TCOM vs BABA vs AZUL Stock Comparison

Trip.com, Alibaba Group Holding and Azul Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (EXPE) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
TCOM Trip.com Group Ltd
$39.91 +1.2% 1M -45.2% 1Y
Market cap
$25.90B
P/E
7.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$9.45B
Div. yield
–
Travel Services Consumer Discretionary
7 wins
BABA Alibaba Group Holding Ltd
$100.26 -8.7% 1M -42.6% 1Y
Market cap
$230.89B
P/E
21.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$150.46B
Div. yield
–
Digital Marketplaces Technology
2 wins
AZUL Azul Sa
$4.05 -37.5% 1M
Market cap
$3.00B
P/E
142.7x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Airlines Industrials
1 win

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Trip.com leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Trip.com 7, Alibaba Group Holding 2, Azul 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionTCOMBABAAZULLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $25.90B $230.89B $3.00B BABA
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 7.6x 21.9x 142.7x TCOM
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 11.0x 14.3x 8.4x AZUL
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +18.1% +8.1% — TCOM
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 36.1% 7.0% — TCOM
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 5.3% 2.4% — TCOM
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -45.2% -42.6% — BABA
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +6.6%/yr -9.9%/yr — TCOM
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 36.3% 40.4% 560.8% TCOM
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 81/100 46/100 — TCOM

Percentile Scorecard

TCOMBABAAZUL

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisTCOMBABAAZUL
Valuation 82 #6 of 29 70 #51 of 167 18 #112 of 136
Growth 80 #6 of 26 17 #127 of 153 –
Profitability 68 #9 of 26 53 #72 of 153 –
Financial Health 93 #3 of 31 59 #74 of 179 1 #143 of 144
Shareholder Returns – 30 #66 of 94 –
Overall 81 46 –
  • TCOM ranked among 32 companies in Travel and Lodging
  • BABA ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms
  • AZUL ranked among 150 companies in Transportation

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodTCOMBABAAZULSPY
1 month +1.2%-8.7%-37.5% -0.8%
3 months -10.9%-12.8%-52.1% +3.5%
6 months -25.0%-24.3%+3.8% +7.0%
Year to date -44.5%-31.6%— +12.2%
1 year -45.2%-42.6%— +13.0%
3 years +13.0%+21.1%— +86.3%
3 years, per year +4.2%+6.6%— +23.1%
5 years +37.9%-40.8%— +68.6%
5 years, per year +6.6%-9.9%— +11.0%
10 years -14.5%-2.5%— +258.0%
10 years, per year -1.6%-0.2%— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureTCOMBABAAZULSPY
Volatility, 1Y 36.3%40.4%560.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 43.1%36.0%725.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.591.111.88 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -1.25-1.06— 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -51.9%-62.9%-99.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -49.5%-44.3%-99.2% -1.8%
52-week high $78.96$179.97$495.00 $779.14
52-week low $37.96$94.81$3.90 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleTCOMBABAAZUL
P/E now vs peer median 7.7xmedian 18.8x 22.1xmedian 17.5x 142.7xmedian 16.1x
P/S now vs peer median 2.7xmedian 1.5x 1.5xmedian 1.4x 3.2xmedian 1.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 15.2x —median 14.5x —median 8.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 16.1x 7.0xmedian 12.1x -47.8xmedian 11.5x
P/B now vs peer median 1.1xmedian 2.5x 1.4xmedian 1.7x —median 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.15median 0.38 -15.35median 0.41 —median 0.81

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsTCOMBABAAZUL
Revenue $9.45B $150.46B –
Gross profit $7.55B $57.45B –
Operating income $1.50B $4.39B –
Net income $3.42B $10.08B –
Free cash flow – $33.19B –
R&D $2.30B $10.68B –
EPS (diluted) $4.88 $4.38 –
Cash & equivalents $8.26B $21.06B $181.08M
Total debt $18.23B $83.76B $4.21B
Shares (diluted) 698.38M 2.40B 17.41B
Enterprise value -$19.14B $44.52B $2.11B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricTCOMBABAAZUL
P/E 7.7x 22.1x 142.7x
P/FCF – 7.0x -47.8x
P/Operating cash flow – 20.6x –
P/S 2.7x 1.5x 3.2x
P/B 1.1x 1.4x –
P/Tangible book 1.2x 1.5x –
EV/EBITDA – – –
EV/EBIT 12.0x 48.0x –
EV/Revenue 1.9x 1.4x –
EV/FCF – 6.3x –
EV/Operating cash flow – 18.6x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.15 -15.35 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricTCOMBABAAZUL
Revenue growth (1Y) 18.1% 8.1% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 27.2% 5.6% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 16.9% 0.2% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 40.9% 6.5% –
Operating income growth (1Y) -28.2% -77.5% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 42.4% -35.9% –
Net income growth (1Y) 34.1% -50.0% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 54.9% -3.6% –
EPS growth (1Y) 33.2% -47.9% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 51.8% -1.4% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – -45.8% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -27.8% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -8.5% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -0.6% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricTCOMBABAAZUL
Gross margin 80.0% 38.2% –
EBITDA margin – – –
Operating margin 15.9% 2.9% –
Pretax margin 45.7% 9.7% –
Net margin 36.1% 7.0% –
FCF margin – 22.1% –
Operating cash flow margin – 7.5% –
Return on equity 14.3% 6.2% –
Return on assets 8.9% 3.6% –
Return on invested capital 5.3% 2.4% –
Return on capital employed 6.1% 2.1% –
Asset turnover 0.2x 0.5x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 1.1x –
Stock comp / revenue – 1.1% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricTCOMBABAAZUL
Debt / assets 10.2% 7.5% 97.6%
Debt / equity 0.2x 0.1x –
Net debt / EBITDA – – –
Debt / FCF – 0.6x –
Liabilities / assets 38.0% 43.6% 165.7%
Equity / assets 62.0% 56.4% –
Interest coverage 19.8x 3.2x –
Current ratio 1.3x 1.4x 0.2x
Quick ratio 1.0x 0.6x 0.1x
Cash ratio 0.9x 0.6x 0.0x
Altman Z-score – 2.30 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricTCOMBABAAZUL
Dividend yield – 1.0% –
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield 0.0% 1.0% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusTCOMBABAAZUL
Forward P/E 11.0xFY2026 14.3xFY2026 8.4xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $3.64FY2026 $7.02FY2026 $0.48FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -44.2%FY2026 +80.9%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +17.0% +22.8% +187.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $9.46BFY2026 $174.00BFY2026 $4.51BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +6.0%FY2026 +17.3%FY2026 +6.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +20.9% +14.7% +13.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersTCOMBABAAZUL
Held by institutions 23.0% 10.1% 2.9%
Institutions holding 319 1,218 42
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.2% -5.4% –
Institutions buying 152 555 42
Institutions selling 119 421 0
Buyers to sellers 1.28 1.32 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

TCOMBABAAZUL
TCOM 1.00 0.33 0.01
BABA 0.33 1.00 -0.02
AZUL 0.01 -0.02 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, TCOM, BABA and AZUL?

Alibaba Group Holding (BABA) is the largest by market capitalisation: Trip.com (TCOM) $25.90B, Alibaba Group Holding (BABA) $230.89B, Azul (AZUL) $3.00B.

Which stock is cheaper, TCOM, BABA and AZUL?

Trip.com (TCOM) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Trip.com (TCOM) 7.6x, Alibaba Group Holding (BABA) 21.9x, Azul (AZUL) 142.7x). On next year's consensus earnings, Azul (AZUL) is cheapest (Trip.com (TCOM) 11.0x, Alibaba Group Holding (BABA) 14.3x, Azul (AZUL) 8.4x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Trip.com (TCOM) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Trip.com (TCOM) +18.1%, Alibaba Group Holding (BABA) +8.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Trip.com (TCOM) has the highest net margin (Trip.com (TCOM) 36.1%, Alibaba Group Holding (BABA) 7.0%). On return on invested capital, Trip.com (TCOM) leads (Trip.com (TCOM) 5.3%, Alibaba Group Holding (BABA) 2.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Alibaba Group Holding (BABA) returned the most: Trip.com (TCOM) -45.2%, Alibaba Group Holding (BABA) -42.6%. Over five years, Trip.com (TCOM) compounded fastest (Trip.com (TCOM) +6.6%/yr, Alibaba Group Holding (BABA) -9.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Trip.com (TCOM) has been the steadiest (Trip.com (TCOM) 36.3%, Alibaba Group Holding (BABA) 40.4%, Azul (AZUL) 560.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, TCOM, BABA and AZUL?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Trip.com (TCOM) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.