SRAD vs ITMSF vs SNOW Stock Comparison

Sportradar Group AG, Intermap Technologies and Snowflake Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (ESTC) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
SRAD Sportradar Group AG
$12.23 +5.8% 1M -53.2% 1Y
Market cap
$12.40B
P/E
621.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.62B
Div. yield
–
Data Infrastructure Technology
4 wins
SNOW Snowflake Inc.
$330.22 0.0% 1M +22.4% 1Y
Market cap
$106.72B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$5.43B
Div. yield
–
Data Infrastructure Technology
4 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Snowflake leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Snowflake 4, Sportradar Group AG 4, Intermap Technologies 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionSRADITMSFSNOWLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $12.40B $32.38M $106.72B SNOW
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 621.9x -3.3x -97.8x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 47.0x 27.5x 154.3x ITMSF
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +24.7% -66.2% +32.0% SNOW
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 1.2% -147.8% -20.1% SRAD
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -8.6% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.4x 1.8x — SRAD
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -53.2% -72.6% +22.4% SNOW
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -10.2%/yr -2.7%/yr -1.4%/yr SNOW
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 56.5% 84.4% 63.2% SRAD
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 59/100 26/100 46/100 SRAD

Percentile Scorecard

SRADITMSFSNOW

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisSRADITMSFSNOW
Valuation 78 #28 of 124 19 #101 of 124 28 #90 of 124
Growth 59 #47 of 113 1 #112 of 113 68 #37 of 113
Profitability 71 #32 of 109 20 #87 of 109 50 #55 of 109
Financial Health 56 #57 of 127 64 #47 of 127 25 #96 of 127
Shareholder Returns 31 #44 of 63 – 60 #26 of 63
Overall 59 26 46
  • SRAD ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • ITMSF ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • SNOW ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodSRADITMSFSNOWSPY
1 month +5.8%-16.7%0.0% +0.7%
3 months -16.8%-22.5%+10.8% +3.7%
6 months -6.3%-60.7%+142.0% +7.1%
Year to date -48.5%-59.6%+50.5% +12.8%
1 year -53.2%-72.6%+22.4% +11.9%
3 years +38.8%+37.5%+129.1% +85.2%
3 years, per year +11.6%+11.2%+31.8% +22.8%
5 years -41.5%-12.7%-6.7% +67.6%
5 years, per year -10.2%-2.7%-1.4% +10.9%
10 years —-21.4%— +262.0%
10 years, per year —-2.4%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureSRADITMSFSNOWSPY
Volatility, 1Y 56.5%84.4%63.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 64.5%99.3%54.7% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.570.861.35 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.94-0.860.36 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -69.0%-78.5%-73.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -53.2%-72.6%-10.5% -1.2%
52-week high $26.14$2.01$368.93 $779.14
52-week low $11.56$0.54$121.11 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleSRADITMSFSNOW
P/E now vs peer median 635.9xmedian 39.0x -3.5xmedian 39.0x -105.7xmedian 39.0x
P/S now vs peer median 2.4xmedian 4.6x 6.0xmedian 4.6x 21.4xmedian 4.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -13.9xmedian 32.7x -2.8xmedian 32.7x -145.3xmedian 32.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 7.5xmedian 27.4x -4.6xmedian 27.4x 97.4xmedian 27.4x
P/B now vs peer median 4.3xmedian 3.2x 2.3xmedian 3.2x 54.1xmedian 3.2x
PEG now vs peer median 21.97median 1.23 —median 1.23 17.90median 1.23

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsSRADITMSFSNOW
Revenue $1.62B $6.65M $5.43B
Gross profit – – $3.64B
Operating income – -$9.75M -$1.24B
Net income $19.94M -$9.82M -$1.09B
Free cash flow $510.26M -$8.57M $1.20B
R&D $44.37M – $2.11B
EPS (diluted) $64,328.88 $-0.16 $-3.12
Cash & equivalents $286.82M $16.18M $1.71B
Total debt $49.28M $1.65M –
Shares (diluted) 310.00 61.80M 349.26M
Enterprise value $10.69B -$51.39M $94.04B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricSRADITMSFSNOW
P/E 635.9x -3.5x -105.7x
P/FCF 7.5x -4.6x 97.4x
P/Operating cash flow 7.6x -5.6x 92.9x
P/S 2.4x 6.0x 21.4x
P/B 4.3x 2.3x 54.1x
P/Tangible book 4.3x 2.4x 67.5x
EV/EBITDA -13.9x -2.8x -145.3x
EV/EBIT -41.3x -2.5x -92.2x
EV/Revenue 2.1x 3.6x 21.0x
EV/FCF 6.8x -2.8x 95.4x
EV/Operating cash flow 6.9x -3.4x 91.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 21.97 – 17.90

Growth

14 metrics
MetricSRADITMSFSNOW
Revenue growth (1Y) 24.7% -66.2% 32.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 23.9% – 30.5%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – 32.9%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – 31.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) – -1,317% 19.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – -7.2%
Net income growth (1Y) -83.5% -1,584% 21.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 51.8% – -8.2%
EPS growth (1Y) -94.7% -1,313% 24.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 28.9% – -5.9%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 15.0% -365.1% 49.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 30.5% – 22.7%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 15.7% -216.7% 59.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 30.7% – 22.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricSRADITMSFSNOW
Gross margin – – 67.0%
EBITDA margin -15.4% -128.3% -14.4%
Operating margin – -146.6% -22.8%
Pretax margin 1.4% -152.3% -19.8%
Net margin 1.2% -147.8% -20.1%
FCF margin 31.6% -129.0% 22.0%
Operating cash flow margin 31.0% -107.7% 23.1%
Return on equity 2.1% -51.9% -53.2%
Return on assets 0.7% -36.5% -12.6%
Return on invested capital -8.6% – –
Return on capital employed -3.5% -45.5% -25.2%
Asset turnover 0.5x 0.2x 0.6x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 25.1x 0.7x -1.1x
Stock comp / revenue 4.2% 9.6% 30.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricSRADITMSFSNOW
Debt / assets 0.4% 1.6% –
Debt / equity 0.0x 0.0x –
Net debt / EBITDA 1.4x 1.8x –
Debt / FCF 0.0x 0.0x –
Liabilities / assets 69.5% 32.0% 75.3%
Equity / assets 30.5% 68.0% 24.7%
Interest coverage -0.8x -180.5x -148.8x
Current ratio 1.0x 3.3x 0.9x
Quick ratio 0.9x 3.2x 0.8x
Cash ratio 0.6x 2.9x 0.6x
Altman Z-score 1.75 -11.00 9.14

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricSRADITMSFSNOW
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield -1.0% – 0.4%
Shareholder yield -1.0% – 0.4%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusSRADITMSFSNOW
Forward P/E 47.0xFY2026 27.5xFY2026 154.3xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.26FY2026 $0.02FY2026 $2.14FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -27.8%FY2026 – +71.2%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +100.0% +350.0% +36.9%
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.65BFY2026 $32.39MFY2026 $6.16BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +8.4%FY2026 +205.6%FY2026 +31.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +10.8% +29.0% +41.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersSRADITMSFSNOW
Held by institutions 17.8% – 79.8%
Institutions holding 151 – 1,460
Change in shares held, QoQ -2.8% – +9.1%
Institutions buying 88 – 850
Institutions selling 42 – 474
Buyers to sellers 2.10 – 1.79

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

SRADITMSFSNOW
SRAD 1.00 0.04 0.18
ITMSF 0.04 1.00 0.13
SNOW 0.18 0.13 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, SRAD, ITMSF and SNOW?

Snowflake (SNOW) is the largest by market capitalisation: Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) $12.40B, Intermap Technologies (ITMSF) $32.38M, Snowflake (SNOW) $106.72B.

Which company is growing faster?

Snowflake (SNOW) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) +24.7%, Intermap Technologies (ITMSF) -66.2%, Snowflake (SNOW) +32.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) has the highest net margin (Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) 1.2%, Intermap Technologies (ITMSF) -147.8%, Snowflake (SNOW) -20.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Snowflake (SNOW) returned the most: Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) -53.2%, Intermap Technologies (ITMSF) -72.6%, Snowflake (SNOW) +22.4%. Over five years, Snowflake (SNOW) compounded fastest (Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) -10.2%/yr, Intermap Technologies (ITMSF) -2.7%/yr, Snowflake (SNOW) -1.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) has been the steadiest (Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) 56.5%, Intermap Technologies (ITMSF) 84.4%, Snowflake (SNOW) 63.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, SRAD, ITMSF and SNOW?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Snowflake (SNOW) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.