SONO vs OWLT vs TBCH Stock Comparison

Sonos, Owlet and Turtle Beach Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (ISPR) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
SONO Sonos Inc
$17.54 +2.6% 1M +1.0% 1Y
Market cap
$2.09B
P/E
36.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.49B
Div. yield
–
Consumer Electronics Consumer Discretionary
6 wins
OWLT Owlet, Inc.
$4.11 -21.3% 1M -56.0% 1Y
Market cap
$116.22M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$114.86M
Div. yield
–
Consumer Electronics Consumer Discretionary
1 win
TBCH Turtle Beach Corp
$16.46 +28.9% 1M -2.6% 1Y
Market cap
$314.30M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$297.77M
Div. yield
–
Consumer Electronics Consumer Discretionary
2 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Sonos leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Sonos 6, Turtle Beach 2, Owlet 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionSONOOWLTTBCHLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $2.09B $116.22M $314.30M SONO
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 36.7x -9.1x -98.5x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 28.8x — 29.4x SONO
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +5.6% +28.2% -17.5% OWLT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 3.8% -11.2% -1.1% SONO
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — 5.6% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 2.8x 2.8x TBCH
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +1.0% -56.0% -2.6% SONO
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -11.3%/yr -40.0%/yr -10.3%/yr TBCH
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 47.4% 85.6% 51.3% SONO
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 73/100 32/100 60/100 SONO

Percentile Scorecard

SONOOWLTTBCH

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisSONOOWLTTBCH
Valuation 37 #27 of 42 5 #40 of 42 49 #22 of 42
Growth 95 #3 of 42 100 #1 of 42 46 #23 of 42
Profitability 85 #7 of 40 18 #33 of 40 59 #17 of 40
Financial Health 63 #17 of 44 40 #27 of 44 51 #22 of 44
Shareholder Returns 85 #5 of 28 0 #28 of 28 96 #2 of 28
Overall 73 32 60
  • SONO ranked among 45 companies in Household Durables
  • OWLT ranked among 45 companies in Household Durables
  • TBCH ranked among 45 companies in Household Durables

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodSONOOWLTTBCHSPY
1 month +2.6%-21.3%+28.9% -1.0%
3 months +19.4%-21.7%+36.7% +2.9%
6 months +18.9%-21.4%+43.8% +6.4%
Year to date -0.1%-74.6%+17.3% +11.4%
1 year +1.0%-56.0%-2.6% +13.1%
3 years +61.7%+0.5%+99.0% +79.4%
3 years, per year +17.4%+0.2%+25.8% +21.5%
5 years -45.2%-92.2%-41.9% +67.7%
5 years, per year -11.3%-40.0%-10.3% +10.9%
10 years ——+211.7% +255.2%
10 years, per year ——+12.0% +13.5%

Risk

MeasureSONOOWLTTBCHSPY
Volatility, 1Y 47.4%85.6%51.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 50.1%94.7%48.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.992.291.76 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.02-0.65-0.05 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -78.0%-96.2%-78.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -8.5%-75.1%-3.7% -2.5%
52-week high $19.16$16.52$17.09 $779.14
52-week low $12.70$4.11$10.14 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleSONOOWLTTBCH
P/E now vs peer median 36.7xmedian 15.0x -9.2xmedian 15.0x -98.9xmedian 15.0x
P/S now vs peer median 1.4xmedian 0.7x 1.0xmedian 0.7x 1.0xmedian 0.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 15.6xmedian 9.7x -21.2xmedian 9.7x 16.2xmedian 9.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 16.6xmedian 12.1x -13.9xmedian 12.1x 9.1xmedian 12.1x
P/B now vs peer median 5.1xmedian 1.2x 5.1xmedian 1.2x 3.7xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.73median 0.64 -0.15median 0.64 -1.56median 0.64

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsSONOOWLTTBCH
Revenue $1.49B $114.86M $297.77M
Gross profit $693.21M $62.89M $110.81M
Operating income $65.97M -$7.23M $9.20M
Net income $56.91M -$8.82M -$3.19M
Free cash flow $125.15M -$8.53M $32.25M
R&D $253.73M $15.87M $17.81M
EPS (diluted) $0.47 $-0.45 $-0.17
Cash & equivalents $206.89M $30.95M $19.57M
Total debt – – $208.99M
Shares (diluted) 120.98M 28.77M 19.18M
Enterprise value $989.65M -$9.41M $253.19M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricSONOOWLTTBCH
P/E 36.7x -9.2x -98.9x
P/FCF 16.6x -13.9x 9.1x
P/Operating cash flow 14.1x -15.3x 8.7x
P/S 1.4x 1.0x 1.0x
P/B 5.1x 5.1x 3.7x
P/Tangible book 6.1x 5.6x 5.9x
EV/EBITDA 15.6x -21.2x 16.2x
EV/EBIT 27.5x -14.5x 38.7x
EV/Revenue 1.2x 0.9x 1.2x
EV/FCF 14.5x -12.3x 11.0x
EV/Operating cash flow 12.3x -13.5x 10.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.73 -0.15 -1.56

Growth

14 metrics
MetricSONOOWLTTBCH
Revenue growth (1Y) 5.6% 28.2% -17.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -3.7% 29.3% 5.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 14.1% 33.8% -14.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -0.9% 53.7% 27.6%
Operating income growth (1Y) 177.2% 56.4% -70.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 48.3% 50.7% 30.2%
Net income growth (1Y) 174.5% 81.9% -116.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 49.2% 47.0% 61.9%
EPS growth (1Y) 174.2% 85.5% -117.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 50.4% 60.9% 63.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 52.9% 38.7% 19.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 97.7% 43.3% 13.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 119.5% 33.2% 29.0%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 50.9% 41.6% 17.2%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricSONOOWLTTBCH
Gross margin 46.5% 54.8% 37.2%
EBITDA margin 7.8% -4.3% 7.4%
Operating margin 4.4% -6.3% 3.1%
Pretax margin 4.8% -7.7% -0.5%
Net margin 3.8% -11.2% -1.1%
FCF margin 8.4% -7.4% 10.8%
Operating cash flow margin 9.9% -6.8% 11.4%
Return on equity 14.4% -39.9% -3.3%
Return on assets 6.6% -9.8% -1.5%
Return on invested capital – – 5.6%
Return on capital employed 13.4% -19.9% 5.7%
Asset turnover 1.7x 1.3x 1.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.6x 0.9x -10.7x
Stock comp / revenue 4.2% 11.3% 2.0%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricSONOOWLTTBCH
Debt / assets – 18.2% 37.5%
Debt / equity – 0.7x 1.0x
Net debt / EBITDA – 2.8x 2.8x
Debt / FCF – -2.0x 2.5x
Liabilities / assets 54.3% 75.3% 62.5%
Equity / assets 45.7% 24.7% 37.5%
Interest coverage 143.7x – –
Current ratio 1.6x 1.6x 2.4x
Quick ratio 1.0x 1.2x 1.1x
Cash ratio 0.7x 0.6x 0.4x
Altman Z-score 4.82 -2.23 2.43

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricSONOOWLTTBCH
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield 4.4% -31.5% 12.8%
Shareholder yield 4.4% -31.5% 12.8%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusSONOOWLTTBCH
Forward P/E 28.8xFY2026 – 29.4xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.61FY2026 $-0.23FY2026 $0.56FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – – -27.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -59.0% – +82.1%
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.57BFY2026 $115.73MFY2026 $360.68MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +9.1%FY2026 +9.5%FY2026 +12.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +8.2% +20.0% +10.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersSONOOWLTTBCH
Held by institutions 100.0% 59.2% 68.8%
Institutions holding 306 58 112
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.8% -3.4% +3.8%
Institutions buying 151 31 58
Institutions selling 105 14 37
Buyers to sellers 1.44 2.21 1.57

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

SONOOWLTTBCH
SONO 1.00 0.21 0.28
OWLT 0.21 1.00 0.11
TBCH 0.28 0.11 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, SONO, OWLT and TBCH?

Sonos (SONO) is the largest by market capitalisation: Sonos (SONO) $2.09B, Owlet (OWLT) $116.22M, Turtle Beach (TBCH) $314.30M.

Which company is growing faster?

Owlet (OWLT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Sonos (SONO) +5.6%, Owlet (OWLT) +28.2%, Turtle Beach (TBCH) -17.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Sonos (SONO) has the highest net margin (Sonos (SONO) 3.8%, Owlet (OWLT) -11.2%, Turtle Beach (TBCH) -1.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Sonos (SONO) returned the most: Sonos (SONO) +1.0%, Owlet (OWLT) -56.0%, Turtle Beach (TBCH) -2.6%. Over five years, Turtle Beach (TBCH) compounded fastest (Sonos (SONO) -11.3%/yr, Owlet (OWLT) -40.0%/yr, Turtle Beach (TBCH) -10.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Sonos (SONO) has been the steadiest (Sonos (SONO) 47.4%, Owlet (OWLT) 85.6%, Turtle Beach (TBCH) 51.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, SONO, OWLT and TBCH?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Sonos (SONO) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.