ST vs HUBB vs ETN Stock Comparison

Sensata Technologies Holding, Hubbell and Eaton Prices as of Nov 3, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (VICR) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
HUBB Hubbell Inc
$449.27 -5.5% 1M -3.9% 1Y
Market cap
$23.12B
P/E
25.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$6.59B
Div. yield
–
Electrical Equipment Industrials
3 wins
ETN Eaton Corp plc
$391.61 -10.2% 1M +1.3% 1Y
Market cap
$136.46B
P/E
35.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$31.98B
Div. yield
–
Electrical Equipment Industrials
3 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Sensata Technologies Holding leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Sensata Technologies Holding 5, Eaton 3, Hubbell 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionSTHUBBETNLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $5.97B $23.12B $136.46B ETN
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 16.3x 25.4x 35.0x ST
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 11.6x 22.4x 28.2x ST
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +4.1% +16.0% +20.1% ETN
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 9.5% 13.8% 12.2% HUBB
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 8.2% 11.3% 10.7% HUBB
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.3x 3.0x 2.8x ST
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +30.9% -3.9% +1.3% ST
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -6.7%/yr +17.1%/yr +17.9%/yr ETN
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 39.6% 32.6% 41.6% HUBB
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 63/100 55/100 43/100 ST

Percentile Scorecard

STHUBBETN

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisSTHUBBETN
Valuation 88 #25 of 204 37 #128 of 204 15 #173 of 204
Growth 73 #52 of 191 72 #54 of 191 73 #53 of 191
Profitability 68 #61 of 189 83 #33 of 189 73 #51 of 189
Financial Health 41 #132 of 221 15 #188 of 221 20 #178 of 221
Shareholder Returns 47 #84 of 158 69 #49 of 158 33 #106 of 158
Overall 63 55 43
  • ST ranked among 223 companies in Machinery
  • HUBB ranked among 223 companies in Machinery
  • ETN ranked among 223 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodSTHUBBETNSPY
1 month -4.2%-5.5%-10.2% -2.0%
3 months -14.4%-10.6%-11.9% -2.2%
6 months -2.7%-11.5%-4.7% +4.2%
Year to date +25.2%+1.2%+23.0% +10.6%
1 year +30.9%-3.9%+1.3% +10.4%
3 years +28.4%+59.4%+82.3% +73.6%
3 years, per year +8.7%+16.8%+22.2% +20.2%
5 years -29.2%+120.2%+127.7% +61.6%
5 years, per year -6.7%+17.1%+17.9% +10.1%
10 years +17.4%+337.8%+555.7% +261.3%
10 years, per year +1.6%+15.9%+20.7% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureSTHUBBETNSPY
Volatility, 1Y 39.6%32.6%41.6% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 37.2%35.9%44.8% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.921.211.92 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.78-0.120.03 0.81
Max drawdown, 5Y -72.8%-33.1%-34.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -22.2%-19.5%-14.9% -3.2%
52-week high $53.55$557.85$459.94 $779.14
52-week low $28.53$407.36$315.82 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleSTHUBBETN
P/E now vs peer median 16.5xmedian 25.4x 26.1xmedian 25.4x 39.1xmedian 25.4x
P/S now vs peer median 1.6xmedian 1.9x 3.6xmedian 1.9x 4.8xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 9.8xmedian 14.5x 17.7xmedian 14.5x 24.7xmedian 14.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 9.5xmedian 23.6x 25.6xmedian 23.6x 40.1xmedian 23.6x
P/B now vs peer median 2.0xmedian 2.2x 5.8xmedian 2.2x 7.2xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median 2.41median 1.21 2.60median 1.21 3.79median 1.21

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsSTHUBBETN
Revenue $3.85B $6.59B $31.98B
Gross profit $1.19B $2.33B $11.21B
Operating income $582.40M $1.33B $5.54B
Net income $366.60M $915.00M $3.90B
Free cash flow $641.20M $928.00M $3.80B
R&D $128.60M – $879.00M
EPS (diluted) $2.49 $17.12 $10.00
Cash & equivalents $553.40M $334.50M $528.00M
Total debt $2.40B $5.12B $20.11B
Shares (diluted) 147.00M 53.10M 389.60M
Enterprise value $3.80B $21.36B $133.40B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricSTHUBBETN
P/E 16.5x 26.1x 39.1x
P/FCF 9.5x 25.6x 40.1x
P/Operating cash flow 8.0x 21.5x 31.0x
P/S 1.6x 3.6x 4.8x
P/B 2.0x 5.8x 7.2x
P/Tangible book 2.2x 24.4x 17.4x
EV/EBITDA 9.8x 17.7x 24.7x
EV/EBIT 13.6x 21.4x 30.9x
EV/Revenue 2.1x 4.3x 5.4x
EV/FCF 12.3x 30.7x 45.2x
EV/Operating cash flow 10.4x 25.8x 34.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.41 2.60 3.79

Growth

14 metrics
MetricSTHUBBETN
Revenue growth (1Y) 4.1% 16.0% 20.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -1.9% 7.9% 12.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 11.4% 17.1% 10.5%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -3.3% 9.0% 11.7%
Operating income growth (1Y) 175.8% 15.2% 9.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 2.8% 10.6% 14.6%
Net income growth (1Y) 1,505% 5.6% -0.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 5.6% 9.4% 9.2%
EPS growth (1Y) 1,492% 6.1% -0.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 6.9% 10.1% 10.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 28.5% 9.0% 19.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 9.6% 12.5% 11.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 34.4% 9.1% 14.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 17.0% 14.9% 10.8%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricSTHUBBETN
Gross margin 30.8% 35.4% 35.0%
EBITDA margin 20.9% 24.5% 21.7%
Operating margin 15.1% 20.2% 17.3%
Pretax margin 12.4% 17.7% 15.4%
Net margin 9.5% 13.8% 12.2%
FCF margin 16.7% 14.1% 11.9%
Operating cash flow margin 19.7% 16.8% 15.3%
Return on equity 12.2% 22.8% 18.9%
Return on assets 5.5% 7.7% 6.9%
Return on invested capital 8.2% 11.3% 10.7%
Return on capital employed 10.0% 13.5% 12.6%
Asset turnover 0.6x 0.6x 0.6x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.1x 1.2x 1.3x
Stock comp / revenue 0.8% 0.5% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricSTHUBBETN
Debt / assets 35.8% 43.0% 35.0%
Debt / equity 0.8x 1.2x 1.0x
Net debt / EBITDA 2.3x 3.0x 2.8x
Debt / FCF 3.7x 5.5x 5.3x
Liabilities / assets 54.1% 65.4% 63.4%
Equity / assets 45.9% 34.6% 36.6%
Interest coverage 4.4x – 9.6x
Current ratio 2.4x 1.5x 1.2x
Quick ratio 1.5x 0.8x 0.7x
Cash ratio 0.7x 0.2x 0.1x
Altman Z-score 2.61 – 3.74

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricSTHUBBETN
Dividend yield 1.2% 1.3% 1.1%
Net buyback yield 0.4% 0.9% 0.1%
Shareholder yield 1.6% 2.1% 1.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusSTHUBBETN
Forward P/E 11.6xFY2026 22.4xFY2026 28.2xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $3.60FY2026 $20.07FY2026 $13.88FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +5.3%FY2026 +10.2%FY2026 +15.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +19.7% +21.9% +14.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $3.79BFY2026 $7.32BFY2026 $31.83BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +2.3%FY2026 +25.4%FY2026 +16.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +1.1% +9.8% +21.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersSTHUBBETN
Held by institutions 100.0% 96.5% 84.7%
Institutions holding 468 1,019 2,647
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.1% -0.1% +1.6%
Institutions buying 266 513 1,402
Institutions selling 149 320 893
Buyers to sellers 1.79 1.60 1.57

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

STHUBBETN
ST 1.00 0.52 0.63
HUBB 0.52 1.00 0.63
ETN 0.63 0.63 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ST, HUBB and ETN?

Eaton (ETN) is the largest by market capitalisation: Sensata Technologies Holding (ST) $5.97B, Hubbell (HUBB) $23.12B, Eaton (ETN) $136.46B.

Which stock is cheaper, ST, HUBB and ETN?

Sensata Technologies Holding (ST) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Sensata Technologies Holding (ST) 16.3x, Hubbell (HUBB) 25.4x, Eaton (ETN) 35.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Sensata Technologies Holding (ST) is cheapest (Sensata Technologies Holding (ST) 11.6x, Hubbell (HUBB) 22.4x, Eaton (ETN) 28.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Eaton (ETN) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Sensata Technologies Holding (ST) +4.1%, Hubbell (HUBB) +16.0%, Eaton (ETN) +20.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Hubbell (HUBB) has the highest net margin (Sensata Technologies Holding (ST) 9.5%, Hubbell (HUBB) 13.8%, Eaton (ETN) 12.2%). On return on invested capital, Hubbell (HUBB) leads (Sensata Technologies Holding (ST) 8.2%, Hubbell (HUBB) 11.3%, Eaton (ETN) 10.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Sensata Technologies Holding (ST) returned the most: Sensata Technologies Holding (ST) +30.9%, Hubbell (HUBB) -3.9%, Eaton (ETN) +1.3%. Over five years, Eaton (ETN) compounded fastest (Sensata Technologies Holding (ST) -6.7%/yr, Hubbell (HUBB) +17.1%/yr, Eaton (ETN) +17.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Hubbell (HUBB) has been the steadiest (Sensata Technologies Holding (ST) 39.6%, Hubbell (HUBB) 32.6%, Eaton (ETN) 41.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ST, HUBB and ETN?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Sensata Technologies Holding (ST) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.