TAP vs MNST vs AKO-A Stock Comparison

Molson Coors Beverage, Monster Beverage and Andina Bottling Prices as of Nov 5, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (STZ) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
MNST Monster Beverage Corp
$47.83 +10.6% 1M -29.5% 1Y
Market cap
$88.12B
P/E
41.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$9.22B
Div. yield
–
Non-Alcoholic Beverages Consumer Staples
3 wins
AKO-A Andina Bottling Co Inc
$25.29 +6.9% 1M +13.0% 1Y
Market cap
$3.99B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$978.62B
Div. yield
–
Non-Alcoholic Beverages Consumer Staples
3 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Molson Coors Beverage leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Molson Coors Beverage 5, Monster Beverage 3, Andina Bottling 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionTAPMNSTAKO-ALeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $7.39B $88.12B $3.99B MNST
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 8.3x 41.4x 0.0x TAP
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 9.5x 39.9x — TAP
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -2.3% +20.4% +2.3% MNST
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 6.9% 23.1% -20.0% MNST
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 5.9% — 13.6% AKO-A
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.6x — 4.0x TAP
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -6.6% -29.5% +13.0% AKO-A
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -2.0%/yr +0.9%/yr +17.9%/yr AKO-A
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 30.6% 73.6% 51.4% TAP
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 71/100 60/100 45/100 TAP

Percentile Scorecard

TAPMNSTAKO-A

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisTAPMNSTAKO-A
Valuation 97 #2 of 37 14 #32 of 37 92 #4 of 37
Growth 63 #13 of 33 69 #11 of 33 9 #30 of 33
Profitability 53 #16 of 33 94 #3 of 33 47 #18 of 33
Financial Health 41 #23 of 38 97 #2 of 38 32 #26 of 38
Shareholder Returns 100 #1 of 24 26 #18 of 24 –
Overall 71 60 45
  • TAP ranked among 41 companies in Beverages
  • MNST ranked among 41 companies in Beverages
  • AKO-A ranked among 41 companies in Beverages

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodTAPMNSTAKO-ASPY
1 month +14.3%+10.6%+6.9% -5.9%
3 months -0.4%-49.2%+9.4% -4.6%
6 months -2.1%-37.0%+11.9% +0.2%
Year to date -9.6%-37.6%+8.5% +7.5%
1 year -6.6%-29.5%+13.0% +8.2%
3 years -28.9%-14.8%+128.0% +68.3%
3 years, per year -10.8%-5.2%+31.6% +19.0%
5 years -9.4%+4.4%+127.2% +56.5%
5 years, per year -2.0%+0.9%+17.9% +9.4%
10 years -58.9%+112.2%+13.4% +251.5%
10 years, per year -8.5%+7.8%+1.3% +13.4%

Risk

MeasureTAPMNSTAKO-ASPY
Volatility, 1Y 30.6%73.6%51.4% 13.6%
Downside volatility, 1Y 31.8%106.5%66.5% 14.2%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.200.320.15 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.21-0.400.25 0.60
Max drawdown, 5Y -49.1%-58.4%-28.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -22.4%-52.1%-6.2% -5.9%
52-week high $54.38$99.94$26.96 $779.14
52-week low $35.96$41.62$20.29 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleTAPMNSTAKO-A
P/E now vs peer median 8.8xmedian 24.4x 44.0xmedian 24.4x 0.0xmedian 24.4x
P/S now vs peer median 0.6xmedian 1.7x 10.2xmedian 1.7x 0.0xmedian 1.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 6.4xmedian 15.0x 32.1xmedian 15.0x 4.0xmedian 15.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 6.7xmedian 21.3x 44.7xmedian 21.3x 2.9xmedian 21.3x
P/B now vs peer median 0.8xmedian 2.6x 10.0xmedian 2.6x 0.0xmedian 2.6x
PEG now vs peer median 0.15median 1.16 2.63median 1.16 —median 1.16

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsTAPMNSTAKO-A
Revenue $12.85B $9.22B $978.62B
Gross profit $3.96B $5.12B $395.25B
Operating income $1.31B $2.69B $506.45B
Net income $863.80M $2.13B $105.41B
Free cash flow $1.17B $2.10B $1.39B
EPS (diluted) $4.78 $1.08 –
Cash & equivalents $602.20M $2.19B $307.72B
Total debt $6.00B – $2.45T
Shares (diluted) 186.80M 1.98B –
Enterprise value $3.38B $76.37B -$1.14T

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricTAPMNSTAKO-A
P/E 8.8x 44.0x 0.0x
P/FCF 6.7x 44.7x 2.9x
P/Operating cash flow 4.3x 41.9x 4.5x
P/S 0.6x 10.2x 0.0x
P/B 0.8x 10.0x 0.0x
P/Tangible book -5.9x 11.7x 0.0x
EV/EBITDA 6.4x 32.1x 4.0x
EV/EBIT 10.2x 33.6x 4.0x
EV/Revenue 1.0x 9.8x 2.1x
EV/FCF 11.3x 43.0x 1,456x
EV/Operating cash flow 7.3x 40.3x 2,275x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.15 2.63 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricTAPMNSTAKO-A
Revenue growth (1Y) -2.3% 20.4% 2.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -2.1% 11.3% -13.2%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -8.9% 21.2% 2.4%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -2.4% 13.6% -12.3%
Operating income growth (1Y) 157.4% 30.3% 13.1%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 21.5% 13.9% 11.9%
Net income growth (1Y) 141.3% 35.2% 5.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 51.3% 14.0% 4.6%
EPS growth (1Y) 145.3% 34.6% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 59.8% 16.7% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 4.8% 9.0% 22.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -2.9% 13.8% -84.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 6.9% 13.1% 6.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -5.0% 15.9% -85.9%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricTAPMNSTAKO-A
Gross margin 30.8% 55.5% 40.4%
EBITDA margin 16.0% 30.5% 51.8%
Operating margin 10.2% 29.2% 51.8%
Pretax margin 8.5% 30.1% 13.8%
Net margin 6.9% 23.1% -20.0%
FCF margin 9.1% 22.8% 0.1%
Operating cash flow margin 14.2% 24.3% 0.1%
Return on equity 8.2% 23.5% 7.6%
Return on assets 3.6% 19.1% 2.9%
Return on invested capital 5.9% – 13.6%
Return on capital employed 6.5% 28.6% 17.3%
Asset turnover 0.5x 0.8x 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.1x 1.1x 0.0x
Stock comp / revenue 0.3% 1.5% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricTAPMNSTAKO-A
Debt / assets 26.5% – 64.8%
Debt / equity 0.6x – 1.7x
Net debt / EBITDA 2.6x – 4.0x
Debt / FCF 5.1x – 1,768x
Liabilities / assets 53.8% 17.7% 62.5%
Equity / assets 46.2% 82.3% 37.5%
Interest coverage – – 18.7x
Current ratio 0.9x 3.7x 1.6x
Quick ratio 0.5x 3.1x 0.6x
Cash ratio 0.2x 2.0x 0.6x
Altman Z-score 1.50 31.23 1.30

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricTAPMNSTAKO-A
Dividend yield 4.5% – –
Net buyback yield 7.2% 0.1% –
Shareholder yield 11.8% 0.1% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusTAPMNSTAKO-A
Forward P/E 9.5xFY2026 39.9xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $4.42FY2026 $1.20FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY -18.5%FY2026 +16.5%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +3.4% +5.8% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $10.73BFY2026 $10.20BFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY -3.7%FY2026 +23.0%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after -1.1% +2.2% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersTAPMNSTAKO-A
Held by institutions 100.0% 67.5% 0.1%
Institutions holding 618 1,362 16
Change in shares held, QoQ +12.2% +3.0% -1.0%
Institutions buying 340 741 4
Institutions selling 196 456 5
Buyers to sellers 1.73 1.63 0.80

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

TAPMNSTAKO-A
TAP 1.00 0.15 -0.07
MNST 0.15 1.00 0.07
AKO-A -0.07 0.07 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, TAP, MNST and AKO-A?

Monster Beverage (MNST) is the largest by market capitalisation: Molson Coors Beverage (TAP) $7.39B, Monster Beverage (MNST) $88.12B, Andina Bottling (AKO-A) $3.99B.

Which stock is cheaper, TAP, MNST and AKO-A?

Molson Coors Beverage (TAP) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Molson Coors Beverage (TAP) 8.3x, Monster Beverage (MNST) 41.4x, Andina Bottling (AKO-A) 0.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Molson Coors Beverage (TAP) is cheapest (Molson Coors Beverage (TAP) 9.5x, Monster Beverage (MNST) 39.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Monster Beverage (MNST) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Molson Coors Beverage (TAP) -2.3%, Monster Beverage (MNST) +20.4%, Andina Bottling (AKO-A) +2.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Monster Beverage (MNST) has the highest net margin (Molson Coors Beverage (TAP) 6.9%, Monster Beverage (MNST) 23.1%, Andina Bottling (AKO-A) -20.0%). On return on invested capital, Andina Bottling (AKO-A) leads (Molson Coors Beverage (TAP) 5.9%, Andina Bottling (AKO-A) 13.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Andina Bottling (AKO-A) returned the most: Molson Coors Beverage (TAP) -6.6%, Monster Beverage (MNST) -29.5%, Andina Bottling (AKO-A) +13.0%. Over five years, Andina Bottling (AKO-A) compounded fastest (Molson Coors Beverage (TAP) -2.0%/yr, Monster Beverage (MNST) +0.9%/yr, Andina Bottling (AKO-A) +17.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Molson Coors Beverage (TAP) has been the steadiest (Molson Coors Beverage (TAP) 30.6%, Monster Beverage (MNST) 73.6%, Andina Bottling (AKO-A) 51.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, TAP, MNST and AKO-A?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Molson Coors Beverage (TAP) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.