SNTL vs ICTSF vs GFAI Stock Comparison

Sentinel Holdings, Icts International N V and Guardforce AI Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (BCO) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
SNTL Sentinel Holdings Ltd.
$1.89 +1.6% 1M -67.3% 1Y
Market cap
$18.31M
P/E
1.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.58M
Div. yield
–
Security Services Industrials
1 win

Head to Head

4 decided of 12

Icts International N V leads on 3 of the 12 questions below (Icts International N V 3, Sentinel Holdings 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionSNTLICTSFGFAILeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $18.31M $167.33M $3.84M ICTSF
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 1.3x -11.3x — –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — 1.5x –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +250.7% — — –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 311.9% — — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.1x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — — 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -67.3% +2.8% -81.1% ICTSF
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -1.1%/yr -9.9%/yr -72.6%/yr SNTL
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 138.6% 82.0% 93.8% ICTSF
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 45/100 — — –

Percentile Scorecard

SNTLICTSFGFAI

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisSNTLICTSFGFAI
Valuation 72 #32 of 113 37 #72 of 113 –
Growth 96 #5 of 96 – –
Profitability 46 #50 of 91 – –
Financial Health 11 #109 of 122 50 #61 of 122 93 #10 of 122
Shareholder Returns 2 #65 of 66 – –
Overall 45 – –
  • SNTL ranked among 130 companies in Business Services
  • ICTSF ranked among 130 companies in Business Services
  • GFAI ranked among 130 companies in Business Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodSNTLICTSFGFAISPY
1 month +1.6%-12.4%-40.6% +0.7%
3 months -53.1%-25.5%-38.7% +3.7%
6 months -65.0%+2.8%-66.6% +7.1%
Year to date -69.4%+33.8%-65.9% +12.8%
1 year -67.3%+2.8%-81.1% +11.9%
3 years -68.5%+11.2%-94.0% +85.2%
3 years, per year -32.0%+3.6%-60.9% +22.8%
5 years -5.5%-40.7%-99.8% +67.6%
5 years, per year -1.1%-9.9%-72.6% +10.9%
10 years +1,475.0%+529.6%— +262.0%
10 years, per year +31.7%+20.2%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureSNTLICTSFGFAISPY
Volatility, 1Y 138.6%82.0%93.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 166.0%134.1%93.1% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.510.282.53 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.490.03-0.86 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -80.5%-68.3%-99.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -70.2%-30.4%-81.1% -1.2%
52-week high $6.35$6.42$1.01 $779.14
52-week low $1.27$3.10$0.19 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleSNTLICTSFGFAI
P/E now vs peer median 1.3xmedian 21.9x -11.3xmedian 21.9x —median 21.9x
P/S now vs peer median 4.0xmedian 0.9x 0.3xmedian 0.9x —median 0.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -4.5xmedian 11.9x —median 11.9x —median 11.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median 8.4xmedian 14.4x -5.1xmedian 14.4x —median 14.4x
P/B now vs peer median -5.1xmedian 2.4x -7.9xmedian 2.4x 0.2xmedian 2.4x
PEG now vs peer median 0.01median 0.97 —median 0.97 —median 0.97

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsSNTLICTSFGFAI
Revenue $4.58M – –
Gross profit $340.92K – –
Operating income -$4.61M – –
Net income -$881.22K – –
Free cash flow $2.17M – –
EPS (diluted) $1.47 – –
Cash & equivalents $146.09K $16.89M $21.30M
Total debt $3.26M $25.53M –
Shares (diluted) 9.69M 36.18M 21.92M
Enterprise value $16.98M $54.77M -$179.64M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricSNTLICTSFGFAI
P/E 1.3x -11.3x –
P/FCF 8.4x -5.1x –
P/Operating cash flow 7.9x – –
P/S 4.0x 0.3x –
P/B -5.1x -7.9x 0.2x
P/Tangible book -4.1x -7.9x 0.2x
EV/EBITDA -4.5x – –
EV/EBIT -4.1x – –
EV/Revenue 4.1x – –
EV/FCF 8.6x – –
EV/Operating cash flow 8.1x – –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.01 – –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricSNTLICTSFGFAI
Revenue growth (1Y) 250.7% – –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -19.0% – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 156.9% – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -38.0% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 43.4% – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 2.3% – –
Net income growth (1Y) 90.2% – –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 22.2% – –
EPS growth (1Y) 322.4% – –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 104.3% – –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 328.9% – –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 245.0% – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 312.6% – –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 237.5% – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricSNTLICTSFGFAI
Gross margin 7.4% – –
EBITDA margin -91.9% – –
Operating margin -100.8% – –
Pretax margin -18.1% – –
Net margin 311.9% – –
FCF margin 47.4% – –
Operating cash flow margin 50.6% – –
Return on equity – – –
Return on assets -40.8% – –
Return on invested capital – – –
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 2.1x – –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -2.6x – –
Stock comp / revenue – – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricSNTLICTSFGFAI
Debt / assets 27.8% 4.7% –
Debt / equity -0.2x -0.4x –
Net debt / EBITDA -0.1x – –
Debt / FCF 0.3x – –
Liabilities / assets 279.9% 112.8% 30.7%
Equity / assets -179.9% -12.8% 69.3%
Interest coverage -9.2x – –
Current ratio 0.2x 1.8x 5.2x
Quick ratio 0.2x 1.6x 4.8x
Cash ratio 0.0x 0.6x 3.8x
Altman Z-score -23.49 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricSNTLICTSFGFAI
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield -11.1% – –
Shareholder yield -11.1% – –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusSNTLICTSFGFAI
Forward P/E – – 1.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – – $0.13FY2026
Revenue, next fiscal year – – $40.46MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – – +14.9%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – – +158.0%

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

SNTLICTSFGFAI
SNTL 1.00 -0.09 -0.08
ICTSF -0.09 1.00 -0.02
GFAI -0.08 -0.02 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, SNTL, ICTSF and GFAI?

Icts International N V (ICTSF) is the largest by market capitalisation: Sentinel Holdings (SNTL) $18.31M, Icts International N V (ICTSF) $167.33M, Guardforce AI (GFAI) $3.84M.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Icts International N V (ICTSF) returned the most: Sentinel Holdings (SNTL) -67.3%, Icts International N V (ICTSF) +2.8%, Guardforce AI (GFAI) -81.1%. Over five years, Sentinel Holdings (SNTL) compounded fastest (Sentinel Holdings (SNTL) -1.1%/yr, Icts International N V (ICTSF) -9.9%/yr, Guardforce AI (GFAI) -72.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Icts International N V (ICTSF) has been the steadiest (Sentinel Holdings (SNTL) 138.6%, Icts International N V (ICTSF) 82.0%, Guardforce AI (GFAI) 93.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, SNTL, ICTSF and GFAI?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Icts International N V (ICTSF) leads on 3. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.