SRAD vs ITMSF vs SNOW Stock Comparison

Sportradar Group AG, Intermap Technologies and Snowflake Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
SRAD Sportradar Group AG
$12.60 -4.8% 1M -53.4% 1Y
Market cap
$12.65B
P/E
634.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.62B
Div. yield
–
Data Infrastructure Technology
4 wins
SNOW Snowflake Inc.
$334.93 -0.3% 1M +29.8% 1Y
Market cap
$117.93B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$5.43B
Div. yield
–
Data Infrastructure Technology
4 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Snowflake leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Snowflake 4, Sportradar Group AG 4, Intermap Technologies 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionSRADITMSFSNOWLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $12.65B $34.05M $117.93B SNOW
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 634.4x -3.5x -108.1x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 48.5x 27.5x 156.5x ITMSF
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +24.7% -66.2% +32.0% SNOW
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 1.2% -147.8% -20.1% SRAD
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -8.6% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.4x 1.8x — SRAD
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -53.4% -74.8% +29.8% SNOW
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -9.0%/yr -4.7%/yr -0.7%/yr SNOW
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 56.6% 84.7% 63.2% SRAD
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 59/100 26/100 45/100 SRAD

Percentile Scorecard

SRADITMSFSNOW

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisSRADITMSFSNOW
Valuation 77 #29 of 124 19 #101 of 124 26 #92 of 124
Growth 63 #43 of 113 1 #112 of 113 69 #36 of 113
Profitability 71 #33 of 110 20 #88 of 110 50 #56 of 110
Financial Health 56 #57 of 129 64 #47 of 129 23 #100 of 129
Shareholder Returns 30 #47 of 67 – 58 #29 of 67
Overall 59 26 45
  • SRAD ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • ITMSF ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • SNOW ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodSRADITMSFSNOWSPY
1 month -4.8%-14.1%-0.3% -0.8%
3 months -14.2%-22.5%+22.8% +3.5%
6 months -9.5%-62.8%+132.2% +7.0%
Year to date -47.0%-59.6%+52.7% +12.2%
1 year -53.4%-74.8%+29.8% +13.0%
3 years +44.0%+37.5%+133.6% +86.3%
3 years, per year +12.9%+11.2%+32.7% +23.1%
5 years -37.5%-21.4%-3.5% +68.6%
5 years, per year -9.0%-4.7%-0.7% +11.0%
10 years —-21.4%— +258.0%
10 years, per year —-2.4%— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureSRADITMSFSNOWSPY
Volatility, 1Y 56.6%84.7%63.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 64.4%99.0%54.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.570.861.34 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.94-0.880.47 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -69.0%-78.5%-73.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -53.5%-73.7%-9.2% -1.8%
52-week high $27.11$2.09$368.93 $779.14
52-week low $11.56$0.54$121.11 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleSRADITMSFSNOW
P/E now vs peer median 655.2xmedian 38.1x -3.5xmedian 38.1x -107.2xmedian 38.1x
P/S now vs peer median 2.4xmedian 4.3x 6.0xmedian 4.3x 21.7xmedian 4.3x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -14.4xmedian 35.4x -2.8xmedian 35.4x -147.4xmedian 35.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median 7.7xmedian 27.1x -4.6xmedian 27.1x 98.8xmedian 27.1x
P/B now vs peer median 4.4xmedian 3.4x 2.3xmedian 3.4x 54.9xmedian 3.4x
PEG now vs peer median 22.63median 1.27 —median 1.27 18.15median 1.27

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsSRADITMSFSNOW
Revenue $1.62B $6.65M $5.43B
Gross profit – – $3.64B
Operating income – -$9.75M -$1.24B
Net income $19.94M -$9.82M -$1.09B
Free cash flow $510.26M -$8.57M $1.20B
R&D $44.37M – $2.11B
EPS (diluted) $64,328.88 $-0.16 $-3.12
Cash & equivalents $286.82M $16.18M $1.71B
Total debt $49.28M $1.65M –
Shares (diluted) 310.00 61.80M 349.26M
Enterprise value $10.94B -$49.72M $105.24B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricSRADITMSFSNOW
P/E 655.2x -3.5x -107.2x
P/FCF 7.7x -4.6x 98.8x
P/Operating cash flow 7.8x -5.6x 94.2x
P/S 2.4x 6.0x 21.7x
P/B 4.4x 2.3x 54.9x
P/Tangible book 4.4x 2.4x 68.5x
EV/EBITDA -14.4x -2.8x -147.4x
EV/EBIT -42.7x -2.5x -93.6x
EV/Revenue 2.2x 3.6x 21.3x
EV/FCF 7.0x -2.8x 96.8x
EV/Operating cash flow 7.2x -3.4x 92.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 22.63 – 18.15

Growth

14 metrics
MetricSRADITMSFSNOW
Revenue growth (1Y) 24.7% -66.2% 32.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 23.9% – 30.5%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – 32.9%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – 31.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) – -1,317% 19.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – -7.2%
Net income growth (1Y) -83.5% -1,584% 21.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 51.8% – -8.2%
EPS growth (1Y) -94.7% -1,313% 24.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 28.9% – -5.9%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 15.0% -365.1% 49.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 30.5% – 22.7%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 15.7% -216.7% 59.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 30.7% – 22.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricSRADITMSFSNOW
Gross margin – – 67.0%
EBITDA margin -15.4% -128.3% -14.4%
Operating margin – -146.6% -22.8%
Pretax margin 1.4% -152.3% -19.8%
Net margin 1.2% -147.8% -20.1%
FCF margin 31.6% -129.0% 22.0%
Operating cash flow margin 31.0% -107.7% 23.1%
Return on equity 2.1% -51.9% -53.2%
Return on assets 0.7% -36.5% -12.6%
Return on invested capital -8.6% – –
Return on capital employed -3.5% -45.5% -25.2%
Asset turnover 0.5x 0.2x 0.6x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 25.1x 0.7x -1.1x
Stock comp / revenue 4.2% 9.6% 30.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricSRADITMSFSNOW
Debt / assets 0.4% 1.6% –
Debt / equity 0.0x 0.0x –
Net debt / EBITDA 1.4x 1.8x –
Debt / FCF 0.0x 0.0x –
Liabilities / assets 69.5% 32.0% 75.3%
Equity / assets 30.5% 68.0% 24.7%
Interest coverage -0.8x -180.5x -148.8x
Current ratio 1.0x 3.3x 0.9x
Quick ratio 0.9x 3.2x 0.8x
Cash ratio 0.6x 2.9x 0.6x
Altman Z-score 1.78 -11.00 9.30

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricSRADITMSFSNOW
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield -1.0% – 0.4%
Shareholder yield -1.0% – 0.4%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusSRADITMSFSNOW
Forward P/E 48.5xFY2026 27.5xFY2026 156.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.26FY2026 $0.02FY2026 $2.14FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -27.8%FY2026 – +71.2%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +100.0% +350.0% +36.9%
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.65BFY2026 $32.39MFY2026 $6.16BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +8.4%FY2026 +205.6%FY2026 +31.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +10.8% +29.0% +41.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersSRADITMSFSNOW
Held by institutions 17.8% – 79.8%
Institutions holding 151 – 1,459
Change in shares held, QoQ -2.8% – +9.1%
Institutions buying 88 – 850
Institutions selling 42 – 473
Buyers to sellers 2.10 – 1.80

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

SRADITMSFSNOW
SRAD 1.00 0.04 0.18
ITMSF 0.04 1.00 0.13
SNOW 0.18 0.13 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, SRAD, ITMSF and SNOW?

Snowflake (SNOW) is the largest by market capitalisation: Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) $12.65B, Intermap Technologies (ITMSF) $34.05M, Snowflake (SNOW) $117.93B.

Which company is growing faster?

Snowflake (SNOW) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) +24.7%, Intermap Technologies (ITMSF) -66.2%, Snowflake (SNOW) +32.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) has the highest net margin (Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) 1.2%, Intermap Technologies (ITMSF) -147.8%, Snowflake (SNOW) -20.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Snowflake (SNOW) returned the most: Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) -53.4%, Intermap Technologies (ITMSF) -74.8%, Snowflake (SNOW) +29.8%. Over five years, Snowflake (SNOW) compounded fastest (Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) -9.0%/yr, Intermap Technologies (ITMSF) -4.7%/yr, Snowflake (SNOW) -0.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) has been the steadiest (Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) 56.6%, Intermap Technologies (ITMSF) 84.7%, Snowflake (SNOW) 63.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, SRAD, ITMSF and SNOW?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Snowflake (SNOW) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.