370.11 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -67.0%-82.9%-50.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -0.1%-8.3%-4.8% -2.5%
52-week high $72.64$293.69$242.05 $779.14
52-week low $43.30$95.03$161.91 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleTECHILMNDHR
P/E now vs peer median 62.2xmedian 30.7x 49.3xmedian 30.7x 40.6xmedian 30.7x
P/S now vs peer median 9.3xmedian 3.0x 9.1xmedian 3.0x 6.5xmedian 3.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 32.2xmedian 17.7x 36.0xmedian 17.7x 24.0xmedian 17.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 43.0xmedian 23.7x 43.7xmedian 23.7x 29.6xmedian 23.7x
P/B now vs peer median 5.4xmedian 2.4x 14.3xmedian 2.4x 3.1xmedian 2.4x
PEG now vs peer median -4.77median 0.96 1.64median 0.96 -3.24median 0.96

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsTECHILMNDHR
Revenue $1.22B $4.49B $25.11B
Gross profit $799.07M $2.98B $14.69B
Operating income $251.89M $882.00M $5.13B
Net income $181.86M $825.00M $4.00B
Free cash flow $263.22M $931.00M $5.47B
R&D $94.77M $960.00M $1.62B
EPS (diluted) $1.16 $5.39 $5.66
Cash & equivalents $264.71M $1.04B $4.35B
Total debt $960.00M $6.97B $26.56B
Shares (diluted) 157.01M 153.00M 707.60M
Enterprise value $10.54B $35.68B $148.00B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricTECHILMNDHR
P/E 62.2x 49.3x 40.6x
P/FCF 43.0x 43.7x 29.6x
P/Operating cash flow 38.8x 37.2x 24.4x
P/S 9.3x 9.1x 6.5x
P/B 5.4x 14.3x 3.1x
P/Tangible book 6.3x 16.8x 5.2x
EV/EBITDA 32.2x 36.0x 24.0x
EV/EBIT 44.7x 47.1x 35.9x
EV/Revenue 9.3x 9.2x 7.3x
EV/FCF 42.8x 44.6x 33.7x
EV/Operating cash flow 38.6x 37.9x 27.8x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -4.77 1.64 -3.24

Growth

14 metrics
MetricTECHILMNDHR
Revenue growth (1Y) -0.4% 4.9% 4.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 2.2% -1.0% -0.5%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 1.1% 4.6% 2.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 1.3% 2.9% -0.9%
Operating income growth (1Y) 146.3% -31.8% 16.1%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -5.5% 28.3% -7.1%
Net income growth (1Y) 147.8% -34.4% 17.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -14.0% 30.0% -14.3%
EPS growth (1Y) 152.0% -32.7% 19.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -13.1% 30.1% -12.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 1.6% -5.1% 7.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 4.7% 38.1% -7.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 2.6% -9.7% 12.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 6.8% 105.0% -9.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricTECHILMNDHR
Gross margin 65.8% 66.4% 58.5%
EBITDA margin 28.7% 25.7% 30.5%
Operating margin 20.7% 19.6% 20.4%
Pretax margin 19.8% 22.6% 19.0%
Net margin 15.0% 18.4% 15.9%
FCF margin 21.7% 20.7% 21.8%
Operating cash flow margin 24.0% 24.4% 26.4%
Return on equity 8.7% 29.9% 7.6%
Return on assets 7.1% 12.5% 4.5%
Return on invested capital 8.3% 15.1% 5.7%
Return on capital employed 10.5% 17.5% 6.4%
Asset turnover 0.5x 0.7x 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.6x 1.3x 1.7x
Stock comp / revenue 0.5% 5.9% 1.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricTECHILMNDHR
Debt / assets 7.7% 29.9% 28.8%
Debt / equity 0.1x 0.7x 0.5x
Net debt / EBITDA -0.2x 0.7x 2.9x
Debt / FCF 0.8x 2.1x 4.9x
Liabilities / assets 18.5% 57.3% 43.1%
Equity / assets 81.5% 42.7% 56.9%
Interest coverage 26.2x 8.9x 17.6x
Current ratio 4.5x 1.8x 1.7x
Quick ratio 2.9x 1.2x 1.0x
Cash ratio 1.6x 0.7x 0.5x
Altman Z-score 15.88 7.73 3.70

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricTECHILMNDHR
Dividend yield 0.4% – 0.7%
Net buyback yield -0.3% 1.2% 1.8%
Shareholder yield 0.1% 1.2% 2.5%
Payout ratio (earnings) 27.4% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 19.0% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) -0.9% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) -0.2% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusTECHILMNDHR
Forward P/E 33.6xFY2027 53.9xFY2026 25.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $2.16FY2027 $5.00FY2026 $9.03FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +11.9%FY2027 +3.3%FY2026 +15.8%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +5.1% +25.4% +8.9%
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.19BFY2027 $4.52BFY2026 $27.12BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -2.1%FY2027 +4.1%FY2026 +10.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +13.5% +12.0% -1.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersTECHILMNDHR
Held by institutions 100.0% 100.0% 81.9%
Institutions holding 597 933 2,115
Change in shares held, QoQ -0.6% +0.0% +1.1%
Institutions buying 293 463 837
Institutions selling 241 330 1,015
Buyers to sellers 1.22 1.40 0.82

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

TECHILMNDHR
TECH 1.00 0.22 0.39
ILMN 0.22 1.00 0.34
DHR 0.39 0.34 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, TECH, ILMN and DHR?

Danaher (DHR) is the largest by market capitalisation: Bio-Techne (TECH) $11.34B, Illumina (ILMN) $40.91B, Danaher (DHR) $164.19B.

Which stock is cheaper, TECH, ILMN and DHR?

Danaher (DHR) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Bio-Techne (TECH) 62.3x, Illumina (ILMN) 49.6x, Danaher (DHR) 41.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Danaher (DHR) is cheapest (Bio-Techne (TECH) 33.6x, Illumina (ILMN) 53.9x, Danaher (DHR) 25.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Illumina (ILMN) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Bio-Techne (TECH) -0.4%, Illumina (ILMN) +4.9%, Danaher (DHR) +4.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Illumina (ILMN) has the highest net margin (Bio-Techne (TECH) 15.0%, Illumina (ILMN) 18.4%, Danaher (DHR) 15.9%). On return on invested capital, Illumina (ILMN) leads (Bio-Techne (TECH) 8.3%, Illumina (ILMN) 15.1%, Danaher (DHR) 5.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Illumina (ILMN) returned the most: Bio-Techne (TECH) +9.8%, Illumina (ILMN) +169.5%, Danaher (DHR) +3.5%. Over five years, Danaher (DHR) compounded fastest (Bio-Techne (TECH) -10.5%/yr, Illumina (ILMN) -7.5%/yr, Danaher (DHR) -6.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Bio-Techne (TECH) 0.00%, Illumina (ILMN) 0.00%, Danaher (DHR) 0.00%. Illumina (ILMN) and Danaher (DHR) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Danaher (DHR) has been the steadiest (Bio-Techne (TECH) 43.6%, Illumina (ILMN) 50.3%, Danaher (DHR) 30.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, TECH, ILMN and DHR?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Danaher (DHR) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.