TEAM vs FIG vs ZM Stock Comparison

Atlassian, Figma and Zoom Communications Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (DBX) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
TEAM Atlassian Corp
$227.61 +16.7% 1M +37.9% 1Y
Market cap
$58.13B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$6.57B
Div. yield
–
Productivity Software Technology
3 wins
FIG Figma, Inc.
$24.64 +13.2% 1M -53.8% 1Y
Market cap
$12.41B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$1.20B
Div. yield
–
Creative Software Technology
1 win
ZM Zoom Communications, Inc.
$95.77 +4.2% 1M +15.7% 1Y
Market cap
$28.72B
P/E
9.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.97B
Div. yield
–
Communications Platforms Technology
4 wins

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Zoom Communications leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Zoom Communications 4, Atlassian 3, Figma 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionTEAMFIGZMLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $58.13B $12.41B $28.72B TEAM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -1,080x -8.7x 9.0x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 40.4x 88.0x 14.8x ZM
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +26.0% +42.2% +4.6% FIG
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -0.8% -119.8% 64.1% ZM
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 0.0% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -1.7x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +37.9% -53.8% +15.7% TEAM
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -11.7%/yr — -19.2%/yr TEAM
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 75.0% 74.6% 44.7% ZM
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 43/100 32/100 79/100 ZM

Percentile Scorecard

TEAMFIGZM

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisTEAMFIGZM
Valuation 7 #28 of 30 3 #29 of 30 66 #11 of 30
Growth 77 #7 of 27 39 #17 of 27 69 #9 of 27
Profitability 32 #18 of 26 4 #25 of 26 84 #5 of 26
Financial Health 42 #19 of 32 81 #7 of 32 97 #2 of 32
Shareholder Returns 56 #8 of 17 – –
Overall 43 32 79
  • TEAM ranked among 33 companies in Workplace Software
  • FIG ranked among 33 companies in Workplace Software
  • ZM ranked among 33 companies in Workplace Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodTEAMFIGZMSPY
1 month +16.7%+13.2%+4.2% -1.0%
3 months +162.0%+16.5%+8.8% +2.9%
6 months +218.1%+41.0%+4.1% +6.4%
Year to date +40.4%-34.1%+11.0% +11.4%
1 year +37.9%-53.8%+15.7% +13.1%
3 years +19.4%—+54.1% +79.4%
3 years, per year +6.1%—+15.5% +21.5%
5 years -46.2%—-65.5% +67.7%
5 years, per year -11.7%—-19.2% +10.9%
10 years +683.8%—— +255.2%
10 years, per year +22.9%—— +13.5%

Risk

MeasureTEAMFIGZMSPY
Volatility, 1Y 75.0%74.6%44.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 63.3%69.6%42.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.811.021.03 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.51-0.720.35 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -87.5%-86.2%-80.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high 0.0%-53.8%-14.4% -2.5%
52-week high $227.61$53.36$111.88 $779.14
52-week low $57.15$16.84$72.72 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleTEAMFIGZM
P/E now vs peer median -1,100xmedian 32.3x -9.1xmedian 32.3x 8.8xmedian 32.3x
P/S now vs peer median 9.0xmedian 2.4x 10.9xmedian 2.4x 5.6xmedian 2.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 409.9xmedian 11.5x -8.0xmedian 11.5x 13.5xmedian 11.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 44.9xmedian 14.2x —median 14.2x 14.2xmedian 14.2x
P/B now vs peer median 55.9xmedian 2.7x 8.8xmedian 2.7x 2.5xmedian 2.7x
PEG now vs peer median -21.06median 0.77 —median 0.77 0.05median 0.77

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsTEAMFIGZM
Revenue $6.57B $1.20B $4.97B
Gross profit $5.58B $971.13M $3.84B
Operating income $10.36M -$1.45B $1.20B
Net income -$53.83M -$1.41B $3.19B
Free cash flow $1.32B – –
R&D $3.27B $1.13B $881.96M
EPS (diluted) $-0.21 $-2.72 $10.64
Cash & equivalents $1.24B $445.85M $931.99M
Total debt $3.96B – –
Shares (diluted) 260.16M 527.46M 299.75M
Enterprise value $51.41B $5.92B -$2.07B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricTEAMFIGZM
P/E -1,100x -9.1x 8.8x
P/FCF 44.9x – 14.2x
P/Operating cash flow 43.8x – –
P/S 9.0x 10.9x 5.6x
P/B 55.9x 8.8x 2.5x
P/Tangible book 94.6x 8.9x 2.5x
EV/EBITDA 409.9x -8.0x 13.5x
EV/EBIT 5,694x -7.9x 17.3x
EV/Revenue 9.0x 9.5x 4.2x
EV/FCF 44.7x – –
EV/Operating cash flow 43.6x – –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -21.06 – 0.05

Growth

14 metrics
MetricTEAMFIGZM
Revenue growth (1Y) 26.0% 42.2% 4.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 23.0% – 3.7%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 29.0% 31.3% 5.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 24.3% – 4.5%
Operating income growth (1Y) 107.9% -63.0% 23.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 26.6% – 112.9%
Net income growth (1Y) 79.0% -96.2% 168.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 52.0% – 182.3%
EPS growth (1Y) 78.9% 15.4% 175.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 52.2% – 184.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -7.3% – –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 15.9% – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -6.8% – –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 16.1% – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricTEAMFIGZM
Gross margin 84.8% 81.1% 77.2%
EBITDA margin 2.2% -119.1% 30.9%
Operating margin 0.2% -120.9% 24.1%
Pretax margin 0.3% -115.4% 82.5%
Net margin -0.8% -119.8% 64.1%
FCF margin 20.1% – –
Operating cash flow margin 20.6% – –
Return on equity -5.6% -94.2% 30.2%
Return on assets -0.9% -59.9% 25.0%
Return on invested capital 0.0% – –
Return on capital employed 0.4% -93.8% 11.2%
Asset turnover 1.1x 0.5x 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -25.1x – –
Stock comp / revenue 24.4% – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricTEAMFIGZM
Debt / assets 16.2% – –
Debt / equity 0.9x – –
Net debt / EBITDA -1.7x – –
Debt / FCF 0.8x – –
Liabilities / assets 82.7% 37.1% 16.8%
Equity / assets 17.3% 62.9% 83.2%
Interest coverage 0.2x – –
Current ratio 0.8x 2.5x 3.8x
Quick ratio 0.7x 2.3x 3.7x
Cash ratio 0.3x 2.1x 3.4x
Altman Z-score 6.57 7.05 9.34

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricTEAMFIGZM
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield 3.0% – –
Shareholder yield 3.0% 0.0% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusTEAMFIGZM
Forward P/E 40.4xFY2027 88.0xFY2026 14.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $5.63FY2027 $0.28FY2026 $6.45FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -3.8%FY2027 -37.8%FY2026 +9.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +24.2% +21.4% +2.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year $7.29BFY2027 $1.43BFY2026 $4.76BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +10.9%FY2027 +35.0%FY2026 -2.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +23.0% +34.9% +7.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersTEAMFIGZM
Held by institutions 99.7% 81.2% 67.2%
Institutions holding 696 373 862
Change in shares held, QoQ +4.9% +12.2% +2.9%
Institutions buying 434 257 477
Institutions selling 193 64 279
Buyers to sellers 2.25 4.02 1.71

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

TEAMFIGZM
TEAM 1.00 0.56 0.50
FIG 0.56 1.00 0.40
ZM 0.50 0.40 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, TEAM, FIG and ZM?

Atlassian (TEAM) is the largest by market capitalisation: Atlassian (TEAM) $58.13B, Figma (FIG) $12.41B, Zoom Communications (ZM) $28.72B.

Which company is growing faster?

Figma (FIG) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Atlassian (TEAM) +26.0%, Figma (FIG) +42.2%, Zoom Communications (ZM) +4.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Zoom Communications (ZM) has the highest net margin (Atlassian (TEAM) -0.8%, Figma (FIG) -119.8%, Zoom Communications (ZM) 64.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Atlassian (TEAM) returned the most: Atlassian (TEAM) +37.9%, Figma (FIG) -53.8%, Zoom Communications (ZM) +15.7%. Over five years, Atlassian (TEAM) compounded fastest (Atlassian (TEAM) -11.7%/yr, Zoom Communications (ZM) -19.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Zoom Communications (ZM) has been the steadiest (Atlassian (TEAM) 75.0%, Figma (FIG) 74.6%, Zoom Communications (ZM) 44.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, TEAM, FIG and ZM?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Zoom Communications (ZM) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.